Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

Muse Wonder vs. Grok 4.6

Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.

shared result series
167
distinct benchmarks
19
latest retrieval
2026-10-15

Change model selection

Specifications

General specifications

Release date, availability, context window, architecture, and published parameter counts at a glance. Undisclosed details remain marked as unavailable.

Specifications for Muse Wonder and Grok 4.6
AttributeMuse WonderGrok 4.6
ProviderMetaxAI
ReleasedOct 12, 2026Aug 12, 2026
AvailabilityPreviewActive
Model typeProprietaryProprietary
ParametersNot publishedNot published
ArchitectureNot publishedNot published
Context window1,048,576 tokens500,000 tokens
Knowledge cutoffNot publishedFebruary 1, 2026
Technical sourcesModel, ContextModel

Pricing

API pricing compared

The table compares official standard API rates per 1M tokens, including published cache pricing. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.

API pricing for Muse Wonder and Grok 4.6
Price typeMuse WonderGrok 4.6
API input$4$2 ≤200K / $4 >200K
API output$20$6 ≤200K / $12 >200K
Cache read$0.2$0.5 ≤200K / $1 >200K
Cache write (5 min.)Not listedNot listed
Cache write (1 hr.)Not listedNot listed
Price verified10/15/2026 Source09/22/2026 Source
Muse WonderGrok 4.6
API inputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Muse Wonder$4
Grok 4.6Lower price$2
API outputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Muse Wonder$20
Grok 4.6Lower price$6
Cache readUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Muse WonderLower price$0.2
Grok 4.6$0.5

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Pricing by provider

Direct developer pricing and provider endpoint tariffs routed through OpenRouter are listed separately. Prices are in USD per 1M tokens. Context-dependent direct tiers plus regional, Flex, Priority, and other OpenRouter tariffs remain individually identifiable.

No provider tariff for Muse Wonder is available in the stored OpenRouter snapshot. The official direct price is still shown.

Provider pricing for Muse Wonder and Grok 4.6
ModelProviderPurchase route and tariffInput per 1M tokensOutput per 1M tokensSource
Muse WonderMetaDirect from developerStandard APILowest listed price: $4Lowest listed price: $20Source10/15/2026
Grok 4.6xAIDirect from developerUp to 200,000 context tokensLowest listed price: $2Lowest listed price: $6Source09/22/2026
xAIDirect from developerAbove 200,000 context tokens$4$12Source09/22/2026
Amazon BedrockVia OpenRouteramazon-bedrock/us-west-2$2.2$6.6Source10/16/2026
xAIVia OpenRouterxaiLowest listed price: $2Lowest listed price: $6Source10/16/2026
xAIVia OpenRouterxai/priority$4$12Source10/16/2026
xAIVia OpenRouterxai/zdrLowest listed price: $2Lowest listed price: $6Source10/16/2026
xAIVia OpenRouterxai/zdr/priority$4$12Source10/16/2026
xAIVia OpenRouterxai/zdr/us$2.2$6.6Source10/16/2026

Performance

Shared benchmarks

Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.

Capability profile from matched benchmarks

Each axis averages directly matched benchmark families. A value of 100 means the stronger value within this pair, not a universal quality score.

Not enough directly matched categories for a reliable radar

Only 0 of at least 5 categories have comparable, direct model measurements. The benchmark tables below show the available evidence without filling missing axes.

Muse WonderGrok 4.6
BioMysteryBenchOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse Wonder67.037 %
Grok 4.6Higher measured value72.222 %
Code MigrationOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse WonderHigher measured value62.552 %
Grok 4.644.572 %
CyberBench v1.1Overall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse WonderHigher measured value80.357 %
Grok 4.667.678 %
EMBOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse WonderHigher measured value67.084 %
Grok 4.662.727 %
Finance Agent (v2)Overall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse WonderHigher measured value56.637 %
Grok 4.653.682 %
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse WonderHigher measured value17.083 %
Grok 4.615.833 %
IOIOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse WonderHigher measured value66.944 %
Grok 4.647.611 %
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse WonderHigher measured value50.481 %
Grok 4.648.077 %
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse WonderHigher measured value1,650.947
Grok 4.61,617.402
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse WonderHigher measured value1,512.671
Grok 4.61,454.976
MysteryMechanismOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse Wonder27.477 %
Grok 4.6Higher measured value30.631 %
ProofBenchOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Muse WonderHigher measured value84 %
Grok 4.651 %

