Bria FIBO 2vs.Adobe Firefly Image 4

Which one is better?

In our own test, Bria FIBO 2 leads. Neither is in the arena. Neither has an API price.

Same task, the first image of each. The task with the biggest difference is preselected.

Bria FIBO 2: Infographic, first image from the fixed test run — Bria FIBO 270 out of 100

Adobe Firefly Image 4: Infographic, first image from the fixed test run — Adobe Firefly Image 45 out of 100

Result for “Infographic”:Bria FIBO 2 ahead

Prompt given to both modelsCreate a square German infographic titled SO FUNKTIONIERT PHOTOSYNTHESE. Show exactly four numbered steps in this order: 1 LICHT, 2 WASSER, 3 CO₂, 4 ZUCKER + SAUERSTOFF. Use a clean editorial science style with one plant cross-section, simple arrows, high contrast, legible labels, and no other text.

What the rating looks at: Numbers, labels, and visual organization.

“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.

Test protocol of the images

Both models receive the same archived prompt in exactly one request, and the first result counts. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.

Character and detail

Bria FIBO 2: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=5555, Fal route default seed 5555; prompt-only VGL generation; approximately 1MP output, estimated cost $0.040000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:58 PM. Source

Adobe Firefly Image 4: manual, 1:1, one request, first output, one output observed, exact UI model Firefly Image 4, provider-default random seed, native 2K square output, no reference images, no selected effects, default content settings, source UI file Create a square cinematic full-b 60374 ydr.ffgenimg, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:42 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6

Bria FIBO 2 image SHA 256: 08e923a728a1475a6c461029900a5e97e808ad495c1910bdddca9f2665f23de9

Adobe Firefly Image 4 image SHA 256: a0305ed203aa5f66fa5082f78a169737d0cea9fc6d7bdac14eb6c874521a6669

Infographic

Bria FIBO 2: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=5555, Fal route default seed 5555; prompt-only VGL generation; approximately 1MP output, estimated cost $0.040000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:59 PM. Source

Adobe Firefly Image 4: manual, 1:1, one request, first output, one output observed, exact UI model Firefly Image 4, provider-default random seed, native 2K square output, no reference images, no selected effects, default content settings, source UI file Create a square German infograph 211113 2kW.ffgenimg, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:42 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f

Bria FIBO 2 image SHA 256: e0a777d79106a8eadf3666524478108f6f17282864c33737c1005121f62baa95

Adobe Firefly Image 4 image SHA 256: 6a23e56ba8c63ec5461c8a20fabc74aff347088ad49b3cc7aa39eb8088d33c23

Product photography

Bria FIBO 2: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=5555, Fal route default seed 5555; prompt-only VGL generation; approximately 1MP output, estimated cost $0.040000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:58 PM. Source

Adobe Firefly Image 4: manual, 1:1, one request, first output, one output observed, exact UI model Firefly Image 4, provider-default random seed, native 2K square output, no reference images, no selected effects, default content settings, source UI file Create a square premium product 776320 41X.ffgenimg, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:42 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3

Bria FIBO 2 image SHA 256: 5a8de701ae2cb8076dd6bb7106c0fec5c4c30c23c342ed3304a628d220d1f50c

Adobe Firefly Image 4 image SHA 256: 4f93f6c8da78501a95fccc17a8464c95f590799028c4a62ed87d15342e123182

Typography and layout

Bria FIBO 2: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=5555, Fal route default seed 5555; prompt-only VGL generation; approximately 1MP output, estimated cost $0.040000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:58 PM. Source

Adobe Firefly Image 4: manual, 1:1, one request, first output, one output observed, exact UI model Firefly Image 4, provider-default random seed, native 2K square output, no reference images, no selected effects, default content settings, source UI file Create a square editorial poster 565284 h6v.ffgenimg, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:42 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419

Bria FIBO 2 image SHA 256: 2f9095a594104e147b3fe4991ed21bef67be104de646e7a4dfd6666b1f621855

Adobe Firefly Image 4 image SHA 256: 97ad71052994f6f16c416e03bb57c37b9e3a7c7be41377ee5f01ebd1fb253de2

The numbers at a glance

Arena ratingfrom votes by users · higher is better

n/a

Bria FIBO 2

not in the arena

n/a

Adobe Firefly Image 4

not in the arena

GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 · higher is better

Bria FIBO 2

Rank 25 of 74

Adobe Firefly Image 4

Rank 68 of 74

Price per imagedollars through the API · lower is better

n/a

Bria FIBO 2

no API price

n/a

Adobe Firefly Image 4

no API price

Ranks among the 22 image models with an arena rating and the 74 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.

Bria FIBO 2

Subscription: n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
Via API: No API price known. Access: API.
Weights: unknown.

Adobe Firefly Image 4

Subscription: n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
Via API: No API price known. Access: Web app.
Weights: unknown.

Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.

GraduallyBench from Nov 1, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (34 days old)

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.

Kennzahl	Bria FIBO 2	Adobe Firefly Image 4
Ratings
Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better	n/a	n/a
Arena rank	n/a	n/a
Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating	n/a	n/a
GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100	62	17
GraduallyBench by task
Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition	69	11
Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details	59	5
Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency	49	46
InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization	70	5
API price
Per imagelower is better	n/a	n/a
100 images	n/a	n/a
Profile
Released	n/a	Apr 24, 2025
Weightsopen means: runs locally	unknown	unknown
Access	API	Web app
Parameters	not published	not published
Largest output	not consistently published	not consistently published
Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model	n/a	n/a

API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.

Sources: Bria FIBO 2 model source (verified Nov 1, 2026) · Adobe Firefly Image 4 model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)

Arena ratings by category

From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.

No shared arena score in the stored snapshot

The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Bria FIBO 2 and Adobe Firefly Image 4 from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.

Compare another matchup

First image modelSecond image model

More matchups

Compare Bria FIBO 2 and Adobe Firefly Image 4 with other important image models.

View the complete image model comparison

Same prompt, two images

The numbers at a glance

Bria FIBO 2

Adobe Firefly Image 4

All data side by side

Arena ratings by category

No shared arena score in the stored snapshot

Compare another matchup

Related image model comparisons