- Home
- LLM comparison
- GPT-5.4 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
GPT-5.4vs.Qwen 3.8 27B
Which one is better?
Level in the overall index: the gap is too small for a clear winner. Qwen 3.8 27B is cheaper: GPT-5.4 costs 62.5 times (input) and 6 times (output) as much per token.
GPT-5.4
Rank 43 to 50
Qwen 3.8 27B
Rank 44 to 57
GPT-5.4
fairly fast
Qwen 3.8 27B
slow
GPT-5.4
expensive
Qwen 3.8 27B
fairly cheap
GPT-5.4
- Subscription
No OpenAI subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €6.36 a month (ElevenLabs Starter, with limited credits). 38 plans in Germany.
- Via API
$2.50 input, $15 output per 1M tokens, unchanged since our price tracking began on Aug 14, 2026.
- Note
- There is a successor: GPT-5.5 (rank 19 to 35, $5 input, $30 output).
Qwen 3.8 27B
- Subscription
No Alibaba subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €1.06 a month (Command Code Go, with limited credits). 10 plans in Germany.
- Via API
$0.04 input, $2.50 output per 1M tokens according to the provider; the price index has listed it at $0.42 and $3 since Oct 27, 2026.
Overall index with data through Oct 29, 2026 · Prices from Oct 29, 2026 · Speed: measured by Artificial Analysis · Subscriptions as of Oct 24, 2026 · Subscription prices incl. VAT
Where is the difference?
Values from 0 to 100 per task area. We only name a winner when the gap is large enough and there are enough tests.
GPT-5.4 ahead: 2Qwen 3.8 27B ahead: 0level: 6too little data: 2of 10 areas
Show 1 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.
Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.
GPT-5.4

Reasoning (requested): high
Current attempt
- Run date
- Oct 1, 2026
- API provider
- openrouter
- Requested API model
- openai/gpt-5.4
- API model reported in response
- openai/gpt-5.4
- Reasoning setting
- high
- Pinned endpoint
- OpenAI | openai/gpt-5.4-20260305
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Test protocol
- community-visual-tests-v1
- Technical checks
- Passed, not a quality rating
- Response time
- 116.8 s
Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.
Earlier attempts (1)
- Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
Qwen 3.8 27B
Not tested yet
Prompt and test conditions
Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle
Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens
Task origin (Simon Willison)SVG short test
SVG short test
One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.
Shared test round: 43b8c5c46830
GPT-5.4
Unavailable in this round
Qwen 3.8 27B

Test details
API reports 0 reasoning tokensAPI model: qwen/qwen3.8-27b865 output tokensAll data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 | Qwen 3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall index0 to 100, higher is better | 16 | 11 |
| Rank | Rank 43 to 50 of 95 | Rank 44 to 57 of 95 |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | $2.50above 272,000 tokens: $5 | $0.04 |
| Outputwhat the model writes | $15above 272,000 tokens: $22.50 | $2.50 |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | 101 | 40 |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages | 262,144 tokens≈ 390 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | Aug 31, 2025 | n/a |
| Released | Mar 5, 2026 | Aug 14, 2026 |
| Availability | Active | Active |
| Open weights | no | yes |
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Shared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
A: GPT-5.4B: Qwen 3.8 27B