Skip to main content

Nex-AGILanguage modelOpen weights

Nex-N2.5-Pro

Nex-N2.5-Pro has no overall index value yet because there are too few independent benchmark results.

PopularityRank 670 of 875

0out of 100same as last month

Summary

Nex-N2.5-Pro extends the visual computer and browser capabilities of the Nex-N2 series. The model can inspect intermediate results through visual feedback. In Nex-AGI’s own OSWorld-2 evaluation, Pro scores 56.4%, compared with 30.5% for Mini.

Nex-AGI offers this larger multimodal checkpoint through OpenRouter and as local weights under Apache 2.0.

See for yourself: one prompt, one attempt

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Nex-N2.5-Pro

Nex-N2.5-Pro: SVG short test

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0002

Test details
Test run
Oct 14, 2026
Provider
nex-agi/fp8
API model
nex-agi/nex-n2.5-pro
Output
964 tokens
Reasoning
API reports 0 reasoning tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0002
Test round
43b8c5c46830
Earlier tests

The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Oct 5, 2026 · 182 s · $0.0020

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Test details
Run date
Oct 5, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
nex-agi/nex-n2.5-pro
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
8,192 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0020
Response time
182.3 s
API model reported in response
nex-agi/nex-n2.5-pro
Pinned endpoint
Nex AGI | nex-agi/nex-n2.5-pro-20260907
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed
Task origin: Simon Willison

All benchmark results

Every published result with its source, test setup and comparison models.

Show all 44 published benchmark results

Page 1 of 4

Measurements without matching peer values

These measurements have no matching peer values under the same test conditions. Their original values and sources remain available here.

TerminalBench 2.1 (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
82.7
Score
82.7
Metric
TerminalBench 2.1 reported score
Unit
No unit provided
Category
source-specific
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Provider model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-04
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Vendor table. Sampling temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40; coding uses NexAU, computer-use tasks use NexCUA, and WebTest is oracle-mode defect detection.
Context
Source-specific observation; it is not a shared comparison cohort. The source table does not state a unit or scale for this numeric score.
Source Provider model card
SWE-Pro (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
61.2
Score
61.2
Metric
SWE-Pro reported score
Unit
No unit provided
Category
source-specific
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Provider model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-04
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Vendor table. Sampling temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40; coding uses NexAU, computer-use tasks use NexCUA, and WebTest is oracle-mode defect detection.
Context
Source-specific observation; it is not a shared comparison cohort. The source table does not state a unit or scale for this numeric score.
Source Provider model card
DeepSWE (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
55.8
Score
55.8
Metric
DeepSWE reported score
Unit
No unit provided
Category
source-specific
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Provider model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-04
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Vendor table. Sampling temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40; coding uses NexAU, computer-use tasks use NexCUA, and WebTest is oracle-mode defect detection.
Context
Source-specific observation; it is not a shared comparison cohort. The source table does not state a unit or scale for this numeric score.
Source Provider model card
Automation (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
44.2
Score
44.2
Metric
Automation reported score
Unit
No unit provided
Category
source-specific
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Provider model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-04
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Vendor table. Sampling temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40; coding uses NexAU, computer-use tasks use NexCUA, and WebTest is oracle-mode defect detection.
Context
Source-specific observation; it is not a shared comparison cohort. The source table does not state a unit or scale for this numeric score.
Source Provider model card
Toolathlon (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
68.5
Score
68.5
Metric
Toolathlon reported score
Unit
No unit provided
Category
source-specific
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Provider model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-04
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Vendor table. Sampling temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40; coding uses NexAU, computer-use tasks use NexCUA, and WebTest is oracle-mode defect detection.
Context
Source-specific observation; it is not a shared comparison cohort. The source table does not state a unit or scale for this numeric score.
Source Provider model card
GDPval (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1628
Score
1628
Metric
GDPval reported score
Unit
No unit provided
Category
source-specific
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Provider model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-04
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Vendor table. Sampling temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40; coding uses NexAU, computer-use tasks use NexCUA, and WebTest is oracle-mode defect detection.
Context
Source-specific observation; it is not a shared comparison cohort. The source table does not state a unit or scale for this numeric score.
Source Provider model card
JobBench (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
41.4
Score
41.4
Metric
JobBench reported score
Unit
No unit provided
Category
source-specific
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Provider model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-04
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Vendor table. Sampling temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40; coding uses NexAU, computer-use tasks use NexCUA, and WebTest is oracle-mode defect detection.
Context
Source-specific observation; it is not a shared comparison cohort. The source table does not state a unit or scale for this numeric score.
Source Provider model card
BrowseComp (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
89.7
Score
89.7
Metric
BrowseComp reported score
Unit
No unit provided
Category
source-specific
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Provider model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-04
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Vendor table. Sampling temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40; coding uses NexAU, computer-use tasks use NexCUA, and WebTest is oracle-mode defect detection.
Context
Source-specific observation; it is not a shared comparison cohort. The source table does not state a unit or scale for this numeric score.
Source Provider model card
OSWorld Verified (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
82.2
Score
82.2
Metric
OSWorld Verified reported score
Unit
No unit provided
Category
source-specific
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Provider model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-04
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Vendor table. Sampling temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40; coding uses NexAU, computer-use tasks use NexCUA, and WebTest is oracle-mode defect detection.
Context
Source-specific observation; it is not a shared comparison cohort. The source table does not state a unit or scale for this numeric score.
Source Provider model card
OSWorld 2 (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
56.4
Score
56.4
Metric
OSWorld 2 reported score
Unit
No unit provided
Category
source-specific
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Provider model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-04
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Vendor table. Sampling temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40; coding uses NexAU, computer-use tasks use NexCUA, and WebTest is oracle-mode defect detection.
Context
Source-specific observation; it is not a shared comparison cohort. The source table does not state a unit or scale for this numeric score.
Source Provider model card
WebTest (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
52.8
Score
52.8
Metric
WebTest reported score
Unit
No unit provided
Category
source-specific
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Provider model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-04
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Vendor table. Sampling temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40; coding uses NexAU, computer-use tasks use NexCUA, and WebTest is oracle-mode defect detection.
Context
Source-specific observation; it is not a shared comparison cohort. The source table does not state a unit or scale for this numeric score.
Source Provider model card
WebArena (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
67.6
Score
67.6
Metric
WebArena reported score
Unit
No unit provided
Category
source-specific
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Provider model card
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-04
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Vendor table. Sampling temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40; coding uses NexAU, computer-use tasks use NexCUA, and WebTest is oracle-mode defect detection.
Context
Source-specific observation; it is not a shared comparison cohort. The source table does not state a unit or scale for this numeric score.
Source Provider model card

