Skip to main content

DeepReinforceLanguage model

Ornith 1.0 397B

Ornith 1.0 397B has no overall index value yet because there are too few independent benchmark results.

PopularityRank 320 of 785

39out of 100-6 vs. last month

based on search, usage and attention

Summary

Ornith 1.0 397B is the large MoE tier in the first Ornith family, with 397 billion total parameters. The checkpoint accepts image and text input with a 262K context. The defining training idea remains joint reinforcement-learning improvement of solution paths and agent scaffolds.

All benchmark results

Every published result with its source, test setup and comparison models.

Show all 19 published benchmark results

Page 1 of 2

Measurements without matching peer values

These measurements have no matching peer values under the same test conditions. Their original values and sources remain available here.

Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Terminus-2) (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
77.5
Score
77.5
Metric
score as published
Unit
No unit provided
Benchmark version
Terminal-Bench 2.1; Terminus-2; five runs
Category
coding
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
DeepReinforce Ornith 1.0 397B model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-15
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Ornith-1.0-397B table row; Terminal-Bench 2.1 using Terminus-2 with parser=json, temperature=1, top_p=1, 128k context, 4h timeout, 32 CPU/48GB, five runs.
Context
Publisher-reported values; exact task revisions are not fully pinned.
Source DeepReinforce Ornith 1.0 397B model card
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Claude Code 2.1.126) (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
78.2
Score
78.2
Metric
score as published
Unit
No unit provided
Benchmark version
Terminal-Bench 2.1; Claude Code 2.1.126; five-run average
Category
coding
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
DeepReinforce Ornith 1.0 397B model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-15
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Ornith-1.0-397B table row; Terminal-Bench 2.1 using Terminus-2 with parser=json, temperature=1, top_p=1, 128k context, 4h timeout, 32 CPU/48GB, five runs.
Context
Publisher-reported values; exact task revisions are not fully pinned.
Source DeepReinforce Ornith 1.0 397B model card
SWE-Bench Verified (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
82.4
Score
82.4
Metric
score as published
Unit
No unit provided
Benchmark version
SWE-Bench Verified; exact harness/sampling not stated
Category
coding
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
DeepReinforce Ornith 1.0 397B model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-15
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Ornith-1.0-397B score row; the card reports these benchmark names but does not fully specify the harness, decoding parameters or task snapshot for each.
Context
The publisher does not disclose a complete per-row evaluation protocol; raw scores are not normalized.
Source DeepReinforce Ornith 1.0 397B model card
SWE-Bench Pro (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
62.2
Score
62.2
Metric
score as published
Unit
No unit provided
Benchmark version
SWE-Bench Pro; exact harness/sampling not stated
Category
coding
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
DeepReinforce Ornith 1.0 397B model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-15
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Ornith-1.0-397B score row; the card reports these benchmark names but does not fully specify the harness, decoding parameters or task snapshot for each.
Context
The publisher does not disclose a complete per-row evaluation protocol; raw scores are not normalized.
Source DeepReinforce Ornith 1.0 397B model card
SWE-Bench Multilingual (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
78.9
Score
78.9
Metric
score as published
Unit
No unit provided
Benchmark version
SWE-Bench Multilingual; exact harness/sampling not stated
Category
coding
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
DeepReinforce Ornith 1.0 397B model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-15
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Ornith-1.0-397B score row; the card reports these benchmark names but does not fully specify the harness, decoding parameters or task snapshot for each.
Context
The publisher does not disclose a complete per-row evaluation protocol; raw scores are not normalized.
Source DeepReinforce Ornith 1.0 397B model card
NL2Repo (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
48.2
Score
48.2
Metric
score as published
Unit
No unit provided
Benchmark version
NL2Repo; exact harness/sampling not stated
Category
coding
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
DeepReinforce Ornith 1.0 397B model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-15
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Ornith-1.0-397B score row; the card reports these benchmark names but does not fully specify the harness, decoding parameters or task snapshot for each.
Context
The publisher does not disclose a complete per-row evaluation protocol; raw scores are not normalized.
Source DeepReinforce Ornith 1.0 397B model card
ClawEval (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
77.1
Score
77.1
Metric
score as published
Unit
No unit provided
Benchmark version
ClawEval; exact harness/sampling not stated
Category
coding
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
