Skip to main content

OpenBMBLanguage model

MiniCPM5-1B

MiniCPM5-1B has no overall index value yet because there are too few independent benchmark results.

PopularityRank 86 of 785

51out of 100-1 vs. last month

based on search, usage and attention

Summary

MiniCPM5-1B is the first compact checkpoint in OpenBMB’s MiniCPM5 family. It has 1.08 billion parameters and a 131,072-token context. The same checkpoint can switch between Think and No Think.

Tool calls use the documented XML format. OpenBMB describes an SGLang parser that converts it into OpenAI-compatible tool_calls. MiniCPM5-2B is a separate, larger family member, while MiniCPM5-1B is the one of the two that can switch between Think and No Think. The chat template and parser are therefore part of the 1B model’s technical interface.

All benchmark results

Every published result with its source, test setup and comparison models.

Show all 45 published benchmark results

Page 1 of 4

Measurements without matching peer values

These measurements have no matching peer values under the same test conditions. Their original values and sources remain available here.

CritPt v2: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
0
Score
0
Metric
pass@1 accuracy
Unit
%
Benchmark version
v2
Category
reasoning
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
disputed
Retrieved at
2026-11-02
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: MiniCPM5-1B (Reasoning) (release minicpm5-1b, row minicpm5-1b, UUID 77f5ff8b-1536-474a-a337-e1bfd138d343, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=Reasoning). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap. The full CritPt v2 run covers 70 questions with five repeats. The official grading server reports pass@1.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/77f5ff8b-1536-474a-a337-e1bfd138d343/minicpm5-1b/minicpm5-1b. Source model name: MiniCPM5-1B. Provider reported by source: OpenBMB. Model snapshot: MiniCPM5-1B (Reasoning). Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Tool policy: Python functions, symbolic expressions, and numerical answers; official grading server. Attempts: 70 questions, five repeats per question, pass@1. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 0.0%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-02-67d46be20a5b. Source payload hash: 67d46be20a5b412db6cfb60ad190441fcaa5513500b8fd47d033168d0e97b6b2. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v3. Imported at: 2026-11-02. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-critpt-v2:v2:standalone:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=Reasoning
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: MiniCPM5-1B (Reasoning) (release minicpm5-1b, row minicpm5-1b, UUID 77f5ff8b-1536-474a-a337-e1bfd138d343, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=Reasoning). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap. The full CritPt v2 run covers 70 questions with five repeats. The official grading server reports pass@1.. Tool policy: Python functions, symbolic expressions, and numerical answers; official grading server. Attempts: 70 questions, five repeats per question, pass@1. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context
This AA source field contains the original CritPt score. The earlier CritPt v2 attribution was incorrect; the value and former label remain as disputed historical evidence.. The source dataset marks this result as disputed. It remains visible as documented evidence, but is not reliable comparative proof.
Source Artificial Analysis
CritPt v2: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
0
Score
0
Metric
pass@1 accuracy
Unit
%
Benchmark version
v2
Category
reasoning
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
disputed
Retrieved at
2026-11-02
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: MiniCPM5-1B (Non-reasoning) (release minicpm5-1b, row minicpm5-1b-non-reasoning, UUID d306cccd-0085-4b2f-8aa0-ffcdbb434695, reasoning=false, effort=not specified, suffix=Non-reasoning). AA marks this model variant as non-reasoning and reports 0 reasoning tokens. The full CritPt v2 run covers 70 questions with five repeats. The official grading server reports pass@1.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/d306cccd-0085-4b2f-8aa0-ffcdbb434695/minicpm5-1b/minicpm5-1b-non-reasoning. Source model name: MiniCPM5-1B. Provider reported by source: OpenBMB. Model snapshot: MiniCPM5-1B (Non-reasoning). Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Tool policy: Python functions, symbolic expressions, and numerical answers; official grading server. Attempts: 70 questions, five repeats per question, pass@1. Reasoning: non-reasoning. Reasoning effort: none. Score display: 0.0%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-02-67d46be20a5b. Source payload hash: 67d46be20a5b412db6cfb60ad190441fcaa5513500b8fd47d033168d0e97b6b2. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v3. Imported at: 2026-11-02. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-critpt-v2:v2:standalone:non-reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=Non-reasoning
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: MiniCPM5-1B (Non-reasoning) (release minicpm5-1b, row minicpm5-1b-non-reasoning, UUID d306cccd-0085-4b2f-8aa0-ffcdbb434695, reasoning=false, effort=not specified, suffix=Non-reasoning). AA marks this model variant as non-reasoning and reports 0 reasoning tokens. The full CritPt v2 run covers 70 questions with five repeats. The official grading server reports pass@1.. Tool policy: Python functions, symbolic expressions, and numerical answers; official grading server. Attempts: 70 questions, five repeats per question, pass@1. Reasoning: non-reasoning. Reasoning effort: none
