Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

Grok 4.3 vs. GLM-5.1

Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.

173

shared result series

20

distinct benchmarks

2026-08-16

latest retrieval

Change model selection

Specifications and cost

General specifications and standard API pricing

Undisclosed parameter counts and knowledge cutoffs stay marked as unavailable. The table shows direct standard token pricing, including documented context tiers. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.

Specifications and API pricing for Grok 4.3 and GLM-5.1
AttributeGrok 4.3GLM-5.1
ProviderxAIZ.ai
ReleasedMay 6, 2026Apr 7, 2026
AvailabilityActiveOpen Source
Model typeProprietaryOpen Weights
ParametersNot published744B, 40B active
ArchitectureNot publishedMixture of Experts
Context window1,000,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Knowledge cutoffNot publishedNot published
Technical sourcesModelModel, Context
API pricing per 1M tokens
API input$1.25 ≤200K / $2.5 >200K$1.4
API output$2.5 ≤200K / $5 >200K$4.4
Cache read$0.2 ≤200K / $0.4 >200K$0.26
Cache write (5 min.)Not listedNot listed
Cache write (1 hr.)Not listedNot listed
Price verified08/11/2026Source07/30/2026Source
Grok 4.3GLM-5.1
API inputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Grok 4.3$1.25Lower price
GLM-5.1$1.4
API outputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Grok 4.3$2.5Lower price
GLM-5.1$4.4
Cache readUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Grok 4.3$0.2Lower price
GLM-5.1$0.26

Performance

Shared benchmarks

Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.

