Glimpse
Elorian
- Released
- October 16, 2026
- Data date
- October 24, 2026
- Input price
- Per 1M input tokens
Glimpse is Elorian's agentic visual reasoning system for images and video. It can use tools and start subagents. In addition to Elorian's API and chat interface, OpenRouter documents it as elorian/glimpse. Its Together endpoint accepts text, images, and video, provides a 262,144-token context, and allows up to 256,000 output tokens within that context budget. These limits apply to the documented provider endpoint.
Specifications and access
| Specification | Value and source |
|---|---|
| Release | Research preview, announced on October 16, 2026Source |
| Access | Elorian API and chat interfaceSource |
| OpenRouter model ID | elorian/glimpse. The documented Together endpoint is elorian/glimpse-20261016.Source |
| Input modalities | Text, images, and video through OpenRouterSource |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens through OpenRouter/TogetherSource |
| Maximum output | 256,000 tokens through OpenRouter/Together, within the shared context budgetSource |
| Capabilities | Can use tools to write code, transform images, and inspect video; supports subagentsSource |
| Base model | Post-trained from an unnamed open-weights base; no Glimpse weight files or license specifiedSource |
| Announcement | 2026-10-16Source |
| Product type | agentic visual reasoning systemSource |
| Input | images and video (The launch article describes visual inputs. OpenRouter separately documents text, image and video input for its Together endpoint.)Source |
| Public API model ID | not publishedSource |
| Base model | unnamed open-weights modelSource |
| Input price in USD per million tokens | 0.6 tokensSource |
| Output price in USD per million tokens | 3 tokensSource |
| Provider model ID | elorian/glimpse on OpenRouterSource |
| Deployment options | Together endpoint elorian/glimpse-20261016 through OpenRouterSource |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens (Applies to the documented OpenRouter/Together endpoint, not an independently established direct Elorian API limit.)Source |
| Maximum output | 256,000 tokens (Applies to the documented OpenRouter/Together endpoint, not an independently established direct Elorian API limit. Output shares the total context budget.)Source |
| API prices in USD per million tokens | USD 0.60 input; USD 3.00 output; USD 0.06 cache read per million tokens (These are OpenRouter endpoint tariffs; the cache rate is not established for Elorian direct billing.)Source |
| API capabilities | reasoning, include_reasoning, max_tokens, temperature, top_p, stop, frequency_penalty, presence_penalty, top_k, repetition_penalty, logit_bias, min_p, tools, tool_choice, response_format, structured_outputs, logprobs, top_logprobsSource |
| Input | Text, Image, VideoSource |
| Model code-generation failures | |
| Provider infrastructure failures excluded | |
| One-sided runtime faults | |
| Requested output-token limit | 235,929Source |
| Generation attempts in the index | 23Source |
| Contributing programs with reasoning disabled | |
| Contributing programs with reasoning enabled | |
| Average estimated cost (USD) | 0.08Source |
| Median estimated cost (USD) | 0.05Source |
| Estimated cost range (USD) | $0.01-$0.22Source |
| Provider-reported total cost (USD) | 1.31Source |
| DuelLab cost-data combinations | 16Source |
| Average output token count | 25kSource |
| Output-token range | 2.1k-73kSource |
| Runs with output-token data | 16Source |
| Player-program result distribution (labels not retained) | Reasoning enabled: 75% / 25% / 0%, n=8; reasoning disabled: 50% / 13% / 37%, n=8Source |
| GCB trust tier | automatedSource |
| GCB guardrail warning | Significant guardrail issues may impede work.Source |
| Busey run duration (seconds) | 100Source |
| Busey run cost (USD) | 0.0684Source |
| Busey total tokens | 22,952 tokensSource |
| Reasoning tokens in output | 9,636Source |
| Busey judge coverage | 9/9Source |
| Busey judge count | |
| Busey samples per judge | |
| OpenRouter run ID | run-glimpse-openrouter-1792245634824-0fisgSource |
| Inference cost (USD, Build 1) | 3.04Source |
| Total requests (Build 1) | 299Source |
| Exact total tokens (Build 1) | 20,158,149 tokensSource |
