Skip to main content

GoogleAudio modelActive

Gemini 3.8 Live

PopularityRank 663 of 875

0out of 100same as last month

Summary

Gemini 3.8 Live is designed for direct audio responses without an extra reasoning delay. It accepts text, images, audio, and video and returns text and audio. While an asynchronous function call runs, the session can keep streaming audio and updating session content; search grounding and built-in audio streaming are part of its documented live behavior.

The API profile allows 131,072 input tokens and 65,536 output tokens. Gemini 3.8 Live Extended Thinking is the separate variant for background reasoning, while Gemini 3.8 Live keeps direct dialogue and ongoing tool use open without that extra step.

All benchmark results

Every published result with its source, test setup and comparison models.

Show all 143 published benchmark results

Page 1 of 12

Measurements without matching peer values

These measurements have no matching peer values under the same test conditions. Their original values and sources remain available here.

Artificial Analysis Big Bench Audio speech reasoning (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
92
Score
92
Metric
accuracy
Unit
%
Benchmark version
Big Bench Audio v1.2
Category
audio
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
1000
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-15
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Native audio-to-audio on Big Bench Audio v1.2, 1,000 questions over four 250-item reasoning categories. Exact configuration: Gemini 3.8 Live.
Source Artificial Analysis
Artificial Analysis Conversational Dynamics (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
96.1
Score
96.1
Metric
conversational behavior score
Unit
%
Benchmark version
AA Full Duplex Bench v1 + v1.5 view
Category
audio
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-15
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Full Duplex Bench v1/v1.5 conversational behavior view (pause handling, turn taking, interruption and backchannel categories). Exact configuration: Gemini 3.8 Live.
Source Artificial Analysis
Artificial Analysis τ-Voice task completion (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
30.1
Score
30.1
Metric
Task Completion pass@1
Unit
%
Benchmark version
Artificial Analysis τ-Voice base task set
Category
audio
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-15
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Customer support agent task completion across airline (50), retail (114), telecom (114) scenarios, with tools and policy. Publisher's general protocol averages three trials; exact row Gemini 3.8 Live uses 3 trials.
Source Artificial Analysis
Speech Agent Arena task success rate (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
93.2
Score
93.2
Metric
eligible-conversation task success rate
Unit
%
Benchmark version
Current Speech Agent Arena board retrieved 2026-10-15
Category
audio
Direction
Higher is better
Lower confidence bound
89
Upper confidence bound
95.8
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-15
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Correct final task-completing tool call on eligible conversations only; participant deviations and unverifiable cases are excluded. Exact configuration: Gemini 3.8 Live.
Source Artificial Analysis
Speko S2S concierge call completion (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
98
Score
98
Metric
scripted call completion rate
Unit
%
Benchmark version
Speko S2S board v2; exact route google:gemini-3.8-live; measured 2026-09-16
Category
speech-to-speech / concierge task quality
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Speko speech-to-speech concierge benchmark
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-17
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Exact Speko route google:gemini-3.8-live, displayed model gemini-3.8-live; six multi-turn concierge scenarios, three sessions per scenario (18 sessions per model); scripted call completion rate. Measured 2026-09-16; evaluator states models were tested in their production-stack configuration.
Context
The evaluator publishes six scenarios and three sessions each, but not the denominator or confidence interval for each metric. No immutable backend revision or all request settings are listed. Latency and pricing cells are excluded.
Source Speko speech-to-speech concierge benchmark
Cekura Gemini 3.8 Live scenario reliability (pass³) (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
41.5
Score
41.5
Metric
share of scenarios passing on all three runs (pass^3)
Unit
%
Benchmark version
Cekura Gemini Live benchmark, page dated 2026-10-16
Category
speech-to-speech
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
82
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Cekura speech-to-speech benchmark
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-17
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Cekura's exact row is Gemini 3.8 Live, with no thinking level. The benchmark uses the same 82 scenarios for every model, each run three times, for 246 live calls per model. Reliability is the pass^3 scenario rate; the page reports 41.5%.
Context
The API serving revision is not pinned and the page does not publish a confidence interval. Do not confuse scenario N=82 with 246 calls.
Source Cekura speech-to-speech benchmark
Cekura TurnBench end-of-turn score (six-condition average) (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
82
Score
82
Metric
end-of-turn score averaged across six line conditions
Unit
%
Benchmark version
Cekura TurnBench leaderboard, retrieved 2026-10-17
Category
speech-to-speech / turn-taking
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Cekura TurnBench
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-17
Methodology
Independent evaluation. The exact leaderboard row is Gemini 3.8 Live. The source reports the end-of-turn score from Sesame TurnBench's published scorer, averaged over six line conditions and a 25-script private leaderboard set. It reports 36 calls per model per condition; all models heard the same recorded calls, streamed from US East with provider-default turn detection.
