Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

GPT-5.5 vs. GPT-5.4

Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.

178

shared result series

20

distinct benchmarks

2026-08-16

latest retrieval

Change model selection

Specifications and cost

General specifications and standard API pricing

Undisclosed parameter counts and knowledge cutoffs stay marked as unavailable. The table shows direct standard token pricing, including documented context tiers. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.

Specifications and API pricing for GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.4
AttributeGPT-5.5GPT-5.4
ProviderOpenAIOpenAI
ReleasedApr 2026Mar 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Model typeProprietaryProprietary
ParametersNot publishedNot published
ArchitectureNot publishedNot published
Context window1,050,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Knowledge cutoffDecember 1, 2025August 31, 2025
Technical sourcesModelModel
API pricing per 1M tokens
API input$5 ≤272K / $10 >272K$2.5 ≤272K / $5 >272K
API output$30 ≤272K / $45 >272K$15 ≤272K / $22.5 >272K
Cache read$0.5 ≤272K / $1 >272K$0.25 ≤272K / $0.5 >272K
Cache write (5 min.)Not listedNot listed
Cache write (1 hr.)Not listedNot listed
Price verified07/30/2026Source07/30/2026Source
GPT-5.5GPT-5.4
API inputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
GPT-5.5$5
GPT-5.4$2.5Lower price
API outputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
GPT-5.5$30
GPT-5.4$15Lower price
Cache readUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
GPT-5.5$0.5
GPT-5.4$0.25Lower price

Performance

Shared benchmarks

Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.

