Skip to main content

TencentLanguage model

Hy3 preview

Hy3 preview has no overall index value yet because there are too few independent benchmark results.

PopularityRank 228 of 785

43out of 100+7 vs. last month

based on search, usage and attention

Summary

Hy3 preview was released as an open-weight preview for practical agent work. Tencent uses a Mixture-of-Experts model with 295 billion total parameters, 21 billion active per token, and a 262,144-token context. The model supports no_think for direct responses and high for harder reasoning tasks.

The weights run locally with vLLM or SGLang. Tencent Cloud has routed hy3-preview calls in its Token Plan to Hy3 since July 24, 2026. The published preview remains a distinct checkpoint for inspection and local use, while the API alias points to Hy3 there.

See for yourself: one prompt, one attempt

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Hy3 preview

Hy3 preview: SVG short test

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0002

Test details
Test run
Oct 14, 2026
Provider
gmicloud/bf16
API model
tencent/hy3-preview
Output
339 tokens
Reasoning
API reports 0 reasoning tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0002
Test round
43b8c5c46830
Earlier tests

The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Oct 5, 2026 · 62 s · $0.0049

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Test details
Run date
Oct 5, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
tencent/hy3-preview
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
8,192 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0049
Response time
62.3 s
API model reported in response
tencent/hy3-preview
Pinned endpoint
GMICloud | tencent/hy3-preview-20260421
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed

Earlier attempts (2)

  • Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
Task origin: Simon Willison

All benchmark results

Every published result with its source, test setup and comparison models.

Show all 35 published benchmark results

Page 1 of 3

Measurements without matching peer values

These measurements have no matching peer values under the same test conditions. Their original values and sources remain available here.

