- Home
- LLM comparison
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Claude Haiku 5.5vs.DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Which one is better?
Level in the overall index: the gap is too small for a clear winner. Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs 1.5 times (input) and 1.2 times (output) as much per token.
Claude Haiku 5.5
Rank 16 to 27
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Rank 14 to 22
Claude Haiku 5.5
fast
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
fast
Claude Haiku 5.5
cheap
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
cheap
Claude Haiku 5.5
- Subscription
Free to use at Anthropic (Claude Free), more from €21.42 a month (Claude Pro). Through other providers from €6.83 a month (Poe Basic, with limited points). 29 plans in Germany.
- Via API
$0.10 input, $0.50 output per 1M tokens, unchanged since Oct 14, 2026.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- Subscription
No DeepSeek subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €6.36 a month (Token Plan Individual Lite, with limited credits). 7 plans in Germany.
- Via API
$0.15 input, $0.60 output per 1M tokens according to the provider; the price index has listed it at $0.30 and $1 since Oct 26, 2026.
Overall index with data through Oct 29, 2026 · Prices from Oct 29, 2026 · Speed: measured by Artificial Analysis · Subscriptions as of Oct 24, 2026 · Subscription prices incl. VAT
Where is the difference?
Values from 0 to 100 per task area. We only name a winner when the gap is large enough and there are enough tests.
Haiku 5.5 ahead: 0DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ahead: 1level: 4too little data: 5of 10 areas
Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
There is no shared test round for this selection. Results from different rounds are not mixed.
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall index0 to 100, higher is better | 57 | 64 |
| Rank | Rank 16 to 27 of 95 | Rank 14 to 22 of 95 |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | $0.10above 100,000 tokens: $0.50 | $0.15 |
| Outputwhat the model writes | $0.50above 100,000 tokens: $2.50 | $0.60 |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | 241 | 178 |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages | 1.05 M tokens≈ 1,570 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | June 2026 | n/a |
| Released | Oct 7, 2026 | Oct 17, 2026 |
| Availability | Active | Open Source |
| Open weights | no | yes |
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: At peak times (Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 01:00-04:00 UTC; Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 06:00-10:00 UTC) the price is $0.30 input and $1.20 output per 1M tokens. The table shows the off-peak price.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, Time-based API pricing: Off peak: $0.15 input, $0.60 output, and $0.003 cached input. Weekdays UTC 01:00-04:00 and 06:00-10:00: $0.30, $1.20, and $0.006. Chinese public holidays are excluded. Source
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Shared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
A: Claude Haiku 5.5B: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Show 54 more benchmarks
Compare another matchup
More matchups
Related LLM comparisons
Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 with other leading models.