Skip to main content

ElevenLabsAudio modelActive

Eleven Music v2.5

PopularityRank 670 of 875

0out of 100same as last month

Summary

Eleven Music v2.5 generates music from natural-language instructions. The current ElevenLabs documentation highlights better prompt adherence, richer melodies, deeper arrangements, and more layered instruments. You can choose vocals or an instrumental result while specifying genre, style, and structure.

Eleven Music v2.5 combines composition plans, audio references, and inpainting in one music model. It can revise selected sections of a piece, while an individual sound effect belongs to the narrower Text to Sound model.

All benchmark results

Every published result with its source, test setup and comparison models.

Show all 18 published benchmark results

Page 1 of 2

Measurements without matching peer values

These measurements have no matching peer values under the same test conditions. Their original values and sources remain available here.

Genflick median written-lyrics recovery by Scribe v2 (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
99
Score
99
Metric
median share of written lyrics recovered in order by Scribe v2 speech-to-text
Unit
%
Benchmark version
Genflick test published 2026-10-02; current model music_v2_5
Category
audio generation / lyric recovery
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
26
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Genflick observed music-generation benchmark
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-17
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Genflick reports the median share of the written lyrics recovered in order by ElevenLabs Scribe v2 across the 26 generated songs in its music_v2_5 test. The page lists 8 languages and 26 minutes of audio. The model serving revision is not pinned.
Context
This is an ASR-based lyric-recovery proxy, not a human lyric-fidelity or acoustic-quality score. It evaluates the interaction of generated audio and Scribe v2 transcription.
Source Genflick observed music-generation benchmark
Artificial Analysis AA-Music-Instrumental Elo (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1001
Score
1001
Metric
blind pairwise same-prompt music preference Elo
Unit
elo
Benchmark version
AA-Music-Instrumental v1.1
Category
audio
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
2236
Confidence interval
21
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-15
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Blind pairwise comparisons generated from the same prompts, judged by validated evaluators; instrumental generation cohort; 2,236 appearances.
Context
Appearances are not unique listeners; vocal and instrumental cohorts measure separate tasks.
Source Artificial Analysis
Artificial Analysis AA-Music-Vocal Elo (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1012
Score
1012
Metric
blind pairwise same-prompt music preference Elo
Unit
elo
Benchmark version
AA-Music-Vocal v1.1
Category
audio
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
2656
Confidence interval
19
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-15
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Blind pairwise comparisons generated from the same prompts, judged by validated evaluators; vocal generation cohort; 2,656 appearances.
Context
Appearances are not unique listeners; vocal and instrumental cohorts measure separate tasks.
Source Artificial Analysis
Genflick median generation time for a 60-second song (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
8
Score
8
Metric
median generation latency for a 60-second song
Unit
seconds
Benchmark version
Genflick test published 2026-10-02; current model music_v2_5
Category
audio generation
Direction
Lower is better
Sample
17
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Genflick observed music-generation benchmark
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-17
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Genflick reports testing the current ElevenLabs Compose Music API model_id music_v2_5. The page reports 26 songs across 8 languages and a median time for a 60-second song across 17 one-at-a-time runs; the range was 7.0 to 10.4 seconds. Serving revision is not pinned.
Context
This is an external observation of the serving API, not a pinned model-weight evaluation. Genflick does not report a confidence interval.
Source Genflick observed music-generation benchmark
Genflick Music v2.5 generated songs with 100% written-lyrics recovery (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
12
Score
12
Metric
Count of generated songs for which Scribe v2 recovered 100% of the written lyrics
Unit
count
Category
audio
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
26
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Genflick GenBench music research
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-19
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Genflick identifies its tested generation model as current ElevenLabs Compose Music model_id music_v2_5 and reports 26 songs, 8 languages, and 26 minutes of audio. This row is the source-reported count of songs with full written-lyrics recovery by Scribe v2; the source says 12 of 26 songs returned at 100%.
Context
This is a source-reported count within the same 26-song experiment as the already-recorded median lyric-recovery cell; it is not an independent second sample. Generation API revision is not pinned.
Source Genflick GenBench music research
Promptif CLAP genre similarity: 30-second lo-fi instrumental, English description (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
0.555
Score
0.555
Metric
CLAP similarity to the requested genre description among six genre candidates
Unit
No unit provided
Benchmark version
Promptif four-track Eleven Music v2.5 test; verified 2026-09-29; article published 2026-09-30
Category
audio
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
1
Source type
community-reported
Evaluator
Promptif
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-19
Methodology
Community-reported result. Promptif's own four-output API test of exact model_id music_v2_5, verified 2026-09-29. Two 30-second instrumental lo-fi tracks used English and French style prompts; two 45-second indie-pop songs used the same supplied 54-word French lyrics with English and French style descriptions, one generation per condition. CLAP compared each track against six genre descriptions; Scribe transcription was compared with the supplied lyrics. The source gives no CI, repeated-run distribution, or immutable serving revision.
Context
Community-reported four-output test with one generation per condition, automatic CLAP/Scribe measurements and no blinded human listening. Promptif discloses an ElevenLabs affiliate link; the rows are not a cross-model comparison or repeated-run estimate.
Source Promptif
Promptif CLAP genre similarity: 30-second lo-fi instrumental, French description (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
0.545
Score
0.545
Metric
CLAP similarity to the requested genre description among six genre candidates
Unit
No unit provided
Benchmark version
Promptif four-track Eleven Music v2.5 test; verified 2026-09-29; article published 2026-09-30
Category
audio
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
1
Source type
community-reported
Evaluator
Promptif
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-19
Methodology
