Head-to-head comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Claude Opus 5

Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.

shared result series: 285
distinct benchmarks: 36
latest retrieval: 2026-10-15

First modelSecond model

Specifications

General specifications

Release date, availability, context window, architecture, and published parameter counts at a glance. Undisclosed details remain marked as unavailable.

Specifications for Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Opus 5
Attribute	Claude Fable 5.1	Claude Opus 5
Provider	Anthropic	Anthropic
Released	Sep 1, 2026	Jul 24, 2026
Availability	Active	Active
Model type	Proprietary	Proprietary
Parameters	Not published	Not published
Architecture	Not published	Not published
Context window	1,000,000 tokens	1,000,000 tokens
Knowledge cutoff	June 2026	May 2026
Technical sources	Model	Model, Knowledge cutoff

Pricing

API pricing compared

The table compares official standard API rates per 1M tokens, including published cache pricing. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.

API pricing for Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Opus 5
Price type	Claude Fable 5.1	Claude Opus 5
API input	$10	$5
API output	$50	$25
Cache read	$0.25	$0.5
Cache write (5 min.)	$12.5	$6.25
Cache write (1 hr.)	$20	$10
Price verified	09/22/2026 Source	09/22/2026 Source

Claude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5

API inputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier

Claude Fable 5.1$10

Claude Opus 5$5

API outputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier

Claude Fable 5.1$50

Claude Opus 5$25

Cache readUSD per 1M tokens, base tier

Claude Fable 5.1$0.25

Claude Opus 5$0.5

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Pricing by provider

Direct developer pricing and provider endpoint tariffs routed through OpenRouter are listed separately. Prices are in USD per 1M tokens. Context-dependent direct tiers plus regional, Flex, Priority, and other OpenRouter tariffs remain individually identifiable.

Provider pricing for Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Opus 5
Model	Provider	Purchase route and tariff	Input per 1M tokens	Output per 1M tokens	Source
Claude Fable 5.1	Anthropic	Direct from developerStandard API	Lowest listed price: $10	Lowest listed price: $50	Source09/22/2026
	Amazon Bedrock	Via OpenRouteramazon-bedrock	Lowest listed price: $10	Lowest listed price: $50	Source10/17/2026
	Anthropic	Via OpenRouteranthropic	Lowest listed price: $10	Lowest listed price: $50	Source10/17/2026
	Azure	Via OpenRouterazure	Lowest listed price: $10	Lowest listed price: $50	Source10/17/2026
	Google	Via OpenRoutergoogle-vertex/global	Lowest listed price: $10	Lowest listed price: $50	Source10/17/2026
Claude Opus 5	Anthropic	Direct from developerStandard API	Lowest listed price: $5	Lowest listed price: $25	Source09/22/2026
	Amazon Bedrock	Via OpenRouteramazon-bedrock	Lowest listed price: $5	Lowest listed price: $25	Source10/17/2026
	Amazon Bedrock	Via OpenRouteramazon-bedrock/eu-west-1	$5.5	$27.5	Source10/17/2026
	Amazon Bedrock	Via OpenRouteramazon-bedrock/us-east-1	$5.5	$27.5	Source10/17/2026
	Anthropic	Via OpenRouteranthropic	Lowest listed price: $5	Lowest listed price: $25	Source10/17/2026
	Anthropic	Via OpenRouteranthropic/fast	$10	$50	Source10/17/2026
	Azure	Via OpenRouterazure/global	Lowest listed price: $5	Lowest listed price: $25	Source10/17/2026
	Azure	Via OpenRouterazure/us	$5.5	$27.5	Source10/17/2026
	Claude Platform on AWS	Via OpenRouterclaude-on-aws	Lowest listed price: $5	Lowest listed price: $25	Source10/17/2026
	Google	Via OpenRoutergoogle-vertex/europe	$5.5	$27.5	Source10/17/2026
	Google	Via OpenRoutergoogle-vertex/global	Lowest listed price: $5	Lowest listed price: $25	Source10/17/2026
	Google	Via OpenRoutergoogle-vertex/us	$5.5	$27.5	Source10/17/2026

Performance

Shared benchmarks

Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.

Capability profile from matched benchmarks

Each axis averages directly matched benchmark families. A value of 100 means the stronger value within this pair, not a universal quality score.

