Skip to main content

Mistral AILanguage model

Pixtral Large (latest)

Pixtral Large (latest) has no overall index value yet because there are too few independent benchmark results.

PopularityRank 689 of 785

22out of 100-1 vs. last month

based on search, usage and attention

Summary

Pixtral Large (latest) is the large multimodal Pixtral checkpoint with a 123B decoder and a vision encoder of about 1B parameters. It accepts text and images with 128,000 tokens of context and, according to Mistral, can handle at least 30 high-resolution images in one context. Documents, diagrams, and complex image questions are its focus.

Mistral introduced Pixtral Large as a multimodal extension of Mistral Large 2.1. The Mistral Research License covers research, and the current overview lists the rolling alias as deprecated.

All benchmark results

Every published result with its source, test setup and comparison models.

Show all 20 published benchmark results

Page 1 of 2

Measurements without matching peer values

These measurements have no matching peer values under the same test conditions. Their original values and sources remain available here.

TurtleAI DSReal (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
10.78
Score
10.78
Metric
Symbolic success
Unit
%
Benchmark version
TurtleAI, Findings of ACL 2026 Table 1; greedy decoding
Category
visual-programming
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
102
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
TurtleAI paper, Findings of ACL 2026
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-17
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Exact Hugging Face checkpoint mistralai/Pixtral-Large-Instruct-2411, cross-checked against the official API alias pixtral-large-2411. TurtleAI evaluates visual programming: provide task image, generate Python turtle code, then compare generated output with reference. Main results use greedy decoding; Table 5 CoT row is a separate prompt condition. Dataset N: DSReal 102, DSCraft 102, DSSyn 619, combined DS 823.
Context
No confidence intervals are published. Table 1 main-result rows that duplicate the no-CoT Table 5 values are kept only once; the separate Table 5 CoT rows remain below.
Source TurtleAI paper, Findings of ACL 2026
TurtleAI DSReal (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
11.76
Score
11.76
Metric
Embedding success
Unit
%
Benchmark version
TurtleAI, Findings of ACL 2026 Table 1; greedy decoding
Category
visual-programming
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
102
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
TurtleAI paper, Findings of ACL 2026
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-17
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Exact Hugging Face checkpoint mistralai/Pixtral-Large-Instruct-2411, cross-checked against the official API alias pixtral-large-2411. TurtleAI evaluates visual programming: provide task image, generate Python turtle code, then compare generated output with reference. Main results use greedy decoding; Table 5 CoT row is a separate prompt condition. Dataset N: DSReal 102, DSCraft 102, DSSyn 619, combined DS 823.
Context
No confidence intervals are published. Table 1 main-result rows that duplicate the no-CoT Table 5 values are kept only once; the separate Table 5 CoT rows remain below.
Source TurtleAI paper, Findings of ACL 2026
TurtleAI DSCraft (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
13.73
Score
13.73
Metric
Symbolic success
Unit
%
Benchmark version
TurtleAI, Findings of ACL 2026 Table 1; greedy decoding
Category
visual-programming
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
102
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
TurtleAI paper, Findings of ACL 2026
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-17
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Exact Hugging Face checkpoint mistralai/Pixtral-Large-Instruct-2411, cross-checked against the official API alias pixtral-large-2411. TurtleAI evaluates visual programming: provide task image, generate Python turtle code, then compare generated output with reference. Main results use greedy decoding; Table 5 CoT row is a separate prompt condition. Dataset N: DSReal 102, DSCraft 102, DSSyn 619, combined DS 823.
Context
No confidence intervals are published. Table 1 main-result rows that duplicate the no-CoT Table 5 values are kept only once; the separate Table 5 CoT rows remain below.
Source TurtleAI paper, Findings of ACL 2026
TurtleAI DSCraft (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
15.69
Score
15.69
Metric
Embedding success
Unit
%
Benchmark version
TurtleAI, Findings of ACL 2026 Table 1; greedy decoding
Category
visual-programming
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
102
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
TurtleAI paper, Findings of ACL 2026
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-17