Community-reported result. Promptif's own four-output API test of exact model_id music_v2_5, verified 2026-09-29. Two 30-second instrumental lo-fi tracks used English and French style prompts; two 45-second indie-pop songs used the same supplied 54-word French lyrics with English and French style descriptions, one generation per condition. CLAP compared each track against six genre descriptions; Scribe transcription was compared with the supplied lyrics. The source gives no CI, repeated-run distribution, or immutable serving revision.
Context
Community-reported four-output test with one generation per condition, automatic CLAP/Scribe measurements and no blinded human listening. Promptif discloses an ElevenLabs affiliate link; the rows are not a cross-model comparison or repeated-run estimate.
Source Promptif
Promptif CLAP genre similarity: 45-second indie-pop song, English style description (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
0.407
Score
0.407
Metric
CLAP similarity to the requested genre description among six genre candidates
Unit
No unit provided
Benchmark version
Promptif four-track Eleven Music v2.5 test; verified 2026-09-29; article published 2026-09-30
Category
audio
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
1
Source type
community-reported
Evaluator
Promptif
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-19
Methodology
Community-reported result. Promptif's own four-output API test of exact model_id music_v2_5, verified 2026-09-29. Two 30-second instrumental lo-fi tracks used English and French style prompts; two 45-second indie-pop songs used the same supplied 54-word French lyrics with English and French style descriptions, one generation per condition. CLAP compared each track against six genre descriptions; Scribe transcription was compared with the supplied lyrics. The source gives no CI, repeated-run distribution, or immutable serving revision.
Context
Community-reported four-output test with one generation per condition, automatic CLAP/Scribe measurements and no blinded human listening. Promptif discloses an ElevenLabs affiliate link; the rows are not a cross-model comparison or repeated-run estimate.
Source Promptif
Promptif CLAP genre similarity: 45-second indie-pop song, French style description (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
0.354
Score
0.354
Metric
CLAP similarity to the requested genre description among six genre candidates
Unit
No unit provided
Benchmark version
Promptif four-track Eleven Music v2.5 test; verified 2026-09-29; article published 2026-09-30
Category
audio
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
1
Source type
community-reported
Evaluator
Promptif
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-19
Methodology
Community-reported result. Promptif's own four-output API test of exact model_id music_v2_5, verified 2026-09-29. Two 30-second instrumental lo-fi tracks used English and French style prompts; two 45-second indie-pop songs used the same supplied 54-word French lyrics with English and French style descriptions, one generation per condition. CLAP compared each track against six genre descriptions; Scribe transcription was compared with the supplied lyrics. The source gives no CI, repeated-run distribution, or immutable serving revision.
Context
Community-reported four-output test with one generation per condition, automatic CLAP/Scribe measurements and no blinded human listening. Promptif discloses an ElevenLabs affiliate link; the rows are not a cross-model comparison or repeated-run estimate.
Source Promptif
Promptif Scribe lyric-transcript word differences: English style description (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
4
Score
4
Metric
Word differences from the supplied 54-word French lyric, one generated song
Unit
count
Benchmark version
Promptif four-track Eleven Music v2.5 test; verified 2026-09-29; article published 2026-09-30
Category
audio
Direction
Lower is better
Sample
1
Source type
community-reported
Evaluator
Promptif
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-19
Methodology
Community-reported result. Promptif's own four-output API test of exact model_id music_v2_5, verified 2026-09-29. Two 30-second instrumental lo-fi tracks used English and French style prompts; two 45-second indie-pop songs used the same supplied 54-word French lyrics with English and French style descriptions, one generation per condition. CLAP compared each track against six genre descriptions; Scribe transcription was compared with the supplied lyrics. The source gives no CI, repeated-run distribution, or immutable serving revision.
Context
Community-reported four-output test with one generation per condition, automatic CLAP/Scribe measurements and no blinded human listening. Promptif discloses an ElevenLabs affiliate link; the rows are not a cross-model comparison or repeated-run estimate.
Source Promptif
Promptif Scribe lyric-transcript word differences: French style description (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
2
Score
2
Metric
Word differences from the supplied 54-word French lyric, one generated song
Unit
count
Benchmark version
Promptif four-track Eleven Music v2.5 test; verified 2026-09-29; article published 2026-09-30
Category
audio
Direction
Lower is better
Sample
1
Source type
community-reported
Evaluator
Promptif
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-19
Methodology
Community-reported result. Promptif's own four-output API test of exact model_id music_v2_5, verified 2026-09-29. Two 30-second instrumental lo-fi tracks used English and French style prompts; two 45-second indie-pop songs used the same supplied 54-word French lyrics with English and French style descriptions, one generation per condition. CLAP compared each track against six genre descriptions; Scribe transcription was compared with the supplied lyrics. The source gives no CI, repeated-run distribution, or immutable serving revision.
Context
Community-reported four-output test with one generation per condition, automatic CLAP/Scribe measurements and no blinded human listening. Promptif discloses an ElevenLabs affiliate link; the rows are not a cross-model comparison or repeated-run estimate.
Source Promptif
Promptif single-generation time: 30-second lo-fi instrumental, English description (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
6.2
Score
6.2
Metric
Observed single-request generation time
Unit
seconds
Benchmark version
Promptif four-track Eleven Music v2.5 test; verified 2026-09-29; article published 2026-09-30
Category
audio
Direction
Lower is better
Sample
1
Source type
community-reported
Evaluator
Promptif
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-19
Methodology
Community-reported result. Promptif's own four-output API test of exact model_id music_v2_5, verified 2026-09-29. Two 30-second instrumental lo-fi tracks used English and French style prompts; two 45-second indie-pop songs used the same supplied 54-word French lyrics with English and French style descriptions, one generation per condition. CLAP compared each track against six genre descriptions; Scribe transcription was compared with the supplied lyrics. The source gives no CI, repeated-run distribution, or immutable serving revision.
Context
Community-reported four-output test with one generation per condition, automatic CLAP/Scribe measurements and no blinded human listening. Promptif discloses an ElevenLabs affiliate link; the rows are not a cross-model comparison or repeated-run estimate.
Source Promptif

