Wan 2.6 Text to Imagevs.PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS

Which one is better?

In our own test, Wan 2.6 Text to Image leads. Neither is in the arena. PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS has no API price.

Test images

Same task, the first image of each. The task with the biggest difference is preselected.

Wan 2.6 Text to Image: Infographic, first image from the fixed test run — Wan 2.6 Text to Image77 out of 100

PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS: Infographic, first image from the fixed test run — PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS5 out of 100

Result for “Infographic”:Wan 2.6 Text to Image ahead

Prompt given to both modelsCreate a square German infographic titled SO FUNKTIONIERT PHOTOSYNTHESE. Show exactly four numbered steps in this order: 1 LICHT, 2 WASSER, 3 CO₂, 4 ZUCKER + SAUERSTOFF. Use a clean editorial science style with one plant cross-section, simple arrows, high contrast, legible labels, and no other text.

What the rating looks at: Numbers, labels, and visual organization.

“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.

Test protocol of the images

Each test attempt uses the same archived prompt and one request. The first output of that attempt counts. Repeats after technical test failures are disclosed for the affected images. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.

Character and detail

Wan 2.6 Text to Image: together, requested 1280x1280, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:30 PM. Source

PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS: manual, local PyTorch 2.13.0, Diffusers 0.36.0; PixArt-alpha/PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS@e102b3591cc82e97071b8b4cb90d834d0c487207; native 1024x1024, 1:1; one request, first output; steps=20, guidance=4.5, seed=7226279879395584696; mps for text encoder and denoising; cpu for native VAE decode; float16 for text encoder and transformer; float32 for VAE; native prompt preprocessing lowercases input, generated Nov 2, 2026, 5:58 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6

Wan 2.6 Text to Image image SHA 256: cf49d7136a442f4f1c1ae29af99e917aa83bcbf501fdacfe3a13a3b3e74d7f9a

PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS image SHA 256: bde9f05db045ee4e3776436ec99b67b4ab2b1e1d98e7f3b9b389116880584dfa

Infographic

Wan 2.6 Text to Image: together, requested 1280x1280, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:30 PM. Source

PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS: manual, local PyTorch 2.13.0, Diffusers 0.36.0; PixArt-alpha/PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS@e102b3591cc82e97071b8b4cb90d834d0c487207; native 1024x1024, 1:1; one request, first output; steps=20, guidance=4.5, seed=3371899936485956023; mps for text encoder and denoising; cpu for native VAE decode; float16 for text encoder and transformer; float32 for VAE; native prompt preprocessing lowercases input, generated Nov 2, 2026, 5:59 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f

Wan 2.6 Text to Image image SHA 256: 28eecbf460194ec047237c35415d934929baee9de9938bdff435cd21a4416435

PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS image SHA 256: a1a6e8b2545200a59deb0cef3614e7421a91014fcb31e4e2725cc40ca1730017

Product photography

Wan 2.6 Text to Image: together, requested 1280x1280, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:29 PM. Source

PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS: manual, local PyTorch 2.13.0, Diffusers 0.36.0; PixArt-alpha/PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS@e102b3591cc82e97071b8b4cb90d834d0c487207; native 1024x1024, 1:1; one request, first output; steps=20, guidance=4.5, seed=2926417222682566089; mps for text encoder and denoising; cpu for native VAE decode; float16 for text encoder and transformer; float32 for VAE; native prompt preprocessing lowercases input, generated Nov 2, 2026, 5:58 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3

Wan 2.6 Text to Image image SHA 256: e8dbcfd0ce965814d72d676eddf74f723d476c1f78c5928c7b6efbc4eca4765e

PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS image SHA 256: 2012912767607d877602f52cd6766af87520f70db960cda065baa5282c377b51

Typography and layout

Wan 2.6 Text to Image: together, requested 1280x1280, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 2:01 PM. Source

PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS: manual, local PyTorch 2.13.0, Diffusers 0.36.0; PixArt-alpha/PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS@e102b3591cc82e97071b8b4cb90d834d0c487207; native 1024x1024, 1:1; one request, first output; steps=20, guidance=4.5, seed=154650094805927878; mps for text encoder and denoising; cpu for native VAE decode; float16 for text encoder and transformer; float32 for VAE; native prompt preprocessing lowercases input, generated Nov 2, 2026, 5:57 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419

Wan 2.6 Text to Image image SHA 256: 7e9557478ee297369d7680b31ab3b23a13c984981c0e0c922ef07372999122a7

PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS image SHA 256: 07f61240d9329bf99f8a3d21b7b437c65c4eeb1780c8f1164e0c8baf2a0f7085

The numbers at a glance

Arena ratingfrom votes by users · higher is better

n/a

Wan 2.6 Text to Image

not in the arena

n/a

PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS

not in the arena

GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 · higher is better

Wan 2.6 Text to Image

Rank 44 of 108

PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS

Rank 99 of 108

Price per imagedollars through the API · lower is better

$0.03

Wan 2.6 Text to Image

cheap

n/a

PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS

no API price

Ranks among the 21 image models with an arena rating and the 108 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.

Wan 2.6 Text to Image

Subscription: n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
Via API: $0.03 per image, 100 images $3.

PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS

Subscription: n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
Via API: No API price known. Access: local.
License: Open weights.

Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.

GraduallyBench from Nov 3, 2026 · API prices from Nov 6, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (38 days old)

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.

Kennzahl	Wan 2.6 Text to Image	PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS
Ratings
Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better	n/a	n/a
Arena rank	n/a	n/a
Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating	n/a	n/a
GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100	63	13
GraduallyBench by task
Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition	41	3
Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details	54	16
Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency	79	27
InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization	77	5
API price
Per imagelower is better	$0.03	n/a
100 images	$3	n/a
Profile
Released	January 2026	Apr 9, 2024
Weightsopen means: runs locally	proprietary	open
Access	API	local
Parameters	not published	0.6 billion
Largest output	2K	not consistently published
Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model	n/a	n/a

API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.

Sources: Wan 2.6 Text to Image model source (verified Aug 15, 2026) · PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)

Arena ratings by category

From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.

No shared arena score in the stored snapshot

The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Wan 2.6 Text to Image and PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.

More comparisons

Compare Wan 2.6 Text to Image and PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

First image modelSecond image model