Head-to-head comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash

Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.

shared result series: 1
distinct benchmark metrics: 1
latest retrieval: 2026-10-16

First modelSecond model

Specifications

General specifications

Release date, availability, context window, architecture, and published parameter counts at a glance. Undisclosed details remain marked as unavailable.

Specifications for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GLM-5.3-Flash
Attribute	Claude Sonnet 4.5	GLM-5.3-Flash
Provider	Anthropic	Z.ai
Released	Sep 2025	Aug 26, 2026
Availability	Active	Open Source
Model type	Proprietary	Open Weights
Parameters	Not published	320B, 18B active
Architecture	Not published	Mixture of Experts
Context window	200,000 tokens	1,000,000 tokens
Knowledge cutoff	January 2025	Not published
Technical sources	Model, Context	Model, Context

Pricing

API pricing compared

The table compares official standard API rates per 1M tokens, including published cache pricing. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.

API pricing for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GLM-5.3-Flash
Price type	Claude Sonnet 4.5	GLM-5.3-Flash
API input	$3	$0.15
API output	$15	$0.5
Cache read	$0.3	$0.03
Cache write (5 min.)	$3.75	Not listed
Cache write (1 hr.)	$6	Not listed
Price verified	09/22/2026 Source	09/22/2026 Source

Claude Sonnet 4.5GLM-5.3-Flash

API inputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier

Claude Sonnet 4.5$3

GLM-5.3-Flash$0.15

API outputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier

Claude Sonnet 4.5$15

GLM-5.3-Flash$0.5

Cache readUSD per 1M tokens, base tier

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.3

GLM-5.3-Flash$0.03

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Pricing by provider

Direct developer pricing and provider endpoint tariffs routed through OpenRouter are listed separately. Prices are in USD per 1M tokens. Context-dependent direct tiers plus regional, Flex, Priority, and other OpenRouter tariffs remain individually identifiable.

Provider pricing for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GLM-5.3-Flash
Model	Provider	Purchase route and tariff	Input per 1M tokens	Output per 1M tokens	Source
Claude Sonnet 4.5	Anthropic	Direct from developerStandard API	Lowest listed price: $3	Lowest listed price: $15	Source09/22/2026
	Amazon Bedrock	Via OpenRouteramazon-bedrock	Lowest listed price: $3	Lowest listed price: $15	Source10/26/2026
	Amazon Bedrock	Via OpenRouteramazon-bedrock/eu-west-1	$3.3	$16.5	Source10/26/2026
	Anthropic	Via OpenRouteranthropic	Lowest listed price: $3	Lowest listed price: $15	Source10/26/2026
	Azure	Via OpenRouterazure/global	Lowest listed price: $3	Lowest listed price: $15	Source10/26/2026
	Claude Platform on AWS	Via OpenRouterclaude-on-aws	Lowest listed price: $3	Lowest listed price: $15	Source10/26/2026
	Google	Via OpenRoutergoogle-vertex/global	Lowest listed price: $3	Lowest listed price: $15	Source10/26/2026
	Google	Via OpenRoutergoogle-vertex/us-east5	$3.3	$16.5	Source10/26/2026
GLM-5.3-Flash	Z.ai	Direct from developerStandard API	$0.15	$0.5	Source09/22/2026
	AtlasCloud	Via OpenRouteratlas-cloud/fp8	$0.15	$0.5	Source10/26/2026
	BaseTen	Via OpenRouterbaseten/fp8	$0.15	$0.5	Source10/26/2026
	BaseTen	Via OpenRouterbaseten/fp8/us	$0.15	$0.5	Source10/26/2026
	Cohere	Via OpenRoutercohere	$0.15	$0.5	Source10/26/2026
	CoreWeave	Via OpenRoutercoreweave/nvfp4	$0.15	$0.5	Source10/26/2026
	Crusoe	Via OpenRoutercrusoe/fp4	$0.15	$0.5	Source10/26/2026
	Darkbloom	Via OpenRouterdarkbloom/fp4	$0.065	$0.18	Source10/26/2026
	DeepInfra	Via OpenRouterdeepinfra/fp4	$0.15	$0.5	Source10/26/2026
	DigitalOcean	Via OpenRouterdigitalocean	$0.1312	$0.4375	Source10/26/2026
	Fireworks	Via OpenRouterfireworks	$0.15	$0.5	Source10/26/2026
	Friendli	Via OpenRouterfriendli	$0.15	$0.5	Source10/26/2026
	GMICloud	Via OpenRoutergmicloud/fp8	$0.075	$0.25	Source10/26/2026
	Inceptron	Via OpenRouterinceptron/fp8	$0.17	$0.6	Source10/26/2026
	InferenceNet	Via OpenRouterinference-net/fp4	$0.12	$0.388	Source10/26/2026
	InferenceNet	Via OpenRouterinference-net/us	$0.12	$0.388	Source10/26/2026
	Makora	Via OpenRoutermakora	$0.14	$0.47	Source10/26/2026
	Mistral	Via OpenRoutermistral	$0.15	$0.5	Source10/26/2026
	Modal	Via OpenRoutermodal/nvfp4	$0.15	$0.5	Source10/26/2026
	Morph	Via OpenRoutermorph/fp8	$0.337	$0.65	Source10/26/2026
	Near AI	Via OpenRouternear-ai/fp8	$0.08	$0.5	Source10/26/2026
	NextBit	Via OpenRouternextbit/fp4	$0.125	$0.5	Source10/26/2026
	Novita	Via OpenRouternovita/fp8	$0.084	$0.28	Source10/26/2026
	OpenInference	Via OpenRouteropen-inference/fp4	$0.11	Lowest listed price: $0.01	Source10/26/2026
	Parasail	Via OpenRouterparasail/fp4	$0.15	$0.5	Source10/26/2026
	Phala	Via OpenRouterphala/nvfp4	$0.1275	$0.425	Source10/26/2026
	PrimeIntellect	Via OpenRouterprimeintellect	$0.15	$0.5	Source10/26/2026
	Reka	Via OpenRouterreka	$0.15	$2.4	Source10/26/2026
	Relace	Via OpenRouterrelace	Lowest listed price: $0.0413	$0.0758	Source10/26/2026
	Sail Research	Via OpenRoutersail-research/fp4	$0.0784	$0.25	Source10/26/2026
	Sail Research	Via OpenRoutersail-research/us	$0.0784	$0.25	Source10/26/2026
	Together	Via OpenRoutertogether	$0.15	$0.5	Source10/26/2026
	Venice	Via OpenRoutervenice	$0.15	$0.5	Source10/26/2026
	Wafer	Via OpenRouterwafer/nvfp4	$0.054	$0.2	Source10/26/2026
	Z.AI	Via OpenRouterz-ai/fp8	$0.15	$0.5	Source10/26/2026