DeepReinforce Ornith 1.0 397B model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-15
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Ornith-1.0-397B score row; the card reports these benchmark names but does not fully specify the harness, decoding parameters or task snapshot for each.
Context
The publisher does not disclose a complete per-row evaluation protocol; raw scores are not normalized.
Source DeepReinforce Ornith 1.0 397B model card
SWE Atlas QnA (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
41.2
Score
41.2
Metric
score as published
Unit
No unit provided
Benchmark version
SWE Atlas QnA; exact harness/sampling not stated
Category
coding
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
DeepReinforce Ornith 1.0 397B model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-15
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Ornith-1.0-397B score row; the card reports these benchmark names but does not fully specify the harness, decoding parameters or task snapshot for each.
Context
The publisher does not disclose a complete per-row evaluation protocol; raw scores are not normalized.
Source DeepReinforce Ornith 1.0 397B model card
SWE Atlas RF (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
42.6
Score
42.6
Metric
score as published
Unit
No unit provided
Benchmark version
SWE Atlas RF; exact harness/sampling not stated
Category
coding
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
DeepReinforce Ornith 1.0 397B model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-15
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Ornith-1.0-397B score row; the card reports these benchmark names but does not fully specify the harness, decoding parameters or task snapshot for each.
Context
The publisher does not disclose a complete per-row evaluation protocol; raw scores are not normalized.
Source DeepReinforce Ornith 1.0 397B model card
SWE Atlas TW (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
39.1
Score
39.1
Metric
score as published
Unit
No unit provided
Benchmark version
SWE Atlas TW; exact harness/sampling not stated
Category
coding
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
DeepReinforce Ornith 1.0 397B model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-15
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Ornith-1.0-397B score row; the card reports these benchmark names but does not fully specify the harness, decoding parameters or task snapshot for each.
Context
The publisher does not disclose a complete per-row evaluation protocol; raw scores are not normalized.
Source DeepReinforce Ornith 1.0 397B model card
DeepSWE (Ornith-1.0-397B) (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
8
Score
8
Metric
score as published
Unit
No unit provided
Benchmark version
Ornith-1.0 benchmark table, pinned repository README commit 9c800446621ebad1172f517a1d0f9b683fb8615e
Category
coding
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Ornith Team, Ornith-1 repository benchmark table
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-18
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. The exact source-table column is Ornith-1.0-397B. The pinned README checkpoint list links this exact 1.0 checkpoint to ornith-ai/Ornith-1.0-397B. The profile's Hugging Face API route resolved to canonical model ID ornith-ai/Ornith-1.0-397B at current revision 5e3e761811e804c295c1d3c0ce68b21da6154209; this confirms route identity, not the checkpoint revision used in the reported evaluation. Benchmark-specific setup: For DeepSWE, the README specifies the Claude Code harness, temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and a 256K context window. The table does not specify whether this 1.0 cell used the same run aggregation; no model serving route or per-cell N is stated.
Context
Vendor-reported score. The table labels no numeric unit and gives no cell-specific N or confidence interval. The tested serving route and exact evaluation checkpoint revision are not pinned; no percentage unit or sample size is inferred.
Source Ornith Team, Ornith-1 repository benchmark table
Frontier-Bench v0.1 (Ornith-1.0-397B) (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
2.7
Score
2.7
Metric
score as published
Unit
No unit provided
Benchmark version
Ornith-1.0 benchmark table, pinned repository README commit 9c800446621ebad1172f517a1d0f9b683fb8615e
Category
coding
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Ornith Team, Ornith-1 repository benchmark table
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-18
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. The exact source-table column is Ornith-1.0-397B. The pinned README checkpoint list links this exact 1.0 checkpoint to ornith-ai/Ornith-1.0-397B. The profile's Hugging Face API route resolved to canonical model ID ornith-ai/Ornith-1.0-397B at current revision 5e3e761811e804c295c1d3c0ce68b21da6154209; this confirms route identity, not the checkpoint revision used in the reported evaluation. Benchmark-specific setup: The README names this benchmark but does not specify the runner, decoding setup or denominator. The table does not specify whether this 1.0 cell used the same run aggregation; no model serving route or per-cell N is stated.
Context
Vendor-reported score. The table labels no numeric unit and gives no cell-specific N or confidence interval. The tested serving route and exact evaluation checkpoint revision are not pinned; no percentage unit or sample size is inferred.
Source Ornith Team, Ornith-1 repository benchmark table