Page 1 of 2

Popularity compared

How often the model is searched for, used and mentioned, compared with every model of its category.

Popularity index

0 to 100, higher is more popular

20 of 83 models

As of November 2026 · Source: gradually.ai popularity index

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026

Eleven Music v2.5Amazon Nova 2 SonicEleven Multilingual STS v2Eleven Text to Sound v2Falcon-ASR

All specifications

Architecture

Model class
Music generation
Source: Model class

Input and output

Input
Text
Source: Input
Output
Music audio
Source: Output

Watermarking and provenance

AI watermarking refers to invisible signals embedded in the output. Visible marks and provenance metadata are listed separately. Unknown means there is insufficient evidence for that particular field.

AI watermarking
Unknown
no source
Watermarking technique
Not known
no source

Licence and access

API

API model ID
music_v2_5
Source: API model ID

Further details

Task
Generate music
Source: Task
Supported details
Text-based music generation
Source: Supported details
Production features
Composition plans, audio references, and inpainting
Source: Production features

Sources and data date

Show all 12 sources

Benchmark sources at a glance

Which independent evaluators tested this model. This is coverage, not a quality ranking.

No active result from the reviewed external evaluators can currently be attributed to this model. Other source evidence remains available below.

Without vendor claims and historical or disputed results; those stay labelled in the single values.

TypeEvidence and data date
Research statusResearch date October 15, 2026. 7 source URLs checked. This documents the inspected sources, not an exhaustive inventory of every publication.
Not published

pinned-serving-revision-and-confidence-interval

Note

Genflick does not report a pinned serving revision or confidence intervals.

Unresolved

generation API revision

Note

Genflick identifies model_id music_v2_5 but does not pin the served generation API revision. The 12-of-26 count is a breakdown from the same experiment, not a separate test.

Additional sourceElevenLabs model documentation (retrieved September 24, 2026; October 15, 2026) · ElevenLabs Models documentation · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceArtificial Analysis (retrieved October 15, 2026; October 23, 2026)12
Additional sourceGenflick observed music-generation benchmark (retrieved October 17, 2026; October 19, 2026; October 21, 2026)
Additional sourcePromptif (retrieved October 19, 2026)
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 17, 2026)
Additional sourceOpenRouter: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceVercel AI Gateway: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceOllama: cumulative downloads for the popularity index
Additional sourceReplicate: cumulative runs for the popularity index
Additional sourceGoogle Trending Now: limited feed selection for Germany and the US
Additional sourceCreative Commons Attribution 4.0