- Home
- LLM comparison
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs. Mistral Large 3
Kimi K3.1 Provs.Mistral Large 3
Which one is better?
Kimi K3.1 Pro is clearly ahead in the overall index, but costs 4 times (input) and 6.7 times (output) as much per token.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Rank 10 to 13
Mistral Large 3
Rank 88 to 94
Kimi K3.1 Pro
slow
Mistral Large 3
fairly slow
Kimi K3.1 Pro
fairly expensive
Mistral Large 3
fairly cheap
Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Subscription
At Moonshot AI from ≈ €20.14 a month (Kimi Plus, with limited credits). 4 plans in Germany.
- Via API
$2 input, $10 output per 1M tokens.
Mistral Large 3
- Subscription
No Mistral AI subscription includes this model. Through other providers only in team or business plans, from €29.75 a month per seat (Langdock Business Standard). 2 plans in Germany.
- Via API
$0.50 input, $1.50 output per 1M tokens, unchanged since our price tracking began on Aug 14, 2026.
Overall index with data through Oct 29, 2026 · Prices from Oct 29, 2026 · Speed: measured by Artificial Analysis · Subscriptions as of Oct 24, 2026 · Subscription prices incl. VAT
Where is the difference?
Values from 0 to 100 per task area. We only name a winner when the gap is large enough and there are enough tests.
Kimi K3.1 Pro ahead: 9Mistral Large 3 ahead: 0level: 0too little data: 1of 10 areas
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.
Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Not tested yet
Mistral Large 3

Reasoning (model default): no reasoning mode Source
Current attempt
- Run date
- Oct 1, 2026
- API provider
- openrouter
- Requested API model
- mistralai/mistral-large-2512
- API model reported in response
- mistralai/mistral-large-2512
- Reasoning setting
- not specified
- Pinned endpoint
- Mistral | mistralai/mistral-large-2512
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Test protocol
- community-visual-tests-v1
- Technical checks
- Passed, not a quality rating
- Response time
- 14.2 s
Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.
Earlier attempts (1)
- Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: not specified
Prompt and test conditions
Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle
Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens
Task origin (Simon Willison)SVG short test
There is no shared test round for this selection. Results from different rounds are not mixed.
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall index0 to 100, higher is better | 80 | below 1 |
| Rank | Rank 10 to 13 of 95 | Rank 88 to 94 of 95 |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | $2 | $0.50 |
| Outputwhat the model writes | $10 | $1.50 |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | 36 | 84 |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 1.05 M tokens≈ 1,570 A4 pages | 262,144 tokens≈ 390 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | n/a | n/a |
| Released | Oct 23, 2026 | Dec 2, 2025 |
| Availability | Active | Active |
| Open weights | n/a | yes |
- Kimi K3.1 Pro, API price listed by Artificial Analysis: $2 input, $10 output, and $0.20 cached input per 1 million tokens. Kimi's official API publishes CNY rates separately. Source
- Kimi K3.1 Pro, Official API pricing: K3.1 Pro: CNY 13 input, CNY 68 output, CNY 13 cache write, and CNY 1.30 cache hit per million tokens. Source
- Kimi K3.1 Pro, Highspeed API pricing: CNY 26 input, CNY 136 output, CNY 26 cache write, and CNY 1.30 cache hit per million tokens. Source
- Kimi K3.1 Pro, International API pricing in USD: The international Kimi platform lists $2 input, $10 output, $2 cache write and $0.20 cache hit per million tokens. Highspeed costs $4/$20/$4/$0.20. Checked October 29, 2026. Separately documented CNY tariffs remain separate observations. Source
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Shared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
No directly comparable result yet
No published benchmark for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Mistral Large 3 currently matches in version, task and metric. We therefore show no estimated or blended values.
Compare another matchup
More matchups
Related LLM comparisons
Compare Kimi K3.1 Pro and Mistral Large 3 with other leading models.