Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Mistral Medium 3.5

Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.

shared result series
49
distinct benchmarks
22
latest retrieval
2026-09-29

Change model selection

Specifications

General specifications

Release date, availability, context window, architecture, and published parameter counts at a glance. Undisclosed details remain marked as unavailable.

Specifications for GPT-5.6 Sol and Mistral Medium 3.5
AttributeGPT-5.6 SolMistral Medium 3.5
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
ReleasedJul 9, 2026Apr 28, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Model typeProprietaryOpen Weights
ParametersNot published128B
ArchitectureNot publishedDense
Context window1,050,000 tokens262,144 tokens
Knowledge cutoffFebruary 16, 2026Not published
Technical sourcesModel, Context, Knowledge cutoffModel, Context

Pricing

API pricing compared

The table compares official standard API rates per 1M tokens, including published cache pricing. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.

API pricing for GPT-5.6 Sol and Mistral Medium 3.5
Price typeGPT-5.6 SolMistral Medium 3.5
API input$4 ≤272K / $8 >272K$1.5
API output$20 ≤272K / $30 >272K$7.5
Cache read$0.4 ≤272K / $0.8 >272KNot listed
Cache write (5 min.)$5 ≤272K / $10 >272KNot listed
Cache write (1 hr.)Not listedNot listed
Price verified09/22/2026 Source09/22/2026 Source
GPT-5.6 SolMistral Medium 3.5
API inputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
GPT-5.6 Sol$4
Mistral Medium 3.5Lower price$1.5
API outputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
GPT-5.6 Sol$20
Mistral Medium 3.5Lower price$7.5

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Pricing by provider

Direct developer pricing and provider endpoint tariffs routed through OpenRouter are listed separately. Prices are in USD per 1M tokens. Context-dependent direct tiers plus regional, Flex, Priority, and other OpenRouter tariffs remain individually identifiable.

Provider pricing for GPT-5.6 Sol and Mistral Medium 3.5
ModelProviderPurchase route and tariffInput per 1M tokensOutput per 1M tokensSource
GPT-5.6 SolOpenAIDirect from developerUp to 272,000 context tokens$4$20Source09/22/2026
OpenAIDirect from developerAbove 272,000 context tokens$8$30Source09/22/2026
Amazon BedrockVia OpenRouteramazon-bedrock/us-east-1$4.4$22Source10/02/2026
AzureVia OpenRouterazure$4$20Source10/02/2026
AzureVia OpenRouterazure/eu$4.4$22Source10/02/2026
AzureVia OpenRouterazure/us$4.4$22Source10/02/2026
OpenAIVia OpenRouteropenai$2$10Source10/02/2026
OpenAIVia OpenRouteropenai/fast$4$20Source10/02/2026
OpenAIVia OpenRouteropenai/flexLowest listed price: $1Lowest listed price: $5Source10/02/2026
Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AIDirect from developerStandard APILowest listed price: $1.5Lowest listed price: $7.5Source09/22/2026
MistralVia OpenRoutermistralLowest listed price: $1.5Lowest listed price: $7.5Source10/02/2026
MistralVia OpenRoutermistral/eu$1.65$8.25Source10/02/2026
MistralVia OpenRoutermistral/zdrLowest listed price: $1.5Lowest listed price: $7.5Source10/02/2026

Performance

Shared benchmarks

Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.

Capability profile from matched benchmarks

Each axis averages directly matched benchmark families. A value of 100 means the stronger value within this pair, not a universal quality score.

255075100CodingReasoningMathematicsKnowledgeFinanceLegalAgentic tasksHealth
GPT-5.6 Sol
Mistral Medium 3.5
Coding: 100 / 27.4 (3 benchmark families)
Reasoning: 100 / 36.6 (1 benchmark family)
Mathematics: 100 / 10.8 (1 benchmark family)
Knowledge: 100 / 84.6 (1 benchmark family)
Finance: 100 / 56.8 (6 benchmark families)
Legal: 100 / 17.8 (2 benchmark families)
Agentic tasks: 100 / 45.4 (1 benchmark family)
Health: 100 / 78.1 (2 benchmark families)

20 matched rows from 20 benchmark families were considered. The radar shows 8 of 10 comparable categories.