Claude Fable 5.1

Claude Opus 5

Coding: 98.4 / 92.4 (8 benchmark families)

Reasoning: 99.8 / 99.8 (1 benchmark family)

Mathematics: 100 / 99.2 (2 benchmark families)

Knowledge: 99.9 / 99.3 (2 benchmark families)

Finance: 99.3 / 96.8 (4 benchmark families)

Legal: 96.6 / 97.7 (4 benchmark families)

Agentic tasks: 99.8 / 82.7 (4 benchmark families)

Multimodal: 100 / 99.2 (1 benchmark family)

231 matched rows from 28 benchmark families were considered. The radar shows 8 of 14 comparable categories.

Claude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5

Code MigrationOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference

Claude Fable 5.154.607 %

Claude Opus 557.473 %

CUA-benchOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference

Claude Fable 5.113.167 %

Claude Opus 59 %

CyberBench v1.1Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference

Claude Fable 5.170.416 %

Claude Opus 565.357 %

EMBOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference

Claude Fable 5.176.67 %

Claude Opus 573.556 %

Finance Agent (v2)Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference

Claude Fable 5.158.877 %

Claude Opus 558.633 %

GPQA DiamondOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical

Claude Fable 5.193.434 %

Claude Opus 593.434 %

Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved. Higher is better. No documented setup difference

Claude Fable 5.16.667 %

Claude Opus 56.667 %

IOIOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference

Claude Fable 5.190.778 %

Claude Opus 584.333 %

Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass. Higher is better. No documented setup difference

