Head-to-head comparison

Grok 4.7 vs. GLM-5.1

Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.

shared result series: 11
distinct benchmarks: 11
latest retrieval: 2026-09-29

First modelSecond model

Specifications

General specifications

Release date, availability, context window, architecture, and published parameter counts at a glance. Undisclosed details remain marked as unavailable.

Specifications for Grok 4.7 and GLM-5.1
Attribute	Grok 4.7	GLM-5.1
Provider	xAI	Z.ai
Released	Sep 21, 2026	Apr 7, 2026
Availability	Active	Open Source
Model type	Proprietary	Open Weights
Parameters	Not published	744B, 40B active
Architecture	Not published	Mixture of Experts
Context window	500,000 tokens	200,000 tokens
Knowledge cutoff	May 2026	Not published
Technical sources	Model, Context	Model, Context

Pricing

API pricing compared

The table compares official standard API rates per 1M tokens, including published cache pricing. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.

API pricing for Grok 4.7 and GLM-5.1
Price type	Grok 4.7	GLM-5.1
API input	$2 ≤200K / $4 >200K	$1.4
API output	$6 ≤200K / $12 >200K	$4.4
Cache read	$0.5 ≤200K / $1 >200K	$0.26
Cache write (5 min.)	Not listed	Not listed
Cache write (1 hr.)	Not listed	Not listed
Price verified	09/23/2026 Source	09/22/2026 Source

Grok 4.7GLM-5.1

API inputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier

Grok 4.7$2

GLM-5.1$1.4

API outputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier

Grok 4.7$6

GLM-5.1$4.4

Cache readUSD per 1M tokens, base tier

Grok 4.7$0.5

GLM-5.1$0.26

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Pricing by provider

Direct developer pricing and provider endpoint tariffs routed through OpenRouter are listed separately. Prices are in USD per 1M tokens. Context-dependent direct tiers plus regional, Flex, Priority, and other OpenRouter tariffs remain individually identifiable.

Provider pricing for Grok 4.7 and GLM-5.1
Model	Provider	Purchase route and tariff	Input per 1M tokens	Output per 1M tokens	Source
Grok 4.7	xAI	Direct from developerUp to 200,000 context tokens	Lowest listed price: $2	Lowest listed price: $6	Source09/23/2026
	xAI	Direct from developerAbove 200,000 context tokens	$4	$12	Source09/23/2026
	xAI	Via OpenRouterxai	Lowest listed price: $2	Lowest listed price: $6	Source10/12/2026
	xAI	Via OpenRouterxai/priority	$4	$12	Source10/12/2026
	xAI	Via OpenRouterxai/zdr	Lowest listed price: $2	Lowest listed price: $6	Source10/12/2026
	xAI	Via OpenRouterxai/zdr/priority	$4	$12	Source10/12/2026
	xAI	Via OpenRouterxai/zdr/us	$2.2	$6.6	Source10/12/2026
GLM-5.1	Z.ai	Direct from developerStandard API	$1.4	$4.4	Source09/22/2026
	Alibaba	Via OpenRouteralibaba/fp8	$1.33	$4.18	Source10/12/2026
	AtlasCloud	Via OpenRouteratlas-cloud/fp8	$1.26	$3.96	Source10/12/2026
	Baidu	Via OpenRouterbaidu/fp8	Lowest listed price: $0.9646	Lowest listed price: $3.0316	Source10/12/2026
	Chutes	Via OpenRouterchutes/fp8	$0.98	$3.08	Source10/12/2026
	Friendli	Via OpenRouterfriendli	$1.4	$4.4	Source10/12/2026
	GMICloud	Via OpenRoutergmicloud/fp8	$1.4	$4.4	Source10/12/2026
	Nebius	Via OpenRouternebius/fp8	$1.4	$4.4	Source10/12/2026
	Novita	Via OpenRouternovita/fp8	$1.38	$4.4	Source10/12/2026
	Phala	Via OpenRouterphala	$1.21	$4.2	Source10/12/2026
	SiliconFlow	Via OpenRoutersiliconflow/fp8	$1.19	$3.74	Source10/12/2026
	StreamLake	Via OpenRouterstreamlake/fp8	$0.966	$3.036	Source10/12/2026
	Venice	Via OpenRoutervenice/fp8	$1.4014	$4.4044	Source10/12/2026
	Z.AI	Via OpenRouterz-ai/fp8	$1.4	$4.4	Source10/12/2026

Performance

Shared benchmarks

Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.