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Exact Hugging Face checkpoint mistralai/Pixtral-Large-Instruct-2411, cross-checked against the official API alias pixtral-large-2411. TurtleAI evaluates visual programming: provide task image, generate Python turtle code, then compare generated output with reference. Main results use greedy decoding; Table 5 CoT row is a separate prompt condition. Dataset N: DSReal 102, DSCraft 102, DSSyn 619, combined DS 823.
Context
No confidence intervals are published. Table 1 main-result rows that duplicate the no-CoT Table 5 values are kept only once; the separate Table 5 CoT rows remain below.
Source TurtleAI paper, Findings of ACL 2026
TurtleAI DSSyn (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
4.68
Score
4.68
Metric
Symbolic success
Unit
%
Benchmark version
TurtleAI, Findings of ACL 2026 Table 1; greedy decoding
Category
visual-programming
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
619
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
TurtleAI paper, Findings of ACL 2026
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-17
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Exact Hugging Face checkpoint mistralai/Pixtral-Large-Instruct-2411, cross-checked against the official API alias pixtral-large-2411. TurtleAI evaluates visual programming: provide task image, generate Python turtle code, then compare generated output with reference. Main results use greedy decoding; Table 5 CoT row is a separate prompt condition. Dataset N: DSReal 102, DSCraft 102, DSSyn 619, combined DS 823.
Context
No confidence intervals are published. Table 1 main-result rows that duplicate the no-CoT Table 5 values are kept only once; the separate Table 5 CoT rows remain below.
Source TurtleAI paper, Findings of ACL 2026
TurtleAI DSSyn (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
3.88
Score
3.88
Metric
Embedding success
Unit
%
Benchmark version
TurtleAI, Findings of ACL 2026 Table 1; greedy decoding
Category
visual-programming
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
619
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
TurtleAI paper, Findings of ACL 2026
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-17
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Exact Hugging Face checkpoint mistralai/Pixtral-Large-Instruct-2411, cross-checked against the official API alias pixtral-large-2411. TurtleAI evaluates visual programming: provide task image, generate Python turtle code, then compare generated output with reference. Main results use greedy decoding; Table 5 CoT row is a separate prompt condition. Dataset N: DSReal 102, DSCraft 102, DSSyn 619, combined DS 823.
Context
No confidence intervals are published. Table 1 main-result rows that duplicate the no-CoT Table 5 values are kept only once; the separate Table 5 CoT rows remain below.
Source TurtleAI paper, Findings of ACL 2026
TurtleAI DS combined (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
6.56
Score
6.56
Metric
Symbolic success
Unit
%
Benchmark version
TurtleAI, Findings of ACL 2026 Table 1; greedy decoding
Category
visual-programming
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
823
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
TurtleAI paper, Findings of ACL 2026
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-17
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Exact Hugging Face checkpoint mistralai/Pixtral-Large-Instruct-2411, cross-checked against the official API alias pixtral-large-2411. TurtleAI evaluates visual programming: provide task image, generate Python turtle code, then compare generated output with reference. Main results use greedy decoding; Table 5 CoT row is a separate prompt condition. Dataset N: DSReal 102, DSCraft 102, DSSyn 619, combined DS 823.
Context
No confidence intervals are published. Table 1 main-result rows that duplicate the no-CoT Table 5 values are kept only once; the separate Table 5 CoT rows remain below.
Source TurtleAI paper, Findings of ACL 2026
TurtleAI DS combined (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
6.32
Score
6.32
Metric
Embedding success
Unit
%
Benchmark version
TurtleAI, Findings of ACL 2026 Table 1; greedy decoding
Category
visual-programming
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
823
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
TurtleAI paper, Findings of ACL 2026
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-17
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Exact Hugging Face checkpoint mistralai/Pixtral-Large-Instruct-2411, cross-checked against the official API alias pixtral-large-2411. TurtleAI evaluates visual programming: provide task image, generate Python turtle code, then compare generated output with reference. Main results use greedy decoding; Table 5 CoT row is a separate prompt condition. Dataset N: DSReal 102, DSCraft 102, DSSyn 619, combined DS 823.
