GPT-6.1 Terravs.Muse Wonder Full
Which one is better?
Muse Wonder Full is clearly ahead in the overall index.
67
GPT-6.1 Terra
Rank 12 to 27
90
Muse Wonder Full
Rank 6 to 9
91
GPT-6.1 Terra
fairly slow
n/a
Muse Wonder Full
$2
GPT-6.1 Terra
fairly expensive
n/a
Muse Wonder Full
GPT-6.1 Terra
- Subscription
Subscriptions in Germany: n/a
- Via API
$1 input, $5 output per 1M tokens.
Muse Wonder Full
- Subscription
Not included in any subscription in Germany.
- Via API
n/a (no API price known).
Overall index with data through Oct 29, 2026 · Prices from Oct 29, 2026 · Speed: measured by Artificial Analysis · Subscriptions as of Oct 24, 2026 · Subscription prices incl. VAT
Where is the difference?
Values from 0 to 100 per task area. We only name a winner when the gap is large enough and there are enough tests.
GPT-6.1 Terra ahead: 0Muse Wonder Full ahead: 4level: 2too little data: 4of 10 areas
AreaGPT-6.1 TerraMuse Wonder Full0 to 100, higher is betterResult
Areas in the overall index
CodinglevelGPT-6.1 Terra: 84Muse Wonder Full: 85
ReasoninglevelGPT-6.1 Terra: 88Muse Wonder Full: 90
Mathematicsonly Muse Wonder Full has a scoreGPT-6.1 Terra: not enough dataMuse Wonder Full: 88
KnowledgeMuse Wonder Full aheadGPT-6.1 Terra: 80Muse Wonder Full: 90
AgentsMuse Wonder Full aheadGPT-6.1 Terra: 57Muse Wonder Full: 88
Generalonly Muse Wonder Full has a scoreGPT-6.1 Terra: not enough dataMuse Wonder Full: 79
Multimodalonly GPT-6.1 Terra has a scoreGPT-6.1 Terra: 70Muse Wonder Full: not enough data
Specialist fields
FinanceMuse Wonder Full aheadGPT-6.1 Terra: 45Muse Wonder Full: 89
LegalMuse Wonder Full aheadGPT-6.1 Terra: 8Muse Wonder Full: 94
Healthonly Muse Wonder Full has a scoreGPT-6.1 Terra: not enough dataMuse Wonder Full: 82
Show 2 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
AreaGPT-6.1 TerraMuse Wonder Full0 to 100, higher is betterResult
Cybersecurityonly Muse Wonder Full has a scoreGPT-6.1 Terra: not enough dataMuse Wonder Full: 92
Productivityonly Muse Wonder Full has a scoreGPT-6.1 Terra: not enough dataMuse Wonder Full: 96
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.
Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.
GPT-6.1 Terra
Not tested yet
Muse Wonder Full
Not tested yet
Prompt and test conditions
Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle
Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens
Task origin (Simon Willison)All data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra | Muse Wonder Full |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall index0 to 100, higher is better | 67 | 90 |
| Rank | Rank 12 to 27 of 95 | Rank 6 to 9 of 95 |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | $1above 272,000 tokens: $2 | n/a |
| Outputwhat the model writes | $5above 272,000 tokens: $7.50 | n/a |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | 91 | n/a |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages | 1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 1, 2026 | n/a |
| Released | Oct 26, 2026 | Oct 12, 2026 |
| Availability | Active | Subscription only |
| Open weights | no | no |
- GPT-6.1 Terra, 12-hour cache write: The table's cache-write rate covers 30-minute retention. With 12-hour retention it is $2.50 per 1M tokens through 272,000 input tokens, $5 above. Source
- GPT-6.1 Terra, Long-context billing: Above 272,000 input tokens, the higher rates apply to the entire request. Input and cache rates double, while output costs 1.5 times the standard rate. Source
- GPT-6.1 Terra, Batch and Flex pricing: 50% off standard pricing Source
- GPT-6.1 Terra, Fast pricing: Fast mode costs twice the standard price Source
- GPT-6.1 Terra, Regional processing: 10% surcharge over standard processing Source
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Shared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
A: GPT-6.1 TerraB: Muse Wonder Full
AA-BriefcaseOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Terra: 1,401.68 eloMuse Wonder Full: 1,729.32 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 10/29/2026
AA-OmniscienceOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Terra: 29.567 pointsMuse Wonder Full: 30.6 pointsArtificial AnalysisAs of 10/29/2026
AA-Omniscience AccuracyOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Terra: 47.6%Muse Wonder Full: 41.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 10/29/2026
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateOverall · lower is betterGPT-6.1 Terra: 34.5%Muse Wonder Full: 17.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 10/29/2026
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Terra: 50.977 pointsMuse Wonder Full: 49.727 pointsArtificial AnalysisAs of 10/29/2026
AutomationBench-AAOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Terra: 60.2%Muse Wonder Full: 71.3%Artificial AnalysisAs of 10/29/2026
CritPt v2Overall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Terra: 28.0%Muse Wonder Full: 32.9%Artificial AnalysisAs of 10/29/2026
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)Overall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Terra: 64.5%Muse Wonder Full: 53.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 10/29/2026
EMB v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 73.3%Muse Wonder Full: 75%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 56%Muse Wonder Full: 67.6%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
FrontierCodeOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Terra: 42.3%Muse Wonder Full: 37.8%Artificial AnalysisAs of 10/29/2026
FrontierCode 1.1 MainOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Terra: 36.0%Muse Wonder Full: 44.9%Artificial AnalysisAs of 10/29/2026
GDP.pdfOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Terra: 28.6%Muse Wonder Full: 32.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 10/29/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Terra: 1,476.05 eloMuse Wonder Full: 1,857.09 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 10/29/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Overall · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 1.7%Muse Wonder Full: 23.3%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