Context
This AA source field contains the original CritPt score. The earlier CritPt v2 attribution was incorrect; the value and former label remain as disputed historical evidence.. The source dataset marks this result as disputed. It remains visible as documented evidence, but is not reliable comparative proof.
Source Artificial Analysis
IFBench: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
49.319727891156504
Score
49.319727891156504
Metric
IFBench prompt-level loose accuracy (pass@1)
Unit
%
Benchmark version
AA test set: 294 questions
Category
general
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
superseded
Retrieved at
2026-11-02
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: MiniCPM5-1B (Reasoning) (release minicpm5-1b, row minicpm5-1b, UUID 77f5ff8b-1536-474a-a337-e1bfd138d343, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=Reasoning). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap. Artificial Analysis runs 294 questions from the IFBench test set with five repeats per question. The official evaluator scores prompt-level accuracy in loose mode as pass@1.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/77f5ff8b-1536-474a-a337-e1bfd138d343/minicpm5-1b/minicpm5-1b. Source model name: MiniCPM5-1B. Provider reported by source: OpenBMB. Model snapshot: MiniCPM5-1B (Reasoning). Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Tool policy: Single-turn answer evaluated with the official IFBench source code. Attempts: pass@1, 5 repeats per question. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 49.3%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-02-67d46be20a5b. Source payload hash: 67d46be20a5b412db6cfb60ad190441fcaa5513500b8fd47d033168d0e97b6b2. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v3. Imported at: 2026-11-02. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-ifbench:AA test set: 294 questions:standalone:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=Reasoning
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: MiniCPM5-1B (Reasoning) (release minicpm5-1b, row minicpm5-1b, UUID 77f5ff8b-1536-474a-a337-e1bfd138d343, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=Reasoning). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap. Artificial Analysis runs 294 questions from the IFBench test set with five repeats per question. The official evaluator scores prompt-level accuracy in loose mode as pass@1.. Tool policy: Single-turn answer evaluated with the official IFBench source code. Attempts: pass@1, 5 repeats per question. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context
The often cited 58 refers to verifiable out-of-domain constraint types, not the number of questions in AA's test run.. This result is retained as historical evidence and is not interchangeable with current results.
Source Artificial Analysis
IFBench: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
49.319727891156504
Score
49.319727891156504
Metric
IFBench prompt-level loose accuracy (pass@1)
Unit
%
Benchmark version
AA test set: 294 questions
Category
general
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-11-07
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: MiniCPM5-1B (Reasoning) (release minicpm5-1b, row minicpm5-1b, UUID 77f5ff8b-1536-474a-a337-e1bfd138d343, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=Reasoning). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count. Artificial Analysis runs 294 questions from the IFBench test set with five repeats per question. The official evaluator scores prompt-level accuracy in loose mode as pass@1.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/77f5ff8b-1536-474a-a337-e1bfd138d343/minicpm5-1b/minicpm5-1b. Source model name: MiniCPM5-1B. Provider reported by source: OpenBMB. Model snapshot: MiniCPM5-1B (Reasoning). Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Tool policy: Single-turn answer evaluated with the official IFBench source code. Attempts: pass@1, 5 repeats per question. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 49.3%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-07-b96e3ffc8c5b. Source payload hash: b96e3ffc8c5b052aa56f96d05e89d02b8cc234a75085820fca0ca2a39e498274. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v4. Imported at: 2026-11-07. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-ifbench:AA test set: 294 questions:standalone:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=Reasoning
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: MiniCPM5-1B (Reasoning) (release minicpm5-1b, row minicpm5-1b, UUID 77f5ff8b-1536-474a-a337-e1bfd138d343, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=Reasoning). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count. Artificial Analysis runs 294 questions from the IFBench test set with five repeats per question. The official evaluator scores prompt-level accuracy in loose mode as pass@1.. Tool policy: Single-turn answer evaluated with the official IFBench source code. Attempts: pass@1, 5 repeats per question. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context
The often cited 58 refers to verifiable out-of-domain constraint types, not the number of questions in AA's test run.
Source Artificial Analysis
IFBench: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
35.1700680272109
Score
35.1700680272109
Metric
IFBench prompt-level loose accuracy (pass@1)
Unit
%
Benchmark version
AA test set: 294 questions
Category
general
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
superseded
Retrieved at
2026-11-02
