Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

Muse Wonder vs. Kimi K2.6

Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.

shared result series
131
distinct benchmarks
10
latest retrieval
2026-10-15

Change model selection

Specifications

General specifications

Release date, availability, context window, architecture, and published parameter counts at a glance. Undisclosed details remain marked as unavailable.

Specifications for Muse Wonder and Kimi K2.6
AttributeMuse WonderKimi K2.6
ProviderMetaMoonshot AI
ReleasedOct 12, 2026Apr 20, 2026
AvailabilityPreviewActive
Model typeProprietaryOpen Weights
ParametersNot published1T, 32B active
ArchitectureNot publishedMixture of Experts
Context window1,048,576 tokens262,144 tokens
Knowledge cutoffNot publishedNot published
Technical sourcesModel, ContextModel, Context

Pricing

API pricing compared

The table compares official standard API rates per 1M tokens, including published cache pricing. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.

API pricing for Muse Wonder and Kimi K2.6
Price typeMuse WonderKimi K2.6
API input$4$0.95
API output$20$4
Cache read$0.2$0.16
Cache write (5 min.)Not listedNot listed
Cache write (1 hr.)Not listedNot listed
Price verified10/15/2026 Source09/22/2026 Source
Muse WonderKimi K2.6
API inputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Muse Wonder$4
Kimi K2.6Lower price$0.95
API outputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Muse Wonder$20
Kimi K2.6Lower price$4
Cache readUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Muse Wonder$0.2
Kimi K2.6Lower price$0.16

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Pricing by provider

Direct developer pricing and provider endpoint tariffs routed through OpenRouter are listed separately. Prices are in USD per 1M tokens. Context-dependent direct tiers plus regional, Flex, Priority, and other OpenRouter tariffs remain individually identifiable.

No provider tariff for Muse Wonder is available in the stored OpenRouter snapshot. The official direct price is still shown.

Provider pricing for Muse Wonder and Kimi K2.6
ModelProviderPurchase route and tariffInput per 1M tokensOutput per 1M tokensSource
Muse WonderMetaDirect from developerStandard APILowest listed price: $4Lowest listed price: $20Source10/15/2026
Kimi K2.6Moonshot AIDirect from developerStandard API$0.95$4Source09/22/2026
AtlasCloudVia OpenRouteratlas-cloud/int4$0.95$4Source10/16/2026
BaiduVia OpenRouterbaidu/fp4$0.95$4Source10/16/2026
ChutesVia OpenRouterchutes/int4$0.45Lowest listed price: $1.95Source10/16/2026
CloudflareVia OpenRoutercloudflare$0.95$4Source10/16/2026
CoreWeaveVia OpenRoutercoreweave/fp4$0.65$3.41Source10/16/2026
CrusoeVia OpenRoutercrusoe/bf16$0.7$3.5Source10/16/2026
DeepInfraVia OpenRouterdeepinfra/fp4$0.75$3.5Source10/16/2026
DigitalOceanVia OpenRouterdigitalocean$0.57$2.4Source10/16/2026
GMICloudVia OpenRoutergmicloud/fp8$0.855$3.6Source10/16/2026
InceptronVia OpenRouterinceptron/int4Lowest listed price: $0.4323$3.2Source10/16/2026
Moonshot AIVia OpenRoutermoonshotai/int4$0.95$4Source10/16/2026
ParasailVia OpenRouterparasail/int4$0.75$3.5Source10/16/2026
PhalaVia OpenRouterphala$1.09$4.6Source10/16/2026
SiliconFlowVia OpenRoutersiliconflow/fp8$0.77$3.4Source10/16/2026
StreamLakeVia OpenRouterstreamlake/fp8$0.5985$2.52Source10/16/2026
VeniceVia OpenRoutervenice/int4$0.75$3.5Source10/16/2026

Performance

Shared benchmarks

Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.

Capability profile from matched benchmarks

Each axis averages directly matched benchmark families. A value of 100 means the stronger value within this pair, not a universal quality score.

Not enough directly matched categories for a reliable radar

Only 0 of at least 5 categories have comparable, direct model measurements. The benchmark tables below show the available evidence without filling missing axes.

