Qwen-Image-2.1vs.Xingliu Star-3
Which one is better?
We have not tested Xingliu Star-3 ourselves yet. Xingliu Star-3 has no arena rating yet. Neither has an API price.
Same prompt, two images
Same task, the first image of each.
No image from the four fixed tasks for Xingliu Star-3 yet.This model does not yet have a complete GraduallyBench run.
Result for “Typography and layout”:only Qwen-Image-2.1 tested
What the rating looks at: Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.
“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.
Missing image run for Xingliu Star-3
This model does not yet have a complete GraduallyBench run. Run the missing fixed tasks, archive the first output of each, and evaluate them blind.
DocumentationThe numbers at a glance
Qwen-Image-2.1
Rank 14 of 22
Xingliu Star-3
not in the arena
Qwen-Image-2.1
Rank 37 of 74
Xingliu Star-3
not tested yet
Qwen-Image-2.1
no API price
Xingliu Star-3
no API price
Ranks among the 22 image models with an arena rating and the 74 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.
Qwen-Image-2.1
- Subscription
- No Alibaba subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €9.59 a month (Krea Basic, with limited credits). 5 plans in Germany.
- Via API
- No API price known. Access: local, Web app.
- License
- Open weights, Qwen Research License: non-commercial use only; commercial use requires a separate license.
Xingliu Star-3
- Subscription
- n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
- Via API
- No API price known. Access: Web app.
- Weights
- unknown.
Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.
Arena rating (LMArena) from Oct 28, 2026 · GraduallyBench from Nov 1, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (34 days old)
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.
| Kennzahl | Qwen-Image-2.1 | Xingliu Star-3 |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better | 1,225 | n/a |
| Arena rank | Rank 14 of 22 | n/a |
| Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating | 19,604 | n/a |
| GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 | 56 | n/a |
| GraduallyBench by task | ||
| Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition | 50 | n/a |
| Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details | 72 | n/a |
| Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency | 21 | n/a |
| InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization | 82 | n/a |
| API price | ||
| Per imagelower is better | n/a | n/a |
| 100 images | n/a | n/a |
| Profile | ||
| Released | Sep 20, 2026 | n/a |
| Weightsopen means: runs locally | openQwen Research License: non-commercial use only; commercial use requires a separate license | unknown |
| Lifecycle | no notice | Web UI model choice; no public weights or fixed API model ID confirmed |
| Access | local, Web app | Web app |
| Parameters | not published | not published |
| Largest output | 2K | not consistently published |
| Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model | 5 | n/a |
API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.
Sources: Qwen-Image-2.1 model source, status source (verified Sep 22, 2026) · Xingliu Star-3 model source, status source (verified Nov 1, 2026)
Arena ratings by category
From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.
No shared arena score in the stored snapshot
The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Qwen-Image-2.1 and Xingliu Star-3 from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.
Compare another matchup
More matchups
Related image model comparisons
Compare Qwen-Image-2.1 and Xingliu Star-3 with other important image models.