Muse Wonder Fullvs.Qwen 3.8 27B
Which one is better?
Muse Wonder Full is clearly ahead in the overall index.
90
Muse Wonder Full
Rank 6 to 9
11
Qwen 3.8 27B
Rank 44 to 57
n/a
Muse Wonder Full
40
Qwen 3.8 27B
slow
n/a
Muse Wonder Full
$0.66
Qwen 3.8 27B
fairly cheap
Muse Wonder Full
- Subscription
Not included in any subscription in Germany.
- Via API
n/a (no API price known).
Qwen 3.8 27B
- Subscription
No Alibaba subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €1.06 a month (Command Code Go, with limited credits). 10 plans in Germany.
- Via API
$0.04 input, $2.50 output per 1M tokens according to the provider; the price index has listed it at $0.42 and $3 since Oct 27, 2026.
Overall index with data through Oct 29, 2026 · Prices from Oct 29, 2026 · Speed: measured by Artificial Analysis · Subscriptions as of Oct 24, 2026 · Subscription prices incl. VAT
Where is the difference?
Values from 0 to 100 per task area. We only name a winner when the gap is large enough and there are enough tests.
Muse Wonder Full ahead: 8Qwen 3.8 27B ahead: 0level: 0too little data: 2of 10 areas
AreaMuse Wonder FullQwen 3.8 27B0 to 100, higher is betterResult
Areas in the overall index
CodingMuse Wonder Full aheadMuse Wonder Full: 85Qwen 3.8 27B: 13
ReasoningMuse Wonder Full aheadMuse Wonder Full: 90Qwen 3.8 27B: 6
MathematicsMuse Wonder Full aheadMuse Wonder Full: 88Qwen 3.8 27B: 8
KnowledgeMuse Wonder Full aheadMuse Wonder Full: 90Qwen 3.8 27B: 5
AgentsMuse Wonder Full aheadMuse Wonder Full: 88Qwen 3.8 27B: 21
Generalonly Muse Wonder Full has a scoreMuse Wonder Full: 79Qwen 3.8 27B: not enough data
Multimodalonly Qwen 3.8 27B has a scoreMuse Wonder Full: not enough dataQwen 3.8 27B: 13
Specialist fields
FinanceMuse Wonder Full aheadMuse Wonder Full: 89Qwen 3.8 27B: 34
LegalMuse Wonder Full aheadMuse Wonder Full: 94Qwen 3.8 27B: 23
HealthMuse Wonder Full aheadMuse Wonder Full: 82Qwen 3.8 27B: 3
Show 2 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
AreaMuse Wonder FullQwen 3.8 27B0 to 100, higher is betterResult
CybersecurityMuse Wonder Full aheadMuse Wonder Full: 92Qwen 3.8 27B: 19
Productivityonly Muse Wonder Full has a scoreMuse Wonder Full: 96Qwen 3.8 27B: not enough data
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.
This is the lowest documented setting for each provider. It does not make compute comparable across models.
Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.
Muse Wonder Full
Not tested yet
Qwen 3.8 27B
The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.
Reasoning (requested): disabled (enabled: false)
Current attempt
- Run date
- Oct 11, 2026
- API provider
- Alibaba
- Requested API model
- qwen/qwen3.8-27b
- API model reported in response
- qwen/qwen3.8-27b
- Reasoning setting
- disabled (enabled: false)
- Pinned endpoint
- Alibaba | qwen/qwen3.8-27b-20260814
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Reasoning tokens
- 0
- Test protocol
- community-visual-low-v1
- Technical checks
- Failed
- Response time
- 119.1 s
Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.
Prompt and test conditions
Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle
Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens
Task origin (Simon Willison)SVG short test
There is no shared test round for this selection. Results from different rounds are not mixed.
