Claude Haiku 5.5
Unavailable in this round
Head-to-head comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.
- shared result series
- 0
- distinct benchmarks
- 0
- latest retrieval
- No data
Change model selection
Specifications
General specifications
Release date, availability, context window, architecture, and published parameter counts at a glance. Undisclosed details remain marked as unavailable.
| Attribute | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Released | Oct 7, 2026 | Jul 21, 2026 |
| Availability | Active | Active |
| Model type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Parameters | Not published | Not published |
| Architecture | Not published | Not published |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Knowledge cutoff | June 2026 | Not published |
| Technical sources | Model | Model |
Pricing
API pricing compared
The table compares official standard API rates per 1M tokens, including published cache pricing. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.
| Price type | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| API input | $0.1 ≤100K / $0.5 >100K | $0.3 |
| API output | $0.5 ≤100K / $2.5 >100K | $2.5 |
| Cache read | $0.01 ≤100K / $0.05 >100K | $0.03 |
| Cache write (5 min.) | $0.13 ≤100K / $0.63 >100K | Not listed |
| Cache write (1 hr.) | $0.2 ≤100K / $1 >100K | Not listed |
| Price verified | 10/13/2026 Source | 09/22/2026 Source |
Claude Haiku 5.5Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
API inputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Claude Haiku 5.5Lower price$0.1
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite$0.3
API outputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Claude Haiku 5.5Lower price$0.5
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite$2.5
Cache readUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Claude Haiku 5.5Lower price$0.01
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite$0.03
Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie
Pricing by provider
Direct developer pricing and provider endpoint tariffs routed through OpenRouter are listed separately. Prices are in USD per 1M tokens. Context-dependent direct tiers plus regional, Flex, Priority, and other OpenRouter tariffs remain individually identifiable.
No provider tariff for Claude Haiku 5.5 is available in the stored OpenRouter snapshot. The official direct price is still shown.
| Model | Provider | Purchase route and tariff | Input per 1M tokens | Output per 1M tokens | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Anthropic | Direct from developerUp to 100,000 context tokens | Lowest listed price: $0.1 | Lowest listed price: $0.5 | Source10/13/2026 |
| Anthropic | Direct from developerAbove 100,000 context tokens | $0.5 | $2.5 | Source10/13/2026 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Direct from developerStandard API | $0.3 | $2.5 | Source09/22/2026 | |
| Via OpenRoutergoogle-vertex/eu | $0.33 | $2.75 | Source10/12/2026 | ||
| Via OpenRoutergoogle-vertex/global | $0.3 | $2.5 | Source10/12/2026 | ||
| Via OpenRoutergoogle-vertex/global/flex | Lowest listed price: $0.15 | Lowest listed price: $1.25 | Source10/12/2026 | ||
| Via OpenRoutergoogle-vertex/global/priority | $0.54 | $4.5 | Source10/12/2026 | ||
| Via OpenRoutergoogle-vertex/us | $0.33 | $2.75 | Source10/12/2026 | ||
| Google AI Studio | Via OpenRoutergoogle-ai-studio | $0.3 | $2.5 | Source10/12/2026 | |
| Google AI Studio | Via OpenRoutergoogle-ai-studio/flex | Lowest listed price: $0.15 | Lowest listed price: $1.25 | Source10/12/2026 | |
| Google AI Studio | Via OpenRoutergoogle-ai-studio/priority | $0.54 | $4.5 | Source10/12/2026 |
Performance
Shared benchmarks
Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.
Capability profile from matched benchmarks
Each axis averages directly matched benchmark families. A value of 100 means the stronger value within this pair, not a universal quality score.
Not enough directly matched categories for a reliable radar
Only 0 of at least 5 categories have comparable, direct model measurements. The benchmark tables below show the available evidence without filling missing axes.
No directly comparable result series yet
No published benchmark for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite currently matches in version, task, metric, and comparison cohort. We therefore show no estimated or blended values.
Our model tests
Our tests
SVG short test
One SVG prompt and fixed output settings. Captures are shown only with 0 reported reasoning tokens or documented lack of reasoning controls. Identical test conditions do not make the models' internal compute identical.
Shared test round: 4ae5d8eeb9a9
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Unavailable in this round
Earlier tests
Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.
Claude Haiku 5.5
Not tested yet
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Reasoning (requested): high
Current attempt
- Run date
- Oct 2, 2026
- API provider
- openrouter
- Requested API model
- google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite
- API model reported in response
- google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite
- Reasoning setting
- high
- Pinned endpoint
- Google AI Studio | google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite-20260721
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Test protocol
- community-visual-tests-v1
- Technical checks
- Passed, not a quality rating
- Response time
- 14.3 s
Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.
Earlier attempts (2)
- Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
- Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
Prompt and test conditions
Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle
Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens
Task origin (Simon Willison)How to read this comparison
Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict
Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.
The standard price table uses direct developer rates. The provider comparison labels OpenRouter endpoints, regions, and special tariffs separately.
Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.
More matchups
Related LLM comparisons
Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite with other leading models using the same data and benchmark logic.