Skip to main content

Fastino LabsInternLMDecision matchup

GLiDEvs.Intern-Decision-4B

Which model makes better decisions?

GLiDE does better in independent tests, while Intern-Decision-4B is available with open weights.

Independent tests
GLiDEahead1 of 1
Intern-Decision-4B0 of 1
Zero-shot IE benchmark
Popularity
GLiDE0
Intern-Decision-4Bahead40
out of 100
Weights and access
GLiDEproprietary
Intern-Decision-4Bopenopen, local
Size
GLiDEn/a
Intern-Decision-4B4 B
Parameters

Pick GLiDE for

Zero-shot IE benchmark

Pick Intern-Decision-4B for

open weightsruns locallymore popular

Shared tests

Independent evaluators and leaderboards only, the newest shared snapshot per evaluator. With 95 % ranges a lead counts when they do not overlap; for hit rates, when it holds in a 95 % test. Without any uncertainty figure at most “slightly ahead”.

Zero-shot IE benchmark

GLiDE ahead

Zero-shot IE spectrum: mixed-pool classification accuracy

GLiDE97.9
Intern-Decision-4B85.4

48 tasks, as of October 17, 2026

Source · latest October 17, 2026

All data side by side

GLiDEIntern-Decision-4B
KindStandaloneStandalone
DeveloperFastino LabsInternLM
StatusActiveOpen source
ReleasedSeptember 30, 2026n/a
Weightsproprietaryopen
Runs locallynoyes
Parametersn/a4 B
Licensen/aApache-2.0 with the Qwen notices retained
Popularity (out of 100)040

More comparisons with GLiDE and Intern-Decision-4B

Clef-Flashvs.Intern-Decision-4BDecider 2Bvs.Intern-Decision-4BDecider 4Bvs.Intern-Decision-4BGLiNER2.5-Decidevs.Intern-Decision-4BKev 0.8Bvs.Intern-Decision-4BLaya Typed Decisionsvs.Intern-Decision-4BKev 9Bvs.Intern-Decision-4BDecider 0.8Bvs.Intern-Decision-4BJulia 1vs.Intern-Decision-4B

All decision models compared