Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

GPT-5.4 vs. GLM-5.1

Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.

163

shared result series

15

distinct benchmarks

2026-08-16

latest retrieval

Change model selection

Specifications and cost

General specifications and standard API pricing

Undisclosed parameter counts and knowledge cutoffs stay marked as unavailable. The table shows direct standard token pricing, including documented context tiers. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.

Specifications and API pricing for GPT-5.4 and GLM-5.1
AttributeGPT-5.4GLM-5.1
ProviderOpenAIZ.ai
ReleasedMar 2026Apr 7, 2026
AvailabilityActiveOpen Source
Model typeProprietaryOpen Weights
ParametersNot published744B, 40B active
ArchitectureNot publishedMixture of Experts
Context window1,050,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Knowledge cutoffAugust 31, 2025Not published
Technical sourcesModelModel, Context
API pricing per 1M tokens
API input$2.5 ≤272K / $5 >272K$1.4
API output$15 ≤272K / $22.5 >272K$4.4
Cache read$0.25 ≤272K / $0.5 >272K$0.26
Cache write (5 min.)Not listedNot listed
Cache write (1 hr.)Not listedNot listed
Price verified07/30/2026Source07/30/2026Source
GPT-5.4GLM-5.1
API inputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
GPT-5.4$2.5
GLM-5.1$1.4Lower price
API outputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
GPT-5.4$15
GLM-5.1$4.4Lower price
Cache readUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
GPT-5.4$0.25Lower price
GLM-5.1$0.26

Performance

Shared benchmarks

Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.

