- Home
- LLM comparison
- Muse Wonder vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Muse Wondervs.DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Which one is better?
Muse Wonder is clearly ahead in the overall index, but costs 26.7 times (input) and 33.3 times (output) as much per token.
Muse Wonder
Rank 10 to 12
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Rank 14 to 22
Muse Wonder
fast
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
fast
Muse Wonder
expensive
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
cheap
Muse Wonder
- Subscription
No Meta subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €106.01 a month (Command Code Max 10×, with limited credits). 4 plans in Germany.
- Via API
$4 input, $20 output per 1M tokens.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- Subscription
No DeepSeek subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €6.36 a month (Token Plan Individual Lite, with limited credits). 7 plans in Germany.
- Via API
$0.15 input, $0.60 output per 1M tokens according to the provider; the price index has listed it at $0.30 and $1 since Oct 26, 2026.
Overall index with data through Oct 29, 2026 · Prices from Oct 29, 2026 · Speed: measured by Artificial Analysis · Subscriptions as of Oct 24, 2026 · Subscription prices incl. VAT
Where is the difference?
Values from 0 to 100 per task area. We only name a winner when the gap is large enough and there are enough tests.
Muse Wonder ahead: 5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ahead: 0level: 1too little data: 3of 9 areas
Show 2 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.
Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.
Muse Wonder
Not tested yet
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Not tested yet
Prompt and test conditions
Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle
Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens
Task origin (Simon Willison)All data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | Muse Wonder | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall index0 to 100, higher is better | 82 | 64 |
| Rank | Rank 10 to 12 of 95 | Rank 14 to 22 of 95 |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | $4 | $0.15 |
| Outputwhat the model writes | $20 | $0.60 |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | 197 | 178 |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 1.05 M tokens≈ 1,570 A4 pages | 1.05 M tokens≈ 1,570 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | n/a | n/a |
| Released | Oct 12, 2026 | Oct 17, 2026 |
| Availability | Preview | Open Source |
| Open weights | no | yes |
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: At peak times (Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 01:00-04:00 UTC; Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 06:00-10:00 UTC) the price is $0.30 input and $1.20 output per 1M tokens. The table shows the off-peak price.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, Time-based API pricing: Off peak: $0.15 input, $0.60 output, and $0.003 cached input. Weekdays UTC 01:00-04:00 and 06:00-10:00: $0.30, $1.20, and $0.006. Chinese public holidays are excluded. Source
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Shared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
A: Muse WonderB: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Show 54 more benchmarks
Compare another matchup
More matchups
Related LLM comparisons
Compare Muse Wonder and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 with other leading models.