Benchmark index

Benchmark index compared

The index combines independent benchmarks on a scale from 0 to 100. A lead only counts when a model comes first in at least 95% of 200 recalculations with randomly redrawn test families. Otherwise both count as level.

Open the AI leaderboard

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Overall index

No overall score yet

GLM-5.3-Flash

Overall index

38.8

GLM-5.3-Flash leads in 3 of 3 shared areas.

Area	Claude Sonnet 4.5	GLM-5.3-Flash
Finance	7.7	56.5
Legal	7.9	49.0
Health	16.9	60.1

Performance

Shared benchmarks

Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.

Capability profile from matched benchmarks

Each axis averages directly matched benchmark families. A value of 100 means the stronger value within this pair, not a universal quality score.

Not enough directly matched categories for a reliable radar

Only 0 of at least 5 categories have comparable, direct model measurements. The benchmark tables below show the available evidence without filling missing axes.

Claude Sonnet 4.5GLM-5.3-Flash

MedScribeOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical

Claude Sonnet 4.584.515 %

GLM-5.3-Flash88.936 %

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Benchmark scores for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GLM-5.3-Flash
Benchmark and task	Claude Sonnet 4.5	GLM-5.3-Flash	Source
MedScribeOverall Test details Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterClaude Sonnet 4.5: Snapshot: claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 30,000 tokens GLM-5.3-Flash: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 30,000 tokens	84.515 %	Higher measured value88.936 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 10/13/2026
Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Our model tests

Our tests

SVG short test

One SVG prompt and fixed output settings. Captures are shown only with 0 reported reasoning tokens or documented lack of reasoning controls. Identical test conditions do not make the models' internal compute identical.

Shared test round: 43b8c5c46830

Claude Sonnet 4.5

GLM-5.3-Flash

Unavailable in this round

Earlier tests

Pelican on a bicycle

A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Reasoning (requested): high

Current attempt

Run date: Oct 1, 2026
API provider: openrouter
Requested API model: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5
API model reported in response: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5
Reasoning setting: high
Pinned endpoint: Anthropic | anthropic/claude-4.5-sonnet-20250929
Temperature: Provider default
Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens
Test protocol: community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks: Passed, not a quality rating
Response time: 30.2 s

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

GLM-5.3-Flash

Reasoning (requested): high

Current attempt

Run date: Oct 1, 2026
API provider: openrouter
Requested API model: z-ai/glm-5.3-flash
API model reported in response: z-ai/glm-5.3-flash
Reasoning setting: high
Pinned endpoint: Z.AI | z-ai/glm-5.3-flash-20260826
Temperature: Provider default
Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens
Test protocol: community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks: Passed, not a quality rating
Response time: 49.7 s

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (1)

Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high

Prompt and test conditions

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens

Task origin (Simon Willison)

How to read this comparison

Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict

Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.

The standard price table uses direct developer rates. The provider comparison labels OpenRouter endpoints, regions, and special tariffs separately.

Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.

More matchups

Compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GLM-5.3-Flash with other leading models using the same data and benchmark logic.

View the complete LLM comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash

Change model selection

General specifications

API pricing compared

Benchmark index compared

Shared benchmarks

Capability profile from matched benchmarks

Our tests

SVG short test

Claude Sonnet 4.5

GLM-5.3-Flash

Pelican on a bicycle

Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict

Related LLM comparisons