AlibabaAudio modelActive
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash-Realtime
0out of 100same as last month
Summary
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash-Realtime connects live text, audio, and video input to text and audio output. Its realtime documentation lists WebSocket, WebRTC, and AOQ transports; function calling and MCP form the documented action path.
The variant has a 196,608-token input context and up to 65,536 output tokens. Rates differ between Beijing and Singapore. Speech output is billed for both audio and its corresponding text. No separate new weights checkpoint is published.
On this page
All benchmark results
Every published result with its source, test setup and comparison models.
Show all 71 published benchmark results
Page 1 of 6
Measurements without matching peer values
These measurements have no matching peer values under the same test conditions. Their original values and sources remain available here.
SEED content stability, Chinese (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 0.74
- Score
- 0.74
- Metric
- content-stability WER/CER
- Unit
- %
- Benchmark version
- arXiv:2609.25611v1, Table 11
- Category
- audio
- Direction
- Lower is better
- Source type
- vendor-reported
- Evaluator
- Qwen3.8-Omni technical report
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-04
- Methodology
- Vendor-reported result. zero-shot voice cloning; SEED subsets
- Context
- Provider-reported zero-shot voice-cloning result; it is not an independently reproduced cohort.
SEED content stability, English (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 0.89
- Score
- 0.89
- Metric
- content-stability WER/CER
- Unit
- %
- Benchmark version
- arXiv:2609.25611v1, Table 11
- Category
- audio
- Direction
- Lower is better
- Source type
- vendor-reported
- Evaluator
- Qwen3.8-Omni technical report
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-04
- Methodology
- Vendor-reported result. zero-shot voice cloning; SEED subsets
- Context
- Provider-reported zero-shot voice-cloning result; it is not an independently reproduced cohort.
SEED content stability, hard (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 5.29
- Score
- 5.29
- Metric
- content-stability WER/CER
- Unit
- %
- Benchmark version
- arXiv:2609.25611v1, Table 11
- Category
- audio
- Direction
- Lower is better
- Source type
- vendor-reported
- Evaluator
- Qwen3.8-Omni technical report
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-04
- Methodology
- Vendor-reported result. zero-shot voice cloning; SEED subsets
- Context
- Provider-reported zero-shot voice-cloning result; it is not an independently reproduced cohort.
SpeechSuperClue content stability, multilingual (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 3.34
- Score
- 3.34
- Metric
- content-stability WER/CER
- Unit
- %
- Benchmark version
- arXiv:2609.25611v1, Table 11
- Category
- audio
- Direction
- Lower is better
- Source type
- vendor-reported
- Evaluator
- Qwen3.8-Omni technical report
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-04
- Methodology
- Vendor-reported result. zero-shot voice cloning; multilingual / cross-lingual subsets
- Context
- Provider-reported zero-shot voice-cloning result; it is not an independently reproduced cohort.
SpeechSuperClue content stability, cross-lingual (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 4
- Score
- 4
- Metric
- content-stability WER/CER
- Unit
- %
- Benchmark version
- arXiv:2609.25611v1, Table 11
- Category
- audio
- Direction
- Lower is better
- Source type
- vendor-reported
- Evaluator
- Qwen3.8-Omni technical report
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-04
- Methodology
- Vendor-reported result. zero-shot voice cloning; multilingual / cross-lingual subsets
- Context
- Provider-reported zero-shot voice-cloning result; it is not an independently reproduced cohort.
SwanBench-Speech content stability, Chinese (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 1.96
- Score
- 1.96
- Metric
- content-stability WER/CER
- Unit
- %
- Benchmark version
- arXiv:2609.25611v1, Table 11
- Category
- audio
- Direction
- Lower is better
- Source type
- vendor-reported
- Evaluator
- Qwen3.8-Omni technical report
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-04
- Methodology
- Vendor-reported result. zero-shot voice cloning; SwanBench-Speech subsets
- Context
- Provider-reported zero-shot voice-cloning result; it is not an independently reproduced cohort.
SwanBench-Speech content stability, English (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 2.37
- Score
- 2.37
- Metric
- content-stability WER/CER
- Unit
- %
- Benchmark version
- arXiv:2609.25611v1, Table 11
- Category
- audio
- Direction
- Lower is better
- Source type
- vendor-reported
- Evaluator
- Qwen3.8-Omni technical report
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-04
- Methodology
- Vendor-reported result. zero-shot voice cloning; SwanBench-Speech subsets
- Context
- Provider-reported zero-shot voice-cloning result; it is not an independently reproduced cohort.