Context
No confidence intervals are published. Table 1 main-result rows that duplicate the no-CoT Table 5 values are kept only once; the separate Table 5 CoT rows remain below.
Source TurtleAI paper, Findings of ACL 2026
TurtleAI DSReal, chain-of-thought prompt (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
11.76
Score
11.76
Metric
symbolic success
Unit
%
Benchmark version
TurtleAI, Findings of ACL 2026 Table 5; CoT prompt, greedy decoding
Category
visual-programming
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
102
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
TurtleAI paper, Findings of ACL 2026
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-17
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Exact Hugging Face checkpoint mistralai/Pixtral-Large-Instruct-2411, cross-checked against the official API alias pixtral-large-2411. TurtleAI evaluates visual programming: provide task image, generate Python turtle code, then compare generated output with reference. Main results use greedy decoding; Table 5 CoT row is a separate prompt condition. Dataset N: DSReal 102, DSCraft 102, DSSyn 619, combined DS 823.
Context
No confidence intervals are published. Table 1 main-result rows that duplicate the no-CoT Table 5 values are kept only once; the separate Table 5 CoT rows remain below.
Source TurtleAI paper, Findings of ACL 2026
TurtleAI DS combined, chain-of-thought prompt (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
4.74
Score
4.74
Metric
symbolic success
Unit
%
Benchmark version
TurtleAI, Findings of ACL 2026 Table 5; CoT prompt, greedy decoding
Category
visual-programming
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
823
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
TurtleAI paper, Findings of ACL 2026
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-17
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Exact Hugging Face checkpoint mistralai/Pixtral-Large-Instruct-2411, cross-checked against the official API alias pixtral-large-2411. TurtleAI evaluates visual programming: provide task image, generate Python turtle code, then compare generated output with reference. Main results use greedy decoding; Table 5 CoT row is a separate prompt condition. Dataset N: DSReal 102, DSCraft 102, DSSyn 619, combined DS 823.
Context
No confidence intervals are published. Table 1 main-result rows that duplicate the no-CoT Table 5 values are kept only once; the separate Table 5 CoT rows remain below.
Source TurtleAI paper, Findings of ACL 2026
HumanEval-V visual coding, pass@1 (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
11.1
Score
11.1
Metric
pass@1
Unit
%
Benchmark version
HumanEval-V, 2024-11-20 official result
Category
vision-coding
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
108
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
HumanEval-V official benchmark repository, README at commit 05d4b520fe41807e2d1b10355c2be77feb6eb08c
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-17
Methodology
Official benchmark leaderboard. Exact checkpoint: Pixtral-Large-Instruct-2411. The authors' 2024-11-20 announcement reports pass@1 11.1. The repository's general protocol uses greedy decoding for pass@1. The result is a historical checkpoint measurement, not a statement about the current pixtral-large-latest API target.
Context
The dataset contains 108 tasks. The repository gives neither a confidence interval nor model-specific hardware, seed, or decoding details beyond the general pass@1 rule. The result cannot be transferred to a current API alias.
Source HumanEval-V official benchmark repository, README at commit 05d4b520fe41807e2d1b10355c2be77feb6eb08c
HumanEval-V visual coding, pass@10 (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
26.9
Score
26.9
Metric
pass@10
Unit
%
Benchmark version
HumanEval-V, 2024-11-20 official result
Category
vision-coding
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
108
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
HumanEval-V official benchmark repository, README at commit 05d4b520fe41807e2d1b10355c2be77feb6eb08c
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-17
Methodology
Official benchmark leaderboard. Exact checkpoint: Pixtral-Large-Instruct-2411. The authors' 2024-11-20 announcement reports pass@10 26.9. The repository's general protocol samples 20 generations at temperature 0.8 and top-p 0.95 for pass@10. The result is a historical checkpoint measurement, not a statement about the current pixtral-large-latest API target.
Context
The dataset contains 108 tasks. The 20 generations per task are not 20 independent test tasks. The repository gives no confidence interval or model-specific hardware or seed details. The result cannot be transferred to a current API alias.
Source HumanEval-V official benchmark repository, README at commit 05d4b520fe41807e2d1b10355c2be77feb6eb08c