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | Muse Wonder Full | Qwen 3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall index0 to 100, higher is better | 90 | 11 |
| Rank | Rank 6 to 9 of 95 | Rank 44 to 57 of 95 |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | n/a | $0.04 |
| Outputwhat the model writes | n/a | $2.50 |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | n/a | 40 |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages | 262,144 tokens≈ 390 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | n/a | n/a |
| Released | Oct 12, 2026 | Aug 14, 2026 |
| Availability | Subscription only | Active |
| Open weights | no | yes |
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Shared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
A: Muse Wonder FullB: Qwen 3.8 27B
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 61%Qwen 3.8 27B: 14.2%Vals AIAs of 10/18/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 73.6%Qwen 3.8 27B: 67.8%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 71.9%Qwen 3.8 27B: 59.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 59.1%Qwen 3.8 27B: 48.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 79.8%Qwen 3.8 27B: 39.1%Vals AIAs of 10/24/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 53.4%Qwen 3.8 27B: 36.1%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
LegalBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 87.4%Qwen 3.8 27B: 82.4%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 49.9%Qwen 3.8 27B: 28.7%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 89.3%Qwen 3.8 27B: 83.8%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 0.5%Qwen 3.8 27B: 0%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 94%Qwen 3.8 27B: 16%Vals AIAs of 10/24/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 43%Qwen 3.8 27B: 30.9%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 37.1%Qwen 3.8 27B: 0%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 86%Qwen 3.8 27B: 64.9%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 58%Qwen 3.8 27B: 2.2%Vals AIAs of 10/18/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 83.9%Qwen 3.8 27B: 83.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 80.9%Qwen 3.8 27B: 53.3%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 56.7%Qwen 3.8 27B: 47.3%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 75.3%Qwen 3.8 27B: 31.8%Vals AIAs of 10/24/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 63.6%Qwen 3.8 27B: 45.5%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
LegalBenchConclusion Tasks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 90.3%Qwen 3.8 27B: 88.4%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 8%Qwen 3.8 27B: 1%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 26.7%Qwen 3.8 27B: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 62.5%Qwen 3.8 27B: 0%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 70%Qwen 3.8 27B: 50%Vals AIAs of 10/18/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 63.3%Qwen 3.8 27B: 51.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 85.3%Qwen 3.8 27B: 79.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 49%Qwen 3.8 27B: 36.8%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 85.5%Qwen 3.8 27B: 48.5%Vals AIAs of 10/24/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 92.8%Qwen 3.8 27B: 88.5%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
LegalBenchInterpretation Tasks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 85%Qwen 3.8 27B: 82%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 0.5%Qwen 3.8 27B: 0%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 76.1%Qwen 3.8 27B: 48.3%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEngineering Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 11.1%Qwen 3.8 27B: 0%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 4.244 / 5Qwen 3.8 27B: 4.197 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/18/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 66.6%Qwen 3.8 27B: 50%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 46.8%Qwen 3.8 27B: 38.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
IOIIOI 2026 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 78.7%Qwen 3.8 27B: 36.8%Vals AIAs of 10/24/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 58.1%Qwen 3.8 27B: 41.9%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
LegalBenchIssue Tasks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 91%Qwen 3.8 27B: 90.2%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 24.2%Qwen 3.8 27B: 11.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 56.6%Qwen 3.8 27B: 43.1%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceLife Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 36.8%Qwen 3.8 27B: 0%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 59.6%Qwen 3.8 27B: 53.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 71.6%Qwen 3.8 27B: 60.3%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 89.8%Qwen 3.8 27B: 86.8%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
LegalBenchRhetoric Tasks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 83.6%Qwen 3.8 27B: 81.4%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 78.3%Qwen 3.8 27B: 58.6%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceMathematical Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 41.2%Qwen 3.8 27B: 0%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
EMBM&A · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 78.3%Qwen 3.8 27B: 64.8%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Earnings Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 78.6%Qwen 3.8 27B: 70.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 44.4%Qwen 3.8 27B: 25.9%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
LegalBenchRule Tasks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 87.1%Qwen 3.8 27B: 70.2%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 46.5%Qwen 3.8 27B: 34.9%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Terminal-Bench-SciencePhysical Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 35.3%Qwen 3.8 27B: 0%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
EMBMisc · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 64.2%Qwen 3.8 27B: 59.1%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Financial Modeling · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 23.7%Qwen 3.8 27B: 19.3%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · Weighted partial credit · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 92.9%Qwen 3.8 27B: 83.1%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 74.8%Qwen 3.8 27B: 57.7%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
EMBOperating · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 68.6%Qwen 3.8 27B: 57%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)General Qualitative Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 74.2%Qwen 3.8 27B: 62.1%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Legal Research BenchConstitutional / Civil Rights · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 47.4%Qwen 3.8 27B: 26.3%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
Tax Agent BenchForms & Filings · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 30%Qwen 3.8 27B: 16.7%Vals AIAs of 10/26/2026
EMBScratch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalMuse Wonder Full: 70.5%Qwen 3.8 27B: 64.1%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Compare another matchup
More matchups
Related LLM comparisons
Compare Muse Wonder Full and Qwen 3.8 27B with other leading models.