Skip to main content

GoogleElevenLabsAudio matchupSpeech to text

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Livevs.Scribe v2 Realtime

Which model is better?

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live and Scribe v2 Realtime each lead in different tests.

Independent tests
Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live0 of 3
Scribe v2 Realtime0 of 3
Coval, Pipecat STT Benchmark, Artificial Analysis
Popularity
Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Liveahead35
Scribe v2 Realtime29
out of 100
Weights and access
Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Liveproprietary
Scribe v2 Realtimeproprietary
Price
Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live$3.50 per 1M audio tokens ($0.005 per audio minute)
Scribe v2 Realtimen/a
verbatim from the provider

Pick Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live for

leaning Pipecat STT Benchmarkmore popular

Pick Scribe v2 Realtime for

leaning Artificial Analysis

Shared tests

Independent evaluators and leaderboards only, the newest shared snapshot per evaluator. With 95 % ranges a lead counts when they do not overlap; for hit rates, when it holds in a 95 % test. Without any uncertainty figure at most “slightly ahead”.

Coval

depends on the subtest

Scribe v2 Realtime is clearly ahead in 0 of 18 subtests and slightly in 8, Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live in 0 clearly and slightly in 6. 4 are level.

Coval Time to Final Segment (TTFS) mean

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live380 ms
Scribe v2 Realtime119 ms

lower is better, as of November 6, 2026

Coval Time to Final Segment (TTFS) p50

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live325 ms
Scribe v2 Realtime111 ms

lower is better, as of November 6, 2026

Coval Time to Final Segment (TTFS) p95

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live493 ms
Scribe v2 Realtime179 ms

lower is better, as of November 6, 2026

Show all 18 subtests
SubtestGemini 3.5 Transcribe LiveScribe v2 RealtimeVerdict
Coval Time to Final Segment (TTFS) mean (lower is better)380 ms119 msScribe v2 Realtime slightly ahead
Coval Time to Final Segment (TTFS) p50 (lower is better)325 ms111 msScribe v2 Realtime slightly ahead
Coval Time to Final Segment (TTFS) p95 (lower is better)493 ms179 msScribe v2 Realtime slightly ahead
Coval Time to First Token (TTFT) maximum (lower is better)12,993 ms4,960 msScribe v2 Realtime slightly ahead
Coval RTF maximum (lower is better)3.121.96Scribe v2 Realtime slightly ahead
Coval pooled corpus Word Error Rate (WER) (lower is better)2.9 %4.2 %Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live slightly ahead
Coval Time to First Token (TTFT) p50 (lower is better)1,471 ms2,111 msGemini 3.5 Transcribe Live slightly ahead
Coval Time to First Token (TTFT) mean (lower is better)1,528 ms2,149 msGemini 3.5 Transcribe Live slightly ahead
Coval Word Error Rate (WER) per-sample p95 (lower is better)16.7 %21.4 %Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live slightly ahead
Coval Time to First Token (TTFT) p95 (lower is better)2,416 ms2,916 msGemini 3.5 Transcribe Live slightly ahead
Coval Time to Final Segment (TTFS) maximum (lower is better)5,018 ms5,714 msGemini 3.5 Transcribe Live slightly ahead
Coval AudioToFinal maximum (lower is better)18.79 s16.82 sScribe v2 Realtime slightly ahead
Coval RTF mean (lower is better)1.061.02Scribe v2 Realtime slightly ahead
Coval AudioToFinal mean (lower is better)8.31 s8.06 sScribe v2 Realtime slightly ahead
Coval RTF p50 (lower is better)1.041.01level
Coval AudioToFinal p50 (lower is better)8.67 s8.43 slevel
Coval Word Error Rate (WER) per-sample maximum (lower is better)100.0 %100.0 %level
Coval Word Error Rate (WER) per-sample p50 (lower is better)0.0 %0.0 %level

Source · latest November 6, 2026

Pipecat STT Benchmark

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live slightly ahead

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live is clearly ahead in 0 of 2 subtests and slightly in 2, Scribe v2 Realtime in none.

Pipecat STT Benchmark semantic pooled WER

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live2.0 %
Scribe v2 Realtime3.1 %

lower is better, as of October 16, 2026

Pipecat STT Benchmark semantic WER mean

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live1.9 %
Scribe v2 Realtime3.1 %

lower is better, as of October 16, 2026

Source · latest October 16, 2026

Artificial Analysis

Scribe v2 Realtime slightly ahead

Artificial Analysis AA-WER Streaming (final transcription)

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live4.0 %
Scribe v2 Realtime3.6 %

lower is better, as of October 15, 2026

Source · latest October 15, 2026

Vendor figures

Figures from vendor reports that cover both models. They do not count toward the verdict.

Show 6 vendor figures
FigureSourceGemini 3.5 Transcribe LiveScribe v2 Realtime
Accented English WER, Mean 4 sets (lower is better)AssemblyAI speech benchmark9.4 %10.1 %
AssemblyAI normalized medical entity error rate mean across three sets (lower is better)AssemblyAI speech benchmark8.6 %7.0 %
AssemblyAI normalized WER mean across three noise conditions (lower is better)AssemblyAI speech benchmark8.5 %7.8 %
Code-switching WER, Mean 5 pairs (lower is better)AssemblyAI speech benchmark10.2 %13.0 %
Long-form English WER, Mean 3 sets (lower is better)AssemblyAI speech benchmark9.4 %17.1 %
Short-form English WER, Mean 3 sets (lower is better)AssemblyAI speech benchmark5.0 %5.1 %

All data side by side

Prices are verbatim from the provider, because audio models bill per minute, character or token.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe LiveScribe v2 Realtime
TaskSpeech to textSpeech to text
DeveloperGoogleElevenLabs
StatusActiveActive
Weightsproprietaryproprietary
Runs locallynono
Price$3.50 per 1M audio tokens ($0.005 per audio minute)n/a
Popularity (out of 100)3529