Page 1 of 2

Popularity compared

How often the model is searched for, used and mentioned, compared with every model of its category.

Popularity index

The 100 most popular models of this category, 0 to 100, higher is more popular

20 of 101 models

As of November 2026 · Source: gradually.ai popularity index

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Pixtral Large (latest)MiniMax M2.5 22Grok 4.3 22InternLM2-Chat-20B 22Command A Reasoning 21

Method changes in the timeline, a jump at these points is no market event:

  1. 1November 1, 2026: Value only with search or usage data, 30-day attention

What is gaining popularity right now, across models, vendors, harnesses and AI subscriptions, is collected in All AI trends.

All specifications

Architecture

Parameters
124 billion
Source: Parameters
Knowledge cutoff
November 2024
Source: Knowledge cutoff

Input and output

Context window
128,000 tokens
Source: Context window
Maximum output
128,000 tokens
Source: Maximum output
Inputs
Text, Image
Source: Inputs
Outputs
Text
Source: Outputs
Tool calling
Yes
Source: Tool calling

Watermarking and provenance

AI watermarking refers to invisible signals embedded in the output. Visible marks and provenance metadata are listed separately. Unknown means there is insufficient evidence for that particular field.

AI watermarking
Unknown
no source
Watermarking technique
Not known
no source

Licence and access

Weights
Open weights
Source: Weights
License
Mistral Research License
Source: License

Frequently asked questions about Pixtral Large (latest)

What is the knowledge cutoff of Pixtral Large (latest)?

November 2024, according to Mistral AI. That is the month of release.

Stated by Mistral AI

How large is the context window of Pixtral Large (latest)?

128,000 tokens. That is how much text Pixtral Large (latest) reads at once, about 190 A4 pages.

Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Context windowTokens the model reads at once · higher is better
GLM-5.1200K
DeepSeek-V3 0324164K
GLM-4.5131K
GPT OSS 120B131K
Pixtral Large (latest)Rank 98 of 103128K
DeepSeek-V3.2128K
DeepSeek-R1128K

Can I run Pixtral Large (latest) locally?

Yes, the weights are open. With 124B parameters it needs a lot of memory, more a server than a laptop.

Stated by Mistral AI

Open weights
yes
License
Mistral Research License
Parameters
124B
active per token
n/a

Sources and data date

Show all 15 sources

Benchmark sources at a glance

Which independent evaluators tested this model. This is coverage, not a quality ranking.

No active result from the reviewed external evaluators can currently be attributed to this model. Other source evidence remains available below.

Without vendor claims and historical or disputed results; those stay labelled in the single values.

TypeEvidence and data date
Input

Documented modalities. Retrieved October 27, 2026.

Output

Documented modalities. Retrieved October 27, 2026.

Research statusResearch date October 15, 2026. 6 source URLs checked. This documents the inspected sources, not an exhaustive inventory of every publication.
Unresolved

current-api-alias

Note

The release proves the historical alias-to-2411 checkpoint mapping; after the publisher deprecated the model, no current alias target is claimed.

Not published

benchmark-configuration

Note

The model card gives benchmark names and metric labels but omits run dates, prompts, sample counts and decoding settings.

Not published

confidence-intervals

Original wording

TurtleAI result tables do not publish model-level confidence intervals.

Additional sourceHugging Face (retrieved October 15, 2026) · Pixtral Large model card · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceTurtleAI paper, Findings of ACL 2026 (retrieved October 17, 2026)
Additional sourceHumanEval-V official benchmark repository, README at commit 05d4b520fe41807e2d1b10355c2be77feb6eb08c (retrieved October 17, 2026)
Additional sourceBenchLeader, Pixtral Large model page and Index methodology (retrieved October 19, 2026)
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 15, 2026)
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 17, 2026)
Additional sourcePixtral Large announcement · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceMistral model overview · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceOpenRouter: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceVercel AI Gateway: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceOllama: cumulative downloads for the popularity index
Additional sourceReplicate: cumulative runs for the popularity index
Additional sourceGoogle Trending Now: limited feed selection for Germany and the US
Additional sourceCreative Commons Attribution 4.0