Skip to main content

TypeSafe AIMapikaDecision matchup

Jevvs.Decider 2B

Which model makes better decisions?

Jev does better in independent tests, while Decider 2B is available with open weights.

Independent tests
Jevahead1 of 1
Decider 2B0 of 1
DecideBench
Popularity
Jev43
Decider 2Bahead52
out of 100
Weights and access
Jevn/a
Decider 2Bopenopen, local
Size
Jevn/a
Decider 2B1.9 B
Parameters

Pick Jev for

DecideBench

Pick Decider 2B for

open weightsruns locallymore popular

Shared tests

Independent evaluators and leaderboards only, the newest shared snapshot per evaluator. With 95 % ranges a lead counts when they do not overlap; for hit rates, when it holds in a 95 % test. Without any uncertainty figure at most “slightly ahead”.

DecideBench

Jev ahead

Jev is clearly ahead in 9 of 10 subtests, Decider 2B in none. 1 is level.

DecideBench pair accuracy

Jev96.0 %
Decider 2B41.0 %

200 tasks, as of October 18, 2026

DecideBench claim_support accuracy

Jev96.0 %
Decider 2B42.0 %

50 tasks, as of October 18, 2026

DecideBench returns_policy accuracy

Jev96.0 %
Decider 2B46.0 %

50 tasks, as of October 18, 2026

Show all 10 subtests
SubtestJevDecider 2BVerdict
DecideBench pair accuracy96.0 %41.0 %Jev ahead
DecideBench claim_support accuracy96.0 %42.0 %Jev ahead
DecideBench returns_policy accuracy96.0 %46.0 %Jev ahead
DecideBench action_review accuracy100.0 %56.0 %Jev ahead
DecideBench overall accuracy98.0 %63.2 %Jev ahead
DecideBench ticket_triage accuracy98.0 %64.0 %Jev ahead
DecideBench agent_routing accuracy98.0 %66.0 %Jev ahead
DecideBench content_moderation accuracy98.0 %66.0 %Jev ahead
DecideBench review_sentiment accuracy98.0 %70.0 %Jev ahead
DecideBench support_intent accuracy100.0 %96.0 %level

Source · latest October 18, 2026

All data side by side

JevDecider 2B
KindStandaloneStandalone
DeveloperTypeSafe AIMapika
StatusEarly accessOpen source
ReleasedSeptember 15, 2026n/a
Weightsn/aopen
Runs locallynoyes
Parametersn/a1.9 B
Licensen/aApache-2.0
Popularity (out of 100)4352