| Reasoning tokens (Build 1) | 283,348 tokensSource |
| App build duration (Build 1) | 37m 18sSource |
| Input tokens (rounded, Build 1) | 19.8MSource |
| Output tokens (rounded, Build 1) | 376kSource |
| Cached input tokens (rounded, Build 1) | 18.4MSource |
| Glimpse model calls (Build 1) | 298Source |
| Gemini helper calls (Build 1) | |
| Inference cost (USD, Build 2) | 2.42Source |
| Total requests (Build 2) | 301Source |
| Exact total tokens (Build 2) | 11,170,983 tokensSource |
| Reasoning tokens (Build 2) | 209,961 tokensSource |
| App build duration (Build 2) | 32m 19sSource |
| Input tokens (rounded, Build 2) | 10.9MSource |
| Output tokens (rounded, Build 2) | 285kSource |
| Cached input tokens (rounded, Build 2) | 9.2MSource |
| Glimpse model calls (Build 2) | 300Source |
| Gemini helper calls (Build 2) | |
| Observed range, not a confidence interval | 0.1595-0.1732Source |
| Comparison group |
Benchmark sources at a glance
Each evaluator measures different capabilities under its own conditions. Test series, composite indices and their components stay separate. The detailed results below retain their scales, configurations and source dates.
No active result from the reviewed external evaluators can currently be attributed to this model. Other source evidence remains available below.
Coverage is not a quality ranking. Overlapping tests and multiple settings do not count as independent experiments. Vendor claims, historical and disputed results are excluded from this overview and remain labelled in the detailed evidence.
Page 1 of 10
Measurements without matching peer values
These measurements have no matching peer values under the same test conditions. Their original values and sources remain available here.
ERQA (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 83.75
- Score
- 83.75
- Metric
- accuracy
- Unit
- %
- Category
- visual and embodied reasoning
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Source type
- vendor-reported
- Evaluator
- Elorian Glimpse announcement
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-24
- Methodology
- Vendor-reported result. Elorian's announced evaluation table; Glimpse result shown for its own model column. The article says Glimpse used max effort with its native agent harness. Benchmark-specific prompt, sample count, and scoring details are not stated in the table.
- Context
- Provider-reported result. The article notes that HSS includes paper-reported results but does not identify whether the Glimpse cell itself is from a paper.
BuseyBench SVG: judge agreement (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 86
- Score
- 86
- Metric
- agreement
- Unit
- %
- Benchmark version
- BuseyBench SVG test, prompt svg-v1-no-web, judge rubric busey-v2, run 2026-10-17
- Category
- judge diagnostic
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Sample
- 9
- Source type
- independent-evaluator
- Evaluator
- BuseyBench
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-24
- Methodology
- Independent evaluation. BuseyBench SVG test prompt svg-v1-no-web; exact generated model Glimpse by Elorian, model release 2026-10-16; run 2026-10-17; three vision judges (GPT-5.2, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview), three samples each; rubric busey-v2.
- Context
- One portrait prompt/run only. The source reports 9/9 judge coverage and sample dispersion σ=0.73; it publishes no confidence interval. Overall weights are likeness 50%, face coherence 20%, aesthetics 15%, prompt adherence 15%.
WGO Bench (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 42.7
- Score
- 42.7
- Metric
- benchmark score
- Unit
- No unit provided
- Category
- visual and embodied reasoning
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Source type
- vendor-reported
- Evaluator
- Elorian Glimpse announcement
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-24
- Methodology
- Vendor-reported result. Elorian's announced evaluation table; Glimpse result shown for its own model column. The article says Glimpse used max effort with its native agent harness. Benchmark-specific prompt, sample count, and scoring details are not stated in the table.
- Context
- Provider-reported result. The article notes that HSS includes paper-reported results but does not identify whether the Glimpse cell itself is from a paper.
