Skip to main content

inclusionAILanguage modelActive

Ling 3.1 Flash Base

Ling 3.1 Flash Base has no overall index value yet because there are too few independent benchmark results.

Summary

Ling 3.1 Flash Base is the base checkpoint in the Ling 3.1 Flash series. inclusionAI recommends it for further training, adaptation, and research, not as a ready-to-use chat assistant. The model card lists 560 billion total parameters and 25 billion active parameters per token. The released weights are BF16 and come from FP8 training followed by Warmup-Stable-and-Merge checkpoint merging.

The model card contains 47 results across eight domains. It lists the metric and shot configuration for each row. These are vendor reports without published sample counts or confidence intervals. They belong only to the base checkpoint and are not attributed to the upgraded 1019 checkpoint or the existing chat model.

The configuration sets max_position_embeddings to 262,144. The model card also reports RULER results through 256K. These are separate figures and are not treated as the same measurement.

All benchmark results

Every published result with its source, test setup and comparison models.

Show all 47 published benchmark results

Page 1 of 4

Measurements without matching peer values

These measurements have no matching peer values under the same test conditions. Their original values and sources remain available here.

Race-High (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
93.88
Score
93.88
Metric
EM
Unit
%
Category
Language understanding
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-29
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. 0-shot; metric EM; score as listed for Ling-3.1-flash-base in the official 47-benchmark base evaluation table.
Context
Vendor-reported result from the Ling-3.1-flash-base model card; no sample count or confidence interval is published. The 47-result table belongs to the base checkpoint only.
Source inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table
SquadV2 (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
92.79
Score
92.79
Metric
Acc
Unit
%
Category
Language understanding
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-29
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. 1-shot; metric Acc; score as listed for Ling-3.1-flash-base in the official 47-benchmark base evaluation table.
Context
Vendor-reported result from the Ling-3.1-flash-base model card; no sample count or confidence interval is published. The 47-result table belongs to the base checkpoint only.
Source inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table
Belebele (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
94.67
Score
94.67
Metric
EM
Unit
%
Category
Language understanding
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-29
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. 0-shot; metric EM; score as listed for Ling-3.1-flash-base in the official 47-benchmark base evaluation table.
Context
Vendor-reported result from the Ling-3.1-flash-base model card; no sample count or confidence interval is published. The 47-result table belongs to the base checkpoint only.
Source inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table
C3 (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
83.34
Score
83.34
Metric
EM
Unit
%
Category
Language understanding
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-29
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. 0-shot; metric EM; score as listed for Ling-3.1-flash-base in the official 47-benchmark base evaluation table.
Context
Vendor-reported result from the Ling-3.1-flash-base model card; no sample count or confidence interval is published. The 47-result table belongs to the base checkpoint only.
Source inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table
CCPM (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
91.88
Score
91.88
Metric
EM
Unit
%
Category
Language understanding
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-29
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. 0-shot; metric EM; score as listed for Ling-3.1-flash-base in the official 47-benchmark base evaluation table.
Context
Vendor-reported result from the Ling-3.1-flash-base model card; no sample count or confidence interval is published. The 47-result table belongs to the base checkpoint only.
Source inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table
ARC-c (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
97.97
Score
97.97
Metric
EM
Unit
%
Category
Knowledge
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-29
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. 0-shot; metric EM; score as listed for Ling-3.1-flash-base in the official 47-benchmark base evaluation table.
Context
Vendor-reported result from the Ling-3.1-flash-base model card; no sample count or confidence interval is published. The 47-result table belongs to the base checkpoint only.
Source inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table
AGIEval (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
82.59
Score
82.59
Metric
Acc
Unit
%
Category
Knowledge
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-29
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. few-shot (0-5); metric Acc; score as listed for Ling-3.1-flash-base in the official 47-benchmark base evaluation table.
Context
Vendor-reported result from the Ling-3.1-flash-base model card; no sample count or confidence interval is published. The 47-result table belongs to the base checkpoint only.
Source inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table
SimpleQA-Verified (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
52.4
Score
52.4
Metric
Acc
Unit
%
Category
Knowledge
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-29
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. 5-shot; metric Acc; score as listed for Ling-3.1-flash-base in the official 47-benchmark base evaluation table.
Context
Vendor-reported result from the Ling-3.1-flash-base model card; no sample count or confidence interval is published. The 47-result table belongs to the base checkpoint only.
Source inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table
C-SimpleQA (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
77.43
Score
77.43
Metric
Acc
Unit
%
Category
Knowledge
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-29
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. 5-shot; metric Acc; score as listed for Ling-3.1-flash-base in the official 47-benchmark base evaluation table.
Context
Vendor-reported result from the Ling-3.1-flash-base model card; no sample count or confidence interval is published. The 47-result table belongs to the base checkpoint only.
Source inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table
AA-Omniscience (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
37.67
Score
37.67
Metric
Acc
Unit
%
Category
Knowledge
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-29
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. 3-shot; metric Acc; score as listed for Ling-3.1-flash-base in the official 47-benchmark base evaluation table.
Context
Vendor-reported result from the Ling-3.1-flash-base model card; no sample count or confidence interval is published. The 47-result table belongs to the base checkpoint only.
Source inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table
MMLU-Pro (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
76.71
Score
76.71
Metric
EM
Unit
%
Category
Knowledge
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-29
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. 5-shot; metric EM; score as listed for Ling-3.1-flash-base in the official 47-benchmark base evaluation table.
Context
Vendor-reported result from the Ling-3.1-flash-base model card; no sample count or confidence interval is published. The 47-result table belongs to the base checkpoint only.
Source inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table
CEval (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
92.36
Score
92.36
Metric
EM
Unit
%
Category
Knowledge
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-29
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. 5-shot; metric EM; score as listed for Ling-3.1-flash-base in the official 47-benchmark base evaluation table.
Context
Vendor-reported result from the Ling-3.1-flash-base model card; no sample count or confidence interval is published. The 47-result table belongs to the base checkpoint only.
Source inclusionAI Ling-3.1-flash-base model card, Base Model Evaluation table