163 shared result series
GPT-5.4GLM-5.1
Arena Text, Style ControlOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.41,465.439 arena points
GLM-5.11,466.935 arena pointsNo clear lead
Code MigrationOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.434.984 %Winner
GLM-5.125.768 %
CorpFin v2Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.465.268 %Winner
GLM-5.164.452 %
GPQA DiamondOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.491.666 %Winner
GLM-5.184.518 %
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.40 %Tie
GLM-5.10 %Tie
LegalBenchOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.486.044 %Winner
GLM-5.184.394 %
LiveCodeBench v6Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.484.141 %Winner
GLM-5.181.38 %
MedCodeOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.441.292 %
GLM-5.141.604 %Winner
MedScribeOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.477.549 %Winner
GLM-5.172.27 %
MMLU-ProOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.487.482 %Winner
GLM-5.186.9 %
ProgramBenchOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.40 %Tie
GLM-5.10 %Tie
SWE-bench VerifiedOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.478.2 %Winner
GLM-5.176.4 %
Benchmark scores for GPT-5.4 and GLM-5.1
Benchmark and taskGPT-5.4GLM-5.1ComparabilitySource
Arena Text, Style ControlOverall
1,465.439 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±3.814The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,466.935 arena pointsNo clear lead
95% confidence interval: ±4.197The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:overallNo documented setup differenceNo clear leadGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4, Harness: Arena text, style control
GLM-5.1: Snapshot: glm-5.1, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.4: Style-controlled Arena rating from 63,759 anonymous pairwise votes.GLM-5.1: Style-controlled Arena rating from 39,063 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Code MigrationOverall
34.984 %Winner
25.768 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-code-migration:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.4GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-code-migration-2026-08-16-107652dc6bfcRetrieved 2026-08-16
CorpFin v2Overall
65.268 %Winner
64.452 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-corp-fin-v2:2:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.4GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-corp_fin_v2-2026-08-16-45bbf84f57abRetrieved 2026-08-16
GPQA DiamondOverall
91.666 %Winner
84.518 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-gpqa:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.4GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-gpqa-2026-08-16-7f8363eaa2dbRetrieved 2026-08-16
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved
0 %Tie
0 %Tie
1task resolution rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-agent-benchmark:1:overallNo documented setup differenceTieGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-14Import ID: vals-hlab-2026-08-16-bae90566df2fRetrieved 2026-08-16
LegalBenchOverall
86.044 %Winner
84.394 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-bench:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.4GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-legal_bench-2026-08-16-d5b3b1b2b5c8Retrieved 2026-08-16
LiveCodeBench v6Overall
84.141 %Winner
81.38 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-lcb:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.4GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-lcb-2026-08-16-17b9c147080dRetrieved 2026-08-16
MedCodeOverall
41.292 %
41.604 %Winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-medcode:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-medcode-2026-08-16-524f7f474eacRetrieved 2026-08-16
MedScribeOverall
77.549 %Winner
72.27 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-medscribe:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.4GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-medscribe-2026-08-16-c385354a7e62Retrieved 2026-08-16
MMLU-ProOverall
87.482 %Winner
86.9 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.4GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-16-e14d5bb3a34cRetrieved 2026-08-16
ProgramBenchOverall
0 %Tie
0 %Tie
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-programbench:1:overallNo documented setup differenceTieGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-programbench-2026-08-16-08d9727662ddRetrieved 2026-08-16
SWE-bench VerifiedOverall
78.2 %Winner
76.4 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-swebench:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.4GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-swebench-2026-08-16-c133071b8167Retrieved 2026-08-16
TaxEval v2Overall
73.958 %Winner
71.194 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-tax-eval-v2:2:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.4GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-tax_eval_v2-2026-08-16-5bbd495dac53Retrieved 2026-08-16
Terminal-Bench 2.0Overall
58.427 %Winner
53.933 %
2.0accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2:2.0:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.4GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-06-04Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-2026-08-16-0d39f2e25723Retrieved 2026-08-16
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall
67.421 %Winner
31.456 %
1.1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-vibe-code-bench:1.1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.4GPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Harness: OpenHands
GLM-5.1: Harness: OpenHands
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-vibe-code-2026-08-16-a73c9770bcc4Retrieved 2026-08-16
Arena Text, Style ControlOverall
1,476.571 arena pointsHigher measured value
95% confidence interval: ±3.887The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,466.935 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±4.197The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:overallTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena text, style control
GLM-5.1: Snapshot: glm-5.1, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.4: Style-controlled Arena rating from 60,819 anonymous pairwise votes.GLM-5.1: Style-controlled Arena rating from 39,063 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Code MigrationCLI
23.788 %Higher measured value
18.833 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-code-migration:1:cliTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-code-migration-2026-08-11-3a2d5ce718a3Retrieved 2026-08-11
CorpFin v2Exact Pages
64.103 %Higher measured value
61.772 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-corp-fin-v2:2:exact_pagesTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-corp_fin_v2-2026-08-11-d9e58d191cd9Retrieved 2026-08-11
GPQA DiamondFew-Shot CoT
91.414 %Higher measured value
85.787 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-gpqa:1:diamond_few_shot_cotTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-gpqa-2026-08-11-d3325290a404Retrieved 2026-08-11
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkAntitrust Competition · Criteria passed
76.449 %Higher measured value
71.377 %