HLE-DiamondOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Terra: 47.3%Muse Wonder Full: 48.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 26%Muse Wonder Full: 53.4%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 15.2%Muse Wonder Full: 43%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Terminal-BenchOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Terra: 55.6%Muse Wonder Full: 57.1%Artificial AnalysisAs of 10/29/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 49.5%Muse Wonder Full: 58.1%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Terra: 57.6%Muse Wonder Full: 37.1%Artificial AnalysisAs of 10/29/2026
Vals Finance IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 52.9%Muse Wonder Full: 64.6%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Vals IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 60.5%Muse Wonder Full: 66.8%Vals AIAs of 10/27/2026
Vals Legal IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 58.6%Muse Wonder Full: 77.9%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 84%Muse Wonder Full: 86%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
EMB v1.1Comps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 75.6%Muse Wonder Full: 80.2%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 50.6%Muse Wonder Full: 74.7%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Antitrust Competition · Criteria passed · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 83%Muse Wonder Full: 96.9%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 45.5%Muse Wonder Full: 63.6%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 5.9%Muse Wonder Full: 26.7%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 26.7%Muse Wonder Full: 46.7%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Vals Finance IndexEMB v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 73.3%Muse Wonder Full: 75%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Vals IndexCode Migration v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 72.2%Muse Wonder Full: 61.7%Vals AIAs of 10/27/2026
Vals Legal IndexBusiness & Commercial · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 51.6%Muse Wonder Full: 77.1%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
EMB v1.1Dataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 86.3%Muse Wonder Full: 86.6%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Finance Agent v2.1All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 42.6%Muse Wonder Full: 54.9%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Antitrust Competition · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 0%Muse Wonder Full: 40%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 84.8%Muse Wonder Full: 92.8%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 42.5%Muse Wonder Full: 76.1%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 58.3%Muse Wonder Full: 58.3%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Vals Finance IndexFinance Agent v2.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 56%Muse Wonder Full: 67.6%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Vals IndexEMB v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 73.3%Muse Wonder Full: 75%Vals AIAs of 10/27/2026
Vals Legal IndexCivil Negligence · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 50.5%Muse Wonder Full: 70.1%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
EMB v1.1DCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 64.3%Muse Wonder Full: 65.7%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 50.4%Muse Wonder Full: 55%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Arbitration International Dispute Resolution · Criteria passed · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 88.4%Muse Wonder Full: 96.6%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 16.3%Muse Wonder Full: 58.1%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 22.1%Muse Wonder Full: 56.6%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0ML · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 42.4%Muse Wonder Full: 66.7%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Vals Finance IndexTax Agent Bench · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 15.2%Muse Wonder Full: 43%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Vals IndexFinance Agent v2.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 56%Muse Wonder Full: 67.6%Vals AIAs of 10/27/2026
Vals Legal IndexCriminal · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 51.3%Muse Wonder Full: 72.9%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
EMB v1.1LBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 64.1%Muse Wonder Full: 63.5%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 64.2%Muse Wonder Full: 80.6%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Arbitration International Dispute Resolution · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 0%Muse Wonder Full: 10%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 75.9%Muse Wonder Full: 89.8%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 53.1%Muse Wonder Full: 78.3%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Operations · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 40.7%Muse Wonder Full: 48.1%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Vals IndexHLAB-Vals-1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 1.7%Muse Wonder Full: 23.3%Vals AIAs of 10/27/2026
Vals Legal IndexFamily · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 4.5%Muse Wonder Full: 31.8%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
EMB v1.1M&A · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 80.7%Muse Wonder Full: 83.4%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Earnings Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 83%Muse Wonder Full: 84.8%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Banking Finance · Criteria passed · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 90.1%Muse Wonder Full: 97.6%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 14.8%Muse Wonder Full: 44.4%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Compare another matchup
More matchups
Related LLM comparisons
Compare GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Wonder Full with other leading models.