CritPt v2: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
4.57142857142857
Score
4.57142857142857
Metric
pass@1 accuracy
Unit
%
Benchmark version
v2
Category
reasoning
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
disputed
Retrieved at
2026-11-02
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-preview, UUID 8ca48626-ff5e-48b3-8401-38081376d706, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=Reasoning). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap. The full CritPt v2 run covers 70 questions with five repeats. The official grading server reports pass@1.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/8ca48626-ff5e-48b3-8401-38081376d706/hy3-preview/hy3-preview. Source model name: Hy3-preview. Provider reported by source: Tencent. Model snapshot: Hy3-preview (Reasoning). Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Tool policy: Python functions, symbolic expressions, and numerical answers; official grading server. Attempts: 70 questions, five repeats per question, pass@1. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 4.6%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-02-67d46be20a5b. Source payload hash: 67d46be20a5b412db6cfb60ad190441fcaa5513500b8fd47d033168d0e97b6b2. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v3. Imported at: 2026-11-02. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-critpt-v2:v2:standalone:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=Reasoning
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-preview, UUID 8ca48626-ff5e-48b3-8401-38081376d706, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=Reasoning). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap. The full CritPt v2 run covers 70 questions with five repeats. The official grading server reports pass@1.. Tool policy: Python functions, symbolic expressions, and numerical answers; official grading server. Attempts: 70 questions, five repeats per question, pass@1. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context
This AA source field contains the original CritPt score. The earlier CritPt v2 attribution was incorrect; the value and former label remain as disputed historical evidence.. The source dataset marks this result as disputed. It remains visible as documented evidence, but is not reliable comparative proof.
Source Artificial Analysis
CritPt v2: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
0.28571428571428603
Score
0.28571428571428603
Metric
pass@1 accuracy
Unit
%
Benchmark version
v2
Category
reasoning
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
disputed
Retrieved at
2026-11-02
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-non-reasoning, UUID b58b8272-cd3f-44b9-9b68-612f40779ce2, reasoning=false, effort=not specified, suffix=Non-reasoning). AA marks this model variant as non-reasoning and reports 0 reasoning tokens. The full CritPt v2 run covers 70 questions with five repeats. The official grading server reports pass@1.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/b58b8272-cd3f-44b9-9b68-612f40779ce2/hy3-preview/hy3-non-reasoning. Source model name: Hy3-preview. Provider reported by source: Tencent. Model snapshot: Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning). Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Tool policy: Python functions, symbolic expressions, and numerical answers; official grading server. Attempts: 70 questions, five repeats per question, pass@1. Reasoning: non-reasoning. Reasoning effort: none. Score display: 0.3%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-02-67d46be20a5b. Source payload hash: 67d46be20a5b412db6cfb60ad190441fcaa5513500b8fd47d033168d0e97b6b2. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v3. Imported at: 2026-11-02. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-critpt-v2:v2:standalone:non-reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=Non-reasoning
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-non-reasoning, UUID b58b8272-cd3f-44b9-9b68-612f40779ce2, reasoning=false, effort=not specified, suffix=Non-reasoning). AA marks this model variant as non-reasoning and reports 0 reasoning tokens. The full CritPt v2 run covers 70 questions with five repeats. The official grading server reports pass@1.. Tool policy: Python functions, symbolic expressions, and numerical answers; official grading server. Attempts: 70 questions, five repeats per question, pass@1. Reasoning: non-reasoning. Reasoning effort: none
Context
This AA source field contains the original CritPt score. The earlier CritPt v2 attribution was incorrect; the value and former label remain as disputed historical evidence.. The source dataset marks this result as disputed. It remains visible as documented evidence, but is not reliable comparative proof.
Source Artificial Analysis
IFBench: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
63.1292517006803
Score
63.1292517006803
Metric
IFBench prompt-level loose accuracy (pass@1)
Unit
%
Benchmark version
AA test set: 294 questions
Category
general
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
superseded
Retrieved at
2026-10-19
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-preview, UUID 8ca48626-ff5e-48b3-8401-38081376d706, reasoning=true, source reasoning-token configuration budget=2000, suffix=Reasoning). This configured value is not measured token consumption. Artificial Analysis runs 294 questions from the IFBench test set with five repeats per question. The official evaluator scores prompt-level accuracy in loose mode as pass@1.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/8ca48626-ff5e-48b3-8401-38081376d706/hy3-preview/hy3-preview. Source model name: Hy3-preview. Provider reported by source: Tencent. Model snapshot: Hy3-preview (Reasoning). Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Tool policy: Single-turn answer evaluated with the official IFBench source code. Attempts: pass@1, 5 repeats per question. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Reasoning effort: Reasoning. Score display: 63.1%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-10-19-8a022369738c. Source payload hash: 8a022369738cbe2a0e2f9bf486a2882865dbb0c6f1396dfec84059a802560e3c. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v2. Imported at: 2026-10-19. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-ifbench:AA test set: 294 questions:standalone:reasoning:tokens=2000:suffix=Reasoning
