Command R+

Cohere
Command R+ carries the original Command R approach into a larger model class with 104 billion parameters, ten languages, and a 128,000-token context. Cohere built the checkpoint for more demanding RAG work and multi-step tool use. Its size was the main distinction from the smaller Command R.
Cohere identifies this model as command-r-plus-04-2024. The API alias has been deprecated since September 15, 2025. The command-r-plus-08-2024 update remains a separate checkpoint. The open weights use CC-BY-NC-4.0 and remain subject to the documented usage terms.
| Specification | Value and source |
|---|---|
| Weights | Open weightsSource |
| Access | LocalSource |
| Parameters | 104BSource |
| Context window | 128,000 tokensSource |
| License | CC-BY-NC-4.0Source |
| Release | 2024-04-04Source |
| Parameters | 104 BSource |
| Architecture | auto-regressive transformerSource |
| Maximum output | 4,000 tokensSource |
| Input | TextSource |
| Output | TextSource |
| Languages | 10Source |
| Tool calling | YesSource |
| API model ID | command-r-plus-04-2024Source |
| Model revision release | 2024-08-30 (This dates the separate command-r-plus-08-2024 refresh and is not an original Command R+ release date.)Source |
Benchmark meta-analysis
These Gradually indexes place selected published measurements on a 0 to 100 scale. They are not accuracy percentages and do not guarantee results in your application.
Retrieval dates of the sources used 2026-10-15 - 2026-10-15
Not enough independent results for a score yet
An overall score needs at least eight test series.
provisional
Published configurations differ within this comparison cohort. Treat the index as provisional.
Index below 1 / 100
provisional
Published configurations differ within this comparison cohort. Treat the index as provisional.
Index below 1 / 100
provisional
Published configurations differ within this comparison cohort. Treat the index as provisional.
Index below 1 / 100
provisional
Published configurations differ within this comparison cohort. Treat the index as provisional.
Index below 1 / 100
provisional
Published configurations differ within this comparison cohort. Treat the index as provisional.
Index below 1 / 100
provisional
Published configurations differ within this comparison cohort. Treat the index as provisional.
Method version: benchmark-meta-score-v3
The index includes active measurements from reviewed primary sources when at least five models are compared in the same documented comparison slice across dataset, harness, agent, tools, and trial count. Each benchmark series and evaluator contributes one shared setup slice from the newest capture. When one source and series include several explicitly documented reasoning tiers, the highest documented tier (none through max) is selected, never the best result value. The explicit source label “Non-reasoning” is treated as none. Unknown or ambiguous tiers exclude the model from that series. Within each series, percentages and rates are logit-transformed, other units stay unchanged, and all values are then standardized. A one-factor model then estimates one shared strength per model and, per series, how sharply it separates the models. Area scores move away from that strength only as far as the model's own results in the area support. The overall score weights the core areas at 75% and finance, law and health at 25%. It requires at least eight test series from two sources and three areas. The 0 to 100 scale refers to a fixed reference group of 29 language models whose average sits at 50.
Published model-specific parameters can differ. This is not a controlled experiment; comparisons with such differences are marked provisional.
Unmeasured series are not entered as zero. Where a model has no own results in a core area, its overall strength stands in, and the note “estimated without own results in …” names the area. Fewer test series lead to a larger standard error.
The 95% interval follows from the standard error of 200 recalculations with randomly redrawn test families. It describes how precisely the recorded test series determine the value. It is no prediction for future tasks or for later recalculations with other participants.
The source count is not a count of independent experiments.
OECD handbook on composite indicatorsAll 5 test families and 5 of 5 raw measurements are listed here. The complete calculation for every model is available in the JSON export.
Family weight in the fixed test panel (informative): 1.53 % · Coverage of this test family: 50 %
Published configurations differ within this cohort.
Family weight in the fixed test panel (informative): 0.71 % · Coverage of this test family: 100 %
Published configurations differ within this cohort.
Family weight in the fixed test panel (informative): 2.08 % · Coverage of this test family: 100 %
Published configurations differ within this cohort.