Context
The private benchmark set cannot be rerun externally. The page says its 95% range overlaps with several models but gives no exact interval for this row; no CI or serving revision is recorded.
Source Cekura TurnBench
VAmoS Energy verified task completion (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
40.1
Score
40.1
Metric
completion rate, fraction of counted attempts passing all task assertions
Unit
%
Benchmark version
VAmoS Part Deux v1, arXiv:2609.38512 (2026-09-29)
Category
speech-to-speech / voice-agent task completion
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
284
Lower confidence bound
34.6
Upper confidence bound
45.9
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
VAmoS Part Deux, VAmoS Energy
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-17
Methodology
Independent evaluation. The paper's Table 2 reports the exact speech-to-speech stack Gemini 3.8 Live, configured as gemini-3.8-live with the same bridge as Gemini 3.1 Live. VAmoS Energy uses 100 household utility-billing tasks, 16 tools backed by a stateful Stripe billing twin and Apache Fineract, two to four requests per call, and three repeats per task across 14 stacks. The completion denominator counts 284 retained Gemini attempts after benchmark-fault exclusions; agent-side run failures count as misses.
Context
This is the whole voice-agent stack, not an isolated model-only test. The benchmark globally excluded 402 fault-affected calls; the per-model retained attempt count is the reported n=284.
Source VAmoS Part Deux, VAmoS Energy
MPTB STOP yield on successful interruptions (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
100
Score
100
Metric
Yield rate on genuine floor-acquisition interruptions
Unit
%
Benchmark version
MultiPartyTurnBench, arXiv:2610.20172v1, Table 4
Category
speech-interaction
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
MultiPartyTurnBench
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-17
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Exact paper label Gemini-3.8-Live (Google, 2026); full-duplex agent test on 120 interactive floor-control scenarios repeated three times per system. Appendix G.3 attributes every stop on true interruptions to provider barge-in events, not solely to model reasoning.
Context
Whole-agent behavior, with provider VAD cancellation; not a model-only reasoning score. The plain live model was tested, not extended thinking. Serving revision is not published.
Source MultiPartyTurnBench
MPTB STOP false yield on backchannels (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
97.7
Score
97.7
Metric
False-yield rate on backchannels that do not acquire the floor
Unit
%
Benchmark version
MultiPartyTurnBench, arXiv:2610.20172v1, Table 4 and Appendix G.1
Category
speech-interaction
Direction
Lower is better
Sample
88
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
MultiPartyTurnBench
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-17
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Exact paper label Gemini-3.8-Live (Google, 2026); STOP test on non-floor-taking backchannels. Appendix G.1 gives 86 yields out of 88 backchannels; all tested Gemini stops coincide with provider barge-in cancellation.
Context
The observed stops are tied to provider VAD/barge-in behavior, not a pure model score. The denominator is 88 backchannel events, not independent scenarios. Serving revision is not published.
Source MultiPartyTurnBench
MPTB STOP balanced accuracy (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
51.1
Score
51.1
Metric
Balanced accuracy for selective interruption yielding; 50% is chance
Unit
%
Benchmark version
MultiPartyTurnBench, arXiv:2610.20172v1, Table 4
Category
speech-interaction
Direction
Higher is better
Lower confidence bound
50
Upper confidence bound
52.8
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
MultiPartyTurnBench
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-17
Methodology
Independent evaluation. Exact paper label Gemini-3.8-Live (Google, 2026); STOP balanced accuracy over true interruptions and backchannels. Table 4 brackets are 95% scenario-clustered bootstrap confidence intervals. Appendix G.3 finds stops coincide with provider VAD barge-in events.
Context
Whole-agent behavior with provider VAD cancellation, not a model-only score. The CI is scenario-clustered. The paper tests plain Gemini-3.8-Live, not extended thinking. Serving revision is not published.
Source MultiPartyTurnBench
IndicFDB English (Indian) pause handling success rate (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
100
Score
100
Metric
pause handling success rate
Unit
%
Benchmark version
IndicFDB arXiv:2609.31967v1, Table 2
Category
speech-to-speech / full-duplex
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
315
Source type
community-reported
Evaluator
IndicFDB paper, arXiv:2609.31967v1
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-18
Methodology
Community-reported result. IndicFDB per-language full-duplex evaluation. Exact source row: Gemini 3.8 Live, cited official model ID gemini-3.8-live. Language: English (Indian). The paper does not report a pinned serving revision.
Context
Primary paper table; institutional independence is not established. Authors list NVIDIA and VoiceArena affiliations. No 95% confidence interval or pinned serving revision is published. Results are language-specific and are not pooled across languages. N=315 pause-handling samples per language; S.R. is the category mean over all samples. Method limitation: IndicFDB uses alignment-free, multi-threshold VAD heuristics. These may mislabel corner cases (for example, brief answers as backchannels); transcription and translation errors can accumulate before judging.
Source IndicFDB paper, arXiv:2609.31967v1

Page 1 of 12

Popularity compared

How often the model is searched for, used and mentioned, compared with every model of its category.

