Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs. Mistral Large 3

Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.

shared result series
10
distinct benchmarks
10
latest retrieval
2026-09-29

Change model selection

Specifications

General specifications

Release date, availability, context window, architecture, and published parameter counts at a glance. Undisclosed details remain marked as unavailable.

Specifications for Claude Fable 5 and Mistral Large 3
AttributeClaude Fable 5Mistral Large 3
ProviderAnthropicMistral AI
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Dec 2, 2025
AvailabilityActiveActive
Model typeProprietaryOpen Weights
ParametersNot published675B, 41B active
ArchitectureNot publishedMixture of Experts
Context window1,000,000 tokens262,144 tokens
Knowledge cutoffJanuary 2026Not published
Technical sourcesModel, Context, Knowledge cutoffModel, Context

Pricing

API pricing compared

The table compares official standard API rates per 1M tokens, including published cache pricing. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.

API pricing for Claude Fable 5 and Mistral Large 3
Price typeClaude Fable 5Mistral Large 3
API input$10$0.5
API output$50$1.5
Cache read$1Not listed
Cache write (5 min.)$12.5Not listed
Cache write (1 hr.)$20Not listed
Price verified09/22/2026 Source09/22/2026 Source
Claude Fable 5Mistral Large 3
API inputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Claude Fable 5$10
Mistral Large 3Lower price$0.5
API outputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Claude Fable 5$50
Mistral Large 3Lower price$1.5

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Pricing by provider

Direct developer pricing and provider endpoint tariffs routed through OpenRouter are listed separately. Prices are in USD per 1M tokens. Context-dependent direct tiers plus regional, Flex, Priority, and other OpenRouter tariffs remain individually identifiable.

Provider pricing for Claude Fable 5 and Mistral Large 3
ModelProviderPurchase route and tariffInput per 1M tokensOutput per 1M tokensSource
Claude Fable 5AnthropicDirect from developerStandard APILowest listed price: $10Lowest listed price: $50Source09/22/2026
Amazon BedrockVia OpenRouteramazon-bedrockLowest listed price: $10Lowest listed price: $50Source10/02/2026
AnthropicVia OpenRouteranthropicLowest listed price: $10Lowest listed price: $50Source10/02/2026
AzureVia OpenRouterazureLowest listed price: $10Lowest listed price: $50Source10/02/2026
Claude Platform on AWSVia OpenRouterclaude-on-awsLowest listed price: $10Lowest listed price: $50Source10/02/2026
GoogleVia OpenRoutergoogle-vertex/europe$11$55Source10/02/2026
GoogleVia OpenRoutergoogle-vertex/globalLowest listed price: $10Lowest listed price: $50Source10/02/2026
Mistral Large 3Mistral AIDirect from developerStandard APILowest listed price: $0.5Lowest listed price: $1.5Source09/22/2026
MistralVia OpenRoutermistral/eu$0.55$1.65Source10/02/2026
MistralVia OpenRoutermistral/zdrLowest listed price: $0.5Lowest listed price: $1.5Source10/02/2026

Performance

Shared benchmarks

Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.

Capability profile from matched benchmarks

Each axis averages directly matched benchmark families. A value of 100 means the stronger value within this pair, not a universal quality score.

255075100CodingReasoningKnowledgeFinanceLegalMultimodalEducation
Claude Fable 5
Mistral Large 3
Coding: 100 / 52.6 (2 benchmark families)
Reasoning: 100 / 73.4 (1 benchmark family)
Knowledge: 100 / 87.2 (1 benchmark family)
Finance: 100 / 85.2 (3 benchmark families)
Legal: 100 / 89.4 (1 benchmark family)
Multimodal: 100 / 74.1 (1 benchmark family)
Education: 100 / 47.4 (1 benchmark family)

10 matched rows from 10 benchmark families were considered. The radar shows 7 of 7 comparable categories.

Claude Fable 5Mistral Large 3
CorpFin v2Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Fable 5Winner71.834 %
Mistral Large 361.033 %
GPQA DiamondOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Fable 5Winner93.182 %
Mistral Large 368.434 %
LegalBenchOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Fable 5Winner88.561 %
Mistral Large 379.138 %
LiveCodeBench v6Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Fable 5Winner89.778 %
Mistral Large 355.337 %
MMLU-ProOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Fable 5Winner91.502 %
Mistral Large 379.823 %
MMMU-ProOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Fable 5Winner89.306 %
Mistral Large 366.185 %
MortgageTaxOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Fable 5Winner68.919 %
Mistral Large 352.106 %
SAGEOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Fable 5Winner51.89 %
Mistral Large 324.595 %
SWE-bench VerifiedOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Fable 5Winner95 %
Mistral Large 341.4 %
TaxEval v2Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Fable 5Winner76.942 %
Mistral Large 373.058 %

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Benchmark scores for Claude Fable 5 and Mistral Large 3
Benchmark and taskClaude Fable 5Mistral Large 3Source
CorpFin v2Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner71.834 %
61.033 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/12/2026
GPQA DiamondOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner93.182 %
68.434 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
LegalBenchOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner88.561 %
79.138 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
LiveCodeBench v6Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner89.778 %
55.337 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
MMLU-ProOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner91.502 %
79.823 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
MMMU-ProOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner89.306 %
66.185 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
MortgageTaxOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner68.919 %
52.106 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
SAGEOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner51.89 %
24.595 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/26/2026
SWE-bench VerifiedOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner95 %
41.4 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
TaxEval v2Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner76.942 %
73.058 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Our model tests

Our tests

Compare how the models respond to the same prompt. Each test shows the first attempt, with no subsequent fixes to the generated code. These results do not contribute to an overall score.

Pelican on a bicycle

A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Claude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Reasoning (requested): high

First attempt
Run date
7 Sept 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-fable-5
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-fable-5
Reasoning setting
high
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-5-fable-20260609
Temperature
Provider default
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating
Response time
53.1 s

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Mistral Large 3

API access was unavailable for this run. The model was not evaluated.

Reasoning (model default): no reasoning mode Source

First attempt
Run date
7 Sept 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
mistralai/mistral-large-2512
Reasoning setting
not specified
Pinned endpoint
Mistral | mistralai/mistral-large-2512
Temperature
Provider default
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Not run

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Prompt and test conditions

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens

Task origin (Simon Willison)

How to read this comparison

Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict

Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.

The standard price table uses direct developer rates. The provider comparison labels OpenRouter endpoints, regions, and special tariffs separately.

Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.

More matchups

Compare Claude Fable 5 and Mistral Large 3 with other leading models using the same data and benchmark logic.

View the complete LLM comparison