- Home
- Image model comparison
- Firefly Image Model 5 vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
Firefly Image Model 5vs.Qwen-Image-2.1
Which one is better?
In our own test both are on par. Firefly Image Model 5 has no arena rating yet. Neither has an API price.
Test images
Same task, the first image of each. The task with the biggest difference is preselected.


Result for “Infographic”:Qwen-Image-2.1 ahead
What the rating looks at: Numbers, labels, and visual organization.
“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.
Test protocol of the images
Each test attempt uses the same archived prompt and one request. The first output of that attempt counts. Repeats after technical test failures are disclosed for the affected images. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.
Character and detail
Firefly Image Model 5: manual, one request, first output, Firefly Image 5, 1:1, 1K, no reference image, no negative prompt, 10 Adobe credits, generated Aug 16, 2026, 12:14 PM. Source
Qwen-Image-2.1: manual, 1:1, requested and received 1024x1024, one request, first output, Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.1 base, 40 steps, true CFG 1.0, prompt enhancement disabled, no negative prompt, no reference images, seed=1591420783, official Space commit 5694809f4c56a4e8c40787b5392cecac36493c5d, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:49 AM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6
Firefly Image Model 5 image SHA 256: 6a8e97db33824727599cf62339ff714cfb836a96a5f078010bb7760d7372f3d4
Qwen-Image-2.1 image SHA 256: b29bb7e207ad464957ee060bbf0655104bcbece703360254e48daa3ec35a62d7
Infographic
Firefly Image Model 5: manual, one request, first output, Firefly Image 5, 1:1, 1K, no reference image, no negative prompt, 10 Adobe credits, generated Aug 16, 2026, 12:14 PM. Source
Qwen-Image-2.1: manual, 1:1, requested and received 1024x1024, one request, first output, Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.1 base, 40 steps, true CFG 1.0, prompt enhancement disabled, no negative prompt, no reference images, seed=1283422012, official Space commit 5694809f4c56a4e8c40787b5392cecac36493c5d, prior anonymous attempt refused before inference (ZeroGPU quota), completed through authenticated browser, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:49 AM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f
Firefly Image Model 5 image SHA 256: 8fa6d9b40c417847061ec33d789ad5bf91f1e85da586515c6226ce6db825d1ba
Qwen-Image-2.1 image SHA 256: 316e38ed63ff401f86a7ceee9cc65c74413e0e9c7c899a6e6bf453acc2940dac
Product photography
Firefly Image Model 5: manual, one request, first output, Firefly Image 5, 1:1, 1K, no reference image, no negative prompt, 10 Adobe credits, generated Aug 16, 2026, 12:14 PM. Source
Qwen-Image-2.1: manual, 1:1, requested and received 1024x1024, one request, first output, Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.1 base, 40 steps, true CFG 1.0, prompt enhancement disabled, no negative prompt, no reference images, seed=196359631, official Space commit 5694809f4c56a4e8c40787b5392cecac36493c5d, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:49 AM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3
Firefly Image Model 5 image SHA 256: c36dab49ebe40473fa9e9a61b2b02fe36c4cd3536cbb6aac1d0ad0f8944d8bfc
Qwen-Image-2.1 image SHA 256: 041f559d4261865b327fcae4f8bb0bd3b176c55a3b1255a042ab3e0fc4f9bc4b
Typography and layout
Firefly Image Model 5: manual, one request, first output, Firefly Image 5, 1:1, 1K, no reference image, no negative prompt, 10 Adobe credits, generated Aug 16, 2026, 12:14 PM. Source
Qwen-Image-2.1: manual, 1:1, requested and received 1024x1024, one request, first output, Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.1 base, 40 steps, true CFG 1.0, prompt enhancement disabled, no negative prompt, no reference images, seed=158818011, official Space commit 5694809f4c56a4e8c40787b5392cecac36493c5d, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:49 AM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419
Firefly Image Model 5 image SHA 256: cf8a921a221de5e456df2311482fc999303f5438270fb1a77c1be2dd3d9afc0b
Qwen-Image-2.1 image SHA 256: 4670269190f492154c05e3f18c4eb9e3938910ca1aca32503b6a1ceb16d39b38
The numbers at a glance
Firefly Image Model 5
not in the arena
Qwen-Image-2.1
Rank 14 of 21
Firefly Image Model 5
Rank 58 of 108
Qwen-Image-2.1
Rank 40 of 108
Firefly Image Model 5
no API price
Qwen-Image-2.1
no API price
Ranks among the 21 image models with an arena rating and the 108 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.
Firefly Image Model 5
- Subscription
- n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
- Via API
- No API price known. Access: API, Web app.
Qwen-Image-2.1
- Subscription
- No Alibaba subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €9.51 a month (Krea Basic, with limited credits). 5 plans in Germany.
- Via API
- No API price known. Access: local, Web app.
- License
- Open weights, Qwen Research License: non-commercial use only; commercial use requires a separate license.
Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.
Arena rating (LMArena) from Oct 28, 2026 · GraduallyBench from Nov 3, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (38 days old)
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.
| Kennzahl | Firefly Image Model 5 | Qwen-Image-2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better | n/a | 1,225 |
| Arena rank | n/a | Rank 14 of 21 |
| Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating | n/a | 19,604 |
| GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 | 55 | 65 |
| GraduallyBench by task | ||
| Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition | 86 | 54 |
| Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details | 46 | 90 |
| Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency | 72 | 34 |
| InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization | 15 | 83 |
| API price | ||
| Per imagelower is better | n/a | n/a |
| 100 images | n/a | n/a |
| Profile | ||
| Released | Oct 28, 2025 | Sep 20, 2026 |
| Weightsopen means: runs locally | proprietary | openQwen Research License: non-commercial use only; commercial use requires a separate license |
| Lifecycle | Generally available since March 19, 2026 | no notice |
| Access | API, Web app | local, Web app |
| Parameters | not published | not published |
| Largest output | 4 Megapixel | 2K |
| Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model | n/a | 5 |
API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.
Sources: Firefly Image Model 5 model source, status source (verified Aug 15, 2026) · Qwen-Image-2.1 model source, status source (verified Sep 22, 2026)
Arena ratings by category
From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.
No shared arena score in the stored snapshot
The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Firefly Image Model 5 and Qwen-Image-2.1 from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.
More comparisons with Firefly Image Model 5 and Qwen-Image-2.1
Compare Firefly Image Model 5 and Qwen-Image-2.1 with the models people compare them with most often.
Compare another matchup
Predecessor and successor
- Firefly Image Model 5 has no successor yet
- No predecessor recorded for Qwen-Image-2.1
- Qwen-Image-2.1 has no successor yet
The most popular comparisons
- 1Krea 2 Large vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 2FLUX.2 Flex vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 3Krea 2 Medium Turbo vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 4FLUX.2 Klein 9B vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 5Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 6GPT Image 2 vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 7Nano Banana Pro vs. Firefly Image Model 5
- 8Qwen Image 2.0 Pro vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 9Nano Banana Pro vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
Show all 21 comparisons
- 10FLUX.2 Max vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 11Nano Banana 2 vs. Firefly Image Model 5
- 12Firefly Image Model 5 vs. GPT Image 2.5 Flare
- 13Qwen-Image-2.1 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
- 14GPT Image 2.5 Flare vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 15HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 16Ideogram 4.0 vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 17Nano Banana 2 vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 18FLUX.2 Pro vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 19Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 20Grok Imagine Image Quality vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 21Seedream 4.0 vs. Qwen-Image-2.1