Bria FIBO 2vs.Adobe Firefly Image 3
Which one is better?
In our own test, Bria FIBO 2 leads. Neither is in the arena. Neither has an API price.
Same prompt, two images
Same task, the first image of each. The task with the biggest difference is preselected.
Result for “Typography and layout”:Bria FIBO 2 ahead
What the rating looks at: Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.
“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.
Test protocol of the images
Both models receive the same archived prompt in exactly one request, and the first result counts. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.
Character and detail
Bria FIBO 2: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=5555, Fal route default seed 5555; prompt-only VGL generation; approximately 1MP output, estimated cost $0.040000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:58 PM. Source
Adobe Firefly Image 3: manual, 1:1, one request, first output (first top-left candidate of native batch), exact UI model Firefly Image 3, provider-default random seed, native resolution provider default, fast mode False, no reference images, no selected effects, default content settings, source UI file Firefly_Create a square cinematic full-body portrait of a fictional bicycle courier waiting u 715099.jpg, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 10:28 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6
Bria FIBO 2 image SHA 256: 08e923a728a1475a6c461029900a5e97e808ad495c1910bdddca9f2665f23de9
Adobe Firefly Image 3 image SHA 256: 9d5906a1ead81d8ccac7833e355e8ca2eb9b501c1ad6eb8afe086eb8aeb72f42
Infographic
Bria FIBO 2: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=5555, Fal route default seed 5555; prompt-only VGL generation; approximately 1MP output, estimated cost $0.040000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:59 PM. Source
Adobe Firefly Image 3: manual, 1:1, one request, first output (first top-left candidate of native batch), exact UI model Firefly Image 3, provider-default random seed, native resolution provider default, fast mode False, no reference images, no selected effects, default content settings, source UI file Firefly_Create a square German infographic titled SO FUNKTIONIERT PHOTOSYNTHESE. Show exactly 715099.jpg, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 10:28 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f
Bria FIBO 2 image SHA 256: e0a777d79106a8eadf3666524478108f6f17282864c33737c1005121f62baa95
Adobe Firefly Image 3 image SHA 256: 9be22655b492fe44a2b5f906d12a9d80d68967e771177c3a7e7e9d9b8d492ad0
Product photography
Bria FIBO 2: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=5555, Fal route default seed 5555; prompt-only VGL generation; approximately 1MP output, estimated cost $0.040000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:58 PM. Source
Adobe Firefly Image 3: manual, 1:1, one request, first output (first top-left candidate of native batch), exact UI model Firefly Image 3, provider-default random seed, native resolution provider default, fast mode False, no reference images, no selected effects, default content settings, source UI file Firefly_Create a square premium product photograph of a brushed titanium wristwatch standing 715099.jpg, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 10:28 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3
Bria FIBO 2 image SHA 256: 5a8de701ae2cb8076dd6bb7106c0fec5c4c30c23c342ed3304a628d220d1f50c
Adobe Firefly Image 3 image SHA 256: 5fc5c7d52a0a0eab5d6e0c078dfcd1723ddfdce1f4f28ee08a68bde942e89fab
Typography and layout
Bria FIBO 2: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=5555, Fal route default seed 5555; prompt-only VGL generation; approximately 1MP output, estimated cost $0.040000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:58 PM. Source
Adobe Firefly Image 3: manual, 1:1, one request, first output (first top-left candidate of native batch), exact UI model Firefly Image 3, provider-default random seed, native resolution provider default, fast mode False, no reference images, no selected effects, default content settings, source UI file Firefly_Create a square editorial poster for an imaginary night train called MONDFALTER. Show 715099.jpg, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 10:28 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419
Bria FIBO 2 image SHA 256: 2f9095a594104e147b3fe4991ed21bef67be104de646e7a4dfd6666b1f621855
Adobe Firefly Image 3 image SHA 256: aa88c80c984b7671eef720bb790dfde56ab82609939bf1412db2fc998ef592e7
The numbers at a glance
Bria FIBO 2
not in the arena
Adobe Firefly Image 3
not in the arena
Bria FIBO 2
Rank 25 of 74
Adobe Firefly Image 3
Rank 74 of 74
Bria FIBO 2
no API price
Adobe Firefly Image 3
no API price
Ranks among the 22 image models with an arena rating and the 74 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.
Bria FIBO 2
- Subscription
- n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
- Via API
- No API price known. Access: API.
- Weights
- unknown.
Adobe Firefly Image 3
- Subscription
- n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
- Via API
- No API price known. Access: Web app.
- Weights
- unknown.
Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.
GraduallyBench from Nov 1, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (34 days old)
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.
| Kennzahl | Bria FIBO 2 | Adobe Firefly Image 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better | n/a | n/a |
| Arena rank | n/a | n/a |
| Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating | n/a | n/a |
| GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 | 62 | 4 |
| GraduallyBench by task | ||
| Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition | 69 | 1 |
| Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details | 59 | 1 |
| Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency | 49 | 9 |
| InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization | 70 | 4 |
| API price | ||
| Per imagelower is better | n/a | n/a |
| 100 images | n/a | n/a |
| Profile | ||
| Released | n/a | Apr 23, 2024 |
| Weightsopen means: runs locally | unknown | unknown |
| Access | API | Web app |
| Parameters | not published | not published |
| Largest output | not consistently published | not consistently published |
| Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model | n/a | n/a |
API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.
Sources: Bria FIBO 2 model source (verified Nov 1, 2026) · Adobe Firefly Image 3 model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)
Arena ratings by category
From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.
No shared arena score in the stored snapshot
The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Bria FIBO 2 and Adobe Firefly Image 3 from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.
Compare another matchup
More matchups
Related image model comparisons
Compare Bria FIBO 2 and Adobe Firefly Image 3 with other important image models.