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-preview, UUID 8ca48626-ff5e-48b3-8401-38081376d706, reasoning=true, source reasoning-token configuration budget=2000, suffix=Reasoning). This configured value is not measured token consumption. Artificial Analysis runs 294 questions from the IFBench test set with five repeats per question. The official evaluator scores prompt-level accuracy in loose mode as pass@1.. Tool policy: Single-turn answer evaluated with the official IFBench source code. Attempts: pass@1, 5 repeats per question. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Reasoning effort: Reasoning
Context
The often cited 58 refers to verifiable out-of-domain constraint types, not the number of questions in AA's test run.. This result is retained as historical evidence and is not interchangeable with current results.
Source Artificial Analysis
IFBench: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
63.1292517006803
Score
63.1292517006803
Metric
IFBench prompt-level loose accuracy (pass@1)
Unit
%
Benchmark version
AA test set: 294 questions
Category
general
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
superseded
Retrieved at
2026-11-02
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-preview, UUID 8ca48626-ff5e-48b3-8401-38081376d706, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=Reasoning). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap. Artificial Analysis runs 294 questions from the IFBench test set with five repeats per question. The official evaluator scores prompt-level accuracy in loose mode as pass@1.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/8ca48626-ff5e-48b3-8401-38081376d706/hy3-preview/hy3-preview. Source model name: Hy3-preview. Provider reported by source: Tencent. Model snapshot: Hy3-preview (Reasoning). Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Tool policy: Single-turn answer evaluated with the official IFBench source code. Attempts: pass@1, 5 repeats per question. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 63.1%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-02-67d46be20a5b. Source payload hash: 67d46be20a5b412db6cfb60ad190441fcaa5513500b8fd47d033168d0e97b6b2. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v3. Imported at: 2026-11-02. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-ifbench:AA test set: 294 questions:standalone:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=Reasoning
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-preview, UUID 8ca48626-ff5e-48b3-8401-38081376d706, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=Reasoning). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap. Artificial Analysis runs 294 questions from the IFBench test set with five repeats per question. The official evaluator scores prompt-level accuracy in loose mode as pass@1.. Tool policy: Single-turn answer evaluated with the official IFBench source code. Attempts: pass@1, 5 repeats per question. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context
The often cited 58 refers to verifiable out-of-domain constraint types, not the number of questions in AA's test run.. This result is retained as historical evidence and is not interchangeable with current results.
Source Artificial Analysis
IFBench: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
63.1292517006803
Score
63.1292517006803
Metric
IFBench prompt-level loose accuracy (pass@1)
Unit
%
Benchmark version
AA test set: 294 questions
Category
general
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-11-07
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-preview, UUID 8ca48626-ff5e-48b3-8401-38081376d706, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=Reasoning). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count. Artificial Analysis runs 294 questions from the IFBench test set with five repeats per question. The official evaluator scores prompt-level accuracy in loose mode as pass@1.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/8ca48626-ff5e-48b3-8401-38081376d706/hy3-preview/hy3-preview. Source model name: Hy3-preview. Provider reported by source: Tencent. Model snapshot: Hy3-preview (Reasoning). Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Tool policy: Single-turn answer evaluated with the official IFBench source code. Attempts: pass@1, 5 repeats per question. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 63.1%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-07-b96e3ffc8c5b. Source payload hash: b96e3ffc8c5b052aa56f96d05e89d02b8cc234a75085820fca0ca2a39e498274. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v4. Imported at: 2026-11-07. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-ifbench:AA test set: 294 questions:standalone:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=Reasoning
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-preview, UUID 8ca48626-ff5e-48b3-8401-38081376d706, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=Reasoning). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count. Artificial Analysis runs 294 questions from the IFBench test set with five repeats per question. The official evaluator scores prompt-level accuracy in loose mode as pass@1.. Tool policy: Single-turn answer evaluated with the official IFBench source code. Attempts: pass@1, 5 repeats per question. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context
