- Home
- LLM comparison
- Muse Wonder vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
Muse Wondervs.Kimi K3.1 Pro
Which one is better?
Level in the overall index: the gap is too small for a clear winner. Kimi K3.1 Pro is cheaper: Muse Wonder costs twice as much per token.
Muse Wonder
Rank 10 to 12
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Rank 10 to 13
Muse Wonder
fast
Kimi K3.1 Pro
slow
Muse Wonder
expensive
Kimi K3.1 Pro
fairly expensive
Muse Wonder
- Subscription
No Meta subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €106.01 a month (Command Code Max 10×, with limited credits). 4 plans in Germany.
- Via API
$4 input, $20 output per 1M tokens.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Subscription
At Moonshot AI from ≈ €20.14 a month (Kimi Plus, with limited credits). 4 plans in Germany.
- Via API
$2 input, $10 output per 1M tokens.
Overall index with data through Oct 29, 2026 · Prices from Oct 29, 2026 · Speed: measured by Artificial Analysis · Subscriptions as of Oct 24, 2026 · Subscription prices incl. VAT
Where is the difference?
Values from 0 to 100 per task area. We only name a winner when the gap is large enough and there are enough tests.
Muse Wonder ahead: 2Kimi K3.1 Pro ahead: 1level: 4too little data: 2of 9 areas
Show 2 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.
Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.
Muse Wonder
Not tested yet
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Not tested yet
Prompt and test conditions
Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle
Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens
Task origin (Simon Willison)All data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | Muse Wonder | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall index0 to 100, higher is better | 82 | 80 |
| Rank | Rank 10 to 12 of 95 | Rank 10 to 13 of 95 |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | $4 | $2 |
| Outputwhat the model writes | $20 | $10 |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | 197 | 36 |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 1.05 M tokens≈ 1,570 A4 pages | 1.05 M tokens≈ 1,570 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | n/a | n/a |
| Released | Oct 12, 2026 | Oct 23, 2026 |
| Availability | Preview | Active |
| Open weights | no | n/a |
- Kimi K3.1 Pro, API price listed by Artificial Analysis: $2 input, $10 output, and $0.20 cached input per 1 million tokens. Kimi's official API publishes CNY rates separately. Source
- Kimi K3.1 Pro, Official API pricing: K3.1 Pro: CNY 13 input, CNY 68 output, CNY 13 cache write, and CNY 1.30 cache hit per million tokens. Source
- Kimi K3.1 Pro, Highspeed API pricing: CNY 26 input, CNY 136 output, CNY 26 cache write, and CNY 1.30 cache hit per million tokens. Source
- Kimi K3.1 Pro, International API pricing in USD: The international Kimi platform lists $2 input, $10 output, $2 cache write and $0.20 cache hit per million tokens. Highspeed costs $4/$20/$4/$0.20. Checked October 29, 2026. Separately documented CNY tariffs remain separate observations. Source
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Shared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
A: Muse WonderB: Kimi K3.1 Pro
Show 54 more benchmarks
Compare another matchup
More matchups
Related LLM comparisons
Compare Muse Wonder and Kimi K3.1 Pro with other leading models.