Claude Fable 5.155.288 %

Claude Opus 555.288 %

LegalBenchOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference

Claude Fable 5.188.511 %

Claude Opus 586.974 %

LiveCodeBench v6Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference

Claude Fable 5.190.515 %

Claude Opus 589.033 %

LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical

Claude Fable 5.11,742.652

Claude Opus 51,657.837

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Benchmark scores for Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Opus 5
Benchmark and task	Claude Fable 5.1	Claude Opus 5	Source
Code MigrationOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	54.607 %	Winner57.473 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/12/2026
CUA-benchOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Reasoning: max, Compute: max, Harness: claude-code, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner13.167 %	9 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/13/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner70.416 %	65.357 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/12/2026
EMBOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner76.67 %	73.556 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/12/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner58.877 %	58.633 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/12/2026
GPQA DiamondOverall Test details Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	No direct winner93.434 %	No direct winner93.434 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/01/2026
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: task resolution rateScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Tie6.667 %	Tie6.667 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/12/2026
IOIOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner90.778 %	84.333 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/14/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: all-pass rateScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Tie55.288 %	Tie55.288 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/12/2026
LegalBenchOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner88.511 %	86.974 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/13/2026
LiveCodeBench v6Overall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner90.515 %	89.033 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/01/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall Test details Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: Snapshot: claude-fable-5.1-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev Claude Opus 5: Snapshot: claude-opus-5-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDevClaude Fable 5.1: Arena rating from 7,230 published pairwise votes.Claude Opus 5: Arena rating from 23,519 published pairwise votes.	Higher measured value1,742.652 95% confidence interval: ±9.147The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.	1,657.837 95% confidence interval: ±5.533The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.	LMArena Source details Data as of: 10/13/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall Test details Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: Snapshot: claude-fable-5.1-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control Claude Opus 5: Snapshot: claude-opus-5-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Text, style controlClaude Fable 5.1: Arena rating from 14,121 published pairwise votes.Claude Opus 5: Arena rating from 65,663 published pairwise votes.	Higher measured value1,500.568 95% confidence interval: ±6.106The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.	1,489.847 95% confidence interval: ±3.689The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.	LMArena Source details Data as of: 10/13/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall Test details Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: Snapshot: claude-fable-5.1-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Vision, style control Claude Opus 5: Snapshot: claude-opus-5-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Vision, style controlClaude Fable 5.1: Arena rating from 4,648 published pairwise votes.Claude Opus 5: Arena rating from 16,665 published pairwise votes.	1,286.407 95% confidence interval: ±9.66The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.	Higher measured value1,287.417 95% confidence interval: ±6.783The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.	LMArena Source details Data as of: 10/09/2026
MedCodeOverall Test details Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens Claude Opus 5: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 30,000 tokens	53.509 %	Higher measured value63.57 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/13/2026
MedScribeOverall Test details Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens Claude Opus 5: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 30,000 tokens	Higher measured value91.294 %	90.985 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/13/2026
MMLU-ProOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner92.375 %	91.591 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/01/2026
MMMU-ProOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner90.636 %	89.884 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/01/2026
MortgageTaxOverall Test details Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	70.786 %	Higher measured value72.059 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/01/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner47.748 %	37.387 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/12/2026
ProgramBenchOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: fully resolved rateScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner7 %	3 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/12/2026
ProofBenchOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner100 %	99 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/12/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	74.899 %	Winner76.928 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/12/2026
SAGEOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 30,000 tokens	48.526 %	Winner49.426 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/08/2026
SkillsBenchOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Harness: OpenHands, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner61.552 %	60.441 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/27/2026
SRE BenchOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: fully solved rateScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner22.901 %	12.214 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/14/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner49.194 %	45.548 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/12/2026
TaxEval v2Overall Test details Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Higher measured value75.961 %	75.143 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/01/2026
Terminal-Bench 2.1Overall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner85.019 %	84.644 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/28/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 4.0Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner58.081 %	53.535 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/13/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 4.0Metric: trial pass rateScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Reasoning: high, Agent: Claude Code, Attempts: 330 graded trials330 graded trials, Claude Code agent, high reasoning. Dataset version 1922072f-a433-429a-8929-350d5e1bcf02.	Winner54.55 % Selection of exactly identified models from the official 35-row leaderboard. Agents and reasoning efforts differ. These values do not belong to the separate Vals Mini-SWE-agent cohort.	50.3 % 95% confidence interval: ±3.73Selection of exactly identified models from the official 35-row leaderboard. Agents and reasoning efforts differ. These values do not belong to the separate Vals Mini-SWE-agent cohort.	Terminal-Bench Source details Data as of: 10/06/2026
Terminal-Bench ScienceOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 0.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Harness: Mini-SWE-agent, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner40 %	27.143 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/14/2026
Time Horizon Index: KSPOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: progressScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner63.333 %	18.833 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/07/2026
Vals IndexOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2.1Metric: weighted index scoreScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner65.827 %	63.674 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/13/2026
Vibe Code Bench 1-100Overall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.0Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Harness: OpenHands, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	28 %	Winner28.533 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/14/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall Test details Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: Compute: max, Harness: OpenHands, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens Claude Opus 5: Harness: OpenHands	Higher measured value90.263 %	88.404 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/12/2026
Code MigrationCLI Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	52.809 %	Winner53.297 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/12/2026
CUA-bencheFootball Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Reasoning: max, Compute: max, Harness: claude-code, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner30 %	0 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/13/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner87.5 %	85.714 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/12/2026
EMBComps Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner82.233 %	75.171 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/12/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	54.393 %	Winner54.617 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/12/2026
GPQA DiamondFew-Shot CoT Test details Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Higher measured value92.929 %	92.424 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/01/2026
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkAntitrust Competition · Criteria passed Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: criteria pass rateScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner89.855 %	87.319 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/12/2026
IOIIOI 2024 Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Tie100 %	Tie100 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/14/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: all-pass rateScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner68.182 %	65.152 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/12/2026
LegalBenchConclusion Tasks Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner92.511 %	91.56 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/13/2026
LiveCodeBench v6Easy Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Tie99.068 %	Tie99.068 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/01/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: Snapshot: claude-fable-5.1-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev Claude Opus 5: Snapshot: claude-opus-5-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDevClaude Fable 5.1: Arena rating from 7,230 published pairwise votes.Claude Opus 5: Arena rating from 17,934 published pairwise votes.	Winner1,742.652 95% confidence interval: ±9.147The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.	1,689.967 95% confidence interval: ±6.28The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.	LMArena Source details Data as of: 10/13/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: Snapshot: claude-fable-5.1-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control Claude Opus 5: Snapshot: claude-opus-5-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style controlClaude Fable 5.1: Arena rating from 14,121 published pairwise votes.Claude Opus 5: Arena rating from 31,907 published pairwise votes.	Winner1,500.568 95% confidence interval: ±6.106The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.	1,489.524 95% confidence interval: ±4.846The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.	LMArena Source details Data as of: 10/13/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese Test details Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: Snapshot: claude-fable-5.1-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Vision, style control Claude Opus 5: Snapshot: claude-opus-5-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Vision, style controlClaude Fable 5.1: Arena rating from 260 published pairwise votes.Claude Opus 5: Arena rating from 985 published pairwise votes.	1,340.8 95% confidence interval: ±36.169The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.	Higher measured value1,366.609 95% confidence interval: ±20.761The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.	LMArena Source details Data as of: 10/09/2026
MMLU-ProBiology Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner96.095 %	95.676 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/01/2026
MortgageTaxNumerical Extraction Test details Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	77.583 %	Higher measured value81.399 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/01/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: almost-resolved rateScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner53.5 %	41.5 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/12/2026
SAGEAutomata Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 30,000 tokens	Winner34.524 %	32.54 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/08/2026
SkillsBenchNo Skills Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Harness: OpenHands, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	44.828 %	Winner45.191 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/27/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: capability scoreScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner36.641 %	31.107 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/14/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner26.667 %	23.295 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/12/2026
TaxEval v2Correctness Test details Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Higher measured value64.105 %	61.979 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/01/2026
Terminal-Bench 2.1Easy Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Tie100 %	Tie100 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/28/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 4.0Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner60 %	33.333 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/13/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall Test details No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: 4.0Metric: trial pass rateScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Reasoning: max, Agent: Claude Code, Attempts: 330 graded trials330 graded trials, Claude Code agent, max reasoning. Dataset version 1922072f-a433-429a-8929-350d5e1bcf02.	No clear lead57.88 % 95% confidence interval: ±3.76Selection of exactly identified models from the official 35-row leaderboard. Agents and reasoning efforts differ. These values do not belong to the separate Vals Mini-SWE-agent cohort.	51.82 % 95% confidence interval: ±3.39Selection of exactly identified models from the official 35-row leaderboard. Agents and reasoning efforts differ. These values do not belong to the separate Vals Mini-SWE-agent cohort.	Terminal-Bench Source details Data as of: 10/06/2026
Terminal-Bench ScienceEarth Sciences Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 0.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Harness: Mini-SWE-agent, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner25 %	12.5 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/14/2026
Time Horizon Index: KSPProgress efficiency Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: progressScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner33.384 %	17.527 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/07/2026
Vals IndexCode Migration Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2.1Metric: benchmark scoreScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens	Winner60.033 %	56.68 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/13/2026
Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Our model tests