173 shared result series
Grok 4.3GLM-5.1
Arena Text, Style ControlOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.31,441.442 arena points
GLM-5.11,466.935 arena pointsWinner
Code MigrationOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.36.795 %
GLM-5.125.768 %Winner
CorpFin v2Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.368.532 %Winner
GLM-5.164.452 %
Finance Agent (v2)Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.337.728 %
GLM-5.144.792 %Winner
GPQA DiamondOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.391.414 %Winner
GLM-5.184.518 %
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.30.417 %Winner
GLM-5.10 %
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.315.385 %
GLM-5.127.885 %Winner
LegalBenchOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.384.458 %Winner
GLM-5.184.394 %
LiveCodeBench v6Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.384.494 %Winner
GLM-5.181.38 %
MedCodeOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.338.068 %
GLM-5.141.604 %Winner
MedScribeOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.374.399 %Winner
GLM-5.172.27 %
MMLU-ProOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Grok 4.385.838 %
GLM-5.186.9 %Winner
Benchmark scores for Grok 4.3 and GLM-5.1
Benchmark and taskGrok 4.3GLM-5.1ComparabilitySource
Arena Text, Style ControlOverall
1,441.442 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±3.977The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,466.935 arena pointsWinner
95% confidence interval: ±4.197The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1Grok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
GLM-5.1: Snapshot: glm-5.1, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 56,645 anonymous pairwise votes.GLM-5.1: Style-controlled Arena rating from 39,063 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Code MigrationOverall
6.795 %
25.768 %Winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-code-migration:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1Grok 4.3: No further settings disclosed
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-code-migration-2026-08-16-107652dc6bfcRetrieved 2026-08-16
CorpFin v2Overall
68.532 %Winner
64.452 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-corp-fin-v2:2:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: Grok 4.3Grok 4.3: No further settings disclosed
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-corp_fin_v2-2026-08-16-45bbf84f57abRetrieved 2026-08-16
Finance Agent (v2)Overall
37.728 %
44.792 %Winner
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-finance-agent-v2:2:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1Grok 4.3: No further settings disclosed
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-14Import ID: vals-fabv2-2026-08-16-8853da43085dRetrieved 2026-08-16
GPQA DiamondOverall
91.414 %Winner
84.518 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-gpqa:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: Grok 4.3Grok 4.3: No further settings disclosed
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-gpqa-2026-08-16-7f8363eaa2dbRetrieved 2026-08-16
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved
0.417 %Winner
0 %
1task resolution rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-agent-benchmark:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: Grok 4.3Grok 4.3: No further settings disclosed
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-14Import ID: vals-hlab-2026-08-16-bae90566df2fRetrieved 2026-08-16
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass
15.385 %
27.885 %Winner
1all-pass rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-research:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1Grok 4.3: No further settings disclosed
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-14Import ID: vals-legal_research-2026-08-16-af296c00ecaaRetrieved 2026-08-16
LegalBenchOverall
84.458 %Winner
84.394 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-bench:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: Grok 4.3Grok 4.3: No further settings disclosed
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-legal_bench-2026-08-16-d5b3b1b2b5c8Retrieved 2026-08-16
LiveCodeBench v6Overall
84.494 %Winner
81.38 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-lcb:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: Grok 4.3Grok 4.3: No further settings disclosed
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-lcb-2026-08-16-17b9c147080dRetrieved 2026-08-16
MedCodeOverall
38.068 %
41.604 %Winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-medcode:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1Grok 4.3: No further settings disclosed
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-medcode-2026-08-16-524f7f474eacRetrieved 2026-08-16
MedScribeOverall
74.399 %Winner
72.27 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-medscribe:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: Grok 4.3Grok 4.3: No further settings disclosed
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-medscribe-2026-08-16-c385354a7e62Retrieved 2026-08-16
MMLU-ProOverall
85.838 %
86.9 %Winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1Grok 4.3: No further settings disclosed
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-16-e14d5bb3a34cRetrieved 2026-08-16
ProgramBenchOverall
0 %Tie
0 %Tie
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-programbench:1:overallNo documented setup differenceTieGrok 4.3: No further settings disclosed
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-programbench-2026-08-16-08d9727662ddRetrieved 2026-08-16
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall
51.691 %
61.84 %Winner
1.1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-snap:1.1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1Grok 4.3: No further settings disclosed
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-public-benefits-bench-2026-08-16-7ce68123c502Retrieved 2026-08-16
SWE-bench VerifiedOverall
71.4 %
76.4 %Winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-swebench:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1Grok 4.3: No further settings disclosed
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-swebench-2026-08-16-c133071b8167Retrieved 2026-08-16
TaxEval v2Overall
70.81 %
71.194 %Winner
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-tax-eval-v2:2:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1Grok 4.3: No further settings disclosed
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-tax_eval_v2-2026-08-16-5bbd495dac53Retrieved 2026-08-16
Terminal-Bench 2.0Overall
43.446 %
53.933 %Winner
2.0accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2:2.0:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1Grok 4.3: No further settings disclosed
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-06-04Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-2026-08-16-0d39f2e25723Retrieved 2026-08-16
Terminal-Bench 2.1Overall
41.948 %
56.929 %Winner
