Skip to main content

GPT-6.1 Terravs.GPT-5.4

Is the higher price worth it?

No: GPT-6.1 Terra is cheaper and even ahead in the overall index.

IntelligenceOverall index, 0 to 100 · higher is better
67

GPT-6.1 Terra

Rank 12 to 27

16

GPT-5.4

Rank 43 to 50

SpeedTokens per second · higher is better
91

GPT-6.1 Terra

fairly slow

101

GPT-5.4

fairly fast

PriceDollars per 1M tokens · lower is better
$2

GPT-6.1 Terra

fairly expensive

$5.63

GPT-5.4

expensive

GPT-6.1 Terra

Subscription

Subscriptions in Germany: n/a

Via API

$1 input, $5 output per 1M tokens.

GPT-5.4

Subscription

No OpenAI subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €6.36 a month (ElevenLabs Starter, with limited credits). 38 plans in Germany.

Via API

$2.50 input, $15 output per 1M tokens, unchanged since our price tracking began on Aug 14, 2026.

Note
There is a successor: GPT-5.5 (rank 19 to 35, $5 input, $30 output).

Overall index with data through Oct 29, 2026 · Prices from Oct 29, 2026 · Speed: measured by Artificial Analysis · Subscriptions as of Oct 24, 2026 · Subscription prices incl. VAT

Where is the difference?

Values from 0 to 100 per task area. We only name a winner when the gap is large enough and there are enough tests.

GPT-6.1 Terra ahead: 5GPT-5.4 ahead: 0level: 2too little data: 2of 9 areas

GPT-6.1 TerraGPT-5.40 to 100, higher is better
Areas in the overall index
CodingGPT-6.1 Terra aheadGPT-6.1 Terra: 84GPT-5.4: 15
ReasoningGPT-6.1 Terra aheadGPT-6.1 Terra: 88GPT-5.4: 20
KnowledgeGPT-6.1 Terra aheadGPT-6.1 Terra: 80GPT-5.4: 18
AgentsGPT-6.1 Terra aheadGPT-6.1 Terra: 57GPT-5.4: 25
Generalonly GPT-5.4 has a scoreGPT-6.1 Terra: not enough dataGPT-5.4: 18
MultimodalGPT-6.1 Terra aheadGPT-6.1 Terra: 70GPT-5.4: 20
Specialist fields
FinancelevelGPT-6.1 Terra: 45GPT-5.4: 17
LegallevelGPT-6.1 Terra: 8GPT-5.4: 14
Healthonly GPT-5.4 has a scoreGPT-6.1 Terra: not enough dataGPT-5.4: 8

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

GPT-6.1 Terra

Not tested yet

GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Reasoning (requested): high

Current attempt
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-5.4
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-5.4
Reasoning setting
high
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-5.4-20260305
Temperature
Provider default
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating
Response time
116.8 s

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (1)
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
Prompt and test conditions

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens

Task origin (Simon Willison)
SVG short test

There is no shared test round for this selection. Results from different rounds are not mixed.

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricGPT-6.1 TerraGPT-5.4
Intelligence
Overall index0 to 100, higher is better6716
RankRank 12 to 27 of 95Rank 43 to 50 of 95
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$1above 272,000 tokens: $2$2.50above 272,000 tokens: $5
Outputwhat the model writes$5above 272,000 tokens: $7.50$15above 272,000 tokens: $22.50
Speed
Tokens per second91101
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJun 1, 2026Aug 31, 2025
ReleasedOct 26, 2026Mar 5, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono
  • GPT-6.1 Terra, 12-hour cache write: The table's cache-write rate covers 30-minute retention. With 12-hour retention it is $2.50 per 1M tokens through 272,000 input tokens, $5 above. Source
  • GPT-6.1 Terra, Long-context billing: Above 272,000 input tokens, the higher rates apply to the entire request. Input and cache rates double, while output costs 1.5 times the standard rate. Source
  • GPT-6.1 Terra, Batch and Flex pricing: 50% off standard pricing Source
  • GPT-6.1 Terra, Fast pricing: Fast mode costs twice the standard price Source
  • GPT-6.1 Terra, Regional processing: 10% surcharge over standard processing Source

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: GPT-6.1 TerraB: GPT-5.4

CritPt v2Overall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Terra: 4.9%GPT-5.4: 0.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 10/29/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Terra: 1,415.29 eloGPT-5.4: 1,256.1 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 10/29/2026
MMMU-ProOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Terra: 76.0%GPT-5.4: 70.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 10/29/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Terra: 84%GPT-5.4: 67.4%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
CritPt v2Overall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Terra: 15.1%GPT-5.4: 7.4%Artificial AnalysisAs of 10/29/2026
MMMU-ProOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Terra: 82.5%GPT-5.4: 78.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 10/29/2026
CritPt v2Overall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Terra: 26.6%GPT-5.4: 23.4%Artificial AnalysisAs of 10/29/2026
MMMU-ProOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Terra: 83.8%GPT-5.4: 78.4%Artificial AnalysisAs of 10/29/2026

Compare another matchup