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: MiniCPM5-1B (Non-reasoning) (release minicpm5-1b, row minicpm5-1b-non-reasoning, UUID d306cccd-0085-4b2f-8aa0-ffcdbb434695, reasoning=false, effort=not specified, suffix=Non-reasoning). AA marks this model variant as non-reasoning and reports 0 reasoning tokens. Artificial Analysis runs 294 questions from the IFBench test set with five repeats per question. The official evaluator scores prompt-level accuracy in loose mode as pass@1.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/d306cccd-0085-4b2f-8aa0-ffcdbb434695/minicpm5-1b/minicpm5-1b-non-reasoning. Source model name: MiniCPM5-1B. Provider reported by source: OpenBMB. Model snapshot: MiniCPM5-1B (Non-reasoning). Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Tool policy: Single-turn answer evaluated with the official IFBench source code. Attempts: pass@1, 5 repeats per question. Reasoning: non-reasoning. Reasoning effort: none. Score display: 35.2%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-02-67d46be20a5b. Source payload hash: 67d46be20a5b412db6cfb60ad190441fcaa5513500b8fd47d033168d0e97b6b2. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v3. Imported at: 2026-11-02. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-ifbench:AA test set: 294 questions:standalone:non-reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=Non-reasoning
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: MiniCPM5-1B (Non-reasoning) (release minicpm5-1b, row minicpm5-1b-non-reasoning, UUID d306cccd-0085-4b2f-8aa0-ffcdbb434695, reasoning=false, effort=not specified, suffix=Non-reasoning). AA marks this model variant as non-reasoning and reports 0 reasoning tokens. Artificial Analysis runs 294 questions from the IFBench test set with five repeats per question. The official evaluator scores prompt-level accuracy in loose mode as pass@1.. Tool policy: Single-turn answer evaluated with the official IFBench source code. Attempts: pass@1, 5 repeats per question. Reasoning: non-reasoning. Reasoning effort: none
Context
The often cited 58 refers to verifiable out-of-domain constraint types, not the number of questions in AA's test run.. This result is retained as historical evidence and is not interchangeable with current results.
Source Artificial Analysis
IFBench: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
35.1700680272109
Score
35.1700680272109
Metric
IFBench prompt-level loose accuracy (pass@1)
Unit
%
Benchmark version
AA test set: 294 questions
Category
general
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-11-07
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: MiniCPM5-1B (Non-reasoning) (release minicpm5-1b, row minicpm5-1b-non-reasoning, UUID d306cccd-0085-4b2f-8aa0-ffcdbb434695, reasoning=false, effort=not specified, suffix=Non-reasoning). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count. Artificial Analysis runs 294 questions from the IFBench test set with five repeats per question. The official evaluator scores prompt-level accuracy in loose mode as pass@1.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/d306cccd-0085-4b2f-8aa0-ffcdbb434695/minicpm5-1b/minicpm5-1b-non-reasoning. Source model name: MiniCPM5-1B. Provider reported by source: OpenBMB. Model snapshot: MiniCPM5-1B (Non-reasoning). Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Tool policy: Single-turn answer evaluated with the official IFBench source code. Attempts: pass@1, 5 repeats per question. Reasoning: non-reasoning. Reasoning effort: none. Score display: 35.2%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-07-b96e3ffc8c5b. Source payload hash: b96e3ffc8c5b052aa56f96d05e89d02b8cc234a75085820fca0ca2a39e498274. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v4. Imported at: 2026-11-07. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-ifbench:AA test set: 294 questions:standalone:non-reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=Non-reasoning
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: MiniCPM5-1B (Non-reasoning) (release minicpm5-1b, row minicpm5-1b-non-reasoning, UUID d306cccd-0085-4b2f-8aa0-ffcdbb434695, reasoning=false, effort=not specified, suffix=Non-reasoning). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count. Artificial Analysis runs 294 questions from the IFBench test set with five repeats per question. The official evaluator scores prompt-level accuracy in loose mode as pass@1.. Tool policy: Single-turn answer evaluated with the official IFBench source code. Attempts: pass@1, 5 repeats per question. Reasoning: non-reasoning. Reasoning effort: none
Context
The often cited 58 refers to verifiable out-of-domain constraint types, not the number of questions in AA's test run.
Source Artificial Analysis
JevBench public-only overall accuracy (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
58.87
Score
58.87
Metric
Accuracy
Unit
%
Benchmark version
JevBench bb05a335; dataset dc3995d8; Ardana result page measured 2026-10-13
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
231
Lower confidence bound
52.32
Upper confidence bound
65.38
Source type
community-reported
Evaluator
Ardana JevBench results page
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-18
Methodology
Community-reported result. Ardana evaluator page; JevBench public items only; exact model tag minicpm5:1b; official OpenBMB openbmb/MiniCPM5-1B-GGUF artifact at the revision shown as 3d55fac8; default quant MiniCPM5-1B-Q8_0.gguf (1.2 GB); stock instruct model; zero-shot chat layout; one run; 95% bootstrap interval resamples items with paraphrase pairs kept together; 600 s client timeout.
Context