LongSpeechGeneration content stability, Chinese (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 1.74
- Score
- 1.74
- Metric
- content-stability WER/CER
- Unit
- %
- Benchmark version
- arXiv:2609.25611v1, Table 11
- Category
- audio
- Direction
- Lower is better
- Source type
- vendor-reported
- Evaluator
- Qwen3.8-Omni technical report
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-04
- Methodology
- Vendor-reported result. zero-shot voice cloning; long-horizon generation
- Context
- Provider-reported zero-shot voice-cloning result; it is not an independently reproduced cohort.
LongSpeechGeneration content stability, English (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 1.59
- Score
- 1.59
- Metric
- content-stability WER/CER
- Unit
- %
- Benchmark version
- arXiv:2609.25611v1, Table 11
- Category
- audio
- Direction
- Lower is better
- Source type
- vendor-reported
- Evaluator
- Qwen3.8-Omni technical report
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-04
- Methodology
- Vendor-reported result. zero-shot voice cloning; long-horizon generation
- Context
- Provider-reported zero-shot voice-cloning result; it is not an independently reproduced cohort.
SEED Custom Voice content stability, Chinese (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 0.83
- Score
- 0.83
- Metric
- content-stability WER/CER
- Unit
- %
- Benchmark version
- arXiv:2609.25611v1, Table 12
- Category
- audio
- Direction
- Lower is better
- Source type
- vendor-reported
- Evaluator
- Qwen3.8-Omni technical report
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-04
- Methodology
- Vendor-reported result. custom-voice evaluation; table notes define WER/CER lower, similarity/accuracy/win rate higher
- Context
- Provider-reported Custom Voice result; it is not an independently reproduced cohort.
SEED Custom Voice content stability, English (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 0.93
- Score
- 0.93
- Metric
- content-stability WER/CER
- Unit
- %
- Benchmark version
- arXiv:2609.25611v1, Table 12
- Category
- audio
- Direction
- Lower is better
- Source type
- vendor-reported
- Evaluator
- Qwen3.8-Omni technical report
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-04
- Methodology
- Vendor-reported result. custom-voice evaluation; table notes define WER/CER lower, similarity/accuracy/win rate higher
- Context
- Provider-reported Custom Voice result; it is not an independently reproduced cohort.
SEED Custom Voice content stability, hard (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 5.22
- Score
- 5.22
- Metric
- content-stability WER/CER
- Unit
- %
- Benchmark version
- arXiv:2609.25611v1, Table 12
- Category
- audio
- Direction
- Lower is better
- Source type
- vendor-reported
- Evaluator
- Qwen3.8-Omni technical report
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-04
- Methodology
- Vendor-reported result. custom-voice evaluation; table notes define WER/CER lower, similarity/accuracy/win rate higher
- Context
- Provider-reported Custom Voice result; it is not an independently reproduced cohort.
Page 1 of 6
Popularity compared
How often the model is searched for, used and mentioned, compared with every model of its category.
Popularity index
0 to 100, higher is more popular
20 of 83 models
As of November 2026 · Source: gradually.ai popularity index
Over time
Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash-RealtimeAmazon Nova 2 SonicEleven Multilingual STS v2Eleven Music v2.5Eleven Text to Sound v2
All specifications
Architecture
Input and output
Watermarking and provenance
AI watermarking refers to invisible signals embedded in the output. Visible marks and provenance metadata are listed separately. Unknown means there is insufficient evidence for that particular field.
- AI watermarking
- Unknown
- no source
- Watermarking technique
- Not known
- no source
Licence and access
API
Further details
- Audio history
- Up to 100 audio turns or 600 seconds; video up to 50 turns or 240 seconds
- Source: Audio history
Prices
- China (Beijing) pricing
- Per 1M tokens in CNY. Audio input 6, audio output 12; text/image/video input 1.5, text output 4.5Source
- Singapore pricing
- Per 1M tokens in CNY. Audio input 6.781, audio output 13.636; text/image/video input 1.677, text output 5.104Source
- Speech billing
- Speech output is billed as audio and its corresponding textSource
- Free quota
- 1M tokens in China (Beijing), valid for 90 days; not automatically applicable to other regionsSource
Sources and data date
Show all 11 sources
Benchmark sources at a glance
Which independent evaluators tested this model. This is coverage, not a quality ranking.
No active result from the reviewed external evaluators can currently be attributed to this model. Other source evidence remains available below.
Without vendor claims and historical or disputed results; those stay labelled in the single values.