178 shared result series
GPT-5.5GPT-5.4
Arena Text, Style ControlOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.51,476.591 arena pointsWinner
GPT-5.41,465.439 arena points
Code MigrationOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.545.161 %Winner
GPT-5.434.984 %
CorpFin v2Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.568.415 %Winner
GPT-5.465.268 %
CyberBenchOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.580.508 %Winner
GPT-5.472.881 %
GPQA DiamondOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.593.182 %Winner
GPT-5.491.666 %
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.53.75 %Winner
GPT-5.40 %
LegalBenchOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.586.515 %Winner
GPT-5.486.044 %
LiveCodeBench v6Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.585.296 %Winner
GPT-5.484.141 %
MedCodeOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.549.1 %Winner
GPT-5.441.292 %
MedScribeOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.586.868 %Winner
GPT-5.477.549 %
MMLU-ProOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.588.144 %Winner
GPT-5.487.482 %
MMMU-ProOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.588.266 %Winner
GPT-5.487.514 %
Benchmark scores for GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.4
Benchmark and taskGPT-5.5GPT-5.4ComparabilitySource
Arena Text, Style ControlOverall
1,476.591 arena pointsWinner
95% confidence interval: ±4.028The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,465.439 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±3.814The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Snapshot: gpt-5.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 56,647 anonymous pairwise votes.GPT-5.4: Style-controlled Arena rating from 63,759 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Code MigrationOverall
45.161 %Winner
34.984 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-code-migration:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: No further settings disclosed
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-code-migration-2026-08-16-107652dc6bfcRetrieved 2026-08-16
CorpFin v2Overall
68.415 %Winner
65.268 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-corp-fin-v2:2:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: No further settings disclosed
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-corp_fin_v2-2026-08-16-45bbf84f57abRetrieved 2026-08-16
CyberBenchOverall
80.508 %Winner
72.881 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-cyberbench:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: No further settings disclosed
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-03Import ID: vals-cyber-2026-08-16-702acaee9aa9Retrieved 2026-08-16
GPQA DiamondOverall
93.182 %Winner
91.666 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-gpqa:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: No further settings disclosed
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-gpqa-2026-08-16-7f8363eaa2dbRetrieved 2026-08-16
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved
3.75 %Winner
0 %
1task resolution rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-agent-benchmark:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: No further settings disclosed
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-14Import ID: vals-hlab-2026-08-16-bae90566df2fRetrieved 2026-08-16
LegalBenchOverall
86.515 %Winner
86.044 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-bench:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: No further settings disclosed
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-legal_bench-2026-08-16-d5b3b1b2b5c8Retrieved 2026-08-16
LiveCodeBench v6Overall
85.296 %Winner
84.141 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-lcb:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: No further settings disclosed
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-lcb-2026-08-16-17b9c147080dRetrieved 2026-08-16
MedCodeOverall
49.1 %Winner
41.292 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-medcode:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: No further settings disclosed
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-medcode-2026-08-16-524f7f474eacRetrieved 2026-08-16
MedScribeOverall
86.868 %Winner
77.549 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-medscribe:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: No further settings disclosed
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-medscribe-2026-08-16-c385354a7e62Retrieved 2026-08-16
MMLU-ProOverall
88.144 %Winner
87.482 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: No further settings disclosed
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-16-e14d5bb3a34cRetrieved 2026-08-16
MMMU-ProOverall
88.266 %Winner
87.514 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmmu:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: No further settings disclosed
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mmmu-2026-08-16-37c9a8c7e21fRetrieved 2026-08-16
MortgageTaxOverall
68.76 %Winner
68.323 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mortgage-tax:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: No further settings disclosed
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-mortgage_tax-2026-08-16-e78c985dbb1cRetrieved 2026-08-16
ProgramBenchOverall
0.5 %Winner
0 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-programbench:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: No further settings disclosed
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-programbench-2026-08-16-08d9727662ddRetrieved 2026-08-16
SAGEOverall
51.532 %Winner
43.312 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-sage:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: No further settings disclosed
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-sage-2026-08-16-a416dd25affbRetrieved 2026-08-16
SkillsBenchOverall
62.209 %Winner
51.711 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-skillsbench:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Harness: OpenHands
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Harness: OpenHands
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-skillsbench-2026-08-16-4917a67268d2Retrieved 2026-08-16
SWE-bench VerifiedOverall
82.6 %Winner
78.2 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-swebench:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: No further settings disclosed
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-swebench-2026-08-16-c133071b8167Retrieved 2026-08-16
TaxEval v2Overall
74.98 %Winner
73.958 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-tax-eval-v2:2:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: No further settings disclosed
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-tax_eval_v2-2026-08-16-5bbd495dac53Retrieved 2026-08-16
Terminal-Bench 2.0Overall
73.202 %Winner
58.427 %
2.0accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2:2.0:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: No further settings disclosed
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-06-04Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-2026-08-16-0d39f2e25723Retrieved 2026-08-16
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall
69.847 %Winner
67.421 %
