Skip to main content

Luma AIVideo model

Ray 3.2

Clip lengthRank 33 of 63

10slongest single cliphigher is better

PopularityRank 670 of 875

0out of 100first value

Summary

Ray 3.2 is a video model from Luma AI. Ray 3.2 supports text-to-video and image-to-video; the API also documents video editing, reframing, and extension.

What Ray 3.2 can do

“n/a” means the provider does not state it or we have not sourced it yet. That is not a “no”.

Text to videoyesSource
Image to videoyesSource
Referencesn/a
Audion/a
Runs locallynoSource
ExtendyesSource
Start and end framen/a
Max. resolution1080pSource

Video sample from our test

This video exists as a documented run for the exact model version. Playback is muted.

Motion and physical consistency

This sample tests Anatomy, object consistency, camera tracking, rain, and reflections.

Open video at original sizeOpen source
Prompt and settings

Generate exactly one continuous five-second 16:9 cinematic video. A fictional bicycle courier in a mustard-yellow raincoat rides a red city bicycle from left to right across a rain-wet Hamburg street at blue hour for the entire clip. The camera tracks her smoothly at waist height. Both hands remain visible on the handlebars, the bicycle geometry stays physically correct, and a transparent umbrella fixed to the bicycle moves naturally in the wind. Wet-street reflections and raindrops follow realistic physics. No cuts, no slow motion, no text, no logos, no subtitles, and no audio.

Generated through fal.ai with model luma/agent/ray/v3.2/text-to-video. Archived settings were 16:9, one request, first output, prompt motion-and-physics, requested 5 s, provider-default audio (no switch), seed provider random, request {"prompt":"Generate exactly one continuous five-second 16:9 cinematic video. A fictional bicycle courier in a mustard-yellow raincoat rides a red city bicycle from left to right across a rain-wet Hamburg street at blue hour for the entire clip. The camera tracks her smoothly at waist height. Both hands remain visible on the handlebars, the bicycle geometry stays physically correct, and a transparent umbrella fixed to the bicycle moves naturally in the wind. Wet-street reflections and raindrops follow realistic physics. No cuts, no slow motion, no text, no logos, no subtitles, and no audio.","duration":"5s","resolution":"720p","aspect_ratio":"16:9"}, configured price estimate $1.00, enforced estimate $1.00.

Popularity compared

How often the model is searched for, used and mentioned, compared with every model of its category.

Popularity index

0 to 100, higher is more popular

20 of 98 models

LTX-2.570
MiniMax H366
Muse Video62
Sora 259
Wan 2.1 T2V 14B54
Wan 2.1 T2V 1.3B54
Runway Gen-4.553
Hy-Nomas53
Wan 2.1 I2V 14B53
Veo 3.150
Wan 2.2 TI2V 5B46
FLUX.3 Video45
LTX-2 19B45
Open-Sora 2.044
Wan 2.2 I2V A14B43
Gemini Omni Flash43
SkyReels V2 T2V 14B42
Grok Imagine Video42
Mochi 1 Preview39
Ray 3.20

As of November 2026 · Source: gradually.ai popularity index

Over time

First value from November 5, 2026. The timeline appears from the second week.

