Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

Grok 4.3 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5

Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.

shared result series
48
distinct benchmarks
21
latest retrieval
2026-09-29

Change model selection

Specifications

General specifications

Release date, availability, context window, architecture, and published parameter counts at a glance. Undisclosed details remain marked as unavailable.

Specifications for Grok 4.3 and Mistral Medium 3.5
AttributeGrok 4.3Mistral Medium 3.5
ProviderxAIMistral AI
ReleasedMay 6, 2026Apr 28, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Model typeProprietaryOpen Weights
ParametersNot published128B
ArchitectureNot publishedDense
Context window1,000,000 tokens262,144 tokens
Knowledge cutoffNot publishedNot published
Technical sourcesModelModel, Context

Pricing

API pricing compared

The table compares official standard API rates per 1M tokens, including published cache pricing. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.

API pricing for Grok 4.3 and Mistral Medium 3.5
Price typeGrok 4.3Mistral Medium 3.5
API input$1.25 ≤200K / $2.5 >200K$1.5
API output$2.5 ≤200K / $5 >200K$7.5
Cache read$0.2 ≤200K / $0.4 >200KNot listed
Cache write (5 min.)Not listedNot listed
Cache write (1 hr.)Not listedNot listed
Price verified09/22/2026 Source09/22/2026 Source
Grok 4.3Mistral Medium 3.5
API inputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Grok 4.3Lower price$1.25
Mistral Medium 3.5$1.5
API outputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Grok 4.3Lower price$2.5
Mistral Medium 3.5$7.5

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Pricing by provider

Direct developer pricing and provider endpoint tariffs routed through OpenRouter are listed separately. Prices are in USD per 1M tokens. Context-dependent direct tiers plus regional, Flex, Priority, and other OpenRouter tariffs remain individually identifiable.

Provider pricing for Grok 4.3 and Mistral Medium 3.5
ModelProviderPurchase route and tariffInput per 1M tokensOutput per 1M tokensSource
Grok 4.3xAIDirect from developerUp to 200,000 context tokensLowest listed price: $1.25Lowest listed price: $2.5Source09/22/2026
xAIDirect from developerAbove 200,000 context tokens$2.5$5Source09/22/2026
xAIVia OpenRouterxaiLowest listed price: $1.25Lowest listed price: $2.5Source10/02/2026
xAIVia OpenRouterxai/priority$2.5$5Source10/02/2026
xAIVia OpenRouterxai/zdrLowest listed price: $1.25Lowest listed price: $2.5Source10/02/2026
xAIVia OpenRouterxai/zdr/priority$2.5$5Source10/02/2026
Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AIDirect from developerStandard APILowest listed price: $1.5Lowest listed price: $7.5Source09/22/2026
MistralVia OpenRoutermistralLowest listed price: $1.5Lowest listed price: $7.5Source10/02/2026
MistralVia OpenRoutermistral/eu$1.65$8.25Source10/02/2026
MistralVia OpenRoutermistral/zdrLowest listed price: $1.5Lowest listed price: $7.5Source10/02/2026

Performance

Shared benchmarks

Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.

Capability profile from matched benchmarks

Each axis averages directly matched benchmark families. A value of 100 means the stronger value within this pair, not a universal quality score.

255075100CodingReasoningMathematicsKnowledgeFinanceLegalAgentic tasksHealth
Grok 4.3
Mistral Medium 3.5
Coding: 100 / 70.7 (4 benchmark families)
Reasoning: 100 / 68.6 (2 benchmark families)
Mathematics: 99.4 / 100 (1 benchmark family)
Knowledge: 100 / 93.4 (2 benchmark families)
Finance: 100 / 80.9 (7 benchmark families)
Legal: 100 / 86.4 (3 benchmark families)
Agentic tasks: 100 / 81.3 (1 benchmark family)
Health: 100 / 92.5 (3 benchmark families)

48 matched rows from 20 benchmark families were considered. The radar shows 8 of 11 comparable categories.