1.1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-vibe-code-bench:1.1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Harness: OpenHands
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Harness: OpenHands
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-vibe-code-2026-08-16-a73c9770bcc4Retrieved 2026-08-16
Arena Text, Style ControlOverallReasoning: high
1,481.794 arena pointsNo clear lead
95% confidence interval: ±4.053The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,476.571 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±3.887The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:overallNo documented setup differenceNo clear leadGPT-5.5: Snapshot: gpt-5.5-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 55,322 anonymous pairwise votes.GPT-5.4: Style-controlled Arena rating from 60,819 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Code MigrationCLIReasoning: xhigh
36.882 %Winner
23.788 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-code-migration:1:cliNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-code-migration-2026-08-11-3a2d5ce718a3Retrieved 2026-08-11
CorpFin v2Exact PagesReasoning: xhigh
65.618 %Winner
64.103 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-corp-fin-v2:2:exact_pagesNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-corp_fin_v2-2026-08-11-d9e58d191cd9Retrieved 2026-08-11
CyberBenchPatch
81.356 %Tie
81.356 %Tie
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-cyberbench:1:patchNo documented setup differenceTieGPT-5.5: No further settings disclosed
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-03Import ID: vals-cyber-2026-08-11-1f20498a3dc1Retrieved 2026-08-11
GPQA DiamondFew-Shot CoTReasoning: xhigh
93.434 %Winner
91.414 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-gpqa:1:diamond_few_shot_cotNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-gpqa-2026-08-11-d3325290a404Retrieved 2026-08-11
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkAntitrust Competition · Criteria passedReasoning: xhigh
82.246 %Winner
76.449 %
1criteria pass rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-agent-benchmark:1:criteria_pass_rate__antitrust_competitionNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-07Import ID: vals-hlab-2026-08-11-ea11b6e53414Retrieved 2026-08-11
LegalBenchConclusion TasksReasoning: xhigh
89.644 %Winner
88.939 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-bench:1:conclusion_tasksNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-legal_bench-2026-08-11-836e5e44618eRetrieved 2026-08-11
LiveCodeBench v6EasyReasoning: xhigh
98.447 %
99.068 %Winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-lcb:1:easyNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.4GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-lcb-2026-08-11-0342bcc364e4Retrieved 2026-08-11
MMLU-ProBiologyReasoning: xhigh
94.003 %Winner
92.887 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:biologyNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-11-b8e53828d746Retrieved 2026-08-11
MortgageTaxNumerical ExtractionReasoning: xhigh
76.153 %Winner
75.994 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mortgage-tax:1:numerical_extractionNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mortgage_tax-2026-08-11-5ea6eef3e482Retrieved 2026-08-11
ProgramBenchAlmost ResolvedReasoning: xhigh
9.5 %Winner
7 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-programbench:1:almostNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-programbench-2026-08-11-b6f8959fbdfeRetrieved 2026-08-11
SAGEAutomataReasoning: xhigh
40.476 %Higher measured value
21.428 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-sage:1:automataTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 30,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 30,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-sage-2026-08-11-f1f79f6d8af3Retrieved 2026-08-11
SkillsBenchNo SkillsReasoning: xhigh
49.875 %Winner
48.905 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-skillsbench:1:no_skillsNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: OpenHands, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: OpenHands, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-07Import ID: vals-skillsbench-2026-08-11-351bec9d0e01Retrieved 2026-08-11
SWE-bench Verified<15 min fixReasoning: xhigh
91.753 %Winner
88.144 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-swebench:1:<15 min fixNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-08Import ID: vals-swebench-2026-08-11-a6212cd857d8Retrieved 2026-08-11
TaxEval v2CorrectnessReasoning: xhigh
65.495 %Winner
64.922 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-tax-eval-v2:2:correctnessNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-tax_eval_v2-2026-08-11-d05a40bf446fRetrieved 2026-08-11
Terminal-Bench 2.0EasyReasoning: high
85 %
100 %Winner
2.0accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2:2.0:easyNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.4GPT-5.5: Reasoning: high, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: high, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-06-04Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-2026-08-11-d91717be20e6Retrieved 2026-08-11
Arena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance
1,486.534 arena pointsNo clear lead
95% confidence interval: ±6.991The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,474.218 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±6.56The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operationsNo documented setup differenceNo clear leadGPT-5.5: Snapshot: gpt-5.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 11,314 anonymous pairwise votes.GPT-5.4: Style-controlled Arena rating from 13,072 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Code MigrationCOBOLReasoning: xhigh
70 %Winner
68.571 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-code-migration:1:cobolNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-code-migration-2026-08-11-3a2d5ce718a3Retrieved 2026-08-11
CorpFin v2Max Fitting ContextReasoning: xhigh
70.047 %Winner
64.918 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-corp-fin-v2:2:max_fitting_contextNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-corp_fin_v2-2026-08-11-d9e58d191cd9Retrieved 2026-08-11
CyberBenchPoC
79.661 %Winner
64.407 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-cyberbench:1:pocNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: No further settings disclosed
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-03Import ID: vals-cyber-2026-08-11-1f20498a3dc1Retrieved 2026-08-11
GPQA DiamondZero-Shot CoTReasoning: xhigh
92.929 %Winner
91.919 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-gpqa:1:diamond_zero_shot_cotNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-gpqa-2026-08-11-d3325290a404Retrieved 2026-08-11
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkAntitrust Competition · Task fully resolvedReasoning: xhigh
0 %Tie
0 %Tie
1task resolution rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-agent-benchmark:1:antitrust_competitionNo documented setup differenceTieGPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-07Import ID: vals-hlab-2026-08-11-ea11b6e53414Retrieved 2026-08-11
LegalBenchInterpretation TasksReasoning: xhigh
83.836 %