Popularity index

0 to 100, higher is more popular

20 of 83 models

As of November 2026 · Source: gradually.ai popularity index

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026

Gemini 3.8 LiveGPT-Live 1Suno v6YuE2-3BAmazon Nova 2 Sonic

All specifications

Architecture

Model class
Real-time audio model
Source: Model class

Input and output

Input
Text, image, audio and video
Source: Input
Output
Text and audio
Source: Output
Capabilities
Interleaved reasoning, asynchronous function calling, session content updates, and built-in audio streaming
Source: Capabilities

Watermarking and provenance

AI watermarking refers to invisible signals embedded in the output. Visible marks and provenance metadata are listed separately. Unknown means there is insufficient evidence for that particular field.

AI watermarking
Yes. Google documents SynthID for audio outputs of the listed Gemini Audio models.
Source: AI watermarking
Watermarking technique
SynthID
Source: Watermarking technique
Labelling reviewed
Nov 5, 2026
Source: Labelling reviewed

Licence and access

API

API model ID
gemini-3.8-live
Source: API model ID

Further details

Task
Voice agents and dialogue
Source: Task
Supported details
Low latency without reasoning delay
Source: Supported details
Input limit
131,072 tokens
Source: Input limit
Output limit
65,536 tokens
Source: Output limit
Tools
Function calling and search grounding
Source: Tools

Prices

Text input price
$0.75 per 1M text tokensSource
Audio input price
$3 per 1M audio tokens ($0.005 per audio minute)Source
Text output price
$4.50 per 1M text tokensSource
Audio output price
$12 per 1M audio tokens ($0.018 per audio minute)Source
Pricing basis
Paid Standard tier, prices in USD. Per-minute rates are estimates based on token usage, not fixed per-minute charges.Source

Sources and data date

Show all 31 sources

Benchmark sources at a glance

Which independent evaluators tested this model. This is coverage, not a quality ranking.

No active result from the reviewed external evaluators can currently be attributed to this model. Other source evidence remains available below.

Without vendor claims and historical or disputed results; those stay labelled in the single values.

TypeEvidence and data date
Research statusResearch date October 15, 2026. 24 source URLs checked. This documents the inspected sources, not an exhaustive inventory of every publication.
Not published

per-metric-denominator-and-serving-revision

Note

No per-metric denominator, confidence interval or immutable backend revision is published.

Not published

Gemini Live TTFA sample count and serving revision

Note

The source does not provide per-model N, confidence interval, or a pinned serving revision for TTFA.

Not published

isolated-model-result

Note

VAmoS measures the full agent stack. It does not provide an isolated model-only result.

Unresolved

Coval rolling 30-day speech-to-speech measurements

Note

The exact public Coval page for Gemini 3.8 Live reports 0 samples / 30 days and says no dated, qualifying measurements are available in this window. HTTP Date Wed, 28 Oct 2026 00:07:14 GMT, ETag "16ypny4lbmn1uum"; no score or run time is published. The response timestamp is older than on the other inspected Coval pages, so current availability remains unresolved.

Additional sourceGoogle Gemini model documentation (retrieved September 24, 2026; October 15, 2026; October 17, 2026) · Google Gemini 3.8 Live model documentation · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceOfficial API pricing (retrieved October 25, 2026)
Additional sourceArtificial Analysis (retrieved October 15, 2026; October 17, 2026; October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceArtificial Analysis (retrieved October 15, 2026; October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceSpeko speech-to-speech concierge benchmark (retrieved October 17, 2026; October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceCekura speech-to-speech benchmark (retrieved October 17, 2026; October 23, 2026)
Additional sourceCekura TurnBench (retrieved October 17, 2026; October 23, 2026)
Additional sourceVAmoS Part Deux, VAmoS Energy (retrieved October 17, 2026)
Additional sourceMultiPartyTurnBench (retrieved October 17, 2026)
Additional sourceVoxParity benchmark README, full-bank leaderboard (retrieved October 17, 2026)
Additional sourceIndicFDB paper, arXiv:2609.31967v1 (retrieved October 18, 2026)
Additional sourceOmi Health Medical Speech-to-Text Benchmark (retrieved October 18, 2026)
Additional sourceBluejay Labs, MIVAS leaderboard (retrieved October 22, 2026)
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 15, 2026; October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 17, 2026)12
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 28, 2026)12345678
Additional sourceGoogle DeepMind Gemini Audio (retrieved November 5, 2026)
Additional sourceOpenRouter: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceVercel AI Gateway: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceOllama: cumulative downloads for the popularity index
Additional sourceReplicate: cumulative runs for the popularity index
Additional sourceGoogle Trending Now: limited feed selection for Germany and the US
Additional sourceCreative Commons Attribution 4.0