The often cited 58 refers to verifiable out-of-domain constraint types, not the number of questions in AA's test run.
Source Artificial Analysis
IFBench: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
47.959183673469404
Score
47.959183673469404
Metric
IFBench prompt-level loose accuracy (pass@1)
Unit
%
Benchmark version
AA test set: 294 questions
Category
general
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
superseded
Retrieved at
2026-10-19
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-non-reasoning, UUID b58b8272-cd3f-44b9-9b68-612f40779ce2, reasoning=false, source reasoning-token configuration budget=0, suffix=Non-reasoning). This configured value is not measured token consumption. Artificial Analysis runs 294 questions from the IFBench test set with five repeats per question. The official evaluator scores prompt-level accuracy in loose mode as pass@1.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/b58b8272-cd3f-44b9-9b68-612f40779ce2/hy3-preview/hy3-non-reasoning. Source model name: Hy3-preview. Provider reported by source: Tencent. Model snapshot: Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning). Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Tool policy: Single-turn answer evaluated with the official IFBench source code. Attempts: pass@1, 5 repeats per question. Reasoning: non-reasoning. Reasoning effort: Non-reasoning. Score display: 48.0%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-10-19-8a022369738c. Source payload hash: 8a022369738cbe2a0e2f9bf486a2882865dbb0c6f1396dfec84059a802560e3c. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v2. Imported at: 2026-10-19. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-ifbench:AA test set: 294 questions:standalone:non-reasoning:tokens=0:suffix=Non-reasoning
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-non-reasoning, UUID b58b8272-cd3f-44b9-9b68-612f40779ce2, reasoning=false, source reasoning-token configuration budget=0, suffix=Non-reasoning). This configured value is not measured token consumption. Artificial Analysis runs 294 questions from the IFBench test set with five repeats per question. The official evaluator scores prompt-level accuracy in loose mode as pass@1.. Tool policy: Single-turn answer evaluated with the official IFBench source code. Attempts: pass@1, 5 repeats per question. Reasoning: non-reasoning. Reasoning effort: Non-reasoning
Context
The often cited 58 refers to verifiable out-of-domain constraint types, not the number of questions in AA's test run.. This result is retained as historical evidence and is not interchangeable with current results.
Source Artificial Analysis
IFBench: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
47.959183673469404
Score
47.959183673469404
Metric
IFBench prompt-level loose accuracy (pass@1)
Unit
%
Benchmark version
AA test set: 294 questions
Category
general
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
superseded
Retrieved at
2026-11-02
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-non-reasoning, UUID b58b8272-cd3f-44b9-9b68-612f40779ce2, reasoning=false, effort=not specified, suffix=Non-reasoning). AA marks this model variant as non-reasoning and reports 0 reasoning tokens. Artificial Analysis runs 294 questions from the IFBench test set with five repeats per question. The official evaluator scores prompt-level accuracy in loose mode as pass@1.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/b58b8272-cd3f-44b9-9b68-612f40779ce2/hy3-preview/hy3-non-reasoning. Source model name: Hy3-preview. Provider reported by source: Tencent. Model snapshot: Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning). Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Tool policy: Single-turn answer evaluated with the official IFBench source code. Attempts: pass@1, 5 repeats per question. Reasoning: non-reasoning. Reasoning effort: none. Score display: 48.0%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-02-67d46be20a5b. Source payload hash: 67d46be20a5b412db6cfb60ad190441fcaa5513500b8fd47d033168d0e97b6b2. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v3. Imported at: 2026-11-02. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-ifbench:AA test set: 294 questions:standalone:non-reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=Non-reasoning
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-non-reasoning, UUID b58b8272-cd3f-44b9-9b68-612f40779ce2, reasoning=false, effort=not specified, suffix=Non-reasoning). AA marks this model variant as non-reasoning and reports 0 reasoning tokens. Artificial Analysis runs 294 questions from the IFBench test set with five repeats per question. The official evaluator scores prompt-level accuracy in loose mode as pass@1.. Tool policy: Single-turn answer evaluated with the official IFBench source code. Attempts: pass@1, 5 repeats per question. Reasoning: non-reasoning. Reasoning effort: none
Context
The often cited 58 refers to verifiable out-of-domain constraint types, not the number of questions in AA's test run.. This result is retained as historical evidence and is not interchangeable with current results.
Source Artificial Analysis
IFBench: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
47.959183673469404
Score
47.959183673469404
Metric
IFBench prompt-level loose accuracy (pass@1)
Unit
%
Benchmark version
AA test set: 294 questions
Category
general
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-11-07
