Fastino LabsInternLMDecision matchup
GLiDEvs.Intern-Decision-2B
Which model makes better decisions?
GLiDE does better in independent tests, while Intern-Decision-2B is available with open weights.
Independent testsZero-shot IE benchmark
GLiDEahead1 of 1
Intern-Decision-2B0 of 1
Popularityout of 100
GLiDE0
Intern-Decision-2Bahead37
Weights and access
GLiDEproprietary
Intern-Decision-2Bopenopen, local
SizeParameters
GLiDEn/a
Intern-Decision-2B2 B
Pick GLiDE for
Zero-shot IE benchmark
Pick Intern-Decision-2B for
open weightsruns locallymore popular
Shared tests
Independent evaluators and leaderboards only, the newest shared snapshot per evaluator. With 95 % ranges a lead counts when they do not overlap; for hit rates, when it holds in a 95 % test. Without any uncertainty figure at most “slightly ahead”.
Zero-shot IE benchmark
GLiDE aheadZero-shot IE spectrum: mixed-pool classification accuracy
GLiDE97.9
Intern-Decision-2B81.3
48 tasks, as of October 17, 2026
Source · latest October 17, 2026
All data side by side
| GLiDE | Intern-Decision-2B | |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Standalone | Standalone |
| Developer | Fastino Labs | InternLM |
| Status | Active | Open source |
| Released | September 30, 2026 | n/a |
| Weights | proprietary | open |
| Runs locally | no | yes |
| Parameters | n/a | 2 B |
| License | n/a | Apache-2.0 with the Qwen notices retained |
| Popularity (out of 100) | 0 | 37 |
More comparisons with GLiDE and Intern-Decision-2B
Clef-Flashvs.Intern-Decision-2BDecider 0.8Bvs.Intern-Decision-2BDecider 2Bvs.Intern-Decision-2BDecider 4Bvs.Intern-Decision-2BGLiNER2.5-Decidevs.Intern-Decision-2BIntern-Decision-0.8Bvs.Intern-Decision-2BIntern-Decision-2Bvs.Intern-Decision-4BJulia 1vs.Intern-Decision-2BKev 0.8Bvs.Intern-Decision-2B