Ardana is the primary source for its own JevBench run, but institutional independence is not established and attribution is therefore community-reported. The evaluation uses only public JevBench items, including only the public half of the hard tier, and is not comparable with the leaderboard that includes held-out items. One run per quant was performed. Prompt details, sampling parameters and hardware are not stated.
Source Ardana JevBench results page
JevBench public-only Easy-tier accuracy (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
95.83
Score
95.83
Metric
Accuracy; Easy difficulty tier
Unit
%
Benchmark version
JevBench bb05a335; dataset dc3995d8; Ardana result page measured 2026-10-13
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
48
Source type
community-reported
Evaluator
Ardana JevBench results page
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-18
Methodology
Community-reported result. Ardana evaluator page; JevBench public items only; exact model tag minicpm5:1b; official OpenBMB openbmb/MiniCPM5-1B-GGUF artifact at the revision shown as 3d55fac8; default quant MiniCPM5-1B-Q8_0.gguf (1.2 GB); stock instruct model; zero-shot chat layout; one run; Difficulty tier Easy; n=48. 600 s client timeout.
Context
Ardana is the primary source for its own JevBench run, but institutional independence is not established and attribution is therefore community-reported. The evaluation uses only public JevBench items, including only the public half of the hard tier, and is not comparable with the leaderboard that includes held-out items. One run per quant was performed. Prompt details, sampling parameters and hardware are not stated. No interval is reported for difficulty subsets.
Source Ardana JevBench results page
JevBench public-only Standard-tier accuracy (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
59.72
Score
59.72
Metric
Accuracy; Standard difficulty tier
Unit
%
Benchmark version
JevBench bb05a335; dataset dc3995d8; Ardana result page measured 2026-10-13
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
72
Source type
community-reported
Evaluator
Ardana JevBench results page
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-18
Methodology
Community-reported result. Ardana evaluator page; JevBench public items only; exact model tag minicpm5:1b; official OpenBMB openbmb/MiniCPM5-1B-GGUF artifact at the revision shown as 3d55fac8; default quant MiniCPM5-1B-Q8_0.gguf (1.2 GB); stock instruct model; zero-shot chat layout; one run; Difficulty tier Standard; n=72. 600 s client timeout.
Context
Ardana is the primary source for its own JevBench run, but institutional independence is not established and attribution is therefore community-reported. The evaluation uses only public JevBench items, including only the public half of the hard tier, and is not comparable with the leaderboard that includes held-out items. One run per quant was performed. Prompt details, sampling parameters and hardware are not stated. No interval is reported for difficulty subsets.
Source Ardana JevBench results page
JevBench public-only Hard-tier accuracy (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
42.34
Score
42.34
Metric
Accuracy; Hard difficulty tier
Unit
%
Benchmark version
JevBench bb05a335; dataset dc3995d8; Ardana result page measured 2026-10-13
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
111
Source type
community-reported
Evaluator
Ardana JevBench results page
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-18
Methodology
Community-reported result. Ardana evaluator page; JevBench public items only; exact model tag minicpm5:1b; official OpenBMB openbmb/MiniCPM5-1B-GGUF artifact at the revision shown as 3d55fac8; default quant MiniCPM5-1B-Q8_0.gguf (1.2 GB); stock instruct model; zero-shot chat layout; one run; Difficulty tier Hard; n=111. 600 s client timeout.
Context
Ardana is the primary source for its own JevBench run, but institutional independence is not established and attribution is therefore community-reported. The evaluation uses only public JevBench items, including only the public half of the hard tier, and is not comparable with the leaderboard that includes held-out items. One run per quant was performed. Prompt details, sampling parameters and hardware are not stated. No interval is reported for difficulty subsets.
Source Ardana JevBench results page
Quantization Benchmark, Overall, FP (bf16) (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
66.16
Score
66.16
Metric
accuracy
Unit
%
Direction
No direction published
Source type
community-reported
Evaluator
LiteRT Community, MiniCPM5-1B Hugging Face model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-18
Methodology
Community-reported result. Category Overall; FP (bf16) full-precision baseline. Thinking mode is off; temperature 0.6, top-p 0.95, random seed 0. The source says the columns use the same evaluation benchmark but does not name its dataset, sample count, or confidence interval.
Source LiteRT Community, MiniCPM5-1B Hugging Face model card
Quantization Benchmark, Overall, W4 (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
60.91
Score
60.91
Metric
accuracy
Unit
%
Direction
No direction published
Source type
community-reported
Evaluator
LiteRT Community, MiniCPM5-1B Hugging Face model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-18
Methodology
Community-reported result. Category Overall; W4 mixed INT4-block32 for linear weights and INT8 for embeddings and lmhead, with FP32 activations (afp32). Thinking mode is off; temperature 0.6, top-p 0.95, random seed 0. The source says the columns use the same evaluation benchmark but does not name its dataset, sample count, or confidence interval.
Source LiteRT Community, MiniCPM5-1B Hugging Face model card