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-non-reasoning, UUID b58b8272-cd3f-44b9-9b68-612f40779ce2, reasoning=false, effort=not specified, suffix=Non-reasoning). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count. Artificial Analysis runs 294 questions from the IFBench test set with five repeats per question. The official evaluator scores prompt-level accuracy in loose mode as pass@1.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/b58b8272-cd3f-44b9-9b68-612f40779ce2/hy3-preview/hy3-non-reasoning. Source model name: Hy3-preview. Provider reported by source: Tencent. Model snapshot: Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning). Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Tool policy: Single-turn answer evaluated with the official IFBench source code. Attempts: pass@1, 5 repeats per question. Reasoning: non-reasoning. Reasoning effort: none. Score display: 48.0%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-07-b96e3ffc8c5b. Source payload hash: b96e3ffc8c5b052aa56f96d05e89d02b8cc234a75085820fca0ca2a39e498274. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v4. Imported at: 2026-11-07. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-ifbench:AA test set: 294 questions:standalone:non-reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=Non-reasoning
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-non-reasoning, UUID b58b8272-cd3f-44b9-9b68-612f40779ce2, reasoning=false, effort=not specified, suffix=Non-reasoning). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count. Artificial Analysis runs 294 questions from the IFBench test set with five repeats per question. The official evaluator scores prompt-level accuracy in loose mode as pass@1.. Tool policy: Single-turn answer evaluated with the official IFBench source code. Attempts: pass@1, 5 repeats per question. Reasoning: non-reasoning. Reasoning effort: none
Context
The often cited 58 refers to verifiable out-of-domain constraint types, not the number of questions in AA's test run.
Source Artificial Analysis
AA-Omniscience Accuracy: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
27.933333333333334
Score
27.933333333333334
Metric
AA-Omniscience Accuracy
Unit
%
Benchmark version
AA Omniscience diagnostic
Category
knowledge
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
superseded
Retrieved at
2026-10-19
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-preview, UUID 8ca48626-ff5e-48b3-8401-38081376d706, reasoning=true, source reasoning-token configuration budget=2000, suffix=Reasoning). This configured value is not measured token consumption. Proportion of all questions answered correctly, regardless of whether the model answers or abstains on other questions.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/8ca48626-ff5e-48b3-8401-38081376d706/hy3-preview/hy3-preview. Source model name: Hy3-preview. Provider reported by source: Tencent. Model snapshot: Hy3-preview (Reasoning). Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Attempts: AA-reported aggregate; diagnostic-specific run count is not stated on the leaderboard. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Reasoning effort: Reasoning. Score display: 27.9%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-10-19-8a022369738c. Source payload hash: 8a022369738cbe2a0e2f9bf486a2882865dbb0c6f1396dfec84059a802560e3c. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v2. Imported at: 2026-10-19. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-omniscience-accuracy:AA Omniscience diagnostic:standalone:reasoning:tokens=2000:suffix=Reasoning
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-preview, UUID 8ca48626-ff5e-48b3-8401-38081376d706, reasoning=true, source reasoning-token configuration budget=2000, suffix=Reasoning). This configured value is not measured token consumption. Proportion of all questions answered correctly, regardless of whether the model answers or abstains on other questions.. Attempts: AA-reported aggregate; diagnostic-specific run count is not stated on the leaderboard. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Reasoning effort: Reasoning
Context
This is the separately published accuracy diagnostic, not the AA-Omniscience Index. AA identifies higher values as better.. This result is retained as historical evidence and is not interchangeable with current results.
Source Artificial Analysis
AA-Omniscience Accuracy: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
23.183333333333334
Score
23.183333333333334
Metric
AA-Omniscience Accuracy
Unit
%
Benchmark version
AA Omniscience diagnostic
Category
knowledge
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
superseded
Retrieved at
2026-10-19
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-non-reasoning, UUID b58b8272-cd3f-44b9-9b68-612f40779ce2, reasoning=false, source reasoning-token configuration budget=0, suffix=Non-reasoning). This configured value is not measured token consumption. Proportion of all questions answered correctly, regardless of whether the model answers or abstains on other questions.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/b58b8272-cd3f-44b9-9b68-612f40779ce2/hy3-preview/hy3-non-reasoning. Source model name: Hy3-preview. Provider reported by source: Tencent. Model snapshot: Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning). Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Attempts: AA-reported aggregate; diagnostic-specific run count is not stated on the leaderboard. Reasoning: non-reasoning. Reasoning effort: Non-reasoning. Score display: 23.2%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-10-19-8a022369738c. Source payload hash: 8a022369738cbe2a0e2f9bf486a2882865dbb0c6f1396dfec84059a802560e3c. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v2. Imported at: 2026-10-19. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-omniscience-accuracy:AA Omniscience diagnostic:standalone:non-reasoning:tokens=0:suffix=Non-reasoning