BabyVision (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 95.36
- Score
- 95.36
- Metric
- benchmark score
- Unit
- No unit provided
- Category
- visual and embodied reasoning
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Source type
- vendor-reported
- Evaluator
- Elorian Glimpse announcement
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-24
- Methodology
- Vendor-reported result. Elorian's announced evaluation table; Glimpse result shown for its own model column. The article says Glimpse used max effort with its native agent harness. Benchmark-specific prompt, sample count, and scoring details are not stated in the table.
- Context
- Provider-reported result. The article notes that HSS includes paper-reported results but does not identify whether the Glimpse cell itself is from a paper.
HSS (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 46.36
- Score
- 46.36
- Metric
- benchmark score
- Unit
- No unit provided
- Category
- visual and embodied reasoning
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Source type
- vendor-reported
- Evaluator
- Elorian Glimpse announcement
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-24
- Methodology
- Vendor-reported result. Elorian's announced evaluation table; Glimpse result shown for its own model column. The article says Glimpse used max effort with its native agent harness. Benchmark-specific prompt, sample count, and scoring details are not stated in the table.
- Context
- Provider-reported result. The article notes that HSS includes paper-reported results but does not identify whether the Glimpse cell itself is from a paper.
CharXiv-R (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 92.9
- Score
- 92.9
- Metric
- benchmark score
- Unit
- No unit provided
- Category
- visual and embodied reasoning
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Source type
- vendor-reported
- Evaluator
- Elorian Glimpse announcement
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-24
- Methodology
- Vendor-reported result. Elorian's announced evaluation table; Glimpse result shown for its own model column. The article says Glimpse used max effort with its native agent harness. Benchmark-specific prompt, sample count, and scoring details are not stated in the table.
- Context
- Provider-reported result. The article notes that HSS includes paper-reported results but does not identify whether the Glimpse cell itself is from a paper.
UGC-VideoCap (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 82.66
- Score
- 82.66
- Metric
- benchmark score
- Unit
- No unit provided
- Category
- visual and embodied reasoning
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Source type
- vendor-reported
- Evaluator
- Elorian Glimpse announcement
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-24
- Methodology
- Vendor-reported result. Elorian's announced evaluation table; Glimpse result shown for its own model column. The article says Glimpse used max effort with its native agent harness. Benchmark-specific prompt, sample count, and scoring details are not stated in the table.
- Context
- Provider-reported result. The article notes that HSS includes paper-reported results but does not identify whether the Glimpse cell itself is from a paper.
DREAM-1K (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 76.04
- Score
- 76.04
- Metric
- benchmark score
- Unit
- No unit provided
- Category
- visual and embodied reasoning
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Source type
- vendor-reported
- Evaluator
- Elorian Glimpse announcement
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-24
- Methodology
- Vendor-reported result. Elorian's announced evaluation table; Glimpse result shown for its own model column. The article says Glimpse used max effort with its native agent harness. Benchmark-specific prompt, sample count, and scoring details are not stated in the table.
- Context
- Provider-reported result. The article notes that HSS includes paper-reported results but does not identify whether the Glimpse cell itself is from a paper.
TOMATO (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 93.6
- Score
- 93.6
- Metric
- benchmark score
- Unit
- No unit provided
- Category
- visual and embodied reasoning
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Source type
- vendor-reported
- Evaluator
- Elorian Glimpse announcement
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-24
- Methodology
- Vendor-reported result. Elorian's announced evaluation table; Glimpse result shown for its own model column. The article says Glimpse used max effort with its native agent harness. Benchmark-specific prompt, sample count, and scoring details are not stated in the table.
- Context
- Provider-reported result. The article notes that HSS includes paper-reported results but does not identify whether the Glimpse cell itself is from a paper.
Video-MME v2 with subtitles (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 56.68
- Score
- 56.68
- Metric
- grouped rubric score
- Unit
- No unit provided
- Category
- visual and embodied reasoning
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Source type
- vendor-reported
- Evaluator
- Elorian Glimpse announcement
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-24
- Methodology
- Vendor-reported result. Elorian's announced evaluation table; Glimpse result shown for its own model column. The article says Glimpse used max effort with its native agent harness. Benchmark-specific prompt, sample count, and scoring details are not stated in the table.