Muse WonderKimi K2.6
Code MigrationOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse WonderHigher measured value62.552 %
Kimi K2.627.768 %
EMBOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse WonderHigher measured value67.084 %
Kimi K2.657.855 %
Finance Agent (v2)Overall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse WonderHigher measured value56.637 %
Kimi K2.644.899 %
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse WonderHigher measured value17.083 %
Kimi K2.61.667 %
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse WonderHigher measured value50.481 %
Kimi K2.615.865 %
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse WonderHigher measured value1,650.947
Kimi K2.61,509.237
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse WonderHigher measured value1,512.671
Kimi K2.61,460.76
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse WonderHigher measured value70.23 %
Kimi K2.656.631 %
Tax Agent BenchOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse WonderHigher measured value36.269 %
Kimi K2.612.404 %
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse WonderHigher measured value83.089 %
Kimi K2.637.891 %
Code MigrationCLI. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse WonderHigher measured value60.07 %
Kimi K2.617.977 %
EMBComps. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse WonderHigher measured value79.488 %
Kimi K2.661.395 %

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Benchmark scores for Muse Wonder and Kimi K2.6
Benchmark and taskMuse WonderKimi K2.6Source
Code MigrationOverall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value62.552 %
27.768 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
EMBOverall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value67.084 %
57.855 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value56.637 %
44.899 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: task resolution rateScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value17.083 %
1.667 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: all-pass rateScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value50.481 %
15.865 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Kimi K2.6: Snapshot: kimi-k2.6, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 1,228 published pairwise votes.Kimi K2.6: Arena rating from 10,192 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,650.947
95% confidence interval: ±18.263The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,509.237
95% confidence interval: ±7.227The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Kimi K2.6: Snapshot: kimi-k2.6, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 1,944 published pairwise votes.Kimi K2.6: Arena rating from 40,030 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,512.671
95% confidence interval: ±13.236The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,460.76
95% confidence interval: ±4.428The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value70.23 %
56.631 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value36.269 %
12.404 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Harness: OpenHands, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Harness: OpenHands, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value83.089 %
37.891 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Code MigrationCLI
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value60.07 %
17.977 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
EMBComps
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value79.488 %
61.395 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value52.67 %
37.934 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkAntitrust Competition · Criteria passed
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: criteria pass rateScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value93.841 %
63.768 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: all-pass rateScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value63.636 %
18.182 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWebdev
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Kimi K2.6: Snapshot: kimi-k2.6, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 1,228 published pairwise votes.Kimi K2.6: Arena rating from 10,192 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,650.947
95% confidence interval: ±18.263The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,509.237
95% confidence interval: ±7.227The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Kimi K2.6: Snapshot: kimi-k2.6, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 338 published pairwise votes.Kimi K2.6: Arena rating from 7,937 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,500.247
95% confidence interval: ±30.856The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,454.55
95% confidence interval: ±7.536The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value20 %
3.333 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value70 %
57.143 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
EMBDataroom
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value79.232 %
75.069 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value45.936 %
32.584 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkAntitrust Competition · Task fully resolved
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: task resolution rateScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value20 %
0 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: weighted partial-credit scoreScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value90.571 %
75.531 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWebdev-html
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Kimi K2.6: Snapshot: kimi-k2.6, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 158 published pairwise votes.Kimi K2.6: Arena rating from 1,160 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,721.908
95% confidence interval: ±51.47The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,484.407
95% confidence interval: ±18.204The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Kimi K2.6: Snapshot: kimi-k2.6, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 487 published pairwise votes.Kimi K2.6: Arena rating from 11,100 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,557.956
95% confidence interval: ±26.189The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,515.795
95% confidence interval: ±6.881The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value71.362 %
42.296 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: mean reviewer code-quality ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value4.061 / 5
3.149 / 5
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
EMBDCF
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value51.035 %
49.675 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value47.933 %
41.069 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkArbitration International Dispute Resolution · Criteria passed
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: criteria pass rateScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value92.473 %
50.179 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: all-pass rateScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value48.837 %
20.93 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWebdev-react
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Kimi K2.6: Snapshot: kimi-k2.6, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 787 published pairwise votes.Kimi K2.6: Arena rating from 7,354 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,637.813
95% confidence interval: ±23.199The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,504.994
95% confidence interval: ±7.997The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Kimi K2.6: Snapshot: kimi-k2.6, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 427 published pairwise votes.Kimi K2.6: Arena rating from 6,330 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,485.682
95% confidence interval: ±29.474The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,432.668
95% confidence interval: ±8.216The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value50 %