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-non-reasoning, UUID b58b8272-cd3f-44b9-9b68-612f40779ce2, reasoning=false, source reasoning-token configuration budget=0, suffix=Non-reasoning). This configured value is not measured token consumption. Proportion of all questions answered correctly, regardless of whether the model answers or abstains on other questions.. Attempts: AA-reported aggregate; diagnostic-specific run count is not stated on the leaderboard. Reasoning: non-reasoning. Reasoning effort: Non-reasoning
Context
This is the separately published accuracy diagnostic, not the AA-Omniscience Index. AA identifies higher values as better.. This result is retained as historical evidence and is not interchangeable with current results.
Source Artificial Analysis
AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
87.3959296947271
Score
87.3959296947271
Metric
AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate
Unit
%
Benchmark version
AA Omniscience diagnostic
Category
knowledge
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Lower is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
superseded
Retrieved at
2026-10-19
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-preview, UUID 8ca48626-ff5e-48b3-8401-38081376d706, reasoning=true, source reasoning-token configuration budget=2000, suffix=Reasoning). This configured value is not measured token consumption. Proportion of incorrect answers among all non-correct responses: incorrect / (incorrect + partial answers + not attempted).. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/8ca48626-ff5e-48b3-8401-38081376d706/hy3-preview/hy3-preview. Source model name: Hy3-preview. Provider reported by source: Tencent. Model snapshot: Hy3-preview (Reasoning). Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Attempts: AA-reported aggregate; diagnostic-specific run count is not stated on the leaderboard. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Reasoning effort: Reasoning. Score display: 87.4%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-10-19-8a022369738c. Source payload hash: 8a022369738cbe2a0e2f9bf486a2882865dbb0c6f1396dfec84059a802560e3c. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v2. Imported at: 2026-10-19. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-omniscience-hallucination-rate:AA Omniscience diagnostic:standalone:reasoning:tokens=2000:suffix=Reasoning
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-preview, UUID 8ca48626-ff5e-48b3-8401-38081376d706, reasoning=true, source reasoning-token configuration budget=2000, suffix=Reasoning). This configured value is not measured token consumption. Proportion of incorrect answers among all non-correct responses: incorrect / (incorrect + partial answers + not attempted).. Attempts: AA-reported aggregate; diagnostic-specific run count is not stated on the leaderboard. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Reasoning effort: Reasoning
Context
This is the separately published hallucination-rate diagnostic, not the AA-Omniscience Index. AA identifies lower values as better.. This result is retained as historical evidence and is not interchangeable with current results.
Source Artificial Analysis
AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
75.6780212627468
Score
75.6780212627468
Metric
AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate
Unit
%
Benchmark version
AA Omniscience diagnostic
Category
knowledge
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Lower is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
superseded
Retrieved at
2026-10-19
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-non-reasoning, UUID b58b8272-cd3f-44b9-9b68-612f40779ce2, reasoning=false, source reasoning-token configuration budget=0, suffix=Non-reasoning). This configured value is not measured token consumption. Proportion of incorrect answers among all non-correct responses: incorrect / (incorrect + partial answers + not attempted).. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/b58b8272-cd3f-44b9-9b68-612f40779ce2/hy3-preview/hy3-non-reasoning. Source model name: Hy3-preview. Provider reported by source: Tencent. Model snapshot: Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning). Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Attempts: AA-reported aggregate; diagnostic-specific run count is not stated on the leaderboard. Reasoning: non-reasoning. Reasoning effort: Non-reasoning. Score display: 75.7%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-10-19-8a022369738c. Source payload hash: 8a022369738cbe2a0e2f9bf486a2882865dbb0c6f1396dfec84059a802560e3c. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v2. Imported at: 2026-10-19. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-omniscience-hallucination-rate:AA Omniscience diagnostic:standalone:non-reasoning:tokens=0:suffix=Non-reasoning
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) (release hy3-preview, row hy3-non-reasoning, UUID b58b8272-cd3f-44b9-9b68-612f40779ce2, reasoning=false, source reasoning-token configuration budget=0, suffix=Non-reasoning). This configured value is not measured token consumption. Proportion of incorrect answers among all non-correct responses: incorrect / (incorrect + partial answers + not attempted).. Attempts: AA-reported aggregate; diagnostic-specific run count is not stated on the leaderboard. Reasoning: non-reasoning. Reasoning effort: Non-reasoning
Context
This is the separately published hallucination-rate diagnostic, not the AA-Omniscience Index. AA identifies lower values as better.. This result is retained as historical evidence and is not interchangeable with current results.
Source Artificial Analysis