1criteria pass rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-agent-benchmark:1:criteria_pass_rate__antitrust_competitionTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-07Import ID: vals-hlab-2026-08-11-ea11b6e53414Retrieved 2026-08-11
LegalBenchConclusion Tasks
88.939 %
89.575 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-bench:1:conclusion_tasksTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-legal_bench-2026-08-11-836e5e44618eRetrieved 2026-08-11
LiveCodeBench v6Easy
99.068 %Higher measured value
98.754 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-lcb:1:easyTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-lcb-2026-08-11-0342bcc364e4Retrieved 2026-08-11
MMLU-ProBiology
92.887 %
93.724 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:biologyTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-11-b8e53828d746Retrieved 2026-08-11
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved
7 %Higher measured value
1 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-programbench:1:almostTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-programbench-2026-08-11-b6f8959fbdfeRetrieved 2026-08-11
SWE-bench Verified<15 min fix
88.144 %
88.66 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-swebench:1:<15 min fixTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-08Import ID: vals-swebench-2026-08-11-a6212cd857d8Retrieved 2026-08-11
TaxEval v2Correctness
64.922 %Higher measured value
61.538 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-tax-eval-v2:2:correctnessTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-tax_eval_v2-2026-08-11-d05a40bf446fRetrieved 2026-08-11
Terminal-Bench 2.0Easy
100 %Higher measured value
75 %
2.0accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2:2.0:easyTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: high, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-06-04Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-2026-08-11-d91717be20e6Retrieved 2026-08-11
Arena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance
1,474.218 arena pointsNo clear lead
95% confidence interval: ±6.56The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,464.98 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±7.499The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operationsNo documented setup differenceNo clear leadGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4, Harness: Arena text, style control
GLM-5.1: Snapshot: glm-5.1, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.4: Style-controlled Arena rating from 13,072 anonymous pairwise votes.GLM-5.1: Style-controlled Arena rating from 7,906 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Code MigrationCOBOL
68.571 %Higher measured value
46.571 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-code-migration:1:cobolTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-code-migration-2026-08-11-3a2d5ce718a3Retrieved 2026-08-11
CorpFin v2Max Fitting Context
64.918 %
66.317 %Higher measured value
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-corp-fin-v2:2:max_fitting_contextTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-corp_fin_v2-2026-08-11-d9e58d191cd9Retrieved 2026-08-11
GPQA DiamondZero-Shot CoT
91.919 %Higher measured value
83.249 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-gpqa:1:diamond_zero_shot_cotTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-gpqa-2026-08-11-d3325290a404Retrieved 2026-08-11
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkAntitrust Competition · Task fully resolved
0 %No direct winner
0 %No direct winner
1task resolution rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-agent-benchmark:1:antitrust_competitionTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-07Import ID: vals-hlab-2026-08-11-ea11b6e53414Retrieved 2026-08-11
LegalBenchInterpretation Tasks
83.921 %Higher measured value
81.709 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-bench:1:interpretation_tasksTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-legal_bench-2026-08-11-836e5e44618eRetrieved 2026-08-11
LiveCodeBench v6Hard
67.714 %Higher measured value
57.429 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-lcb:1:hardTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-lcb-2026-08-11-0342bcc364e4Retrieved 2026-08-11
MMLU-ProBusiness
91.762 %Higher measured value
91.128 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:businessTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-11-b8e53828d746Retrieved 2026-08-11
ProgramBenchFully Resolved
0 %No direct winner
0 %No direct winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-programbench:1:strictTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-programbench-2026-08-11-b6f8959fbdfeRetrieved 2026-08-11
SWE-bench Verified>4 hours
0 %
33.333 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-swebench:1:>4 hoursTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-08Import ID: vals-swebench-2026-08-11-a6212cd857d8Retrieved 2026-08-11
TaxEval v2Stepwise Reasoning
82.993 %Higher measured value
80.851 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-tax-eval-v2:2:stepwise_reasoningTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-tax_eval_v2-2026-08-11-d05a40bf446fRetrieved 2026-08-11
Terminal-Bench 2.0Hard
33.333 %
36.667 %Higher measured value
2.0accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2:2.0:hardTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: high, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-06-04Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-2026-08-11-d91717be20e6Retrieved 2026-08-11
Arena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance
1,483.617 arena pointsHigher measured value
95% confidence interval: ±6.683The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,464.98 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±7.499The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operationsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena text, style control
GLM-5.1: Snapshot: glm-5.1, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.4: Style-controlled Arena rating from 12,373 anonymous pairwise votes.GLM-5.1: Style-controlled Arena rating from 7,906 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Code MigrationCode Quality
3.632 / 5Higher measured value
3.544 / 5
1mean reviewer code-quality ratingHigher is betterCohort: vals-code-migration:1:code_qualityTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-code-migration-2026-08-11-3a2d5ce718a3Retrieved 2026-08-11
CorpFin v2Shared Max Context
66.783 %Higher measured value
65.268 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-corp-fin-v2:2:shared_max_contextTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-corp_fin_v2-2026-08-11-d9e58d191cd9Retrieved 2026-08-11
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkArbitration International Dispute Resolution · Criteria passed
66.667 %Higher measured value
53.405 %
1criteria pass rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-agent-benchmark:1:criteria_pass_rate__arbitration_international_dispute_resolutionTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-07Import ID: vals-hlab-2026-08-11-ea11b6e53414Retrieved 2026-08-11
LegalBenchIssue Tasks
90.526 %Higher measured value
89.02 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-bench:1:issue_tasksTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-legal_bench-2026-08-11-836e5e44618eRetrieved 2026-08-11