- Context
- Provider-reported result. The article notes that HSS includes paper-reported results but does not identify whether the Glimpse cell itself is from a paper.
E.T. Bench (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 63.55
- Score
- 63.55
- Metric
- benchmark score
- Unit
- No unit provided
- Category
- visual and embodied reasoning
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Source type
- vendor-reported
- Evaluator
- Elorian Glimpse announcement
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-24
- Methodology
- Vendor-reported result. Elorian's announced evaluation table; Glimpse result shown for its own model column. The article says Glimpse used max effort with its native agent harness. Benchmark-specific prompt, sample count, and scoring details are not stated in the table.
- Context
- Provider-reported result. The article notes that HSS includes paper-reported results but does not identify whether the Glimpse cell itself is from a paper.
FSC-147 (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 83.36
- Score
- 83.36
- Metric
- benchmark score
- Unit
- No unit provided
- Category
- visual and embodied reasoning
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Source type
- vendor-reported
- Evaluator
- Elorian Glimpse announcement
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-24
- Methodology
- Vendor-reported result. Elorian's announced evaluation table; Glimpse result shown for its own model column. The article says Glimpse used max effort with its native agent harness. Benchmark-specific prompt, sample count, and scoring details are not stated in the table.
- Context
- Provider-reported result. The article notes that HSS includes paper-reported results but does not identify whether the Glimpse cell itself is from a paper.
Page 1 of 10
Sources and data date
| Type | Evidence and data date |
|---|---|
| Research status | Research date October 24, 2026. 97 source URLs checked. This documents the inspected sources, not an exhaustive inventory of every publication. |
| Not published | Direct Elorian API model ID Note The Research Preview article does not publish a direct Elorian API request ID. OpenRouter separately documents the gateway ID elorian/glimpse. |
| Not published | Base model name Note The announcement says Glimpse was post-trained from an open-weights base but does not identify the model. |
| Not published | Model weights and license Note No Glimpse weight files or license terms are published in the announcement. |
| Unresolved | Benchmark methodology details Note The article reports the Glimpse column and a high-level native agent harness description but omits benchmark-specific sample counts, prompts, and complete scoring configurations. |
| Not found in the inspected sources | Direct Elorian API documentation Note No public schema for the direct Elorian API was found in the reviewed sources. The separate OpenRouter endpoint is publicly documented. |
| Additional source | Elorian Glimpse announcement (retrieved October 24, 2026) · Elorian Glimpse announcement · Editorial description reviewed October 24, 2026 |
| Additional source | OpenRouter Glimpse Together endpoint (retrieved October 24, 2026) · OpenRouter Glimpse Together endpoint · Editorial description reviewed October 24, 2026 |
| Additional source | DuelLab GameBench 2 (retrieved October 24, 2026) |
| Additional source | Great Commission Benchmark (retrieved October 24, 2026) |
| Additional source | BuseyBench (retrieved October 24, 2026) |
| Additional source | LeanZero Forge 2.0 (retrieved October 24, 2026) |
| Additional source | LeanZero Forge 2.0 (retrieved October 24, 2026) |
| Additional source | LeanZero Forge 2.0 (retrieved October 24, 2026) |
| Additional source | Model metadata (retrieved October 24, 2026) |
| Additional source | Model metadata (retrieved October 24, 2026) |
| Additional source | Model metadata (retrieved October 24, 2026) |
| Additional source | Model metadata (retrieved October 24, 2026) |
| Additional source | Model metadata (retrieved October 24, 2026) |
| Additional source | Model metadata (retrieved October 24, 2026) |
| Additional source | Model metadata (retrieved October 24, 2026) |
| Additional source | Model metadata (retrieved October 24, 2026) |
| Additional source | Model metadata (retrieved October 24, 2026) |
| Additional source | Model metadata (retrieved October 24, 2026) |
| Additional source | Model metadata (retrieved October 24, 2026) |