Page 1 of 3

Popularity compared

How often the model is searched for, used and mentioned, compared with every model of its category.

Popularity index

The 100 most popular models of this category, 0 to 100, higher is more popular

20 of 101 models

As of November 2026 · Source: gradually.ai popularity index

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Hy3 previewAgnes 3.0 Flash 43Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 43Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning 43Nex-N2.5-Pro 43

Method changes in the timeline, a jump at these points is no market event:

  1. 1November 1, 2026: Value only with search or usage data, 30-day attention

What is gaining popularity right now, across models, vendors, harnesses and AI subscriptions, is collected in All AI trends.

All specifications

Architecture

Parameters
295 billion
Source: Parameters
Active parameters
21 billion
Source: Active parameters

Input and output

Context window
256,000 tokens
Source: Context window
Maximum output
64,000 tokens
Source: Maximum output
Inputs
Text
Source: Inputs
Outputs
Text
Source: Outputs
Reasoning
Yes
Source: Reasoning
Tool calling
Yes
Source: Tool calling

Watermarking and provenance

AI watermarking refers to invisible signals embedded in the output. Visible marks and provenance metadata are listed separately. Unknown means there is insufficient evidence for that particular field.

AI watermarking
Unknown
no source
Watermarking technique
Not known
no source

Licence and access

Weights
Open weights
Source: Weights
License
Tencent Hunyuan Community
Source: License

Prices

Not included in any subscription in Germany.

All plans in the AI subscription comparison

Frequently asked questions about Hy3 preview

How large is the context window of Hy3 preview?

256,000 tokens. That is how much text Hy3 preview reads at once, about 380 A4 pages.

Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Context windowTokens the model reads at once · higher is better
Kimi K2.6262K
Qwen 3.8 27B262K
Kimi K2.7 Code262K
Kimi K2.5262K
Nemotron 3 Ultra262K
Kimi K2 Thinking262K
Hy3 previewRank 77 of 103256K

Can I run Hy3 preview locally?

Yes, the weights are open. With 295B parameters it needs a lot of memory, more a server than a laptop.

Stated by Tencent

Open weights
yes
License
Tencent Hunyuan Community
Parameters
295B
active per token
21B

Sources and data date

Show all 29 sources

Benchmark sources at a glance

Which independent evaluators tested this model. This is coverage, not a quality ranking.

EvaluatorTest seriesComposite indicesRecorded active measurements
Artificial Analysis102
LMArena001

Without vendor claims and historical or disputed results; those stay labelled in the single values. 1 measurements are not yet assigned to a test series.

TypeEvidence and data date
Input

Documented modalities. Retrieved October 27, 2026.

Output

Documented modalities. Retrieved October 27, 2026.

Research statusResearch date October 15, 2026. 16 source URLs checked. This documents the inspected sources, not an exhaustive inventory of every publication.
Not published

leaderboard-run-date-and-settings

Note

The independently surfaced widgets provide exact model IDs and values but not common prompt/decoding configuration, quantization, or evaluation run dates.

Additional sourceHugging Face (retrieved October 15, 2026) · Tencent Hy3 preview model card · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceArtificial Analysis (retrieved November 2, 2026)
Additional sourceArtificial Analysis (retrieved October 19, 2026; November 2, 2026; November 7, 2026)
Additional sourceArtificial Analysis (retrieved October 19, 2026)
Additional sourceSWE-bench Verified official leaderboard (retrieved October 15, 2026)
Additional sourceGPQA official benchmark result surfaced on Tencent model card (retrieved October 15, 2026)
Additional sourceTerminal-Bench 2.0 official leaderboard (retrieved October 15, 2026)
Additional sourceTencent Hy3-preview official model card, Instruct Model Performance chart, pinned revision (retrieved October 17, 2026)1234
Additional sourceArena.ai Text Arena leaderboard (retrieved October 18, 2026)
Additional sourceSpeciEval (retrieved October 19, 2026)
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 17, 2026)123
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 19, 2026)123
Additional sourceTencent Hy3 preview announcement · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceTencent Hy3 preview configuration · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceTencent Cloud TokenHub routing notice · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceOpenRouter: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceVercel AI Gateway: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceOllama: cumulative downloads for the popularity index
Additional sourceReplicate: cumulative runs for the popularity index
Additional sourceGoogle Trending Now: limited feed selection for Germany and the US
Additional sourceCreative Commons Attribution 4.0