Page 1 of 4

Popularity compared

How often the model is searched for, used and mentioned, compared with every model of its category.

Popularity index

The 100 most popular models of this category, 0 to 100, higher is more popular

20 of 101 models

Gemini 4 Argon92
GPT-6 Astra78
Claude Haiku 5.577
Qwen3.5 4B76
GPT-573
GPT-6 Sol72
Qwen3.5 0.8B72
Qwen3.5 2B71
Qwen 3.8 27B70
Claude Opus 5.570
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 101768
Qwen 3.8 Max 090268
Kimi K368
DeepSeek-V4-Flash65
GPT-5.6 Terra64
Claude Sonnet 563
DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT63
Claude Opus 562
Qwen 3.8 Flash62
Nex-N2.5-Pro0

As of November 2026 · Source: gradually.ai popularity index

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026

Nex-N2.5-ProAgnes 3.0 FlashAion 3.5Aion 3.5 MiniEmber-1

All specifications

Input and output

Input
Text and visual inputs
Source: Input

Watermarking and provenance

AI watermarking refers to invisible signals embedded in the output. Visible marks and provenance metadata are listed separately. Unknown means there is insufficient evidence for that particular field.

AI watermarking
Unknown
no source
Watermarking technique
Not known
no source

Licence and access

Access
Open weights and OpenRouter
Source: Access
License
Apache 2.0
Source: License

API

Model ID
nex-agi/Nex-N2.5-Pro
Source: Model ID

Frequently asked questions about Nex-N2.5-Pro

Can I run Nex-N2.5-Pro locally?

Yes, the weights are open.

Stated by Nex-AGI

Open weights
yes
License
Apache 2.0
Parameters
n/a
active per token
n/a

Sources and data date

Show all 10 sources

Benchmark sources at a glance

Which independent evaluators tested this model. This is coverage, not a quality ranking.

No active result from the reviewed external evaluators can currently be attributed to this model. Other source evidence remains available below.

Without vendor claims and historical or disputed results; those stay labelled in the single values.

TypeEvidence and data date
Research statusResearch date October 4, 2026. 2 source URLs checked. This documents the inspected sources, not an exhaustive inventory of every publication.
Not published

GameBench 2 Balanced group

Note

The source reports: No published result.

Additional sourceNex-N2.5-Pro model card (retrieved October 3, 2026; October 4, 2026) · Nex-N2.5-Pro model card · Editorial description reviewed October 4, 2026
Additional sourceNex-N2.5-mini model card (retrieved October 3, 2026) · Nex-N2.5-mini model card · Editorial description reviewed October 4, 2026
Additional sourceNex-N2.5-Max model card (retrieved October 3, 2026) · Nex-N2.5-Max model card · Editorial description reviewed October 4, 2026
Additional sourceDuelLab GameBench 2 model results (retrieved October 28, 2026; November 2, 2026; November 5, 2026)
Additional sourceOpenRouter: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceVercel AI Gateway: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceOllama: cumulative downloads for the popularity index
Additional sourceReplicate: cumulative runs for the popularity index
Additional sourceGoogle Trending Now: limited feed selection for Germany and the US
Additional sourceCreative Commons Attribution 4.0