Page 1 of 4

All specifications

Architecture

Architecture
Hybrid-linear MoE with 63 KDA and 9 Gated MLA layers, 512 routed experts, one shared expert, and eight active routed experts per token.
Source: Architecture
Architecture
Hybrid-linear MoE with 63 KDA and 9 Gated MLA layers, 512 routed experts, one shared expert, and eight active routed experts
Source: Architecture

Licence and access

License
MIT
Source: License

Further details

Checkpoint type
Base checkpoint for continued pretraining, mid-training, fine-tuning, and research; the model card does not recommend direct end-user chat without additional post-training.
Source: Checkpoint type
Parameter scale
560 billion total parameters, with 25 billion active per token.
Source: Parameter scale
Training and weight precision
FP8 training; the released base files are the BF16 checkpoint after Warmup-Stable-and-Merge checkpoint merging.
Source: Training and weight precision
Configuration position limit
config.json sets max_position_embeddings to 262,144. The benchmark table reports RULER results through ruler_256k; that is a separate observed benchmark length.
Source: Configuration position limit
Benchmarks
The model card reports 47 scores across language understanding, knowledge, code, mathematics, reasoning, multilingual ability, medicine, and long context. Each table row lists its shot count and metric.
Source: Benchmarks
Checkpoint type
Base checkpoint for further training and research
Source: Checkpoint type
Parameter scale
560 billion total parameters, 25 billion active per token
Source: Parameter scale
Training and weight precision
FP8 training; BF16 weights are provided after Warmup-Stable-and-Merge
Source: Training and weight precision
Context configuration
config.json sets max_position_embeddings to 262,144; the RULER table includes results through 256k
Source: Context configuration
Benchmark scope
47 benchmark results across eight domains with metrics and shot configurations
Source: Benchmark scope

Frequently asked questions about Ling 3.1 Flash Base

How large is the context window of Ling 3.1 Flash Base?

262,144 tokens. That is how much text Ling 3.1 Flash Base reads at once, about 390 A4 pages.

Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Context windowTokens the model reads at once · higher is better
Ling 3.1 Flash BaseRank 68 of 100262K
Kimi K2.6262K
Qwen 3.8 27B262K
Kimi K2.7 Code262K
Kimi K2.5262K
Kimi K2 Thinking262K
Ling 3.0 Flash262K

Can I run Ling 3.1 Flash Base locally?

Yes, the weights are open. With 560B parameters it needs a lot of memory, more a server than a laptop.

Stated by inclusionAI

Open weights
yes
License
MIT
Parameters
560B
active per token
25B

Sources and data date

Benchmark sources at a glance

Which independent evaluators tested this model. This is coverage, not a quality ranking.

No active result from the reviewed external evaluators can currently be attributed to this model. Other source evidence remains available below.

Without vendor claims and historical or disputed results; those stay labelled in the single values.

TypeEvidence and data date
Research statusResearch date October 29, 2026. 58 source URLs checked. This documents the inspected sources, not an exhaustive inventory of every publication.
Not published

Benchmark sample counts and confidence intervals

Note

The 47-row table lists metric, shot configuration, and score, but no per-benchmark n or confidence intervals.

Not found in the inspected sources

Public weight availability date

Note

No verified public release date was found in the card and config. The repository creation timestamp is not treated as a release date.

Not found in the inspected sources

Vals rows in captured payloads

Note

Nine complete Vals payloads dated 28 October were checked; no exact model ID or unambiguous model label. Limited to these saved benchmarks.

Unresolved

Uncaptured Arena Code/Speech leaderboards

Note

Text, Agent including Code/Chat/Work, and twelve WebDev views were captured. A separate general Code and Arena Speech leaderboard were not saved as complete tables.

Unresolved

Artificial Analysis catalog reconciliation

Note

The full current AA model and benchmark catalog was not re-reconciled for this profile in this sidecar. This sidecar makes no AA absence claim; native AA imports remain authoritative.

Additional sourceLing-3.1-flash-base official model card (retrieved October 29, 2026) · Ling-3.1-flash-base official model card · Editorial description reviewed October 29, 2026
Additional sourceLing-3.1-flash-base configuration (retrieved October 29, 2026) · Ling-3.1-flash-base configuration · Editorial description reviewed October 29, 2026
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 29, 2026)12