Grok 4.3Mistral Medium 3.5
Code MigrationOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.3Winner6.795 %
Mistral Medium 3.55.127 %
CorpFin v2Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.3Winner68.532 %
Mistral Medium 3.558.78 %
EMBOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.3Winner18.394 %
Mistral Medium 3.511.185 %
Finance Agent (v2)Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.3Winner37.728 %
Mistral Medium 3.532.103 %
GPQA DiamondOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.3Winner91.414 %
Mistral Medium 3.534.848 %
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.3Tie0.417 %
Mistral Medium 3.5Tie0.417 %
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.3Winner15.385 %
Mistral Medium 3.59.135 %
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.3Winner1,441.593
Mistral Medium 3.51,426.128
MedCodeOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.3Winner38.068 %
Mistral Medium 3.533.752 %
MedScribeOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.3Winner74.399 %
Mistral Medium 3.567.728 %
MMLU-ProOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.3Winner85.838 %
Mistral Medium 3.575.335 %
MortgageTaxOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.3Winner48.252 %
Mistral Medium 3.528.895 %

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Benchmark scores for Grok 4.3 and Mistral Medium 3.5
Benchmark and taskGrok 4.3Mistral Medium 3.5Source
Code MigrationOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner6.795 %
5.127 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
CorpFin v2Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner68.532 %
58.78 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/12/2026
EMBOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner18.394 %
11.185 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner37.728 %
32.103 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
GPQA DiamondOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner91.414 %
34.848 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: task resolution rateScoring: Higher is better
Tie0.417 %
Tie0.417 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: all-pass rateScoring: Higher is better
Winner15.385 %
9.135 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 71,054 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 11,693 anonymous pairwise votes.
Winner1,441.593
95% confidence interval: ±3.641The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,426.128
95% confidence interval: ±6.42The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
MedCodeOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner38.068 %
33.752 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/26/2026
MedScribeOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner74.399 %
67.728 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/26/2026
MMLU-ProOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner85.838 %
75.335 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
MortgageTaxOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner48.252 %
28.895 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
SAGEOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
19.736 %
Winner37.613 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/26/2026
SWE-bench VerifiedOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner71.4 %
66.4 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner34.416 %
27.291 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
TaxEval v2Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner70.81 %
67.988 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
Terminal-Bench 2.0Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2.0Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner43.446 %
30.337 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 06/04/2026
Terminal-Bench 2.1Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner41.948 %
38.951 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
Vals IndexOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: weighted index scoreScoring: Higher is better
Winner24.294 %
17.947 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
Vals Multimodal IndexOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.2Metric: weighted index scoreScoring: Higher is better
Winner43.293 %
34.768 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/11/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Harness: OpenHands
Winner19.403 %
2.888 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 14,291 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 2,256 anonymous pairwise votes.
No clear lead1,439.761
95% confidence interval: ±6.298The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,430.173
95% confidence interval: ±12.827The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 4,531 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 621 anonymous pairwise votes.
No clear lead1,477.707
95% confidence interval: ±9.633The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,446.524
95% confidence interval: ±23.931The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 19,949 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 3,282 anonymous pairwise votes.
No clear lead1,488.001
95% confidence interval: ±5.656The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,477.898
95% confidence interval: ±10.854The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 12,909 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 1,999 anonymous pairwise votes.
Winner1,422.565
95% confidence interval: ±6.566The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,397.828
95% confidence interval: ±13.94The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEnglish
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 32,389 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 5,562 anonymous pairwise votes.
No clear lead1,451.053
95% confidence interval: ±4.742The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,442.84
95% confidence interval: ±8.53The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEntertainment, sports and media
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 16,950 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 2,618 anonymous pairwise votes.
Winner1,415.952
95% confidence interval: ±5.995The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,394.24
95% confidence interval: ±12.151The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlExcluding ties
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 54,500 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 8,856 anonymous pairwise votes.
Winner1,440.278
95% confidence interval: ±4.803The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,419.562
95% confidence interval: ±8.482The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlExpert prompts
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 7,511 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 1,205 anonymous pairwise votes.
No clear lead1,452.353
95% confidence interval: ±7.918The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,433.7
95% confidence interval: ±17.235The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlFrench
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 2,579 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 453 anonymous pairwise votes.
No clear lead1,462.083
95% confidence interval: ±13.943The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,435.855
95% confidence interval: ±29.943The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlGerman
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 1,041 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 173 anonymous pairwise votes.
1,439.453
95% confidence interval: ±19.291The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
No clear lead1,447.96
95% confidence interval: ±43.885The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlHard prompts
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 47,683 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 7,627 anonymous pairwise votes.
No clear lead1,456.21