Ray 3.2 compared

Compare with another model

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Gemini Omni Flash vs. Ray 3.2
  2. 2FLUX.3 Video vs. Ray 3.2
  3. 3Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Ray 3.2
  4. 4Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Ray 3.2
  5. 5MiniMax H3 vs. Ray 3.2
  6. 6Sora 2 Pro vs. Ray 3.2
  7. 7Sora 2 vs. Ray 3.2
  8. 8Veo 3.1 vs. Ray 3.2
  9. 9Veo 3.1 Fast vs. Ray 3.2
Show all 47 comparisons
  1. 10Grok Imagine Video 1.5 vs. Ray 3.2
  2. 11Grok Imagine Video vs. Ray 3.2
  3. 12Wan 2.7 vs. Ray 3.2
  4. 13Wan 2.6 vs. Ray 3.2
  5. 14Runway Gen-4.5 vs. Ray 3.2
  6. 15Kling 3.0 Pro vs. Ray 3.2
  7. 16Kling 2.6 Pro vs. Ray 3.2
  8. 17Vidu Q3 Pro vs. Ray 3.2
  9. 18PixVerse V5.6 vs. Ray 3.2
  10. 19Hailuo 2.3 vs. Ray 3.2
  11. 20LTX-2 19B vs. Ray 3.2
  12. 21Wan 2.2 A14B vs. Ray 3.2
  13. 22HunyuanVideo 1.5 vs. Ray 3.2
  14. 23Pika 2.2 vs. Ray 3.2
  15. 24Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs. Ray 3.2
  16. 25Wan 3.0 vs. Ray 3.2
  17. 26Wan 3.0 Prime vs. Ray 3.2
  18. 27HappyHorse 1.0 vs. Ray 3.2
  19. 28HappyHorse 1.1 vs. Ray 3.2
  20. 29PixVerse V6 vs. Ray 3.2
  21. 30PixVerse C1 vs. Ray 3.2
  22. 31Seedance 2.0 Fast vs. Ray 3.2
  23. 32Seedance 2.0 Mini vs. Ray 3.2
  24. 33Vidu Q3 Turbo vs. Ray 3.2
  25. 34Vidu Q2 vs. Ray 3.2
  26. 35Vidu Q1 vs. Ray 3.2
  27. 36Kling 4.0 vs. Ray 3.2
  28. 37Kling 3.0 Standard API vs. Ray 3.2
  29. 38Kling Video O1 vs. Ray 3.2
  30. 39Hailuo 2.3 Fast vs. Ray 3.2
  31. 40Wan 2.5 Preview vs. Ray 3.2
  32. 41Wan 2.6 I2V Flash vs. Ray 3.2
  33. 42Wan 2.2 TI2V 5B vs. Ray 3.2
  34. 43Wan 2.2 I2V A14B vs. Ray 3.2
  35. 44HunyuanVideo 1.0 T2V vs. Ray 3.2
  36. 45HunyuanVideo I2V 1.0 vs. Ray 3.2
  37. 46Ray 3.2 vs. Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite
  38. 47Ray 3.2 vs. LTX-2.5

All specifications

Input and output

Maximum resolution
1080p
Source: Maximum resolution
Maximum duration
10 s
Source: Maximum duration

Watermarking and provenance

AI watermarking refers to invisible signals embedded in the output. Visible marks and provenance metadata are listed separately. Unknown means there is insufficient evidence for that particular field.

AI watermarking
Unknown
no source
Watermarking technique
Not known
no source

Licence and access

Weights
Proprietary
Source: Weights
Access
API, Web
Source: Access
Release
Ray 3.2 and API access were announced on June 9, 2026.
Source: Release

API

API model ID
ray-3.2
Source: API model ID

Further details

Input modes
Text-to-video and image-to-video; the API also documents video editing, reframing, and extension.
Source: Input modes
Generation limits
For documented generation modes: 540p, 720p, or 1080p and 5 or 10 seconds. The launch announcement mentions up to 20 seconds, but the current model guide does not state this as a general T2V limit.
Source: Generation limits
Audio output
Native audio output is not clearly documented in the current model materials reviewed.
Source: Audio output

Prices

Choose a price view
fal.ai (luma/agent/ray/v3.2/text-to-video)
$1 per request (estimated)Source

No Luma AI subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €21.20 a month (Recraft Pro, with limited credits). 7 plans in Germany.

Filter plans
PlanMonthly priceNote
Recraft Pro≈ €21.20with limited credit
Recraft Teams≈ €23.33with limited credit, for teams, per seat
Luma Plus≈ €31.81with limited credit
Luma Pro≈ €95.42with limited credit
Luma Ultra≈ €318.07with limited credit
Luma Enterprisen/afor enterprises
Luma Teamn/afor teams

All plans in the AI subscription comparison

Frequently asked questions about Ray 3.2

How long can a video with Ray 3.2 be?

Up to 10 seconds in one go. Resolution: 1080p.

According to Luma AI

Longest clip
10s
Resolution
1080p
Open weights
no

Where can I use Ray 3.2?

Not in a Luma AI subscription. Including other providers that makes 7 plans in Germany.

Subscription comparison, prices in Germany incl. VAT

At Luma AI

No Luma AI subscription includes this model.

Through other providers

7 plans from 2 providers, from ≈ €21.20 a month (Recraft Pro), with limited credits.

Sources and data date

Show all 9 sources
TypeEvidence and data date
Additional sourceLuma AI (retrieved November 1, 2026) · Luma AI · Editorial description reviewed November 1, 2026
Additional sourceLuma AI (retrieved November 1, 2026)
Additional sourcefal.ai
Additional sourceOpenRouter: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceVercel AI Gateway: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceOllama: cumulative downloads for the popularity index
Additional sourceReplicate: cumulative runs for the popularity index
Additional sourceGoogle Trending Now: limited feed selection for Germany and the US
Additional sourceCreative Commons Attribution 4.0