Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.
shared result series
178
distinct benchmarks
19
latest retrieval
2026-10-15
Change model selection
Specifications
General specifications
Release date, availability, context window, architecture, and published parameter counts at a glance. Undisclosed details remain marked as unavailable.
The table compares official standard API rates per 1M tokens, including published cache pricing. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.
Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie
Pricing by provider
Direct developer pricing and provider endpoint tariffs routed through OpenRouter are listed separately. Prices are in USD per 1M tokens. Context-dependent direct tiers plus regional, Flex, Priority, and other OpenRouter tariffs remain individually identifiable.
No provider tariff for Muse Wonder is available in the stored OpenRouter snapshot. The official direct price is still shown.
Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.
Capability profile from matched benchmarks
Each axis averages directly matched benchmark families. A value of 100 means the stronger value within this pair, not a universal quality score.
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Wonder
Coding: 95.9 / 100 (2 benchmark families)
Reasoning: 96.7 / 100 (1 benchmark family)
Knowledge: 96.6 / 100 (1 benchmark family)
Finance: 96.1 / 100 (1 benchmark family)
General: 95.1 / 100 (1 benchmark family)
22 matched rows from 2 benchmark families were considered. The radar shows 5 of 5 comparable categories.
GPT-6 LunaMuse Wonder
BioMysteryBenchOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
GPT-6 Luna61.481 %
Muse WonderHigher measured value67.037 %
Code MigrationOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
GPT-6 Luna42.554 %
Muse WonderHigher measured value62.552 %
CyberBench v1.1Overall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
GPT-6 Luna76.25 %
Muse WonderHigher measured value80.357 %
EMBOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
GPT-6 LunaHigher measured value68.515 %
Muse Wonder67.084 %
Finance Agent (v2)Overall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
GPT-6 Luna49.873 %
Muse WonderHigher measured value56.637 %
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
GPT-6 Luna2.917 %
Muse WonderHigher measured value17.083 %
IOIOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
GPT-6 Luna55.556 %
Muse WonderHigher measured value66.944 %
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
GPT-6 Luna30.288 %
Muse WonderHigher measured value50.481 %
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-6 Luna1,581.731
Muse WonderWinner1,650.947
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-6 Luna1,442.954
Muse WonderWinner1,512.671
MysteryMechanismOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
GPT-6 Luna19.369 %
Muse WonderHigher measured value27.477 %
ProofBenchOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
GPT-6 Luna64 %
Muse WonderHigher measured value84 %
Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-6 Luna: Snapshot: gpt-6-luna-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDevGPT-6 Luna: Arena rating from 17,869 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 1,228 published pairwise votes.
1,581.731
95% confidence interval: ±6.249The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Winner1,650.947
95% confidence interval: ±18.263The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-6 Luna: Snapshot: gpt-6-luna-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style controlGPT-6 Luna: Arena rating from 43,294 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 1,944 published pairwise votes.
1,442.954
95% confidence interval: ±4.676The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Winner1,512.671
95% confidence interval: ±13.236The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-6 Luna: Snapshot: gpt-6-luna-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDevGPT-6 Luna: Arena rating from 17,869 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 1,228 published pairwise votes.
1,581.731
95% confidence interval: ±6.249The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Winner1,650.947
95% confidence interval: ±18.263The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and financeTest details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-6 Luna: Snapshot: gpt-6-luna-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style controlGPT-6 Luna: Arena rating from 7,459 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 338 published pairwise votes.
1,441.508
95% confidence interval: ±7.801The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Winner1,500.247
95% confidence interval: ±30.856The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-6 Luna: Snapshot: gpt-6-luna-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDevGPT-6 Luna: Arena rating from 2,693 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 158 published pairwise votes.
1,594.39
95% confidence interval: ±13.306The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Winner1,721.908
95% confidence interval: ±51.47The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-6 Luna: Snapshot: gpt-6-luna-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style controlGPT-6 Luna: Arena rating from 9,840 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 487 published pairwise votes.
1,506.827
95% confidence interval: ±6.964The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Winner1,557.956
95% confidence interval: ±26.189The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-6 Luna: Snapshot: gpt-6-luna-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDevGPT-6 Luna: Arena rating from 11,131 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 787 published pairwise votes.
1,576.876
95% confidence interval: ±7.251The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Winner1,637.813
95% confidence interval: ±23.199The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-6 Luna: Snapshot: gpt-6-luna-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style controlGPT-6 Luna: Arena rating from 9,799 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 427 published pairwise votes.
1,409.637
95% confidence interval: ±7.394The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Winner1,485.682
95% confidence interval: ±29.474The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.
The standard price table uses direct developer rates. The provider comparison labels OpenRouter endpoints, regions, and special tariffs separately.
Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.
More matchups
Related LLM comparisons
Compare GPT-6 Luna and Muse Wonder with other leading models using the same data and benchmark logic.