95% confidence interval: ±4.348The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,444.677
95% confidence interval: ±7.686The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlHard prompts, English
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 22,338 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 3,821 anonymous pairwise votes.
No clear lead1,462.76
95% confidence interval: ±5.485The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,455.806
95% confidence interval: ±10.148The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlInstruction following
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 25,157 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 3,827 anonymous pairwise votes.
1,414.928
95% confidence interval: ±5.274The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
No clear lead1,420.763
95% confidence interval: ±10.011The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlKorean
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 1,126 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 188 anonymous pairwise votes.
No clear lead1,406.339
95% confidence interval: ±19.258The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,392.677
95% confidence interval: ±43.291The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlLegal and government
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 5,787 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 893 anonymous pairwise votes.
No clear lead1,438.605
95% confidence interval: ±8.8The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,437.755
95% confidence interval: ±20.721The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlLife, physical and social science
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 11,811 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 1,939 anonymous pairwise votes.
Winner1,457.152
95% confidence interval: ±6.629The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,435.825
95% confidence interval: ±13.971The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlLonger queries
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 33,192 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 5,065 anonymous pairwise votes.
Winner1,443.332
95% confidence interval: ±5.001The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,428.117
95% confidence interval: ±9.119The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlMath
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 3,404 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 565 anonymous pairwise votes.
1,419.092
95% confidence interval: ±10.768The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
No clear lead1,428.606
95% confidence interval: ±24.143The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlMathematical professions
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 3,921 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 653 anonymous pairwise votes.
1,431.793
95% confidence interval: ±10.225The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
No clear lead1,438.481
95% confidence interval: ±22.896The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlMedicine and healthcare
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 5,339 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 844 anonymous pairwise votes.
No clear lead1,450.98
95% confidence interval: ±9.194The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,421.161
95% confidence interval: ±21.257The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlMulti-turn
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 12,874 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 1,925 anonymous pairwise votes.
No clear lead1,447.044
95% confidence interval: ±6.532The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,432.256
95% confidence interval: ±14.007The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlNon-English
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 38,664 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 6,131 anonymous pairwise votes.
Winner1,428.048
95% confidence interval: ±4.521The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,406.139
95% confidence interval: ±8.159The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlPolish
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 1,205 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 235 anonymous pairwise votes.
No clear lead1,444.892
95% confidence interval: ±17.617The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,415.979
95% confidence interval: ±38.135The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlRussian
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 7,515 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 1,242 anonymous pairwise votes.
Winner1,440.06
95% confidence interval: ±7.682The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,410.34
95% confidence interval: ±17.157The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlSoftware and IT services
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 28,553 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 4,587 anonymous pairwise votes.
No clear lead1,479.419
95% confidence interval: ±5.003The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,468.806
95% confidence interval: ±9.304The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlSpanish
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 2,048 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 393 anonymous pairwise votes.
Winner1,441.644
95% confidence interval: ±14.576The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,392.394
95% confidence interval: ±31.573The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlWriting, literature and language
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGrok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
Mistral Medium 3.5: Snapshot: mistral-medium-3.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 18,396 anonymous pairwise votes.Mistral Medium 3.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 2,919 anonymous pairwise votes.
Winner1,423.851
95% confidence interval: ±5.775The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,403.766
95% confidence interval: ±11.409The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Our model tests

Our tests

Compare how the models respond to the same prompt. Each test shows the first attempt, with no subsequent fixes to the generated code. These results do not contribute to an overall score.

Pelican on a bicycle

A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Grok 4.3

Grok 4.3: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Reasoning (requested): high

First attempt
Run date
7 Sept 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
x-ai/grok-4.3
API model reported in response
x-ai/grok-4.3
Reasoning setting
high
Pinned endpoint
xAI | x-ai/grok-4.3-20260430
Temperature
Provider default
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating
Response time
149 s

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Mistral Medium 3.5

API access was unavailable for this run. The model was not evaluated.

Reasoning (requested): high

First attempt
Run date
7 Sept 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
mistralai/mistral-medium-3-5
Reasoning setting
high
Pinned endpoint
Mistral | mistralai/mistral-medium-3.5-20260430
Temperature
Provider default
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Not run

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Prompt and test conditions

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens

Task origin (Simon Willison)

How to read this comparison

Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict

Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.

The standard price table uses direct developer rates. The provider comparison labels OpenRouter endpoints, regions, and special tariffs separately.

Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.

More matchups

Compare Grok 4.3 and Mistral Medium 3.5 with other leading models using the same data and benchmark logic.

View the complete LLM comparison