GPT-5.6 SolMistral Medium 3.5
Code MigrationOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.6 SolWinner52.916 %
Mistral Medium 3.55.127 %
CorpFin v2Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.6 SolWinner64.375 %
Mistral Medium 3.558.78 %
EMBOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.6 SolWinner72.339 %
Mistral Medium 3.511.185 %
Finance Agent (v2)Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.6 SolWinner53.756 %
Mistral Medium 3.532.103 %
GPQA DiamondOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.6 SolWinner95.202 %
Mistral Medium 3.534.848 %
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.6 SolWinner2.5 %
Mistral Medium 3.50.417 %
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.6 SolWinner48.077 %
Mistral Medium 3.59.135 %
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
GPT-5.6 SolHigher measured value1,483.171
Mistral Medium 3.51,426.128
MedCodeOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.6 SolWinner43.974 %
Mistral Medium 3.533.752 %
MedScribeOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.6 SolWinner85.233 %
Mistral Medium 3.567.728 %
MMLU-ProOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.6 SolWinner89.1 %
Mistral Medium 3.575.335 %
MortgageTaxOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.6 SolWinner67.289 %
Mistral Medium 3.528.895 %

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Benchmark scores for GPT-5.6 Sol and Mistral Medium 3.5
Benchmark and taskGPT-5.6 SolMistral Medium 3.5Source
Code MigrationOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner52.916 %
5.127 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
CorpFin v2Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner64.375 %
58.78 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/12/2026
EMBOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner72.339 %
11.185 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner53.756 %
32.103 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
GPQA DiamondOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner95.202 %
34.848 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: task resolution rateScoring: Higher is better
Winner2.5 %
0.417 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: all-pass rateScoring: Higher is better
Winner48.077 %
9.135 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 34,258 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 11,693 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,483.171
95% confidence interval: ±4.527The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,426.128
95% confidence interval: ±6.42The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
MedCodeOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner43.974 %
33.752 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/26/2026
MedScribeOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner85.233 %
67.728 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/26/2026
MMLU-ProOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner89.1 %
75.335 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
MortgageTaxOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner67.289 %
28.895 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
ProofBenchOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner83 %
9 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/28/2026
SAGEOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner52.563 %
37.613 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/26/2026
SWE-bench VerifiedOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner96.2 %
66.4 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
Taste-BenchOverall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: arxiv:2609.25804v2Metric: both-orders-correct, engineering/research macro averageScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 65,536 tokens, Attempts: 502 questions, two option orders each
Mistral Medium 3.5: Reasoning: high, Output limit: 65,536 tokens, Attempts: 502 questions, two option orders each
Same prompt for all models. Each of 502 questions is shown twice with the options reversed. Average of engineering and research success rates, requiring both orders to be correct. 65,536-token output budget; unparseable answers count as wrong.
Higher measured value59.7 %
0 of 1,004 responses were unparseable and counted as wrong. Not a Gradually test.
37.7 %
24 of 1,004 responses were unparseable and counted as wrong. Not a Gradually test.
Taste-Bench paper
Source details
Data as of: 09/23/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner67.955 %
27.291 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
TaxEval v2Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner74.775 %
67.988 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
Terminal-Bench 2.1Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner85.768 %
38.951 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
Vals IndexOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: weighted index scoreScoring: Higher is better
Winner63.709 %
17.947 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
Vals Multimodal IndexOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.2Metric: weighted index scoreScoring: Higher is better
Winner72.64 %
34.768 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/11/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Harness: OpenHands
Winner80.495 %
2.888 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 6,528 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 2,256 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,485.385
95% confidence interval: ±8.098The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,430.173
95% confidence interval: ±12.827The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 2,675 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 621 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,537.771
95% confidence interval: ±12.067The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,446.524
95% confidence interval: ±23.931The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 9,391 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 3,282 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,530.687
95% confidence interval: ±7.09The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,477.898
95% confidence interval: ±10.854The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 6,868 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 1,999 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,470.128
95% confidence interval: ±8.25The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,397.828
95% confidence interval: ±13.94The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEnglish
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 13,693 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 5,562 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,488.245
95% confidence interval: ±6.067The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,442.84
95% confidence interval: ±8.53The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEntertainment, sports and media
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 8,521 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 2,618 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,471.695
95% confidence interval: ±7.555The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,394.24
95% confidence interval: ±12.151The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlExcluding ties
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 25,743 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 8,856 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,498.373
95% confidence interval: ±5.89The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,419.562
95% confidence interval: ±8.482The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlExpert prompts
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 3,890 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 1,205 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,534.172
95% confidence interval: ±10.051The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,433.7
95% confidence interval: ±17.235The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlFrench
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 1,056 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 453 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,509.759
95% confidence interval: ±19.656The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,435.855
95% confidence interval: ±29.943The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlGerman
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 535 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 173 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,505.593
95% confidence interval: ±25.799The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,447.96
95% confidence interval: ±43.885The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlHard prompts
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 22,641 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 7,627 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,509.071
95% confidence interval: ±5.285The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,444.677
95% confidence interval: ±7.686The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlHard prompts, English
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 9,072 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 3,821 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,507.352
95% confidence interval: ±7.094The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,455.806
95% confidence interval: ±10.148The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlInstruction following
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 12,137 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 3,827 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,489.133
95% confidence interval: ±6.469The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,420.763
95% confidence interval: ±10.011The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlKorean
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 683 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 188 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,447.288
95% confidence interval: ±23.945The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,392.677
95% confidence interval: ±43.291The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlLegal and government
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 2,909 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 893 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,493.838
95% confidence interval: ±11.614The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,437.755
95% confidence interval: ±20.721The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlLife, physical and social science
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 5,597 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 1,939 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,487.268
95% confidence interval: ±8.534The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,435.825
95% confidence interval: ±13.971The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlLonger queries
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 16,066 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 5,065 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,497.175
95% confidence interval: ±6.045The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,428.117
95% confidence interval: ±9.119The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlMath
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 1,601 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 565 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,494.283
95% confidence interval: ±14.807The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,428.606
95% confidence interval: ±24.143The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlMathematical professions
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 1,930 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 653 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,512.669
95% confidence interval: ±14.013The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,438.481
95% confidence interval: ±22.896The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlMedicine and healthcare
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 2,514 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 844 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,480.211
95% confidence interval: ±12.587The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,421.161
95% confidence interval: ±21.257The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlMulti-turn
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 5,680 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 1,925 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,484.308
95% confidence interval: ±8.592The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,432.256
95% confidence interval: ±14.007The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlNon-English
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 20,560 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 6,131 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,474.574
95% confidence interval: ±5.358The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,406.139
95% confidence interval: ±8.159The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlPolish
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 530 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 235 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,502.031
95% confidence interval: ±25.782The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,415.979
95% confidence interval: ±38.135The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlRussian
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 3,976 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 1,242 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,492.473
95% confidence interval: ±9.91The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,410.34
95% confidence interval: ±17.157The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlSoftware and IT services
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 13,555 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 4,587 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,521.192
95% confidence interval: ±6.18The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,468.806
95% confidence interval: ±9.304The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlSpanish
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 994 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 393 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,468.704
95% confidence interval: ±19.601The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,392.394
95% confidence interval: ±31.573The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlWriting, literature and language
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Sol: Style-controlled Arena rating from 9,085 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 2,919 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,482.503
95% confidence interval: ±7.271The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,403.766
95% confidence interval: ±11.409The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Our model tests

Our tests

Compare how the models respond to the same prompt. Each test shows the first attempt, with no subsequent fixes to the generated code. These results do not contribute to an overall score.

Pelican on a bicycle

A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

GPT-5.6 Sol

API access was unavailable for this run. The model was not evaluated.

Reasoning (requested): high

First attempt
Run date
7 Sept 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-5.6-sol
Reasoning setting
high
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-5.6-sol-20260709
Temperature
Provider default
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Not run

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Mistral Medium 3.5

API access was unavailable for this run. The model was not evaluated.

Reasoning (requested): high

First attempt
Run date
7 Sept 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
mistralai/mistral-medium-3-5
Reasoning setting
high
Pinned endpoint
Mistral | mistralai/mistral-medium-3.5-20260430
Temperature
Provider default
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Not run

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Prompt and test conditions

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens

Task origin (Simon Willison)

How to read this comparison

Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict

Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.

The standard price table uses direct developer rates. The provider comparison labels OpenRouter endpoints, regions, and special tariffs separately.

Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.

More matchups

Compare GPT-5.6 Sol and Mistral Medium 3.5 with other leading models using the same data and benchmark logic.

View the complete LLM comparison