Skip to main content

ElevenLabsDeepgramAudio matchupSpeech output

Eleven Flash v2.5vs.Aura-2

Which model is better?

Aura-2 is slightly ahead in independent tests, but the lead is not certain.

Independent tests
Eleven Flash v2.50 of 2
Aura-20 of 2
Coval, Cekura
Popularity
Eleven Flash v2.522
Aura-2ahead44
out of 100
Weights and access
Eleven Flash v2.5proprietary
Aura-2proprietary
Released
Eleven Flash v2.5n/a
Aura-2n/a

Pick Eleven Flash v2.5 for

No clear edge

Pick Aura-2 for

leaning Cekuramore popular

Shared tests

Independent evaluators and leaderboards only, the newest shared snapshot per evaluator. With 95 % ranges a lead counts when they do not overlap; for hit rates, when it holds in a 95 % test. Without any uncertainty figure at most “slightly ahead”.

Coval

depends on the subtest

Eleven Flash v2.5 is clearly ahead in 0 of 20 subtests and slightly in 9, Aura-2 in 0 clearly and slightly in 5. 6 are level.

Coval TTFA leading silence maximum

Eleven Flash v2.5116 ms
Aura-2534 ms

lower is better, as of November 6, 2026

Coval TTFA leading silence mean

Eleven Flash v2.542 ms
Aura-2192 ms

lower is better, as of November 6, 2026

Coval TTFA leading silence p50

Eleven Flash v2.542 ms
Aura-2133 ms

lower is better, as of November 6, 2026

Show all 20 subtests
SubtestEleven Flash v2.5Aura-2Verdict
Coval TTFA leading silence maximum (lower is better)116 ms534 msEleven Flash v2.5 slightly ahead
Coval TTFA leading silence mean (lower is better)42 ms192 msEleven Flash v2.5 slightly ahead
Coval TTFA leading silence p50 (lower is better)42 ms133 msEleven Flash v2.5 slightly ahead
Coval Time to First Audio (TTFA) p90 (lower is better)248 ms496 msEleven Flash v2.5 slightly ahead
Coval Time to First Audio (TTFA) p75 (lower is better)218 ms433 msEleven Flash v2.5 slightly ahead
Coval Time to First Audio (TTFA) p95 (lower is better)279 ms536 msEleven Flash v2.5 slightly ahead
Coval Time to First Audio (TTFA) mean (lower is better)204 ms307 msEleven Flash v2.5 slightly ahead
Coval Time to First Audio (TTFA) maximum (lower is better)555 ms808 msEleven Flash v2.5 slightly ahead
Coval TTFA roundtrip component mean (lower is better)162 ms115 msAura-2 slightly ahead
Coval Time to First Audio (TTFA) p50 (lower is better)197 ms277 msEleven Flash v2.5 slightly ahead
Coval TTFA roundtrip component p50 (lower is better)151 ms129 msAura-2 slightly ahead
Coval TTFA roundtrip component maximum (lower is better)517 ms464 msAura-2 slightly ahead
Coval Word Error Rate (WER) per-sample maximum (lower is better)75.0 %68.0 %Aura-2 slightly ahead
Coval Word Error Rate (WER) per-sample p95 (lower is better)16.0 %15.2 %Aura-2 slightly ahead
Coval Word Error Rate (WER) per-sample p90 (lower is better)9.1 %8.8 %level
Coval Time to First Audio (TTFA) p25 (lower is better)182 ms178 mslevel
Coval pooled corpus Word Error Rate (WER) (lower is better)1.9 %1.9 %level
Coval Word Error Rate (WER) per-sample p25 (lower is better)0.0 %0.0 %level
Coval Word Error Rate (WER) per-sample p50 (lower is better)0.0 %0.0 %level
Coval Word Error Rate (WER) per-sample p75 (lower is better)2.7 %2.7 %level

Source · latest November 6, 2026

Cekura

Aura-2 slightly ahead

Aura-2 is clearly ahead in 0 of 8 subtests and slightly in 4, Eleven Flash v2.5 in 0 clearly and slightly in 2. 2 are level.

Cekura TTS hard-part accuracy: codes and addresses

Eleven Flash v2.555.0 %
Aura-287.0 %

as of October 19, 2026

Cekura TTS non-streaming latency

Eleven Flash v2.5182 ms
Aura-2281 ms

lower is better, as of October 19, 2026

Cekura TTS streaming latency median

Eleven Flash v2.5177 ms
Aura-2126 ms

lower is better, as of October 19, 2026

Show all 8 subtests
SubtestEleven Flash v2.5Aura-2Verdict
Cekura TTS hard-part accuracy: codes and addresses55.0 %87.0 %Aura-2 slightly ahead
Cekura TTS non-streaming latency (lower is better)182 ms281 msEleven Flash v2.5 slightly ahead
Cekura TTS streaming latency median (lower is better)177 ms126 msAura-2 slightly ahead
Cekura TTS hard-part accuracy: numbers and shorthand55.0 %71.0 %Aura-2 slightly ahead
Cekura TTS ASR-based hard-part accuracy estimate64.4 %77.2 %Aura-2 slightly ahead
Cekura TTS hard-part accuracy: medical terms100.0 %86.0 %Eleven Flash v2.5 slightly ahead
Cekura UTMOS-predicted naturalness44level
Cekura TTS hard-part accuracy: read from context75.0 %75.0 %level

Source · latest October 19, 2026

All data side by side

Prices are verbatim from the provider, because audio models bill per minute, character or token.

Eleven Flash v2.5Aura-2
TaskSpeech outputSpeech output
DeveloperElevenLabsDeepgram
StatusActiveActive
Weightsproprietaryproprietary
Runs locallynono
Popularity (out of 100)2244