Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

Krea 2 Large vs. Qwen-Image-2.1

Compare shared capability tests, arena scores with documented retrieval dates, task-specific image pricing, and verified specifications. Research benchmarks, preference arenas, and our n = 1 samples remain separate.

shared result series
8
shared sample prompts
0
latest arena retrieval
2026-10-15

Change image model selection

Specifications and cost

General specifications and task-specific pricing

A model can have one price for generating new images and another for editing. Prices therefore remain tied to the corresponding arena configuration.

Specifications and pricing for Krea 2 Large and Qwen-Image-2.1
AttributeKrea 2 LargeQwen-Image-2.1
ProviderKreaAlibaba
ReleasedMay 2026September 20, 2026
AccessAPI, Web applocal
LifecycleNo separate lifecycle noticeQwen Research License: non-commercial use only; commercial use requires a separate license Status source
WeightsProprietaryOpen weights
ParametersNot publishedNot published
Maximum output1K2K
Arena configurationLargeNo separate configuration named
Text-to-image price$60 per 1,000 imagesNo arena entry
Editing priceNo arena entryNo arena entry
Technical sourceModel sourceVerified 2026-08-15Model sourceVerified 2026-09-22

Prompt adherence and specialist tests

Shared capability benchmarks

These exact checkpoints have not both completed the fixed Gradually sample protocol. Earlier checkpoints do not substitute for them. No exact shared result from the integrated research benchmarks is available for this pair.

No shared Gradually ranking yet

A score appears only after both exact checkpoints complete all four fixed prompts and the same blind evaluation.

Independent preference tests

Shared arena benchmarks

Artificial Analysis and Arena derive scores from blind comparisons. Raters see outputs for the same prompt and choose the image they prefer. Separate series cover text rendering, photorealism, portraits, art, commercial design, and image editing. Confidence intervals indicate how certain a measured lead is.

8 shared result series
Krea 2 LargeQwen-Image-2.1
LMArena Text to Image: 3D modelingBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Krea 2 Large1,114.464
Qwen-Image-2.1Higher score1,195.289
LMArena Text to Image: ArtBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Krea 2 Large1,119.335
Qwen-Image-2.1Higher score1,227.351
LMArena Text to Image: CartoonBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Krea 2 Large1,117.094
Qwen-Image-2.1Higher score1,233.633
LMArena Text to Image: Commercial designBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Krea 2 Large1,108.274
Qwen-Image-2.1Higher score1,235.518
LMArena Text to Image: OverallBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Krea 2 Large1,111.516
Qwen-Image-2.1Higher score1,222.928
LMArena Text to Image: PhotorealismBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Krea 2 Large1,127.622
Qwen-Image-2.1Higher score1,226.426
LMArena Text to Image: PortraitsBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Krea 2 Large1,122.593
Qwen-Image-2.1Higher score1,248.117
LMArena Text to Image: Text renderingBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Krea 2 Large1,112.886
Qwen-Image-2.1Higher score1,251.604

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Arena benchmark scores for Krea 2 Large and Qwen-Image-2.1
BenchmarkKrea 2 LargeQwen-Image-2.1Source
LMArena Text to Image: 3D modeling
1,114.464
Rank 50, 95% confidence interval: ±9.09, 5,175 ratings
Higher score1,195.289
Rank 19, 95% confidence interval: ±18.3, 933 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-10-15
LMArena Text to Image: Art
1,119.335
Rank 49, 95% confidence interval: ±7.8, 8,306 ratings
Higher score1,227.351
Rank 16, 95% confidence interval: ±14.42, 1,595 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-10-15
LMArena Text to Image: Cartoon
1,117.094
Rank 49, 95% confidence interval: ±6.11, 21,998 ratings
Higher score1,233.633
Rank 19, 95% confidence interval: ±9.79, 4,240 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-10-15
LMArena Text to Image: Commercial design
1,108.274
Rank 56, 95% confidence interval: ±5.98, 19,026 ratings
Higher score1,235.518
Rank 19, 95% confidence interval: ±9.91, 3,467 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-10-15
LMArena Text to Image: Overall
1,111.516
Rank 53, 95% confidence interval: ±4.16, 56,888 ratings
Higher score1,222.928
Rank 19, 95% confidence interval: ±6.65, 11,441 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-10-15
LMArena Text to Image: Photorealism
1,127.622
Rank 47, 95% confidence interval: ±6.15, 22,001 ratings
Higher score1,226.426
Rank 19, 95% confidence interval: ±9.69, 4,413 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-10-15
LMArena Text to Image: Portraits
1,122.593
Rank 53, 95% confidence interval: ±7.45, 11,006 ratings
Higher score1,248.117
Rank 17, 95% confidence interval: ±12.6, 2,416 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-10-15
LMArena Text to Image: Text rendering
1,112.886
Rank 53, 95% confidence interval: ±6.19, 18,330 ratings
Higher score1,251.604
Rank 19, 95% confidence interval: ±10.05, 3,522 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-10-15

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Visual comparison

Sample images

Our images complement preference data, but do not replace it. The prompt, request count, and selection rule match. Provider resolution, quality tier, randomness, and prompt processing remain visible limitations, so this is not a fully controlled laboratory test.

No shared documented run yet

The fixed test suite covers typography, product photography, character details, and an infographic. A prompt appears only after both models have a verifiable first run.

Missing image run for Qwen-Image-2.1

Missing prompts. Typography and layout, Product photography, Character and detail, Infographic.

No results with the four fixed test prompts are available for this model yet.

Next step. Run the four fixed prompts with this model, archive the first outputs, and evaluate them blind.

Documentation

How to read this comparison

An Elo score is not a verdict on creativity

A higher arena score means this specific configuration was preferred more often in blind comparisons.

Typography, character consistency, local execution, licensing, and price may matter more to your workload than overall visual appeal.

Prices cover 1,000 images at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels using settings documented by Artificial Analysis. Subscriptions and special rates are excluded.

More matchups

Compare Krea 2 Large and Qwen-Image-2.1 with other important image models under the same evidence rules. Each page shows only exact shared measurements and samples.

View the complete image model comparison