2.1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2-1:2.1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1Grok 4.3: No further settings disclosed
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-1-2026-08-16-b3f38c18bea4Retrieved 2026-08-16
Vals IndexCorpFin v2
70.047 %Higher measured value
65.268 %
1.2benchmark scoreHigher is betterCohort: vals-vals-index:1.2:corp_fin_v2Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-vals_index-2026-08-11-e79d08d59249Retrieved 2026-08-11
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall
19.403 %
31.456 %Winner
1.1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-vibe-code-bench:1.1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1Grok 4.3: Harness: OpenHands
GLM-5.1: Harness: OpenHands
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-vibe-code-2026-08-16-a73c9770bcc4Retrieved 2026-08-16
Arena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance
1,438.629 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±6.95The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,464.98 arena pointsWinner
95% confidence interval: ±7.499The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operationsNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1Grok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
GLM-5.1: Snapshot: glm-5.1, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 11,449 anonymous pairwise votes.GLM-5.1: Style-controlled Arena rating from 7,906 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Code MigrationCLI
9.06 %
18.833 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-code-migration:1:cliTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-code-migration-2026-08-11-3a2d5ce718a3Retrieved 2026-08-11
CorpFin v2Exact Pages
66.783 %Higher measured value
61.772 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-corp-fin-v2:2:exact_pagesTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-corp_fin_v2-2026-08-11-d9e58d191cd9Retrieved 2026-08-11
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments
31.863 %
43.276 %Higher measured value
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-finance-agent-v2:2:adjustmentsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-fabv2-2026-08-11-3e5c93a1857cRetrieved 2026-08-11
GPQA DiamondFew-Shot CoT
92.929 %Higher measured value
85.787 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-gpqa:1:diamond_few_shot_cotTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-gpqa-2026-08-11-d3325290a404Retrieved 2026-08-11
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkAntitrust Competition · Criteria passed
61.594 %
71.377 %Higher measured value
1criteria pass rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-agent-benchmark:1:criteria_pass_rate__antitrust_competitionTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-07Import ID: vals-hlab-2026-08-11-ea11b6e53414Retrieved 2026-08-11
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass
25.758 %
31.818 %Higher measured value
1all-pass rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-research:1:administrative_regulatoryTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-legal_research-2026-08-11-326cf7aaca58Retrieved 2026-08-11
LegalBenchConclusion Tasks
89.912 %Higher measured value
89.575 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-bench:1:conclusion_tasksTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-legal_bench-2026-08-11-836e5e44618eRetrieved 2026-08-11
LiveCodeBench v6Easy
98.447 %
98.754 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-lcb:1:easyTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-lcb-2026-08-11-0342bcc364e4Retrieved 2026-08-11
MMLU-ProBiology
93.305 %
93.724 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:biologyTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-11-b8e53828d746Retrieved 2026-08-11
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved
0 %
1 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-programbench:1:almostTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-programbench-2026-08-11-b6f8959fbdfeRetrieved 2026-08-11
SWE-bench Verified<15 min fix
83.505 %
88.66 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-swebench:1:<15 min fixTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-08Import ID: vals-swebench-2026-08-11-a6212cd857d8Retrieved 2026-08-11
TaxEval v2Correctness
60.589 %
61.538 %Higher measured value
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-tax-eval-v2:2:correctnessTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-tax_eval_v2-2026-08-11-d05a40bf446fRetrieved 2026-08-11
Terminal-Bench 2.0Easy
66.667 %
75 %Higher measured value
2.0accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2:2.0:easyTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-06-04Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-2026-08-11-d91717be20e6Retrieved 2026-08-11
Terminal-Bench 2.1Easy
75 %
83.333 %Higher measured value
2.1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2-1:2.1:easyTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-1-2026-08-11-8f0ebd72a609Retrieved 2026-08-11
Vals IndexFinance Agent v2
37.766 %
44.79 %Higher measured value
1.2benchmark scoreHigher is betterCohort: vals-vals-index:1.2:finance_agentTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-vals_index-2026-08-11-e79d08d59249Retrieved 2026-08-11
Arena Text, Style ControlChinese
1,484.029 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±11.768The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,519.866 arena pointsWinner
95% confidence interval: ±13.198The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:chineseNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1Grok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
GLM-5.1: Snapshot: glm-5.1, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 3,105 anonymous pairwise votes.GLM-5.1: Style-controlled Arena rating from 2,373 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Code MigrationCOBOL
0 %
46.571 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-code-migration:1:cobolTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-code-migration-2026-08-11-3a2d5ce718a3Retrieved 2026-08-11
CorpFin v2Max Fitting Context
68.765 %Higher measured value
66.317 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-corp-fin-v2:2:max_fitting_contextTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-corp_fin_v2-2026-08-11-d9e58d191cd9Retrieved 2026-08-11
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass
26.373 %
32.68 %Higher measured value
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-finance-agent-v2:2:all_passTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-fabv2-2026-08-11-3e5c93a1857cRetrieved 2026-08-11
GPQA DiamondZero-Shot CoT
89.899 %Higher measured value
83.249 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-gpqa:1:diamond_zero_shot_cotTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-gpqa-2026-08-11-d3325290a404Retrieved 2026-08-11
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkAntitrust Competition · Task fully resolved
0 %No direct winner
0 %No direct winner