Capability profile from matched benchmarks

Each axis averages directly matched benchmark families. A value of 100 means the stronger value within this pair, not a universal quality score.

Grok 4.7

GLM-5.1

Coding: 100 / 31.3 (3 benchmark families)

Finance: 100 / 85.7 (1 benchmark family)

Legal: 100 / 53.1 (3 benchmark families)

Agentic tasks: 100 / 77.6 (1 benchmark family)

Productivity: 100 / 94.2 (1 benchmark family)

Health: 100 / 82.4 (2 benchmark families)

11 matched rows from 11 benchmark families were considered. The radar shows 6 of 6 comparable categories.

Grok 4.7GLM-5.1

Code MigrationOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference

Grok 4.744.816 %

GLM-5.125.768 %

Finance Agent (v2)Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference

Grok 4.752.251 %

GLM-5.144.792 %

Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved. Higher is better. No documented setup difference

Grok 4.712.5 %

GLM-5.10 %

Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass. Higher is better. No documented setup difference

Grok 4.747.115 %

GLM-5.127.885 %

LegalBenchOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference

Grok 4.784.389 %

GLM-5.184.394 %

MedCodeOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference

Grok 4.749.553 %

GLM-5.141.604 %

MedScribeOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference

Grok 4.789.377 %

GLM-5.172.27 %

ProgramBenchOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference

Grok 4.70.5 %

GLM-5.10 %

Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference

Grok 4.765.629 %

GLM-5.161.84 %

Terminal-Bench 2.1Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference

Grok 4.773.408 %

GLM-5.156.929 %

Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference

Grok 4.786.175 %

GLM-5.131.456 %

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Benchmark scores for Grok 4.7 and GLM-5.1
Benchmark and task	Grok 4.7	GLM-5.1	Source
Code MigrationOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better	Winner44.816 %	25.768 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/27/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better	Winner52.251 %	44.792 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/27/2026
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: task resolution rateScoring: Higher is better	Winner12.5 %	0 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/27/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: all-pass rateScoring: Higher is better	Winner47.115 %	27.885 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/27/2026
LegalBenchOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better	84.389 %	Winner84.394 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/27/2026
MedCodeOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better	Winner49.553 %	41.604 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/26/2026
MedScribeOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better	Winner89.377 %	72.27 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/26/2026
ProgramBenchOverall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better	Winner0.5 %	0 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/27/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better	Winner65.629 %	61.84 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/27/2026
Terminal-Bench 2.1Overall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better	Winner73.408 %	56.929 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/27/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall Test details No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Harness: OpenHands	Winner86.175 %	31.456 %	Vals AI Source details Data as of: 09/27/2026
Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Our model tests

Our tests

Compare how the models respond to the same prompt. Each test shows the latest attempt, with no subsequent fixes to the generated code. Earlier runs remain available in the test details. These results do not contribute to an overall score.

Pelican on a bicycle

A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Grok 4.7

Reasoning (requested): high

Current attempt

Run date: 1 Oct 2026
API provider: openrouter
Requested API model: x-ai/grok-4.7
API model reported in response: x-ai/grok-4.7
Reasoning setting: high
Pinned endpoint: xAI | x-ai/grok-4.7-20260916
Temperature: Provider default
Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens
Test protocol: community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks: Passed, not a quality rating
Response time: 13.4 s

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (1)

1 Oct 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high

GLM-5.1

Output withheld for safety

Reasoning (requested): high

Current attempt

Run date: 2 Oct 2026
API provider: openrouter
Requested API model: z-ai/glm-5.1
API model reported in response: z-ai/glm-5.1
Reasoning setting: high
Pinned endpoint: Z.AI | z-ai/glm-5.1-20260406
Temperature: Provider default
Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens
Test protocol: community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks: Failed
Response time: 178.8 s

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Earlier attempts (2)

1 Oct 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
7 Sept 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high

Prompt and test conditions

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens

Task origin (Simon Willison)

How to read this comparison

Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict

Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.

The standard price table uses direct developer rates. The provider comparison labels OpenRouter endpoints, regions, and special tariffs separately.

Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.

More matchups

Compare Grok 4.7 and GLM-5.1 with other leading models using the same data and benchmark logic.

View the complete LLM comparison