Family weight in the fixed test panel (informative): 2.78 % · Coverage of this test family: 100 %
Published configurations differ within this cohort.
Family weight in the fixed test panel (informative): 3.57 % · Coverage of this test family: 100 %
Published configurations differ within this cohort.
Each evaluator measures different capabilities under its own conditions. Test series, composite indices and their components stay separate. The detailed results below retain their scales, configurations and source dates.
| Evaluator | Test series | Composite indices | Recorded active measurements |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals AI | 5 | 0 | 35 |
Coverage is not a quality ranking. Overlapping tests and multiple settings do not count as independent experiments. Vendor claims, historical and disputed results are excluded from this overview and remain labelled in the detailed evidence.
Page 1 of 4
| Sub-task | Command R+ (This model) | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| Conclusion Tasks | 48.31% (best value in this row) | 13.98% |
| Interpretation Tasks | 71.62% (best value in this row) | 38.72% |
| Issue Tasks | 76.32% (best value in this row) | 8.89% |
| Overall | 68.29% (best value in this row) | 32.97% |
| Rhetoric Tasks | 75.64% (best value in this row) | 71.01% |
| Rule Tasks | 69.55% (best value in this row) | 32.24% |
higher is betterAs of October 15, 2026Source: Vals AIbars scaled within each row, not across rows
These measurements have no matching peer values under the same test conditions. Their original values and sources remain available here.
Page 1 of 4
One SVG prompt and fixed output settings. Captures are shown only with 0 reported reasoning tokens or documented lack of reasoning controls. Identical test conditions do not make the models' internal compute identical.

28 / 100
Official documentation
Cohere's own changelog announces updates to its flagship generative AI model series, Command R and Command R+, giving the refreshed models' throughput and latency relative to the previous version; it does not use the words replaces or successor, so this is recorded as nearest-profile rather than direct.
Cohere changelog: Command models August refresh (2026-09-19)| Type | Evidence and data date |
|---|---|
| Input | Documented modalities. Retrieved September 8, 2026. |
| Output | Documented modalities. Retrieved September 8, 2026. |
| Research status | Research date September 8, 2026. 7 source URLs checked. This documents the inspected sources, not an exhaustive inventory of every publication. |
| Not found in the inspected sources | knowledge-cutoff Original wording The checked original card, launch post and model overview do not publish an exact cutoff for command-r-plus-04-2024. |
| Not found in the inspected sources | training-tokens Original wording The checked original sources do not publish a training-token count. |
| Unresolved | refresh-model-exclusion Original wording Earlier evidence used the same canonical ID for the August 2024 refresh. The refresh is a separate command-r-plus-08-2024 model and its facts and benchmarks are intentionally excluded from this original record. |
| Unresolved | AA benchmark rows Original wording No exact Artificial Analysis model page located in the checked public sitemap. |
| Additional source | Model metadata (retrieved September 8, 2026) · Cohere Command R and R+ model card · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026 |
| Additional source | Provider model lifecycle (retrieved October 2, 2026) · Cohere model overview and lifecycle · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026 |
| Additional source | Vals AI (retrieved October 15, 2026) |
| Additional source | Vals AI (retrieved October 15, 2026) |
| Additional source | Vals AI (retrieved October 15, 2026) |
| Additional source | Vals AI (retrieved October 15, 2026) |
| Additional source | Vals AI (retrieved October 15, 2026) |
| Additional source | Model metadata (retrieved September 8, 2026) |
| Additional source | Model metadata (retrieved September 8, 2026) |
| Additional source | Model metadata (retrieved September 8, 2026) |
| Additional source | Cohere Command R+ documentation · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026 |
| Additional source | OpenRouter: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0 |
| Additional source | Vercel AI Gateway: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0 |
| Additional source | Ollama: cumulative downloads for the popularity index |
| Additional source | Replicate: cumulative runs for the popularity index |
| Additional source | Google Trending Now: limited feed selection for Germany and the US |
| Additional source | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 |
| Additional source | Cohere changelog: Command models August refresh (2026-09-19) |