GPT Image 2vs.Qwen Image 3.0 Pro
Which one is better?
We have not tested Qwen Image 3.0 Pro ourselves yet. Qwen Image 3.0 Pro has no arena rating yet. Qwen Image 3.0 Pro has no API price.
Same prompt, two images
Same task, the first image of each.
No image from the four fixed tasks for Qwen Image 3.0 Pro yet.This model does not yet have a complete GraduallyBench run.
Result for “Typography and layout”:only GPT Image 2 tested
What the rating looks at: Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.
“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.
Missing image run for Qwen Image 3.0 Pro
This model does not yet have a complete GraduallyBench run. Run the missing fixed tasks, archive the first output of each, and evaluate them blind.
DocumentationThe numbers at a glance
GPT Image 2
Rank 3 of 22
Qwen Image 3.0 Pro
not in the arena
GPT Image 2
Rank 12 of 74
Qwen Image 3.0 Pro
not tested yet
GPT Image 2
expensive
Qwen Image 3.0 Pro
no API price
Ranks among the 22 image models with an arena rating and the 74 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.
GPT Image 2
- Subscription
- No OpenAI subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €6.39 a month (ElevenLabs Starter, with limited credits). 61 plans in Germany.
- Via API
- $0.21 per image, 100 images $21.10.
Qwen Image 3.0 Pro
- Subscription
- At Alibaba from ≈ €6.39 a month (Token Plan Individual Lite, with limited credits). 7 plans in Germany.
- Via API
- No API price known. Access: API, Web app.
- Weights
- unknown.
Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.
Arena rating (LMArena) from Oct 28, 2026 · GraduallyBench from Nov 1, 2026 · API prices from Oct 28, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (34 days old)
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.
| Kennzahl | GPT Image 2 | Qwen Image 3.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better | 1,381 | n/a |
| Arena rank | Rank 3 of 22 | n/a |
| Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating | 103,385 | n/a |
| GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 | 69 | n/a |
| GraduallyBench by task | ||
| Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition | 49 | n/a |
| Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details | 87 | n/a |
| Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency | 61 | n/a |
| InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization | 78 | n/a |
| API price | ||
| Per imagelower is better | $0.21 | n/a |
| 100 images | $21.10 | n/a |
| Profile | ||
| Released | April 2026 | n/a |
| Weightsopen means: runs locally | proprietary | unknown |
| Access | API, Web app | API, Web app |
| Parameters | not published | not published |
| Largest output | 4K | 2K |
| Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model | 61 | 7 |
API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.
Sources: GPT Image 2 model source (verified Aug 15, 2026) · Qwen Image 3.0 Pro model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)
Arena ratings by category
From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.
No shared arena score in the stored snapshot
The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for GPT Image 2 and Qwen Image 3.0 Pro from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.
Compare another matchup
More matchups
Related image model comparisons
Compare GPT Image 2 and Qwen Image 3.0 Pro with other important image models.