- Home
- Image model comparison
- Grok Imagine Image Quality vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
Grok Imagine Image Qualityvs.Qwen-Image-2.1
Which one is better?
In our own test both are on par. Grok Imagine Image Quality has no arena rating yet. Qwen-Image-2.1 has no API price.
Test images
Same task, the first image of each. The task with the biggest difference is preselected.


Result for “Product photography”:Qwen-Image-2.1 ahead
What the rating looks at: Materials, reflections, and fine details.
“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.
Test protocol of the images
Each test attempt uses the same archived prompt and one request. The first output of that attempt counts. Repeats after technical test failures are disclosed for the affected images. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.
Character and detail
Grok Imagine Image Quality: openrouter, aspect ratio 1:1, resolution 1K, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.050000, generated Aug 14, 2026, 1:34 PM. Source
Qwen-Image-2.1: manual, 1:1, requested and received 1024x1024, one request, first output, Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.1 base, 40 steps, true CFG 1.0, prompt enhancement disabled, no negative prompt, no reference images, seed=1591420783, official Space commit 5694809f4c56a4e8c40787b5392cecac36493c5d, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:49 AM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6
Grok Imagine Image Quality image SHA 256: b6cccae7af9a70af45a46b9e3264fa6971101e04979f7a0539e889ba6521250a
Qwen-Image-2.1 image SHA 256: b29bb7e207ad464957ee060bbf0655104bcbece703360254e48daa3ec35a62d7
Infographic
Grok Imagine Image Quality: openrouter, aspect ratio 1:1, resolution 1K, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.050000, generated Aug 14, 2026, 1:34 PM. Source
Qwen-Image-2.1: manual, 1:1, requested and received 1024x1024, one request, first output, Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.1 base, 40 steps, true CFG 1.0, prompt enhancement disabled, no negative prompt, no reference images, seed=1283422012, official Space commit 5694809f4c56a4e8c40787b5392cecac36493c5d, prior anonymous attempt refused before inference (ZeroGPU quota), completed through authenticated browser, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:49 AM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f
Grok Imagine Image Quality image SHA 256: 03fbeae7859be72584048dfc23fba0651220ab44c707da66c386b77d90cc86f7
Qwen-Image-2.1 image SHA 256: 316e38ed63ff401f86a7ceee9cc65c74413e0e9c7c899a6e6bf453acc2940dac
Product photography
Grok Imagine Image Quality: openrouter, aspect ratio 1:1, resolution 1K, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.050000, generated Aug 14, 2026, 1:34 PM. Source
Qwen-Image-2.1: manual, 1:1, requested and received 1024x1024, one request, first output, Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.1 base, 40 steps, true CFG 1.0, prompt enhancement disabled, no negative prompt, no reference images, seed=196359631, official Space commit 5694809f4c56a4e8c40787b5392cecac36493c5d, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:49 AM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3
Grok Imagine Image Quality image SHA 256: 0ea1e48f20bf61ff10414398b5248b0496c9040b3868c915580efd11d0dbaf11
Qwen-Image-2.1 image SHA 256: 041f559d4261865b327fcae4f8bb0bd3b176c55a3b1255a042ab3e0fc4f9bc4b
Typography and layout
Grok Imagine Image Quality: openrouter, aspect ratio 1:1, resolution 1K, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.050000, generated Aug 14, 2026, 2:05 PM. Source
Qwen-Image-2.1: manual, 1:1, requested and received 1024x1024, one request, first output, Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.1 base, 40 steps, true CFG 1.0, prompt enhancement disabled, no negative prompt, no reference images, seed=158818011, official Space commit 5694809f4c56a4e8c40787b5392cecac36493c5d, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:49 AM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419
Grok Imagine Image Quality image SHA 256: 84d88fb03bdbba672fc91268f4c120b17a19e4c9d637425aeca8ed44b2397d9f
Qwen-Image-2.1 image SHA 256: 4670269190f492154c05e3f18c4eb9e3938910ca1aca32503b6a1ceb16d39b38
The numbers at a glance
Grok Imagine Image Quality
not in the arena
Qwen-Image-2.1
Rank 14 of 21
Grok Imagine Image Quality
Rank 54 of 108
Qwen-Image-2.1
Rank 40 of 108
Grok Imagine Image Quality
fairly cheap
Qwen-Image-2.1
no API price
Ranks among the 21 image models with an arena rating and the 108 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.