LiveCodeBench v6Medium
85.64 %
87.958 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-lcb:1:mediumTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-lcb-2026-08-11-0342bcc364e4Retrieved 2026-08-11
MMLU-ProChemistry
91.078 %
91.844 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:chemistryTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-11-b8e53828d746Retrieved 2026-08-11
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate
68.596 %Higher measured value
50.879 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-programbench:1:partialTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-programbench-2026-08-11-b6f8959fbdfeRetrieved 2026-08-11
SWE-bench Verified1-4 hours
50 %Higher measured value
45.238 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-swebench:1:1-4 hoursTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-08Import ID: vals-swebench-2026-08-11-a6212cd857d8Retrieved 2026-08-11
Terminal-Bench 2.0Medium
69.091 %Higher measured value
61.818 %
2.0accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2:2.0:mediumTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: high, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-06-04Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-2026-08-11-d91717be20e6Retrieved 2026-08-11
Arena Text, Style ControlChinese
1,496.688 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±11.202The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,519.866 arena pointsNo clear lead
95% confidence interval: ±13.198The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:chineseNo documented setup differenceNo clear leadGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4, Harness: Arena text, style control
GLM-5.1: Snapshot: glm-5.1, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.4: Style-controlled Arena rating from 3,574 anonymous pairwise votes.GLM-5.1: Style-controlled Arena rating from 2,373 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkArbitration International Dispute Resolution · Task fully resolved
0 %No direct winner
0 %No direct winner
1task resolution rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-agent-benchmark:1:arbitration_international_dispute_resolutionTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-07Import ID: vals-hlab-2026-08-11-ea11b6e53414Retrieved 2026-08-11
LegalBenchRhetoric Tasks
82.824 %Higher measured value
81.108 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-bench:1:rhetoric_tasksTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-legal_bench-2026-08-11-836e5e44618eRetrieved 2026-08-11
MMLU-ProComputer Science
89.756 %Higher measured value
89.487 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:computer_scienceTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-11-b8e53828d746Retrieved 2026-08-11
SWE-bench Verified15 min - 1 hour
76.245 %Higher measured value
72.797 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-swebench:1:15 min - 1 hourTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-08Import ID: vals-swebench-2026-08-11-a6212cd857d8Retrieved 2026-08-11
Arena Text, Style ControlChinese
1,506.007 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±11.398The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,519.866 arena pointsHigher measured value
95% confidence interval: ±13.198The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:chineseTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena text, style control
GLM-5.1: Snapshot: glm-5.1, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.4: Style-controlled Arena rating from 3,369 anonymous pairwise votes.GLM-5.1: Style-controlled Arena rating from 2,373 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkBanking Finance · Criteria passed
80.297 %Higher measured value
71.004 %
1criteria pass rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-agent-benchmark:1:criteria_pass_rate__banking_financeTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-07Import ID: vals-hlab-2026-08-11-ea11b6e53414Retrieved 2026-08-11
LegalBenchRule Tasks
84.008 %Higher measured value
80.56 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-bench:1:rule_tasksTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-legal_bench-2026-08-11-836e5e44618eRetrieved 2026-08-11
MMLU-ProEconomics
89.692 %Higher measured value
88.981 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:economicsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-11-b8e53828d746Retrieved 2026-08-11
Arena Text, Style ControlCoding
1,513.75 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±5.977The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,515.299 arena pointsNo clear lead
95% confidence interval: ±6.649The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:codingNo documented setup differenceNo clear leadGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4, Harness: Arena text, style control
GLM-5.1: Snapshot: glm-5.1, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.4: Style-controlled Arena rating from 17,752 anonymous pairwise votes.GLM-5.1: Style-controlled Arena rating from 11,013 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkBanking Finance · Task fully resolved
0 %No direct winner
0 %No direct winner
1task resolution rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-agent-benchmark:1:banking_financeTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-07Import ID: vals-hlab-2026-08-11-ea11b6e53414Retrieved 2026-08-11
MMLU-ProEngineering
85.243 %Higher measured value
84.029 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:engineeringTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-11-b8e53828d746Retrieved 2026-08-11
Arena Text, Style ControlCoding
1,520.704 arena pointsHigher measured value
95% confidence interval: ±6.02The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,515.299 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±6.649The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:codingTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena text, style control
GLM-5.1: Snapshot: glm-5.1, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.4: Style-controlled Arena rating from 16,515 anonymous pairwise votes.GLM-5.1: Style-controlled Arena rating from 11,013 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkBankruptcy Restructuring · Criteria passed
68.512 %
75.432 %Higher measured value
1criteria pass rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-agent-benchmark:1:criteria_pass_rate__bankruptcy_restructuringTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-07Import ID: vals-hlab-2026-08-11-ea11b6e53414Retrieved 2026-08-11
MMLU-ProHealth
82.396 %Higher measured value
81.518 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:healthTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-2026-03-05, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-11-b8e53828d746Retrieved 2026-08-11

The table shows 64 diversified result series from 163 shared results. This prevents one benchmark with many subtasks from crowding out every other test.

How to read this comparison

Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict

Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.

Prices use official API rates per 1M tokens. Web subscriptions and cloud platform surcharges can differ.

Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.