Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.
shared result series
189
distinct benchmarks
19
latest retrieval
2026-10-15
Change model selection
Specifications
General specifications
Release date, availability, context window, architecture, and published parameter counts at a glance. Undisclosed details remain marked as unavailable.
The table compares official standard API rates per 1M tokens, including published cache pricing. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.
Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie
Pricing by provider
Direct developer pricing and provider endpoint tariffs routed through OpenRouter are listed separately. Prices are in USD per 1M tokens. Context-dependent direct tiers plus regional, Flex, Priority, and other OpenRouter tariffs remain individually identifiable.
No provider tariff for Muse Wonder is available in the stored OpenRouter snapshot. The official direct price is still shown.
Provider pricing for Claude Opus 5 and Muse Wonder
Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.
Capability profile from matched benchmarks
Each axis averages directly matched benchmark families. A value of 100 means the stronger value within this pair, not a universal quality score.
Claude Opus 5
Muse Wonder
Coding: 98.8 / 98.9 (2 benchmark families)
Reasoning: 99.3 / 99.6 (1 benchmark family)
Knowledge: 99.8 / 100 (1 benchmark family)
Finance: 98.9 / 100 (1 benchmark family)
General: 98.4 / 100 (1 benchmark family)
22 matched rows from 2 benchmark families were considered. The radar shows 5 of 5 comparable categories.
Claude Opus 5Muse Wonder
BioMysteryBenchOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Claude Opus 5Higher measured value79.259 %
Muse Wonder67.037 %
Code MigrationOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Claude Opus 557.473 %
Muse WonderHigher measured value62.552 %
CyberBench v1.1Overall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Claude Opus 565.357 %
Muse WonderHigher measured value80.357 %
EMBOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Claude Opus 5Higher measured value73.556 %
Muse Wonder67.084 %
Finance Agent (v2)Overall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Claude Opus 5Higher measured value58.633 %
Muse Wonder56.637 %
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Claude Opus 56.667 %
Muse WonderHigher measured value17.083 %
IOIOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Claude Opus 5Higher measured value84.333 %
Muse Wonder66.944 %
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Claude Opus 5Higher measured value55.288 %
Muse Wonder50.481 %
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Claude Opus 5Higher measured value1,657.837
Muse Wonder1,650.947
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Claude Opus 51,489.847
Muse WonderHigher measured value1,512.671
MysteryMechanismOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Claude Opus 5Higher measured value37.387 %
Muse Wonder27.477 %
ProofBenchOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Claude Opus 5Higher measured value99 %
Muse Wonder84 %
Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie
Benchmark scores for Claude Opus 5 and Muse Wonder
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 5: Snapshot: claude-opus-5-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDevClaude Opus 5: Arena rating from 23,519 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 1,228 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,657.837
95% confidence interval: ±5.533The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,650.947
95% confidence interval: ±18.263The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 5: Snapshot: claude-opus-5-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Text, style control Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style controlClaude Opus 5: Arena rating from 65,663 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 1,944 published pairwise votes.
1,489.847
95% confidence interval: ±3.689The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Higher measured value1,512.671
95% confidence interval: ±13.236The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2.1Metric: weighted index scoreScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 5: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens Muse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 5: Harness: OpenHands Muse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Harness: OpenHands, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 5: Snapshot: claude-opus-5-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDevClaude Opus 5: Arena rating from 17,934 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 1,228 published pairwise votes.
Winner1,689.967
95% confidence interval: ±6.28The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,650.947
95% confidence interval: ±18.263The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 5: Snapshot: claude-opus-5-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style controlClaude Opus 5: Arena rating from 31,907 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 1,944 published pairwise votes.
1,489.524
95% confidence interval: ±4.846The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Winner1,512.671
95% confidence interval: ±13.236The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 5: Snapshot: claude-opus-5-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDevClaude Opus 5: Arena rating from 23,519 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 1,228 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,657.837
95% confidence interval: ±5.533The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,650.947
95% confidence interval: ±18.263The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and financeTest details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 5: Snapshot: claude-opus-5-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Text, style control Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style controlClaude Opus 5: Arena rating from 12,397 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 338 published pairwise votes.
1,485.352
95% confidence interval: ±6.638The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Higher measured value1,500.247
95% confidence interval: ±30.856The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 5: Snapshot: claude-opus-5-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDevClaude Opus 5: Arena rating from 17,934 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 1,228 published pairwise votes.
Winner1,689.967
95% confidence interval: ±6.28The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,650.947
95% confidence interval: ±18.263The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and financeTest details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 5: Snapshot: claude-opus-5-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style controlClaude Opus 5: Arena rating from 5,959 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 338 published pairwise votes.
1,484.122
95% confidence interval: ±8.561The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
No clear lead1,500.247
95% confidence interval: ±30.856The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 5: Snapshot: claude-opus-5-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDevClaude Opus 5: Arena rating from 3,275 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 158 published pairwise votes.
1,652.09
95% confidence interval: ±12.247The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Higher measured value1,721.908
95% confidence interval: ±51.47The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.
The standard price table uses direct developer rates. The provider comparison labels OpenRouter endpoints, regions, and special tariffs separately.
Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.
More matchups
Related LLM comparisons
Compare Claude Opus 5 and Muse Wonder with other leading models using the same data and benchmark logic.