26.467 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
EMBLBO
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value60.69 %
43.117 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value67.252 %
52.124 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkArbitration International Dispute Resolution · Task fully resolved
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: task resolution rateScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
No direct winner0 %
No direct winner0 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: weighted partial-credit scoreScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value86.88 %
78.436 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEnglish
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Kimi K2.6: Snapshot: kimi-k2.6, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 802 published pairwise votes.Kimi K2.6: Arena rating from 18,177 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,523.395
95% confidence interval: ±20.831The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,469.196
95% confidence interval: ±5.636The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value77.655 %
51.239 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
EMBM&A
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value76.852 %
64.205 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Earnings Analysis
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value76.768 %
63.824 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkBanking Finance · Criteria passed
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: criteria pass rateScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value94.424 %
84.758 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · All-pass
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: all-pass rateScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value37.037 %
18.519 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEntertainment, sports and media
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Kimi K2.6: Snapshot: kimi-k2.6, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 536 published pairwise votes.Kimi K2.6: Arena rating from 8,304 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,468.099
95% confidence interval: ±25.703The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,429.904
95% confidence interval: ±7.52The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value39.535 %
9.302 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
EMBMisc
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value56.936 %
54.599 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Financial Modeling
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value22.515 %
14.201 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkBanking Finance · Task fully resolved
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: task resolution rateScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value20 %
0 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · Weighted partial credit
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: weighted partial-credit scoreScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value89.018 %
75.8 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlExcluding ties
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Kimi K2.6: Snapshot: kimi-k2.6, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 1,390 published pairwise votes.Kimi K2.6: Arena rating from 29,659 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,538.781
95% confidence interval: ±18.91The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,464.547
95% confidence interval: ±5.8The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value67.563 %
46.747 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
EMBOperating
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value65.354 %
56.923 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Finance Agent (v2)General Qualitative Analysis
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value70.779 %
57.295 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkBankruptcy Restructuring · Criteria passed
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: criteria pass rateScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value89.965 %
54.325 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Legal Research BenchConstitutional / Civil Rights · All-pass
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: all-pass rateScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value39.474 %
21.053 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlExpert prompts
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Kimi K2.6: Snapshot: kimi-k2.6, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 212 published pairwise votes.Kimi K2.6: Arena rating from 3,855 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,512.579
95% confidence interval: ±38.177The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,502.724
95% confidence interval: ±9.922The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
Tax Agent BenchForms & Filings
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value23.333 %
3.333 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
EMBScratch
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value69.002 %
59.678 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Finance Agent (v2)General Quantitative Analysis
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value77.605 %
65.13 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkBankruptcy Restructuring · Task fully resolved
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: task resolution rateScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
No direct winner0 %
No direct winner0 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Legal Research BenchConstitutional / Civil Rights · Weighted partial credit
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: weighted partial-credit scoreScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value89.259 %
79.224 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlHard prompts
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Kimi K2.6: Snapshot: kimi-k2.6, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 1,218 published pairwise votes.Kimi K2.6: Arena rating from 26,084 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,533.453
95% confidence interval: ±16.637The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,485.51
95% confidence interval: ±5.181The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
Tax Agent BenchForms & Filings
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2.6: Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Higher measured value69.85 %
37.63 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Our model tests

Our tests

There is no shared test round for this selection. Results from different rounds are not mixed.

Earlier tests

Pelican on a bicycle

A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Muse Wonder

Not tested yet

Kimi K2.6

Output withheld for safety

Reasoning (requested): high

Current attempt
Run date
Oct 5, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
moonshotai/kimi-k2.6
API model reported in response
moonshotai/kimi-k2.6
Reasoning setting
high
Pinned endpoint
Moonshot AI | moonshotai/kimi-k2.6-20260420
Temperature
Provider default
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed
Response time
124 s

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Earlier attempts (3)
  • Oct 2, 2026Output withheld for safetyReasoning setting: high
  • Oct 1, 2026Output withheld for safetyReasoning setting: high
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
Prompt and test conditions

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens

Task origin (Simon Willison)

How to read this comparison

Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict

Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.

The standard price table uses direct developer rates. The provider comparison labels OpenRouter endpoints, regions, and special tariffs separately.

Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.

More matchups

Compare Muse Wonder and Kimi K2.6 with other leading models using the same data and benchmark logic.

View the complete LLM comparison