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Benchmark scores for Muse Wonder and Grok 4.6
Benchmark and taskMuse WonderGrok 4.6Source
BioMysteryBenchOverall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Harness: Terminus 2, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Harness: Terminus 2, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
67.037 %
Higher measured value72.222 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Code MigrationOverall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value62.552 %
44.572 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value80.357 %
67.678 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
EMBOverall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value67.084 %
62.727 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value56.637 %
53.682 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: task resolution rateScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value17.083 %
15.833 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
IOIOverall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value66.944 %
47.611 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/14/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: all-pass rateScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value50.481 %
48.077 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Grok 4.6: Snapshot: grok-4.6-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 1,228 published pairwise votes.Grok 4.6: Arena rating from 9,774 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,650.947
95% confidence interval: ±18.263The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,617.402
95% confidence interval: ±7.519The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Grok 4.6: Snapshot: grok-4.6-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 1,944 published pairwise votes.Grok 4.6: Arena rating from 28,124 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,512.671
95% confidence interval: ±13.236The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,454.976
95% confidence interval: ±4.884The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
27.477 %
Higher measured value30.631 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
ProofBenchOverall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value84 %
51 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value70.23 %
66.847 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value36.269 %
33.141 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 4.0Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value49.495 %
17.172 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
Terminal-Bench ScienceOverall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 0.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Harness: Mini-SWE-agent, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Harness: Mini-SWE-agent, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value22.857 %
11.429 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/14/2026
Vals IndexOverall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2.1Metric: weighted index scoreScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value61.062 %
52.092 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
Vibe Code Bench 1-100Overall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1.0Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Harness: OpenHands, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Harness: OpenHands, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value26.55 %
14.75 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/14/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Harness: OpenHands, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Harness: OpenHands, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value83.089 %
76.239 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
BioMysteryBenchHard
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Harness: Terminus 2, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Harness: Terminus 2, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
No direct winner29.412 %
No direct winner29.412 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Code MigrationCLI
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value60.07 %
39.429 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value85.714 %
80.357 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
EMBComps
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value79.488 %
59.923 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value52.67 %
49.619 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkAntitrust Competition · Criteria passed
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: criteria pass rateScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value93.841 %
93.116 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
IOIIOI 2024
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value66.833 %
50.333 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/14/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: all-pass rateScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value63.636 %
62.121 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWebdev
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Grok 4.6: Snapshot: grok-4.6-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 1,228 published pairwise votes.Grok 4.6: Arena rating from 9,774 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,650.947
95% confidence interval: ±18.263The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,617.402
95% confidence interval: ±7.519The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Grok 4.6: Snapshot: grok-4.6-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 338 published pairwise votes.Grok 4.6: Arena rating from 5,224 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,500.247
95% confidence interval: ±30.856The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,447.727
95% confidence interval: ±8.727The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value20 %
16.667 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 4.0Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value46.667 %
6.667 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
Terminal-Bench ScienceEarth Sciences
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 0.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Harness: Mini-SWE-agent, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Harness: Mini-SWE-agent, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value50 %
12.5 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/14/2026
Vals IndexCode Migration
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2.1Metric: benchmark scoreScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value62.009 %
44.603 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
BioMysteryBenchHuman-solvable
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Harness: Terminus 2, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Harness: Terminus 2, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
75.799 %
Higher measured value82.192 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value70 %
60 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value75 %
55 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
EMBDataroom
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value79.232 %
78.154 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value45.936 %
42.901 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkAntitrust Competition · Task fully resolved
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: task resolution rateScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