83.921 %Winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-bench:1:interpretation_tasksNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.4GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-legal_bench-2026-08-11-836e5e44618eRetrieved 2026-08-11
LiveCodeBench v6HardReasoning: xhigh
69.714 %Winner
67.714 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-lcb:1:hardNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-lcb-2026-08-11-0342bcc364e4Retrieved 2026-08-11
MMLU-ProBusinessReasoning: xhigh
92.015 %Winner
91.762 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:businessNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-11-b8e53828d746Retrieved 2026-08-11
MortgageTaxSemantic ExtractionReasoning: xhigh
61.367 %Winner
60.652 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mortgage-tax:1:semantic_extractionNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mortgage_tax-2026-08-11-5ea6eef3e482Retrieved 2026-08-11
ProgramBenchFully ResolvedReasoning: xhigh
0.5 %Winner
0 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-programbench:1:strictNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-programbench-2026-08-11-b6f8959fbdfeRetrieved 2026-08-11
SAGECalculusReasoning: xhigh
72.222 %Higher measured value
70.988 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-sage:1:calculusTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Temperature: 1
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 30,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-sage-2026-08-11-f1f79f6d8af3Retrieved 2026-08-11
SkillsBenchWith SkillsReasoning: xhigh
62.209 %Winner
51.711 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-skillsbench:1:with_skillsNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: OpenHands, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: OpenHands, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-07Import ID: vals-skillsbench-2026-08-11-351bec9d0e01Retrieved 2026-08-11
SWE-bench Verified>4 hoursReasoning: xhigh
66.667 %Winner
0 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-swebench:1:>4 hoursNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-08Import ID: vals-swebench-2026-08-11-a6212cd857d8Retrieved 2026-08-11
TaxEval v2Stepwise ReasoningReasoning: xhigh
84.464 %Winner
82.993 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-tax-eval-v2:2:stepwise_reasoningNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-tax_eval_v2-2026-08-11-d05a40bf446fRetrieved 2026-08-11
Terminal-Bench 2.0HardReasoning: high
60.5 %Winner
33.333 %
2.0accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2:2.0:hardNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: high, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: high, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-06-04Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-2026-08-11-d91717be20e6Retrieved 2026-08-11
Arena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and financeReasoning: high
1,489.293 arena pointsNo clear lead
95% confidence interval: ±6.974The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,483.617 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±6.683The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operationsNo documented setup differenceNo clear leadGPT-5.5: Snapshot: gpt-5.5-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 11,166 anonymous pairwise votes.GPT-5.4: Style-controlled Arena rating from 12,373 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Code MigrationCode QualityReasoning: xhigh
3.498 / 5
3.632 / 5Winner
1mean reviewer code-quality ratingHigher is betterCohort: vals-code-migration:1:code_qualityNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.4GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-code-migration-2026-08-11-3a2d5ce718a3Retrieved 2026-08-11
CorpFin v2Shared Max ContextReasoning: xhigh
69.58 %Winner
66.783 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-corp-fin-v2:2:shared_max_contextNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-corp_fin_v2-2026-08-11-d9e58d191cd9Retrieved 2026-08-11
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkArbitration International Dispute Resolution · Criteria passedReasoning: xhigh
78.495 %Winner
66.667 %
1criteria pass rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-agent-benchmark:1:criteria_pass_rate__arbitration_international_dispute_resolutionNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-07Import ID: vals-hlab-2026-08-11-ea11b6e53414Retrieved 2026-08-11
LegalBenchIssue TasksReasoning: xhigh
91.193 %Winner
90.526 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-bench:1:issue_tasksNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-legal_bench-2026-08-11-836e5e44618eRetrieved 2026-08-11
LiveCodeBench v6MediumReasoning: xhigh
87.728 %Winner
85.64 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-lcb:1:mediumNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-lcb-2026-08-11-0342bcc364e4Retrieved 2026-08-11
MMLU-ProChemistryReasoning: xhigh
91.254 %Winner
91.078 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:chemistryNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-11-b8e53828d746Retrieved 2026-08-11
ProgramBenchRaw Pass RateReasoning: xhigh
70.775 %Winner
68.596 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-programbench:1:partialNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-programbench-2026-08-11-b6f8959fbdfeRetrieved 2026-08-11
SAGELinear AlgebraReasoning: xhigh
74.436 %Higher measured value
68.826 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-sage:1:linear_algebraTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 30,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 30,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-sage-2026-08-11-f1f79f6d8af3Retrieved 2026-08-11
SWE-bench Verified1-4 hoursReasoning: xhigh
50 %Tie
50 %Tie
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-swebench:1:1-4 hoursNo documented setup differenceTieGPT-5.5: Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-08Import ID: vals-swebench-2026-08-11-a6212cd857d8Retrieved 2026-08-11
Terminal-Bench 2.0MediumReasoning: high
79.273 %Winner
69.091 %
2.0accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2:2.0:mediumNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Reasoning: high, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: high, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-06-04Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-2026-08-11-d91717be20e6Retrieved 2026-08-11
Arena Text, Style ControlChinese
1,534.524 arena pointsWinner
95% confidence interval: ±12.143The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,496.688 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±11.202The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:chineseNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.5GPT-5.5: Snapshot: gpt-5.5, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 3,010 anonymous pairwise votes.GPT-5.4: Style-controlled Arena rating from 3,574 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16

The table shows 64 diversified result series from 178 shared results. This prevents one benchmark with many subtasks from crowding out every other test.

How to read this comparison

Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict

Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.

Prices use official API rates per 1M tokens. Web subscriptions and cloud platform surcharges can differ.

Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.