Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

Mistral Large 4 vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.

shared result series
0
distinct benchmarks
0
latest retrieval
No data

Change model selection

Specifications

General specifications

Release date, availability, context window, architecture, and published parameter counts at a glance. Undisclosed details remain marked as unavailable.

Specifications for Mistral Large 4 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
AttributeMistral Large 4MiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderMistral AIXiaomi
ReleasedOct 6, 2026Apr 27, 2026
AvailabilityPreviewOpen Source
Model typeOpen weights announced; currently an API previewOpen Weights
Parameters1.05T1T, 42B active
ArchitectureMixture of ExpertsMixture of Experts
Context window1M tokens (Mistral); 524,288 tokens (OpenRouter)1,000,000 tokens
Knowledge cutoffNot publishedNot published
Technical sourcesModel, ContextModel

Pricing

API pricing compared

The table compares official standard API rates per 1M tokens, including published cache pricing. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.

API pricing for Mistral Large 4 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Price typeMistral Large 4MiMo-V2.5-Pro
API input$1.36$0.43
API output$4.18$0.87
Cache read$0.14$0.
Cache write (5 min.)Not listedNot listed
Cache write (1 hr.)Not listedNot listed
Price verified10/07/2026 Source07/31/2026 Source

Mistral Large 4, Launch pricing announced October 6, 2026

Mistral announced a 50% discount for two weeks. The published introductory rates are $0.68 input, $2.09 output and $0.07 cache read per 1M tokens. Price comparisons use the standard rates. Source

Mistral Large 4MiMo-V2.5-Pro
API inputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Mistral Large 4$1.36
MiMo-V2.5-ProLower price$0.435
API outputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Mistral Large 4$4.18
MiMo-V2.5-ProLower price$0.87
Cache readUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Mistral Large 4$0.14
MiMo-V2.5-ProLower price$0.004

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Pricing by provider

Direct developer pricing and provider endpoint tariffs routed through OpenRouter are listed separately. Prices are in USD per 1M tokens. Context-dependent direct tiers plus regional, Flex, Priority, and other OpenRouter tariffs remain individually identifiable.

No provider tariff for Mistral Large 4 is available in the stored OpenRouter snapshot. The official direct price is still shown.

Provider pricing for Mistral Large 4 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
ModelProviderPurchase route and tariffInput per 1M tokensOutput per 1M tokensSource
Mistral Large 4Mistral AIDirect from developerStandard APILowest listed price: $1.36Lowest listed price: $4.18Source10/07/2026
MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomiDirect from developerStandard API$0.435$0.87Source07/31/2026
AtlasCloudVia OpenRouteratlas-cloud/fp8$0.435$0.87Source10/12/2026
DigitalOceanVia OpenRouterdigitalocean$0.48$1.8Source10/12/2026
GMICloudVia OpenRoutergmicloud/bf16Lowest listed price: $0.3045Lowest listed price: $0.609Source10/12/2026
NovitaVia OpenRouternovita$0.4802$0.9605Source10/12/2026
StreamLakeVia OpenRouterstreamlake$0.522$1.044Source10/12/2026
XiaomiVia OpenRouterxiaomi/fp8$0.435$0.87Source10/12/2026

Performance

Shared benchmarks

Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.

Capability profile from matched benchmarks

Each axis averages directly matched benchmark families. A value of 100 means the stronger value within this pair, not a universal quality score.

Not enough directly matched categories for a reliable radar

Only 0 of at least 5 categories have comparable, direct model measurements. The benchmark tables below show the available evidence without filling missing axes.

No directly comparable result series yet

No published benchmark for Mistral Large 4 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro currently matches in version, task, metric, and comparison cohort. We therefore show no estimated or blended values.

Our model tests

Our tests

Compare how the models respond to the same prompt. Each test shows the latest attempt, with no subsequent fixes to the generated code. Earlier runs remain available in the test details. These results do not contribute to an overall score.

Pelican on a bicycle

A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Mistral Large 4

Not tested yet

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Reasoning (requested): high

Current attempt
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-pro
API model reported in response
xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-pro
Reasoning setting
high
Pinned endpoint
Xiaomi | xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-pro-20260422
Temperature
Provider default
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating
Response time
110.7 s

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (1)
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
Prompt and test conditions

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens

Task origin (Simon Willison)

How to read this comparison

Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict

Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.

The standard price table uses direct developer rates. The provider comparison labels OpenRouter endpoints, regions, and special tariffs separately.

Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.

More matchups

Compare Mistral Large 4 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro with other leading models using the same data and benchmark logic.

View the complete LLM comparison