GPT Image 1.5vs.Wan 2.7 Image Pro
Which one is better?
In our own test, Wan 2.7 Image Pro leads. Wan 2.7 Image Pro has no arena rating yet. Wan 2.7 Image Pro has no API price.
Same prompt, two images
Same task, the first image of each. The task with the biggest difference is preselected.
Result for “Product photography”:Wan 2.7 Image Pro ahead
What the rating looks at: Materials, reflections, and fine details.
“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.
Test protocol of the images
Both models receive the same archived prompt in exactly one request, and the first result counts. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.
Character and detail
GPT Image 1.5: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:17 PM. Source
Wan 2.7 Image Pro: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=1941203496, estimated cost $0.075000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:25 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6
GPT Image 1.5 image SHA 256: 0dff52ccd39400ac66ac8870c9ea937512ff1474688e70118688f420c38c2296
Wan 2.7 Image Pro image SHA 256: 0bd2cf4922b58d78d0e6ec3d804aaccd427e5317066816fdc039ca5c80f4de28
Infographic
GPT Image 1.5: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:17 PM. Source
Wan 2.7 Image Pro: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=1839059937, estimated cost $0.075000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:26 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f
GPT Image 1.5 image SHA 256: 1c9ff59c32621c8b48b002dacb0ae66487262280c7c0a5b3d6456c81b248ebe9
Wan 2.7 Image Pro image SHA 256: caa6b4e95e0676d9867358db906f1f029dd320960e9dd1b8300283a5e2723077
Product photography
GPT Image 1.5: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:16 PM. Source
Wan 2.7 Image Pro: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=1277346407, estimated cost $0.075000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:24 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3
GPT Image 1.5 image SHA 256: 67cfa2f324447027ceb5f82e9446d40a1395b46ce425890a74606b4d97731cf6
Wan 2.7 Image Pro image SHA 256: 1ed875886c86963322fdf329bf809943b96886fb4f373197e1654256316ac67c
Typography and layout
GPT Image 1.5: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 1:59 PM. Source
Wan 2.7 Image Pro: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=1291974856, estimated cost $0.075000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:23 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419
GPT Image 1.5 image SHA 256: 6a4cec86850fd371b65274198e2bf630b3cf36a096f9fb953d4bfe17c3222ebe
Wan 2.7 Image Pro image SHA 256: 4e860e01ecb53ed47d9a3ad2be57e9f2567e8dc010e44780615f71e30713f648
The numbers at a glance
GPT Image 1.5
Rank 13 of 22
Wan 2.7 Image Pro
not in the arena
GPT Image 1.5
Rank 43 of 74
Wan 2.7 Image Pro
Rank 8 of 74
GPT Image 1.5
expensive
Wan 2.7 Image Pro
no API price
Ranks among the 22 image models with an arena rating and the 74 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.
GPT Image 1.5
- Subscription
- No OpenAI subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €6.39 a month (ElevenLabs Starter, with limited credits). 42 plans in Germany.
- Via API
- $0.13 per image, 100 images $13.30.
Wan 2.7 Image Pro
- Subscription
- At Alibaba from ≈ €6.39 a month (Token Plan Individual Lite, with limited credits). 7 plans in Germany.
- Via API
- No API price known. Access: API.
- Weights
- unknown.
Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.
Arena rating (LMArena) from Oct 28, 2026 · GraduallyBench from Nov 1, 2026 · API prices from Oct 28, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (34 days old)
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.
| Kennzahl | GPT Image 1.5 | Wan 2.7 Image Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better | 1,236 | n/a |
| Arena rank | Rank 13 of 22 | n/a |
| Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating | 174,012 | n/a |
| GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 | 54 | 73 |
| GraduallyBench by task | ||
| Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition | 58 | 82 |
| Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details | 38 | 80 |
| Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency | 64 | 68 |
| InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization | 56 | 62 |
| API price | ||
| Per imagelower is better | $0.13 | n/a |
| 100 images | $13.30 | n/a |
| Profile | ||
| Released | December 2025 | n/a |
| Weightsopen means: runs locally | proprietary | unknown |
| Lifecycle | Marked as deprecated by OpenAI; removed from the API on December 1, 2026 | no notice |
| Access | API, Web app | API |
| Parameters | not published | not published |
| Largest output | 1,536 × 1,024 pixels | 4K |
| Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model | 42 | 7 |
API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.
Sources: GPT Image 1.5 model source, status source (verified Aug 15, 2026) · Wan 2.7 Image Pro model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)
Arena ratings by category
From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.
No shared arena score in the stored snapshot
The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for GPT Image 1.5 and Wan 2.7 Image Pro from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.
Compare another matchup
More matchups
Related image model comparisons
Compare GPT Image 1.5 and Wan 2.7 Image Pro with other important image models.