Our tests

SVG short test

One SVG prompt and fixed output settings. Captures are shown only with 0 reported reasoning tokens or documented lack of reasoning controls. Identical test conditions do not make the models' internal compute identical.

Shared test round: 4ae5d8eeb9a9

Claude Fable 5.1

Unavailable in this round

Claude Opus 5

Unavailable in this round

Earlier tests

Pelican on a bicycle

A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Claude Fable 5.1

Reasoning (requested): high

Current attempt

Run date: Sep 7, 2026
API provider: openrouter
Requested API model: anthropic/claude-fable-5.1
API model reported in response: anthropic/claude-fable-5.1
Reasoning setting: high
Pinned endpoint: Anthropic | anthropic/claude-fable-5.1-20260831
Temperature: Provider default
Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens
Test protocol: community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks: Passed, not a quality rating
Response time: 27 s

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Claude Opus 5

Reasoning (requested): high

Current attempt

Run date: Oct 1, 2026
API provider: openrouter
Requested API model: anthropic/claude-opus-5
API model reported in response: anthropic/claude-opus-5
Reasoning setting: high
Pinned endpoint: Anthropic | anthropic/claude-opus-5-20260723
Temperature: Provider default
Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens
Test protocol: community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks: Passed, not a quality rating
Response time: 63 s

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (1)

Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high

Prompt and test conditions

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens

Task origin (Simon Willison)

How to read this comparison

Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict

Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.

The standard price table uses direct developer rates. The provider comparison labels OpenRouter endpoints, regions, and special tariffs separately.

Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.

More matchups

Compare Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Opus 5 with other leading models using the same data and benchmark logic.

View the complete LLM comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Claude Opus 5

Change model selection

General specifications

API pricing compared

Shared benchmarks

Capability profile from matched benchmarks

Our tests

SVG short test

Claude Fable 5.1

Claude Opus 5

Pelican on a bicycle

Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict

Related LLM comparisons