Skip to main content

DeepgramFish AudioAudio matchupSpeech output

Aura-2vs.Fish Audio S2.1 Pro

Which model is better?

Aura-2 and Fish Audio S2.1 Pro each lead in different tests.

Independent tests
Aura-20 of 1
Fish Audio S2.1 Pro0 of 1
Coval
Popularity
Aura-2ahead44
Fish Audio S2.1 Pro0
out of 100
Weights and access
Aura-2proprietary
Fish Audio S2.1 Proproprietary
Price
Aura-2n/a
Fish Audio S2.1 ProFree through 2026-11-30 under fair-use rules; changes with advance notice
verbatim from the provider

Pick Aura-2 for

more popular

Pick Fish Audio S2.1 Pro for

No clear edge

Shared tests

Independent evaluators and leaderboards only, the newest shared snapshot per evaluator. With 95 % ranges a lead counts when they do not overlap; for hit rates, when it holds in a 95 % test. Without any uncertainty figure at most “slightly ahead”.

Coval

depends on the subtest

Aura-2 is clearly ahead in 0 of 14 subtests and slightly in 6, Fish Audio S2.1 Pro in 0 clearly and slightly in 6. 2 are level.

Coval TTFA leading silence p50

Aura-2133 ms
Fish Audio S2.1 Pro4 ms

lower is better, as of November 6, 2026

Coval TTFA leading silence mean

Aura-2192 ms
Fish Audio S2.1 Pro15 ms

lower is better, as of November 6, 2026

Coval TTFA roundtrip component maximum

Aura-2464 ms
Fish Audio S2.1 Pro1,740 ms

lower is better, as of November 6, 2026

Show all 14 subtests
SubtestAura-2Fish Audio S2.1 ProVerdict
Coval TTFA leading silence p50 (lower is better)133 ms4 msFish Audio S2.1 Pro slightly ahead
Coval TTFA leading silence mean (lower is better)192 ms15 msFish Audio S2.1 Pro slightly ahead
Coval TTFA roundtrip component maximum (lower is better)464 ms1,740 msAura-2 slightly ahead
Coval TTFA leading silence maximum (lower is better)534 ms143 msFish Audio S2.1 Pro slightly ahead
Coval TTFA roundtrip component mean (lower is better)115 ms356 msAura-2 slightly ahead
Coval TTFA roundtrip component p50 (lower is better)129 ms333 msAura-2 slightly ahead
Coval Time to First Audio (TTFA) maximum (lower is better)808 ms1,825 msAura-2 slightly ahead
Coval Word Error Rate (WER) per-sample maximum (lower is better)68.0 %50.0 %Fish Audio S2.1 Pro slightly ahead
Coval Time to First Audio (TTFA) p50 (lower is better)277 ms346 msAura-2 slightly ahead
Coval Word Error Rate (WER) per-sample p95 (lower is better)15.2 %12.5 %Fish Audio S2.1 Pro slightly ahead
Coval Time to First Audio (TTFA) mean (lower is better)307 ms371 msAura-2 slightly ahead
Coval pooled corpus Word Error Rate (WER) (lower is better)1.9 %1.6 %Fish Audio S2.1 Pro slightly ahead
Coval Time to First Audio (TTFA) p95 (lower is better)536 ms531 mslevel
Coval Word Error Rate (WER) per-sample p50 (lower is better)0.0 %0.0 %level

Source · latest November 6, 2026

All data side by side

Prices are verbatim from the provider, because audio models bill per minute, character or token.

Aura-2Fish Audio S2.1 Pro
TaskSpeech outputSpeech output
DeveloperDeepgramFish Audio
StatusActiveActive
Releasedn/aJune 23, 2026
Weightsproprietaryproprietary
Runs locallynono
Pricen/aFree through 2026-11-30 under fair-use rules; changes with advance notice
Popularity (out of 100)440