Page 1 of 4

Popularity compared

How often the model is searched for, used and mentioned, compared with every model of its category.

Popularity index

The 100 most popular models of this category, 0 to 100, higher is more popular

20 of 100 models

As of November 2026 · Source: gradually.ai popularity index

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

MiniCPM5-1BSWE-2 51Qwen 3 Coder 480B A35B 51MiniMax M3.1 Flash 51GLM-5.2 51

Method changes in the timeline, a jump at these points is no market event:

  1. 1November 1, 2026: Value only with search or usage data, 30-day attention

What is gaining popularity right now, across models, vendors, harnesses and AI subscriptions, is collected in All AI trends.

All specifications

Architecture

Parameters
1 billion
Source: Parameters

Input and output

Context window
131,072 tokens
Source: Context window
Maximum output
131,072 tokens
Source: Maximum output
Inputs
Text
Source: Inputs
Outputs
Text
Source: Outputs
Reasoning
Yes
Source: Reasoning
Tool calling
Yes
Source: Tool calling

Watermarking and provenance

AI watermarking refers to invisible signals embedded in the output. Visible marks and provenance metadata are listed separately. Unknown means there is insufficient evidence for that particular field.

AI watermarking
Unknown
no source
Watermarking technique
Not known
no source

Licence and access

Weights
Open weights
Source: Weights
License
Apache 2.0
Source: License

Frequently asked questions about MiniCPM5-1B

How large is the context window of MiniCPM5-1B?

131,072 tokens. That is how much text MiniCPM5-1B reads at once, about 200 A4 pages.

Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Context windowTokens the model reads at once · higher is better
GLM-5.1200K
DeepSeek-V3 0324164K
MiniCPM5-1BRank 94 of 103131K
GLM-4.5131K
GPT OSS 120B131K
DeepSeek-V3.2128K
DeepSeek-R1128K

Can I run MiniCPM5-1B locally?

Yes, the weights are open.

Stated by OpenBMB

Open weights
yes
License
Apache 2.0
Parameters
1B
active per token
n/a

Sources and data date

Show all 17 sources

Benchmark sources at a glance

Which independent evaluators tested this model. This is coverage, not a quality ranking.

EvaluatorTest seriesComposite indicesRecorded active measurements
Artificial Analysis102

Without vendor claims and historical or disputed results; those stay labelled in the single values.

TypeEvidence and data date
Input

Documented modalities. Retrieved October 27, 2026.

Output

Documented modalities. Retrieved October 27, 2026.

Research statusResearch date October 15, 2026. 8 source URLs checked. This documents the inspected sources, not an exhaustive inventory of every publication.
Not published

leaderboard-methodology

Note

The exact Thinking column and metric labels are visible, but card/image do not publish task dates, score scale, inference settings or task-specific protocols.

Additional sourceHugging Face (retrieved October 15, 2026; October 18, 2026) · MiniCPM5-1B model card · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceArtificial Analysis (retrieved November 2, 2026)
Additional sourceArtificial Analysis (retrieved November 2, 2026; November 7, 2026)
Additional sourceOpenBMB MiniCPM5-1B public leaderboard image (retrieved October 15, 2026)
Additional sourceArdana JevBench results page (retrieved October 18, 2026)
Additional sourceOpenBMB (retrieved October 18, 2026)
Additional sourceLiteRT Community, MiniCPM5-1B Hugging Face model card (retrieved October 18, 2026)
Additional sourceArtificial Analysis, MiniCPM5-1B: The leading 1B open weights model (retrieved October 22, 2026)
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 18, 2026)12
Additional sourceOpenRouter: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceVercel AI Gateway: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceOllama: cumulative downloads for the popularity index
Additional sourceReplicate: cumulative runs for the popularity index
Additional sourceGoogle Trending Now: limited feed selection for Germany and the US
Additional sourceCreative Commons Attribution 4.0