Page 1 of 2

Popularity compared

How often the model is searched for, used and mentioned, compared with every model of its category.

Popularity index

The 100 most popular models of this category, 0 to 100, higher is more popular

20 of 101 models

As of November 2026 · Source: gradually.ai popularity index

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Ornith 1.0 397BAliceAI Foundation 80B A3B Base 39Command R7B 39Devstral Small 2 39Ling 3.0 Flash 39

Method changes in the timeline, a jump at these points is no market event:

  1. 1November 1, 2026: Value only with search or usage data, 30-day attention

What is gaining popularity right now, across models, vendors, harnesses and AI subscriptions, is collected in All AI trends.

All specifications

Architecture

Parameters
397 billion
Source: Parameters

Input and output

Context window
262,144 tokens
Source: Context window
Inputs
Text, Image
Source: Inputs
Outputs
Text
Source: Outputs
Reasoning
Yes
Source: Reasoning
Tool calling
Yes
Source: Tool calling

Watermarking and provenance

AI watermarking refers to invisible signals embedded in the output. Visible marks and provenance metadata are listed separately. Unknown means there is insufficient evidence for that particular field.

AI watermarking
Unknown
no source
Watermarking technique
Not known
no source

Licence and access

Weights
Open weights
Source: Weights
License
MIT
Source: License

Frequently asked questions about Ornith 1.0 397B

How large is the context window of Ornith 1.0 397B?

262,144 tokens. That is how much text Ornith 1.0 397B reads at once, about 390 A4 pages.

Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Context windowTokens the model reads at once · higher is better
Ornith 1.0 397BRank 67 of 103262K
Kimi K2.6262K
Qwen 3.8 27B262K
Kimi K2.7 Code262K
Kimi K2.5262K
Nemotron 3 Ultra262K
Kimi K2 Thinking262K

Can I run Ornith 1.0 397B locally?

Yes, the weights are open. With 397B parameters it needs a lot of memory, more a server than a laptop.

Stated by DeepReinforce

Open weights
yes
License
MIT
Parameters
397B
active per token
n/a

Sources and data date

Show all 12 sources

Benchmark sources at a glance

Which independent evaluators tested this model. This is coverage, not a quality ranking.

No active result from the reviewed external evaluators can currently be attributed to this model. Other source evidence remains available below.

Without vendor claims and historical or disputed results; those stay labelled in the single values.

TypeEvidence and data date
Input

Documented modalities. Retrieved October 27, 2026.

Output

Documented modalities. Retrieved October 27, 2026.

Research statusResearch date October 15, 2026. 3 source URLs checked. This documents the inspected sources, not an exhaustive inventory of every publication.
Not published

benchmark-units-and-snapshots

Note

Most table rows do not publish units, exact task revisions or complete harness settings; the source values are preserved as unknown-unit raw scores.

Additional sourceHugging Face · Ornith 1.0 397B model card · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceDeepReinforce Ornith 1.0 397B model card (retrieved October 15, 2026)
Additional sourceOrnith Team, Ornith-1 repository benchmark table (retrieved October 18, 2026)
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 18, 2026)
Additional sourceOrnith 1.0 family model card · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceOpenRouter: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceVercel AI Gateway: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceOllama: cumulative downloads for the popularity index
Additional sourceReplicate: cumulative runs for the popularity index
Additional sourceGoogle Trending Now: limited feed selection for Germany and the US
Additional sourceCreative Commons Attribution 4.0