Grok Imagine Image Quality
- Subscription
- n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
- Via API
- $0.05 per image, 100 images $5.
Qwen-Image-2.1
- Subscription
- No Alibaba subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €9.51 a month (Krea Basic, with limited credits). 5 plans in Germany.
- Via API
- No API price known. Access: local, Web app.
- License
- Open weights, Qwen Research License: non-commercial use only; commercial use requires a separate license.
Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.
Arena rating (LMArena) from Oct 28, 2026 · GraduallyBench from Nov 3, 2026 · API prices from Nov 3, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (38 days old)
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.
| Kennzahl | Grok Imagine Image Quality | Qwen-Image-2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better | n/a | 1,225 |
| Arena rank | n/a | Rank 14 of 21 |
| Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating | n/a | 19,604 |
| GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 | 60 | 65 |
| GraduallyBench by task | ||
| Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition | 88 | 54 |
| Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details | 37 | 90 |
| Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency | 56 | 34 |
| InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization | 61 | 83 |
| API price | ||
| Per imagelower is better | $0.05 | n/a |
| 100 images | $5 | n/a |
| Profile | ||
| Released | April 2026 | Sep 20, 2026 |
| Weightsopen means: runs locally | proprietary | openQwen Research License: non-commercial use only; commercial use requires a separate license |
| Lifecycle | Deprecated: xAI retires the model slug on November 2, 2026; requests are then served by grok-imagine-image-2.0 (quality=low) | no notice |
| Access | API, Web app | local, Web app |
| Parameters | not published | not published |
| Largest output | 2K | 2K |
| Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model | n/a | 5 |
API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.
Sources: Grok Imagine Image Quality model source, status source (verified Aug 15, 2026) · Qwen-Image-2.1 model source, status source (verified Sep 22, 2026)
Arena ratings by category
From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.
Artificial Analysis from Nov 3, 2026 · LMArena from Oct 28, 2026
All individual values with sources
| Rating | Grok Imagine Image Quality | Qwen-Image-2.1 | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Text to Image Arena | 1,049 | 1,043 | Artificial AnalysisRetrieved Nov 3, 2026 |
| Image Editing Arena | 1,096 | 1,081 | Artificial AnalysisRetrieved Nov 3, 2026 |
| Image Editing: Overall | 1,391 | 1,362 | LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026 |
More comparisons with Grok Imagine Image Quality and Qwen-Image-2.1
Compare Grok Imagine Image Quality and Qwen-Image-2.1 with the models people compare them with most often.
Compare another matchup
Predecessor and successor
- SuccessorGrok Imagine Image Quality vs. Grok Imagine Image 2.0Successor of Grok Imagine Image Quality
- No predecessor recorded for Grok Imagine Image Quality
- No predecessor recorded for Qwen-Image-2.1
- Qwen-Image-2.1 has no successor yet
The most popular comparisons
- 1Krea 2 Large vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 2FLUX.2 Flex vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 3Krea 2 Medium Turbo vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 4FLUX.2 Klein 9B vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 5Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 6Grok Imagine Image Quality vs. GPT Image 2.5 Flare
- 7GPT Image 2 vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 8Qwen Image 2.0 Pro vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 9Nano Banana Pro vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
Show all 19 comparisons
- 10FLUX.2 Max vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 11Grok Imagine Image Quality vs. Midjourney V8.1
- 12Qwen-Image-2.1 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
- 13GPT Image 2.5 Flare vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 14HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 15Ideogram 4.0 vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 16Nano Banana 2 vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 17FLUX.2 Pro vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 18Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 19Seedream 4.0 vs. Qwen-Image-2.1