No direct winner20 %
No direct winner20 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
IOIIOI 2025
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value75.5 %
49 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/14/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: weighted partial-credit scoreScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
90.571 %
Higher measured value91.39 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWebdev-html
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Grok 4.6: Snapshot: grok-4.6-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 158 published pairwise votes.Grok 4.6: Arena rating from 1,551 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,721.908
95% confidence interval: ±51.47The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,598.783
95% confidence interval: ±16.535The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Grok 4.6: Snapshot: grok-4.6-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 487 published pairwise votes.Grok 4.6: Arena rating from 7,047 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,557.956
95% confidence interval: ±26.189The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,509.617
95% confidence interval: ±7.75The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value71.362 %
68.102 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 4.0Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value33.333 %
0 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
Terminal-Bench ScienceEngineering Sciences
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 0.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Harness: Mini-SWE-agent, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Harness: Mini-SWE-agent, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
0 %
Higher measured value11.111 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/14/2026
Vals IndexEMB
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2.1Metric: benchmark scoreScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value67.084 %
62.727 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: mean reviewer code-quality ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
4.061 / 5
Higher measured value4.077 / 5
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
EMBDCF
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value51.035 %
49.837 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value47.933 %
41.229 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkArbitration International Dispute Resolution · Criteria passed
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: criteria pass rateScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value92.473 %
88.889 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
IOIIOI 2026
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value58.5 %
43.5 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/14/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: all-pass rateScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
No direct winner48.837 %
No direct winner48.837 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWebdev-react
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Grok 4.6: Snapshot: grok-4.6-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 787 published pairwise votes.Grok 4.6: Arena rating from 6,327 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,637.813
95% confidence interval: ±23.199The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,631.232
95% confidence interval: ±8.91The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Grok 4.6: Snapshot: grok-4.6-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 427 published pairwise votes.Grok 4.6: Arena rating from 6,256 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,485.682
95% confidence interval: ±29.474The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,443.01
95% confidence interval: ±8.568The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value50 %
43.333 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0ML
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 4.0Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value45.455 %
15.152 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
Terminal-Bench ScienceLife Sciences
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 0.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Harness: Mini-SWE-agent, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Harness: Mini-SWE-agent, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
No direct winner21.053 %
No direct winner21.053 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/14/2026
Vals IndexFinance Agent v2
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2.1Metric: benchmark scoreScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value56.637 %
53.682 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
EMBLBO
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value60.69 %
59.307 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
Higher measured value67.252 %
64.355 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkArbitration International Dispute Resolution · Task fully resolved
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: task resolution rateScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
No direct winner0 %
No direct winner0 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: weighted partial-credit scoreScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Reasoning: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Grok 4.6: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
86.88 %
Higher measured value89.75 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEnglish
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterMuse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Grok 4.6: Snapshot: grok-4.6-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Text, style control
Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 802 published pairwise votes.Grok 4.6: Arena rating from 11,387 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,523.395
95% confidence interval: ±20.831The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,460.057
95% confidence interval: ±6.479The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Our model tests

Our tests

There is no shared test round for this selection. Results from different rounds are not mixed.

Earlier tests

Pelican on a bicycle

A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Muse Wonder

Not tested yet

Grok 4.6

Grok 4.6: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Reasoning (requested): high

Current attempt
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
x-ai/grok-4.6
API model reported in response
x-ai/grok-4.6
Reasoning setting
high
Pinned endpoint
xAI | x-ai/grok-4.6-20260810
Temperature
Provider default
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating
Response time
113.6 s

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (1)
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
Prompt and test conditions

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens

Task origin (Simon Willison)

How to read this comparison

Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict

Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.

The standard price table uses direct developer rates. The provider comparison labels OpenRouter endpoints, regions, and special tariffs separately.

Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.

More matchups

Compare Muse Wonder and Grok 4.6 with other leading models using the same data and benchmark logic.

View the complete LLM comparison