1task resolution rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-agent-benchmark:1:antitrust_competitionTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-07Import ID: vals-hlab-2026-08-11-ea11b6e53414Retrieved 2026-08-11
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit
73.866 %
80.005 %Higher measured value
1weighted partial-credit scoreHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-research:1:weighted_pass__administrative_regulatoryTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-legal_research-2026-08-11-326cf7aaca58Retrieved 2026-08-11
LegalBenchInterpretation Tasks
81.805 %Higher measured value
81.709 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-bench:1:interpretation_tasksTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-legal_bench-2026-08-11-836e5e44618eRetrieved 2026-08-11
LiveCodeBench v6Hard
66 %Higher measured value
57.429 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-lcb:1:hardTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-lcb-2026-08-11-0342bcc364e4Retrieved 2026-08-11
MMLU-ProBusiness
92.902 %Higher measured value
91.128 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:businessTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-11-b8e53828d746Retrieved 2026-08-11
ProgramBenchFully Resolved
0 %No direct winner
0 %No direct winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-programbench:1:strictTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-programbench-2026-08-11-b6f8959fbdfeRetrieved 2026-08-11
SWE-bench Verified>4 hours
33.333 %No direct winner
33.333 %No direct winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-swebench:1:>4 hoursTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-08Import ID: vals-swebench-2026-08-11-a6212cd857d8Retrieved 2026-08-11
TaxEval v2Stepwise Reasoning
81.03 %Higher measured value
80.851 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-tax-eval-v2:2:stepwise_reasoningTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-tax_eval_v2-2026-08-11-d05a40bf446fRetrieved 2026-08-11
Terminal-Bench 2.0Hard
24.444 %
36.667 %Higher measured value
2.0accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2:2.0:hardTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-06-04Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-2026-08-11-d91717be20e6Retrieved 2026-08-11
Terminal-Bench 2.1Hard
14.444 %
37.778 %Higher measured value
2.1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2-1:2.1:hardTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-1-2026-08-11-8f0ebd72a609Retrieved 2026-08-11
Vals IndexSWE-bench
70.588 %
72.549 %Winner
1.2benchmark scoreHigher is betterCohort: vals-vals-index:1.2:swebenchNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1Grok 4.3: No further settings disclosed
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-vals_index-2026-08-11-e79d08d59249Retrieved 2026-08-11
Arena Text, Style ControlCoding
1,488.18 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±6.181The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,515.299 arena pointsWinner
95% confidence interval: ±6.649The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:codingNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1Grok 4.3: Snapshot: grok-4.3, Harness: Arena text, style control
GLM-5.1: Snapshot: glm-5.1, Harness: Arena text, style control
Grok 4.3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 16,059 anonymous pairwise votes.GLM-5.1: Style-controlled Arena rating from 11,013 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Code MigrationCode Quality
3.098 / 5
3.544 / 5Higher measured value
1mean reviewer code-quality ratingHigher is betterCohort: vals-code-migration:1:code_qualityTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-code-migration-2026-08-11-3a2d5ce718a3Retrieved 2026-08-11
CorpFin v2Shared Max Context
70.047 %Higher measured value
65.268 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-corp-fin-v2:2:shared_max_contextTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-corp_fin_v2-2026-08-11-d9e58d191cd9Retrieved 2026-08-11
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables
35.857 %
41.557 %Higher measured value
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-finance-agent-v2:2:comparablesTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-fabv2-2026-08-11-3e5c93a1857cRetrieved 2026-08-11
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkArbitration International Dispute Resolution · Criteria passed
68.1 %Higher measured value
53.405 %
1criteria pass rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-agent-benchmark:1:criteria_pass_rate__arbitration_international_dispute_resolutionTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-07Import ID: vals-hlab-2026-08-11-ea11b6e53414Retrieved 2026-08-11
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass
13.953 %
23.256 %Higher measured value
1all-pass rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-research:1:business_commercialTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-legal_research-2026-08-11-326cf7aaca58Retrieved 2026-08-11
LegalBenchIssue Tasks
89.182 %Higher measured value
89.02 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-bench:1:issue_tasksTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-legal_bench-2026-08-11-836e5e44618eRetrieved 2026-08-11
LiveCodeBench v6Medium
89.034 %Higher measured value
87.958 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-lcb:1:mediumTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-lcb-2026-08-11-0342bcc364e4Retrieved 2026-08-11
MMLU-ProChemistry
91.608 %
91.844 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:chemistryTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-11-b8e53828d746Retrieved 2026-08-11
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate
22.105 %
50.879 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-programbench:1:partialTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-programbench-2026-08-11-b6f8959fbdfeRetrieved 2026-08-11
SWE-bench Verified1-4 hours
38.095 %
45.238 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-swebench:1:1-4 hoursTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-08Import ID: vals-swebench-2026-08-11-a6212cd857d8Retrieved 2026-08-11
Terminal-Bench 2.0Medium
52.121 %
61.818 %Higher measured value
2.0accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2:2.0:mediumTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGrok 4.3: Temperature: 0.7, Top P: 0.95
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-06-04Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-2026-08-11-d91717be20e6Retrieved 2026-08-11

The table shows 64 diversified result series from 173 shared results. This prevents one benchmark with many subtasks from crowding out every other test.

How to read this comparison

Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict

Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.

Prices use official API rates per 1M tokens. Web subscriptions and cloud platform surcharges can differ.

Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.